normal day in tf2 casual
This is what goes on in those gmod RP 128 player servers that are always full
This kind of smart, walkable, mixed-use urbanism is illegal to build in most American cities
I'd rather be in outer space šø

No title available
No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
noise dept.
Cosimo Galluzzi

izzy's playlists!
art blog(derogatory)
h

blake kathryn

Product Placement
No title available
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
EXPECTATIONS
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
YOU ARE THE REASON

Origami Around
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

romaā

#extradirty
seen from Türkiye
seen from Belgium
seen from Indonesia
seen from Russia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Ecuador

seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Bolivia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Finland
seen from Panama
seen from Canada

seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
seen from France
seen from Netherlands
seen from Russia
@fluffypizzapie
normal day in tf2 casual
This is what goes on in those gmod RP 128 player servers that are always full
This kind of smart, walkable, mixed-use urbanism is illegal to build in most American cities
āmy father is a boy and my mother is a girl so iām mixedā is the funniest possible response to someone asking your gender and it came from 6ā5 Viking footballer and notable weird little guy Erling Haaland on a Snapchat
Planning for a flight now consists of planning out how to document the legal violations the airline is inevitably going to commit.
Since I started using a wheelchair, I have had exactly one (1) flight where an airline didnāt break the law.
The question isnāt āAre airlines breaking the law?ā They absolutely are, on almost every flight. The questions are āDoes the wheelchair user know their rights?ā (most donāt), and āAre they physically and mentally able to document the violations and report them to the DOT?ā (most canāt).
[ID: @diffusedmuse āOne question if you have a moment: do you confront airlines themselves or go straight to the DOT? For example, they often push me into signing a release of liability in case they wreck my wheelchair, which Iām fairly sure is illegal but Iām afraid to say anything and be denied my flight.ā]
Under US law, it is definitely illegal for an airline to make you sign a release of liability for transporting your wheelchair. I would definitely advise you not sign any release of liability. The newest statistics show that airlines damage or lose 25 wheelchairs per day. (Source) You canāt afford for them toĀ notĀ fix or replace your wheelchair if they damage it.
ā§382.35 Ā May carriers require passengers with a disability to sign waivers or releases?
ā(b) You must not require passengers with a disability to sign waivers of liability for damage to or loss of wheelchairs or other assistive devices.ā
(Source)
I always insist on having my wheelchair in the cabin, but if the flight has less than 100 seats theyāre not required to have space in-cabin, and if you have a power chair itās not going to fit in the in-cabin wheelchair closet. So I realize some people have to put their chairs in cargo.
Personally Iād pocket whatever release form they gave me, scan it in when I got home and include it in my DOT complaint. I bet the DOT would be very interested to see what release theyāre trying to get you to sign.
I have on several occasions had airline employees threaten to not let me fly, try to maneuver me into agreeing to take a different flight, or insinuate that if I continue to insist they follow the law they wonāt let me fly. This is illegal, and I let them know that I know that it is illegal.
ā§382.11 Ā What is the general nondiscrimination requirement of this part?
ā(4) You must not take any adverse action against an individual (e.g., refusing to provide transportation) because the individual asserts, on his or her own behalf or through or on behalf of others, rights protected by this part or the Air Carrier Access Act.āĀ
(Source)
So yes, I confront the airline employees myself, although I realize not everyone is able to do so. I always have a copy of the law with me - I have a document where I put together the clauses that I know theyāre going to violate, and I print out a couple copies before I fly. I also have the full ACAA on my phone. Only once has an airline employee ever looked at the law - they generally just flat out refuse to read it - but I have it with me so I can prove I know what the law says. That means that canāt sayĀ āthatās not in the law,ā they can only sayĀ āI donāt care what the law says,ā and that is not going to show in their favor when they have to justify their actions to the DOT.
I definitely also report the airline to the DOT after I get back from my trip. The DOTās formal investigation process is to have the airline investigate themselves and report their findings back to the DOT. IME the airline always, every time, lies and claims they didnāt break any laws. They generally accidentally admit to breaking a couple laws, but for the majority it ends up being a he says/she says situation.Ā
Personally, I want the airline to get fined for every clause of the ACAA they break when I fly, not just the ones they accidentally admit to because they are that ridiculously unfamiliar with the law theyāre required by law to know. (The record so far is fourteenĀ clauses broken on one flight.) So as of my last flightĀ I now record every interaction I have with an airline employee. On that flight, the minute I realized they had found a new and ridiculous way to violate the ACAA, I set my phone to video and put it in a shallow outside pocket in my personal bag with the camera facing out. When I got home, I extracted the audio file from the video, made a transcript, and forwarded both the audio file and the transcript to the DOT along with my complaint. When the airline investigated themselves and lied about what they did, I then forwarded the audio file and transcript to them as well and proved that their employees lied. It was interesting watching them scramble to explain themselves.Ā
The DOT takes a year to process complaints, so I havenāt heard back from the DOT on that one yet, but Iām particularly interested to see how this complaint turns out as itās going to be impossible for them to squirrel out of any of their violations. I have proof.
After that last flight I bought myself an audio recorder (like the kind you use to record lectures in school) which I now have hanging from my personal bag. Some airlines prohibit photography and video in their contract of carriage, but I have yet to find one that prohibits audio recordings. Part of my prep for this trip has been testing that audio recorder to see what the range is and how well it records, so I know where on my bag to hang it to be sure it records everything that happens.
If youāre recording audio, keep that in mind when youāre dealing with airline employees. Ask for names or read out their name badge (āJane Smith, right?ā) and describe whatās happening if itās not apparent from what they say. (āWait, so youāre telling me I need to sign this release of liability form before youāll transport my wheelchair? You do realize thatās illegal, right?ā)
I have an audio recording of an airline employee on my last flight sayingĀ āI donāt care what the law says!ā and my response which wasĀ āI donāt think the DOT is going to be very impressed with that.ā Iām pretty sure theyāre not. I canāt wait to see the DOTās response to the airline.
This is absolutely amazing. And itās great that OP outlines several different levels of protecting yourself against and documenting these illegal actionsābecause, yeah, not everyone can or wants to go All The Way. But to those who do? We salute you.
Anyway, know your rights when flying, yāall [same source as above, we just wanna highlight it].
Internet commentors turned on D'Arcee Neal after he was forced to crawl off his flight when his wheelchair didn't turn up
Thatās my friend D'Arcee from our cerebral palsy support group. This happened over a decade ago. We rallied around him hard and the ableism was ferocious.
the painted lady
spiritual (hah) successor to my Kyoshi fan art š
older coco and agott wearing orufreys clothes bc why not?
older coco and
agott wearing orufreys
clothes bc why not?
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
( Ķ”~ ĶŹ ͔° )?
There is something about choice
And the lack of choice
Being a part of something
And being blocked away from it
There is something about an experience youāre asked to partake in
And cannot broach
There is
Something
when the persona you made eats you; when the performance youve been putting on eats you; when the name they gave you eats you; when the image people made of you eats you; when the role you were assigned eats you; when the you that other people see or even made for you or you made for them takes over the you that you know and eats you alive.
for the record im not technially 100% anti-AI, in the sense that its a broad category of tech being lumped under one umbrella term so it feels over-zealous to say i hate all of it all the time forever. but i also think trying to discuss what it actually IS good for is difficult right now when i cant take one step without something trying to convince me to use chatgpt to summarize my life and speed up my hobbies and turn my friends into chatbots and optimize my life into oblivion. i am certain there is nuance to the topic but can we stop cramming the square peg into the round hole before you start trying to sell me on the legitimate benefits of the square peg. please.
Neural Nets have existed for decades and are genuinely useful. It's a form of AI that recognizes patterns, and can do stuff like identify cancer cells, tell whether an egg is fertilized or not, detect fraud, and optimize routes.
Those are Expert Systems, tuned to do exactly one thing. If you (say) ask a medical expert system a question about financial law, it's useless. The autopilot that flies a 787 has no idea how to drive a truck on the freeway. A Coulter Counter is excellent at identifying lymphocytes in a blood sample but can't predict the next card in a blackjack game.
And so on.
The problem with so-called generalized AI (AGI) is that we don't have that yet. It doesn't exist. It MIGHT some day, but AGI has been "10 years away" since the 1980s. The goals keep moving as we learn more about how people and machines process data.
But the current crop of AI techbros have been selling generative Large Language Model AI (LLM) as AGI because generative systems do a good job of faking it. There's no actual thought going on, merely the illusion of thought via predicting the next word in a sentence accurately.
If you let a human toddler listen to 800 hours of YouTube car influencer videos, that toddler might end up sounding like a car influencer. They'd parrot horsepower numbers and 0 to 60 times, mention EV range and MSRP numbers.
But they wouldn't understand any of it.
That's ChatGPT.
And yeah, it's worse than useless because it doesn't even know when it's lying or hallucinating. It just babbles convincingly until you stop it.
But for techbros to make money selling that as "AI"? It's the perfect scam, especially if you don't understand how it works.
I fucking hate it.
I'm sorry, if you use "tma/tme" unironically, it gets my back up instantly.
"Transmisogyny affected!" "Transmisogyny exempt!" Nobody is exempt from transmisogyny, if the people who want you silenced decide you deserve it. These categories make no sense and are just another transphobe method of getting people to admit what their genitals look like.
Why would you want to define yourself by the way your oppressors treat you, anyway?
Another day, another doggy you canāt pet. Meet the dhole (Cuon alpinus). Found widely across parts of Asia from India to China to Indonesia, this social canid typically lives in groups of up to 12 individuals. Sometimes it even socializes with other groups of dholes to form āsuper packsā of more than 30 members! Teamwork enables these hunters to take down prey ten times their size. And unlike many other species of canid, dholes allow their pups to feed first on kills. Their diet includes pigs, deer, and buffalo.
Photo: mihail1981, iStockĀ
important reminder that most people you follow online are significantly lamer than you think they are including me. and if you feel insecure comparing yourself to someone online: DON'T. theyre probably also lame and weird. most people on the internet are
Other useful trueisms about coolness
People who think theyre cool generally are not
Cool people are also broadly actually not cool deep down
There's no such thing as a cool person. We are all dogs fighting for scraps
Soon this world will be given a new purpose. The existing social structures we know will crumble and collapse
All of you will succumb to my will.
Thereās no such thing as
a cool person. We are all
dogs fighting for scraps
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
i read this to adam and he just yelled, outraged, "THEYRE BABIES"
TRUE HATERS, SINCE DAY 1 THEY HAVENT BEEN GIVING THEM A FUCKING INCH
this is next level
20 years later. you're kermit. opening night at the muppet theater. you look up. you can't believe it. those two awful cunts from next door are here. neither of them died yet. they're going to be here, forever.
They're immortal.
They were heckling the actors in Ford's theater on the day Lincoln was shot.
They heckled the first reading of the Epic of Gilgamesh.
They heckled the first lifeform to crawl onto land.
They heckled the big bang.
"They say that time exists now."
"I can tell."
"How so?"
"Because this show is a waste of it!"
"DOHOHOHOHOHO!"
so uh I have a very important Thing⢠coming out tomorrow apparently and it would be great if you guys would watch this space for some pretty good frogs, okay?
Imagine if we did the āpublic libraries are punkā thing for other subcultures. Imagine if people made shirts that said āSoup kitchens are grungeā or āMixed Use Urbanism is Juggaloā.
so uh I have a very important Thing⢠coming out tomorrow apparently and it would be great if you guys would watch this space for some pretty good frogs, okay?
hi this drives me crazy
canon is what happens in the text. e.g. merlin tries to poison morgana
a headcanon is a fact that you have personally made up as an elaboration of canon. it is your invention. e.g. i think morgana and gwen had a teenage lesbian situationship before the events of canon. or, i think modern morgana would love evanesence.
an interpretation is how one reads the existing text. it is not an invented fact nor is it a headcanon, it is a reading. e.g. i think merlin tries to poison morgana out of misplaced self-hatred. or, i think that one line was delivered with suppressed malice and shows a nuanced relationship.
fanon is the general fandomās accepted headcanons and interpretations that elaborate or recontextualize canon. e.g. merlin is a badass waif and morgana is a bitch.
these are all different words with different meanings.
and a cannon is a large mounted gun, usually on wheels, that uses explosives to fire projectiles.