glait

1988, Poland, wannabe LIS researcher, larper, can't draw (but does it anyway)

[nojaktotak]

[sizvideos]

[kingkyllo]

This makes me so happy

[ihadsuchhighhopes]

And if you can’t find a dad

a lesbian will work just as well

[jimmy-tiberius-deactivated20200]

I didn’t think it could get better but it got better

[nojaktotak]

[angstofdestiny]

Me, talking about my writing: Gay, double gay, hella gay. 

[drillheadonfire-deactivated2014]

whats the difference between bi people and unicorns

i can see unicorns on movies and tv

[thesweetpianowritingdownmylife]

I told this to my mum and she was like “That’s not t… yes it is.”

[that-nonbinary-guy]

Also, unicorns on tv are called unicorns, not ‘horses that don’t like labels’

[comradesleep]

horses that don’t like labels

[idealcat-deactivated20181202]

[hattress-blog]

I can’t even. Just.

Credit.

[whereiseefashion]

Match #223

Sasha Pivovarova photographed by Paolo Roversi for Vogue India October 2007 | Abstract 8561 by Kim Keever

So this is match number two hundred and 23, it’s January 23rd and I’m turning 23 today! Perfect timing! :)

More matches here

[whami-allstars]

Neon Spidey. Wallcrawling or dancing? You decide.

[hexedh3art-deactivated20211018]

[thors]

[cathiacutsson]

Always reblog.

[littlebunnysunshine]

[goddessofcheese]

This makes me want a video game about a zombie apocalypse that only affects men so it’s up to the housewives of 50s’ America to save humanity.

…saving this idea for class.

[banahbanah]

i would play the heck out of that game, it is an amazing idea.

[basedmarinaarchives-blog]

Also can there be a character design screen so you can make your little housewife?

I think it’d be entertaining to see what guys could come up with for making their female-selves. If you ask me.

[starfishface]

I would so play this game. 

I would suck at it but I would play it.

[oxybelis-deactivated20220323]

I’ve never played a zombie game, but you got me at 50’s.

[oldfrax]

Hngggggggg I love 50s clothes give it to me

[japhers]

OMG I already thought of some sort of premise:

In 1953 a certain laboratory on an undisclosed location developed a serum that could genetically modify humans, giving them enhanced speed, agility, strength, and brainpower.

Scientists found a way to modify the serum such that it could only activate itself in the presence of a Y chromosome, thus isolating the effects to men, mostly because of female discrimination at the time.

The serum was a success, and sales skyrocketed just a few weeks after its release.

What the developers did not anticipate, though, was the human body’s incapacity to handle the serum. The mental and physical over-exhaustion triggered a mental decay which starts out slow, but speeds up exponentially within a few months after usage of the serum. The brains of the users are left with only the most basic survival reflexes, transforming the users into strong, fast, agile, emotionless human shells, devouring any mobile life form in their path.

Bites from the affected individuals could place copies of the rogue serum into the bodies of the bitten, giving them the symptoms. Shortly after, the serum evolved into a sort of genetic virus, causing mental decay in just days. No one was safe. No one…

…except the women.

*cue in epic music*

[engine-red]

Can you imagine the shitstorm this game would cause. I’d laugh pretty hard.

Would still play it though.

[skull-bearer]

I just love the role reversal like the uninfected men would suddenly become this priceless commodity and would be told ‘no, no- stay at home and mind the kids, we can’t have you going out, it’s too dangerous,” and “What were you thinking trying to fix the car? Think of what could have happened! Take up knitting.”

[mirrorfalls]

Wait, if it’s 1950s America, does that mean you’ll be able to kill zombie Joe McCarthy and zombie Richard Nixon in a boss battle?

[tanoraqui]

absolutely

[barafurbear]

number 4753 on my list of things that I didn’t realize i needed

[the-barista-district]

Is this a game yet?

[sketchypandagames-blog]

We’re making it into one. Follow us for the details, and don’t miss our Kickstarter.

[jvh1988]

Emma Watson on 'her naked pictures' rumors in Media

[why-would-you-ever]

A woolen cat with a scary face. Handmade. Flea market in Leipzig, 3 EUR (bargained down from 5 EUR for general scariness). —

Wełniany kot ze straszną twarzą, ręcznie robiony. Pchli targ w Lipsku, 3 euro (stargowane z pięciu za straszność).

[cosmobeau]

So I stumbled across a new meme

Feminist Cthulhu

[iwillclimbivytothemoon]

This is pleasing to the eyeballs.

[comediva-blog]

Feminist Cthulhu

[teesadutta]

1.22.15

T: Obviously we’re all still reeling from the terrible events of January 7th. J: Oh, right, the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris. T: Oh…well, that too. But I was actually talking about the Baga and Dora Baga massacres in Nigeria.

[wolfsheim66-deactivated20150621]

What’s the difference here?

[the-exercist]

The first woman is a real human being. She controls her own body and has her own personality. She has control over her own actions and can make autonomous decisions in her life. She also has to directly deal with the people around her and the bigotry, stereotyping and harassment that she is exposed to. She is real, she has emotions, she has thoughts, and she has rights. 

The second woman is fictional. She was created by other people who exert full control over her body, appearance and actions. Her sole purpose is to be literally bought and sold for the entertainment of an audience. She cannot make her own decisions, she cannot control her own body and she is not real. She is not responsible for her behavior or appearance: She is the product of the environment that she was created in. 

The first woman, by virtue of being a human being who identifies with the feminist movement and acts in accordance to those beliefs, is therefore a feminist. She is actively participating in feminism and is choosing to dress herself in a manner of protest that best demonstrates that she alone controls her body, and that no others have a right to access her body without her consent. She is a multi-faceted person who has agency, and part of that agency includes the ability to look sexy while refusing to consent to her own dehumanization. Her actions are not only one small part of what makes her a person, but she is also participating within a cultural trend of protesting rape culture. 

The second woman, because she is not autonomous and was designed by a series of outsiders, is sexist because she is the passive product of sexist content creators. She exists as an ornament. Her clothes were chosen as fan service so that she can be sexually available and gratifying at all times, most likely for straight male gamers. Her erotic appearance has little functional purpose other than to please an audience. And since she exists within an industry that is consistently criticized for ostracizing female participants and creating a large gap between the depictions of male and female characters, her appearance is simply one detail within a much larger array of sexist problems. 

Get it?

[justsomeantifas]

I swear the people who don’t understand this