Fluff | 29 | he/they | Adults Only | Might post art might not who knows dawg. For whatever reason Tumblr won't let me have both a banner and pfp. I'm not a bot I swear;;_;;
Looks like tweedleditz and steeldumb + whoever they roped into their crew this time deleted their failed callout blog against Lemon.
Would be a shame if I baited them into defending their zoo-shit and kiddie interests.
Would also be a shame if reblogs still stayed up after you delete a tumblr account.
No, Patrick, a blue horse that cannot speak and is always treated as a wild animal is still a feral animal. You can't just say "nuh uh" pretend that makes the horse you wanna fuck not a horse you wanna fuck.
You're still attracted to a horse with 0 anthro details. Harkness test failed.
Also, not gonna address the "pretending to be a kid in bed" thing? We're not gonna do that one? Okie smokes.
Looks like tweedleditz and steeldumb + whoever they roped into their crew this time deleted their failed callout blog against Lemon.
Would be a shame if I baited them into defending their zoo-shit and kiddie interests.
Would also be a shame if reblogs still stayed up after you delete a tumblr account.
it's just really apparent that people think it's okay to want pain but morally abhorrent to want to give it. sorry but the sadist gets to have fun too. it's actually pretty crucial to the process.
Image ID: A screenshot of a tumblr comment that says "yeah, its only abhorrent imo, when the recipient is non consenting, i've" the screenshot cuts off.
Omg you guys are such creeps ToT making a whole account against lemon for making people aware of weird stuff you already made public and now youâre making desperate attempts to pretend you arenât prosh1p even though itâs so obvious you only say that publicly and then indulge in that stuff behind the scenes :// if you like weird stuff do it openly at least so that those of us that donât want to interact with you have the choice not to.
If you read the screenshots listed (I'll place them here for you again since you couldn't be bothered to read them the first time),
Lemon also admitted to knowing said behaviors were PUSHED, and the people involved were INFULENCED. But I assume you don't believe in different acts of self-harm, how adults can groom other adults, or even what change is, since your first response is to call a blog about helping victims creeps.
Just out of curiosity then, why do Ditzy and Steel have a joint twitter account called @/P33ONMEPWEASE that includes drawings of the Fourse (a feral animal btw) with its dick out posted earlier this February?
And why does that same account say they'll post ageplay?
And even if that isn't Steel or Ditzy, why are they the 2nd and 3rd followers of that account?
Did this change occur in the last couple weeks?
It also looks from the screenshots you yourself posted, it was this Jay person who didn't want to be named, which they were not.
What YOUR preferrence of what is right and wrong in porn isnât up for debate in this situation at all, they are victims and when you visit said account, in both your screenshots and the pinned it states that it is not a âproshipâ account, and following said account doesnât suddenly make them proshippers.
You donât get to suddenly strip victimhood from people because the nsfw they view or what they engage in isnât up to your own standards. They (the victims) asked not to have their trauma pushed out as some sort of call out doc, they asked to have their names censored, they even provided MORE evidence of what is happening in this situation, evidence that if not provided would not be able to expose pankie and others.
You donât get to victimize victims because they follow someone you donât like. Iâm not here to talk morality with you, What was promised wasnât provided as stated in the screenshots.
You're doing the Patrick Star and Man Ray meme. You can't just say "no proship!" and then post FERAL HORSE COCK and AGEPLAY. It's not like "swiper no swiping!"
Also, again in the screenshot you provided in this post, this third party intervening on Steel and Ditzy/Pupi's behalf was told that it was counterintuitive to not name them since they had already been named. "Jay" then continued to speak with Lemon on when the implication was clearly "no, I'm not going to censor their names since they're already there." "Jay" went on to ask that THEIR name not be shown, which was abided by.
If Ditzy and Steel parted from Ren and Co. in October 2025 and are deeply sorry for what they did "in private", why are they *publically* posting/interacting with the *exact same* type of thing in February of 2026? Only a few weeks ago?
You're trying to pull the same garbage Pankie did where you pretend Ren was the mastermind behind it all when they're still doing the thing Ren supposedly influenced months ago.
Addressing Pankiepoo's Statement to the Allegations: Proshipping, Defending groomers, Racism, etc.
[Evidence of all Claims Below] Part 1
IF YOU CARE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST PANKIE ARE TRUE OR FALSE, YOU'LL READ THIS THREAD IN IT'S ENTIRETY AND LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED.
i'm copying and pasting this from my other account. tumblr only allows 30 images per post so i'll be splitting this into two posts.
in this thread i'll be addressing pankie's statements (seen below) to the allegations that were brought up against him (seen here).
first off: pankie claims that he did not see/know about the proship content his partners were engaging with, and therefor he should not be held accountable. however, there's evidence showing that pankie was present + participated in these types of conversations with his partners.
pankie claims he separated from these two in september/october. i was skeptical of this because: pankie only started to PUBLICLY say this when a fight broke out in the proship servers/gcs they were in, and threats of exposing each other publicly became a reality.
this fight went on for months, and was detailed in a doc released by one of the members in the proship server/gc exposing pankie, ren/razz, and clowntainment, as well as pankie's complacency in the situation. the overall fight was over ren's gaslighting + manipulation
this fight took place in a proship environment, with only the secret proshippers in the server/gc being aware of it. however, it spread far enough that people outside of it started to notice weird things. multiple people would question pankie about it. this was pankie's response:
pankie was also approached by concerned friends who saw ren interacting with proship content such as zoophilia and pedophilia. in the response below you can see pankie claiming he had no idea. however he was confronted for previously dismissing ren's behavior and saying it wasn't his business
notice how pankie keeps claiming he has no idea about anything and he's not involved at all, as well as the dates that he made this claim. he even tries to claim that he has no idea what his friend is talking about but ALSO says it's personal and he shouldn't say anything.
pankie is doing everything to distance himself from his boyfriend's behavior, and doing everything to claim he has no idea what the "situation" is, and that he has no idea ren liked proship things. even though pankie was active in the proship servers/gc his partners were in
now for this next part of the thread im going to show you how pankie has handled situations like this in the past; where he was approached by victims who asked for his help regarding groomers in his server or friends who tried to tell him he was acting inappropriately.
a 13 year old in pankie's art server told pankie that their groomer/abuser was in the server, and requested that pankie take action. they provided evidence as well. however rather than remove the groomer, pankie suggested the victim leave instead, and warn their own friends.
because the groomer was 15, pankie didn't believe the grooming allegations the victim was telling him about. even though the 15 year old admitted to it themselves and all of their victims were around 11-12 years old or younger.
rather than removing the abuser/groomer, pankie suggested the idea of just closing down the chat in the server so that no one could talk. the groomer was allowed to stay, and pankie left the victim with no choice but to leave.
not only was the groomer allowed to stay and the victim was forced to leave, but the groomer reached out to the victim to try and address the doc they made about pankie and the situation, and even confirmed that they and pankie had gotten closer and became friends.
tumblr won't let me add more images, so i'm going reblog this with the second part.
Addressing Pankiepoo's Statement to the Allegations: Proshipping, Defending groomers, Racism, etc.
[Evidence of all Claims Below] Part 2
IF YOU CARE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST PANKIE ARE TRUE OR FALSE, YOU'LL READ THIS THREAD IN IT'S ENTIRETY AND LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED.
for this next example of how pankie handles situations in which others tell him he's acting inappropriately, i'm going to provide context. pankie is white. born and raised in sweden, and 100% white. here's proof of that.
at 16 pankie dated a 14 year old. i bring up this age difference because despite being the younger one, pankie's 14 year old partner and their partner's friends had to be the ones to tell pankie he cant say racial slurs (like the N word) since he's white
however, pankie wouldn't take the situation seriously and would pretend to have changed but would "accidentally" say racial slurs again and joke about it. he'd even try to tell his then partner to say racial slurs too, despite them being white as well and uncomfortable with it
his ex stated that pankie's way of handling conflict was with "a lot of avoidance and making light of it to make it seem less serious." we can see he still does this in the below example, and we can see his avoidance when confronted about his partner's proship behavior as well.
pankie tried to claim that he had no idea that his boyfriends were into any of this. but i have also started to hear that pankie is now changing this to say that ren and clowntainment were the "masterminds" behind everything and pankie was uninvolved. this however is false.
in september, when the situation was coming out, i confronted clowntainment. he tried to deny knowing, but in doing so he revealed that pankie and ren originally excluded him and had a gc where they'd roleplay extreme/proship fetishes they wrent sure they could trust him with yet
WARNING FOR NSFW TEXT IN NEXT TWO SCREENSHOTS:
while clowntainment's claim that he had no idea about their proship behavior is completely false, since there are screenshots above from june/july proving otherwise, it does show that pankie + ren were already engaging in that kind of stuff without his influence
theres also word that pankie has tried to claim that clowntainment forced him into a relationship with ren, but this is false as well. he even disproves this himself in his own statement? pankie met ren first, dated him first, and then they invited clowntainment as their third
pankie also claims that he would never put children in harm or expose them to sexual content, and that he wishes people would tell him if he made a mistake. but when questioned for turning an nsfw fetish drawing "sfw" by editing the expression, pankie doubles down and defends himself.
what pankie conveniently left out is that this wasn't just a "suggestive drawing" turned sfw. it was an explicit drawing in a collection of nsfw macro/micro fetish drawings. pankie took the least explicit out of the bunch and edited it to share with their minor audience
(CENSORED NSFW BELOW)
i shouldn't have to explain it but taking nsfw fetish images and editing them to look innocent just so you can show it to your fanbase, which you KNOW consists of minors, is extremely predatory. it exposes unwilling and unknowing people (AND MINORS!!) who did not consent to engaging with fetish material.
it's a complete overstep of boundaries and ignores consent entirely. this is a tactic that many people use to get people to unknowingly engage in their fetish.
Addressing Pankiepoo's Statement to the Allegations: Proshipping, Defending groomers, Racism, etc.
[FINAL THOUGHTS]
lastly, pankie says he tried to reach out to me so that misinformation could be "corrected." ive had him blocked for several months, so he sent people to try and speak to me. it wasnt a matter of "correcting" misinformation, but trying to get me to delete the thread. he wrote them a copy pasta to send me and asked that i delete the thread because of "misinformation" about him still being in contact with ren and clowntainment.
however, whether or not pankie is still in contact with ren and clowntainment does not change his previous involvement.
he and his partners lied about not being proship. he was proven to be involved. he allowed groomers in his servers. he won't take accountability. i'm not deleting any of this.
Omg you guys are such creeps ToT making a whole account against lemon for making people aware of weird stuff you already made public and now youâre making desperate attempts to pretend you arenât prosh1p even though itâs so obvious you only say that publicly and then indulge in that stuff behind the scenes :// if you like weird stuff do it openly at least so that those of us that donât want to interact with you have the choice not to.
If you read the screenshots listed (I'll place them here for you again since you couldn't be bothered to read them the first time),
Lemon also admitted to knowing said behaviors were PUSHED, and the people involved were INFULENCED. But I assume you don't believe in different acts of self-harm, how adults can groom other adults, or even what change is, since your first response is to call a blog about helping victims creeps.
Just out of curiosity then, why do Ditzy and Steel have a joint twitter account called @/P33ONMEPWEASE that includes drawings of the Fourse (a feral animal btw) with its dick out posted earlier this February?
And why does that same account say they'll post ageplay?
And even if that isn't Steel or Ditzy, why are they the 2nd and 3rd followers of that account?
Did this change occur in the last couple weeks?
It also looks from the screenshots you yourself posted, it was this Jay person who didn't want to be named, which they were not.
