the gaang as adults (from the ending credits of "Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender")
cherry valley forever

tannertan36

izzy's playlists!
Monterey Bay Aquarium
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Fai_Ryy
The Bowery Presents
occasionally subtle
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
d e v o n
Today's Document
Noah Kahan
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available

bliss lane
Jules of Nature

blake kathryn

Origami Around

PR's Tumblrdome
Cosmic Funnies
seen from Canada

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany
seen from Vietnam

seen from Austria

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Mexico

seen from Belgium
seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@gamemasterofscratch
the gaang as adults (from the ending credits of "Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender")
☆ official avatar studios concept art ARTIST: Judy Jong
Something I genuinely wish was explored more in the ATLA universe/fandom is how Katara is the last waterbender of the Southern Tribe. Like, I understand why it's not spoken about as much as Aang being the last airbender, because he is simply the only airbender left. But Katara is the last link in her entire tribes history of bending.
Sure, the Northern Tribe might have benders, but they have such a different culture/identity around bending compared to the South. We see in Hama's flashbacks that the Southern Tribe had male and female benders at the helm, fighting equally, learning the same things, sharing the same tactics. They weren't left behind as strictly healers or defenseless women given a man's gift, they were strong.
And the thing that separates Katara and Aang's stories being the last benders of their nations is that Aang remembers what it means to be an Air Nomad. There are obviously blind spots because of how young he was, but Aang knows the customs and the culture and spiritual practices. He was able to pass those down to Tenzin and his grandchildren, he was able to start the process of rebuilding what was lost.
But Katara? She was even younger than Aang was when the Southern waterbenders were eradicated. There are Southern practices that are most definetly just... a fractured part of history because she never got to experience them. There are ways of hunting, of building, of navigating the waters, ways of healing, probably even spiritbending, that are simply lost to time.
And maybe her grandmother can clue her into it, memories from a nonbender living aside benders, but it's not the same. She didn't get to hear it from the waterbenders, she didn't get to learn from a Southern waterbender, she doesn't even know what to rebuild because it was never something she was versed in.
That's why The Puppet Master is such a heartbreaking episode. Because Hama could have been the Southern teacher Katara clearly wanted, she could have shown her more, but ended up passing on her legacy of Bloodbending. And on the inverse, I can't even fully call Hama a villain for wanting Katara to know how to bloodbend, because the ache of thinking you were the only one left for so long, the rage against a Nation known for destroying nations, would've driven anyone insane.
We know that Tenzin felt an intense pressure to keep rebuilding Air Nomad culture, but I'm so convinced that Kya probably felt something similar with Southern waterbending.
More concept art of toph and sokka
you are my solution
You thought when people painted the "someday you're going to have to choose, for real, between the World and God, you won't be able to walk the line between both" picture that they were talking about martyrdom.
Some extreme. "Trample this picture of Jesus." "Say you don't believe!" "Convert to a different religion!"
You didn't realize that it wouldn't look like that. You didn't realize that when the line gets drawn in the sand, and Jesus is on one side, the other side would look like crying people wailing out, "why can't you just accept me for who I am? Why aren't I enough for you?"
You didn't realize that the choice would be between Jesus the Truth...or a majority of people in the culture making movies, making t-shirt slogans, changing their names, gently telling you that maybe this word in the Bible doesn't mean what you think it means, maybe love just means love, maybe you can have Jesus and whatever sexuality you want.
"Did God really say...?"
You thought it would be something overt. But the bad guys never said, "hey, choose the dark side over the light." They always said, "hey, maybe you don't even know what Jesus said."
The choice is: "It is the Lord. Let Him do what seems good to Him." OR "Did God really say...?"
That's the choice. This is where the rubber meets the road. This is our "choose this day who you will serve." As for me, I'm serving the Lord, and He's holding on to me. He never changes, and yes He did really say.
Hold fast to the truth. It doesn't change. People and cultures do.
Absolutely agree, especially since I reread Genesis just now and oh wow look first sin, and specifically first lie, in the Bible is someone trying to tell you that what God says isn’t really true or not really what he meant.
“Now the serpent was more cunning than any animal of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God really said, ‘You shall not eat from any tree of the garden’?””
Genesis 3:1 NASB2020
Read the verse more carefully.
Has God really said, ‘You shall not eat from any tree of the garden’?””
Because, of course, God never said that. He said they could eat from any tree except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The sin here is not Eve or the Serpent questioning God's commandments, but the Serpent misrepresenting God's commandments and Eve blindly going along.
On a semi-tangent, I grew up in a young-earth creationist environment, and one of the things that made me leave it was realising that there were many things they treated as self-evident from Genesis 1-11 that simply aren't there in the text or are contradicted by it. For example, saying that the world at the end of Genesis 1 was perfect, when the command to fill the earth and subdued it, paralleling the initial statement that the earth was formless and void, implying that creation was incomplete. Or regarding (ultimately thanks to St. Augustine) Adam and Eve as perfect beings, when I and the Orthodox tradition would argue that the narrative actually portrays them as childlike - they are easily fooled, have no knowledge of good and evil and have no shame about nudity.
It is true that God did not say that, which is why this is a particularly tricksy lie from the serpent. God said;
"The Lord God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may freely eat; but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for on the day that you eat from it you will certainly die.”
Genesis 2:16-17 NASB2020
God said to only not eat from one tree, and the serpent knows this, the lie is him pretending he doesn't know this to trick Eve.
A common manipulation tactic is to ask someone a leading question their likely to agree with as a way to get their foot in the door. Then they will convince them of something they are unlikely to agree with.
Eve knows God didn't say that, and corrects the serpent;
The woman said to the serpent, “From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.’”
Genesis 3: 2-3 NASB2020
The serpent then jumps off from Eve correcting him with a far more blatant lie;
The serpent said to the woman, “You certainly will not die! For God knows that on the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will become like God, knowing good and evil.”
Genesis 3: 4-6 NASB2020
Adam and Eve will absolutely die if they eat the fruit, the way their 'eyes will be opened' as the serpent describes it only brings them shame and suffering, and they are already like God, made in his image and given stewardship of the world.
Hope that cleared up my reasoning on believing this is the first lie of the Bible!
Note that Eve didn’t actually quote the truth either; compare
“The Lord God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may freely eat; but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for on the day that you eat from it you will certainly die.””
Genesis 2:16-17 NASB2020
And
“The woman said to the serpent, “From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.’ ””
Genesis 3:2-3 NASB2020
The addendum “touch it” led commentators like Rabbi Yitzchak ben Shlomo (Rashi) to say:
NEITHER SHALL YE TOUCH IT — She added to God’s command (which did not forbid touching the tree, but only eating of its fruit) therefore she was led to diminish from it. It is to this that the text refers (Proverbs 30:6): “Add thou not unto His words” (Genesis Rabbah 19:3).
Yeah I haven't been able to figure out why Eve added that.
Maybe she didn't and it was a translation error.
Maybe she wanted to get extra brownie points by not only following God's command to not eat from it, but to not even tempt herself by not touching it.
Maybe God later added to not touch it and we just didn't see that.
Maybe she was trying to sound smarter to the serpent by adding to it.
I'm not really interested in trying to parse Eve's motives, since it's not relevant to my point. No matter what her motive was she knew that they shouldn't eat from it or they will die, and the serpent was trying to trick and tempt her.
You thought when people painted the "someday you're going to have to choose, for real, between the World and God, you won't be able to walk the line between both" picture that they were talking about martyrdom.
Some extreme. "Trample this picture of Jesus." "Say you don't believe!" "Convert to a different religion!"
You didn't realize that it wouldn't look like that. You didn't realize that when the line gets drawn in the sand, and Jesus is on one side, the other side would look like crying people wailing out, "why can't you just accept me for who I am? Why aren't I enough for you?"
You didn't realize that the choice would be between Jesus the Truth...or a majority of people in the culture making movies, making t-shirt slogans, changing their names, gently telling you that maybe this word in the Bible doesn't mean what you think it means, maybe love just means love, maybe you can have Jesus and whatever sexuality you want.
"Did God really say...?"
You thought it would be something overt. But the bad guys never said, "hey, choose the dark side over the light." They always said, "hey, maybe you don't even know what Jesus said."
The choice is: "It is the Lord. Let Him do what seems good to Him." OR "Did God really say...?"
That's the choice. This is where the rubber meets the road. This is our "choose this day who you will serve." As for me, I'm serving the Lord, and He's holding on to me. He never changes, and yes He did really say.
Hold fast to the truth. It doesn't change. People and cultures do.
Absolutely agree, especially since I reread Genesis just now and oh wow look first sin, and specifically first lie, in the Bible is someone trying to tell you that what God says isn’t really true or not really what he meant.
“Now the serpent was more cunning than any animal of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God really said, ‘You shall not eat from any tree of the garden’?””
Genesis 3:1 NASB2020
Read the verse more carefully.
Has God really said, ‘You shall not eat from any tree of the garden’?””
Because, of course, God never said that. He said they could eat from any tree except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The sin here is not Eve or the Serpent questioning God's commandments, but the Serpent misrepresenting God's commandments and Eve blindly going along.
On a semi-tangent, I grew up in a young-earth creationist environment, and one of the things that made me leave it was realising that there were many things they treated as self-evident from Genesis 1-11 that simply aren't there in the text or are contradicted by it. For example, saying that the world at the end of Genesis 1 was perfect, when the command to fill the earth and subdued it, paralleling the initial statement that the earth was formless and void, implying that creation was incomplete. Or regarding (ultimately thanks to St. Augustine) Adam and Eve as perfect beings, when I and the Orthodox tradition would argue that the narrative actually portrays them as childlike - they are easily fooled, have no knowledge of good and evil and have no shame about nudity.
It is true that God did not say that, which is why this is a particularly tricksy lie from the serpent. God said;
"The Lord God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may freely eat; but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for on the day that you eat from it you will certainly die.”
Genesis 2:16-17 NASB2020
God said to only not eat from one tree, and the serpent knows this, the lie is him pretending he doesn't know this to trick Eve.
A common manipulation tactic is to ask someone a leading question their likely to agree with as a way to get their foot in the door. Then they will convince them of something they are unlikely to agree with.
Eve knows God didn't say that, and corrects the serpent;
The woman said to the serpent, “From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.’”
Genesis 3: 2-3 NASB2020
The serpent then jumps off from Eve correcting him with a far more blatant lie;
The serpent said to the woman, “You certainly will not die! For God knows that on the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will become like God, knowing good and evil.”
Genesis 3: 4-6 NASB2020
Adam and Eve will absolutely die if they eat the fruit, the way their 'eyes will be opened' as the serpent describes it only brings them shame and suffering, and they are already like God, made in his image and given stewardship of the world.
Hope that cleared up my reasoning on believing this is the first lie of the Bible!
Some doodles of little Ghost before I lock in for artfight 🗣️🗣️
I open Daemons of the Shadow Realm. I learn that the male protagonist is shorter than his sister because of lacking nutrients. I check off "milk propaganda" on my checklist.
Fei-Yen, from ‘Virtual On Marz’ on the PlayStation 2.
practicing expressions but i ended up drawing pissed off leos instead
i wish they let him crash out more in the show (though the movie makes up for it lol (≖ᴗ≖ )
repairing a little friend :)
details below ⬇️
and out of the darkness - you you you you you
I cannot stop thinking abt this leaky blob and his rock buddy
Bonus ⬇️
ryland grace in my style !! what a pookie pie loser boy (open for more doodles)