Pretty village, Norway

gracie abrams
todays bird
The Stonewall Inn
Cosimo Galluzzi

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Mike Driver
★
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
official daine visual archive

No title available
Not today Justin
Monterey Bay Aquarium

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Kiana Khansmith

shark vs the universe

#extradirty
The Bowery Presents
No title available
RMH
No title available
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from India

seen from Italy

seen from Canada
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Canada
seen from United States
@girlsndnature
Pretty village, Norway
god i hate being asked for my pronouns. the implicit question is “how do you WANT to be seen, how do you CHOOSE to be seen.” i didn’t want to be female and the only “choice” i made was facing up to the reality that i can’t control.
when i frown and say “she,” i’m reporting nothing more than i was born female and i refuse to hide it or run away from reality anymore. but you hear “i LIKE this gender role, i CHOSE this gender role” and it’s so insulting and so utterly counter to my lifelong struggle to make peace with the things i cannot change about myself that it makes me want to scream :)
Thank you for writing this, this is exactly how I feel about it as well.
people born with vaginas face a unique type of oppression.
“A long-term study of children raised by lesbians found that these children were less likely to suffer from physical and sexual abuse than were their peers who were raised by heterosexuals. This is thought to be due to the absence of adult heterosexual men in the households (Gartrell, Bos, & Goldberg, 2010). Girls raised by lesbians tend to have higher self-esteem, show more maturity and tolerance than their peers, and are older when they have their first heterosexual contact (Gartrell et al., 2005, 2010). Children raised by same-sex parents seem to be less constrained by traditional gender roles; boys are less aggressive, and girls are more inclined to consider nontraditional careers, such as doctor, lawyer, or engineer (Gartrell et al., 2005; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001). Over the course of more than 20 years, scientists studied the psychological adjustment of 78 teenagers who were raised by lesbian mothers. Compared to age-matched counterparts raised by heterosexual parents, these adolescents were rated higher in social, academic, and total competence, and lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggression, and externalizing problem behavior (Gartrell & Bos, 2010). There are fewer studies of children raised by two men, but gay fathers are more likely than straight fathers to put their children before their career, to make big changes in their lives to accommodate a child, and to strengthen bonds with their extended families after becoming fathers (Bergman, Rubio, Green, & Padrone, 2010).” ~ Martha Rosenthal, Human Sexuality: From Cells to Society, p.247.
“having gay parents will harm children”
I love that this is cited and sourced ahhhh. Actual researched support! So good.
Here’s Gartrell, Bos, and Goldberg’s paper since whatever link that was is broken.
My mom: You need to start liking girly things
Me: *starts liking girls*
My mom:
In the 1960′s Legally a woman couldn’t
Open a bank account or get a credit card without signed permission from her father or hr husband.
Serve on a jury - because it might inconvenience the family not to have the woman at home being her husband’s helpmate.
Obtain any form of birth control without her husband’s permission. You had to be married, and your hub and had to agree to postpone having children.
Get an Ivy League education. Ivy League schools were men’s colleges ntil the 70′s and 80′s. When they opened their doors to women it was agree that women went there for their MRS. Degee.
Experience equality in the workplace: Kennedy’s Commission on the Status of Women produced a report in 1963 that revealed, among other things, that women earned 59 cents for every dollar that men earned and were kept out of the more lucrative professional positions.
Keep her job if she was pregnant.Until the Pregnancy Discrimination Act in 1978, women were regularly fired from their workplace for being pregnant.
Refuse to have sex with her husband.The mid 70s saw most states recognize marital rape and in 1993 it became criminalized in all 50 states. Nevertheless, marital rape is still often treated differently to other forms of rape in some states even today.
Get a divorce with some degree of ease.Before the No Fault Divorce law in 1969, spouses had to show the faults of the other party, such as adultery, and could easily be overturned by recrimination.
Have a legal abortion in most states.The Roe v. Wade case in 1973 protected a woman’s right to abortion until viability.
Take legal action against workplace sexual harassment. According to The Week, the first time a court recognized office sexual harassment as grounds for legal action was in 1977.
Play college sports Title IX of the Education Amendments of protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance It was nt until this statute that colleges had teams for women’s sports
Apply for men’s Jobs The EEOC rules that sex-segregated help wanted ads in newspapers are illegal. This ruling is upheld in 1973 by the Supreme Court, opening the way for women to apply for higher-paying jobs hitherto open only to men.
This is why we needed feminism - this is why we know that feminism works
I just want to reiterate this stuff, because I legit get the feeling there are a lot of younger women for whom it hasn’t really sunk in what it is today’s GOP is actively trying to return to.
Did you go to a good college? Shame on you, you took a college placement that could have gone to a man who deserves and needs it to support or prepare for his wife & children. But if you really must attend college, well, some men like that, you can still get married if you focus on finding the right man.
Got a job? Why? A man could be doing that job. You should be at home caring for a family. You shouldn’t be taking that job away from a man who needs it (see college, above). You definitely don’t have a career – you’ll be pregnant and raising children soon, so no need to worry about promoting you.
This shit was within living memory. I’M A MILLENIAL and my mother was in the second class that allowed women at an Ivy League school. Men who are alive today either personally remember shit like this or have parents/family who have raised them into thinking this was the way America functioned back in the blissful Good Old Days. There are literally dudes in the GOP old enough to remember when it was like this and yearn for those days to return.
When people talk about resisting conservativism and the GOP, we’re not just talking about whether the wage gap is a myth or not. We’re talking about whether women even have the fundamental right to exist as individuals, to run their own households and compete for jobs and be considered on an equal footing with men in any arena at all in the first place.
I was a child in the 1960s, a teenager in the 1970s, a young adult in the 1980s. This is what it was like: When I was growing up, it was considered unfortunate if a girl was good at sports. Girls were not allowed in Little League. Girls’ teams didn’t exist in high school, except at all-girls’ high schools. Boys played sports, and girls were the cheerleaders. People used to ask me as a child what I wanted to be when I grew up. I said I wanted to be a brain surgeon or the first woman justice on the Supreme Court. Everyone told me it was impossible–those just weren’t realistic goals for a girl–the latter, especially, because you couldn’t trust women to judge fairly and rationally, after all. In the 1960s and 1970s, all women were identified by their marital status, even in arrest reports and obituaries. In elementary school, my science teacher referred to Pierre Curie as DOCTOR Curie and Marie Curie as MRS. Curie…because, as he put it, “she was just his wife.” (Both had doctorates and both were Nobel prize winners, so you would think that both would be accorded respect.) Companies could and did require women to wear dresses and skirts. Failure to do could and did get women fired. And it was legal. It was also legal to fire women for getting married or getting pregnant. The rationale was that a woman who was married or who had a child had no business working; that was what her husband was for. Aetna Insurance, the biggest insurance company in America, fired women for all of the above. A man could rape his wife. Legally. I can remember being twelve years old and reading about legal experts actually debating whether or not a man could actually be said to coerce his wife into having sex. This was a serious debate in 1974. The debate about marital rape came up in my law school, too, in 1984. Could a woman be raped by her husband? The guys all said no–a woman got married, so she was consenting to sex at all times. So I turned it around. I asked them if, since a man had gotten married, that meant that his wife could shove a dildo or a stick or something up his ass any time she wanted to for HER sexual pleasure. (Hey, I thought it was reasonable. If one gender was legally entitled to force sex on the other, then obviously the reverse should also be true.) The male law students didn’t like the idea. Interestingly, they commented that being treated like that would make them feel like a woman. My reaction was, “Thank you for proving my point…” The concept of date rape, when first proposed, was considered laughable. If a woman went out on a date, the argument of legal experts ran, sexual consent was implied. Even more sickening was the fact that in some states–even in the early 1980s–a man could rape his daughter…and it was no worse than a misdemeanor. Women taking self-defense classes in the 1970s and 1980s were frequently described in books and on TV as “cute.” The implication was that it was absurd for a woman to attempt to defend herself, but wasn’t it just adorable for her to try? I was expressly forbidden to take computer classes in junior and senior years of high school–1978-79 and 1979-80–because, as the principal told me, “Only boys have to know that kind of thing. You girls are going to get married, and you won’t use it.” When I was in college–from 1980 to 1984–there were no womens’ studies. The idea hadn’t occurred in many places because the presumption was that there was nothing TO study. My history professor–a man who had a doctorate in history–informed me quite seriously that women had never produced a noted painter, sculptor, composer, architect or scientist because…wait for it…womens’ brains were too small. (He was very surprised when I came up with a list of fifty women gifted in the arts and science, most of whom he had never heard of before.) When Walter Mondale picked Geraldine Ferraro as a running mate in 1984, the press hailed it as a disaster. What would happen, they asked fearfully, if Mondale died and Ferraro became president? What if an international crisis arose and she was menstruating? She could push the nuclear button in a fit of PMS! It would be the end of the WORLD!! …No, they WEREN’T kidding. On the surface, things are very different now than they were when I was a child, a teen and a young adult. But I’m afraid that people now do not realize what it was like then. I’ve read a lot of posts from young women who say that they are not feminists. If the only exposure to feminism they have is the work of extremists, I cannot blame them overmuch. I wish that I could tell them what feminism was like when it was new–when the dream of legal equality was just a dream, and hadn’t even begun to come true. When “woman’s work” was a sneer–and an overt putdown. When people tut-tutted over bright and athletic girls with the words, “Really, it’s a shame she’s not a boy.” That lack of feminism wasn’t all men opening doors and picking up checks. A lot of it was an attitude of patronizing contempt that hasn’t entirely died out, but which has become less publicly acceptable. I wish I could make them feel what it was like…when grown men were called “men” and grown women were “girls.”
Know your history.
So this, too, is what they mean saying “make America great again” and/or the good old days.
REBLOG FOREVER.
reblorever.
This portmanteau was created from phrase ‘reblog forever’. Beep-boop. Portmanteau^bot^1
I have never slammed the reblog button harder in my LIFE, because I, too, grew up during the birth of the equal rights movement.
And I will point out that, nearly fifty years later, we STILL do not have an Equal Rights Amendment.
I also want to mention that the majority of men’s prevailing misogynistic attitudes - even now - can be laid at the feet of organized religions, the majority of which are male dominated institutions that have made the subjugation of women their mission since organized religion was invented.
When I started junior high, my mother had to march into the guidance counselor’s office and insist that I be enrolled in the industrial arts classes instead of home economics. I was one of two girls in shop class that year. It wasn’t that long ago.
The idea that women aren’t really people isn’t new, and yet it still catches us by surprise sometimes, having grown used to the idea of being people by, you know, the fact of being people.
When I was in high school (1972-75), girls were required to take home ec and boys were required to take shop. My ninth-grade science teacher laughed when I suggested that the rigors of childbirth indicated that women are physically durable. He encouraged all the boys in the class to laugh at me as well.
In 1974, my friend J. got pregnant. She went with her boyfriend, W., to have an abortion, and I remember how relieved we all were – for both of them, but of course especially for her. A year after Roe.
It makes me sick and angry to listen to young women disavow feminism. They have no fucking idea what feminism has done for them – what shit we went through, fighting for women to be recognized as complete and autonomous persons.
bad advice barbie
I used to cringe so hard at my “I’m not like other girls” phase until I realized that most girls have this phase and what we actually mean is, “I’m not a thoughtless one-dimensional caricature of makeup and boobs, which is all I’ve been taught to believe girls are.” How can women be viewed so poorly that little girls everywhere all think they’re unique just for having independent thoughts and interests?
“oP iS a TErF!”
THE LESBIAN AGENDA IS SUCCEEDING
@bootsnblossoms
YESSSSSSSSS
“not all lesbians can be attracted to trans women” is still an inaccurate statement because…a lesbian who is capable of attraction to biological males is no lesbian at all. she wasn’t a lesbian in the first place. i sincerely do not care if this makes people feel invalidated, because the flip side to all your campaigning for homosexuality to be male-inclusive is the verbal and sexual harassment of lesbians.
Appreciation for the imperfect radfems
For those who still feel ugly without makeup, disgusted by their body without shaving, feel inappropriate without wearing bras, don’t have the confidence to be outspoken in real life. Consuming consciously is better than consuming blindly, baby steps are okay. I know it’s easy to feel like a fake radfem, I promise your ideas are still important. You don’t have to be perfect.
wild how like PCOS, endometriosis, vaginismus & hell, even frequent yeast infections are “mysterious” with no well known cause and little to no decent treatment, but we have tons of supposedly well researched body fat removal methods, about 20 different kinds of breast implants, laser hair removal, and 100 different dermatologist recommended anti aging creams. we sure had the money and brainpower to cure those “diseases”
YOU MISSED THIS PART THO
Some guy sure fucking tried it didn’t he
From Kristel Bugayong.
Furthermore, 16 of those villages have not recorded female births since the beginning of the year, according to the district magistrate
A recent Indian government report shows that none of the 216 births recorded in 132 villages from a northern Indian district are girls, leading local officials to suspect female foeticide.
Furthermore, 16 of those villages have not recorded a single female birth since the beginning of the year, according to the district’s magistrate Ashish Chauhan.
Officials in the district of Uttarkashi, Uttarkhand state have marked 82 villages as “red zones” to closely investigate local data and have asked local health workers to stay on alert.
Female foeticide has been banned in India since 1994, but still continues in areas where communities place a higher value on boys than girls.
“It is shocking to have a zero girl child birth rate in 132 village of the district, as we have rarely heard of (or) seen any incident of female foeticide in the hills,” said legislative assembly member Gopal Rawat, as quoted by The Independent.
According to TNN news agency, Chauhan said that any parents found to be guilty will face legal action.
Last year, police discovered 19 aborted female fetuses near a hospital in Maharashtra, while investigating the death of women who had undergone an illegal abortion.
A 2018 report stated that 63 million women were statistically “missing” from the country’s population.
Kalpana Thakur, a social worker, claimed that the lack of female births clearly points to a prevalence of female foeticide. “No girl child was born for three months in these villages. It cannot just be a coincidence,” she said, as quoted by NDTV, an Indian news broadcast agency. This clearly indicated female foeticide is taking place in the district. The government and the administration are not doing anything.”
Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Indian government launched a campaign four years ago, aimed at saving and educating girls.
India’s patriarchal society has historically valued male children as family breadwinners and female children as a drain on the family funds. Parents with daughters are still often expected to pay dowries when they marry, even though the practice was outlawed in 1961.
Uh, so what do the people who claim bio sex doesn’t exist say about this? I mean really, how do they explain this away? 🤨
Lol they don’t bother because it affects brown girls in Asia instead of white men in the west. They don’t care. Too busy protecting white males like Jessica Yaniv from being misgendered.
The fact that this is going to lead to yet another generation of men kidnapping women and girls from other areas to be their “wives” because they feel that goddamn entitled to women’s bodies and labor is beyond heartbreaking and makes me so fucking sick and upset. Another generation of women and girls have been stolen from us, and another will be forced to suffer, all because of men. I’m so, so tired.
But a man wanted to feel valid
I’ve never once referred to my breasts as “big naturals” but I’m also not a whole ass male.
fetishizing female suffering >>> listening to women lament about the things we suffer from
this is gonna be my last post abt jy for the day but tras backpedaling all of a sudden because "he doesnt represent the community!!" is such a pathetic attempt at a cover up. You may not believe he represents your community, but he belives he does. he has benefitted from your activism and from the new norms you've pushed for. If he were the only male in the world who has abused and exploited pro-trans sentiment for his own gain, it should still be reason enough to retract the freedoms of self-id. he has and is going to continue hurting people in the name of the trans community. are you going to do something about it or are you going to sit on Twitter whining about terfs?