They same

Product Placement
Doug Jones
Interview Vampire Daily
Today's Document

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available

pixel skylines
ojovivo
almost home
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Sade Olutola

Jimmy Eat World
untitled
Cosimo Galluzzi
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
No title available

blake kathryn
Color Me Curious
Game of Thrones Daily

seen from Finland
seen from Argentina
seen from Mexico
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from Venezuela

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Finland

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@filipfatalattractionrblog
They same
I don't think his friends call him that.
No you see it's even funnier, because in Spanish it's actually "niño blanco". So this guy, who already gets called "white boy", is doing the whitest thing you can do: butcher Spanish spelling and grammar.
Speed Kim!! - Disco Elysium comic
This whole comic only exists because I really wanted to give Kim a little Initial D-style drift moment in his Kineema, because it has to be rear-wheel drive, so it should be possible to drift it, right? This weird project sent me down such a deep rabbit hole, and now I want to know everything about these vehicles: Why does it look like a horse-carriage? Why doesn't it have a steering wheel, and instead has two giant joysticks? How the hell do you even steer it? Are they supposed to work like horse reins? Does it have an airbag and seat belts? Or do the police officers just get launched out of the car and die in an accident?
Anyway, please read this with whatever eurobeat you like.
I hope you enjoyed
Ignore the murderous tendencies, this man is a super model.
based on the one answer from the ogrepoppenangleaksofficial about Matilda's zoomies
remember me, like this.
Aliens: Wow you guys sure are completely normal and not at all indescribably horny.
NASA *beating the alien fuckers with a broom*: Yep. Just a completely normal species. no inappropriate lusting for extraterrestrial booty here, no sir.
[ID: reply by lusciouslusus that reads,
“We zoom out slightly to reveal the aliens are ALSO beating their own alien-fuckers away with a space-broom.”
End ID]
As an asexual, I vibe with NASA on this one. It’s… a metaphor.
I don’t. Let them out
fun fact about character development by the way. you can make them develop worse.
like I mean this very seriously as writing advice. the character should experience events and make decisions that make them different at the end of the story. they should be changed. they do not have to be improved.
they can get worse. they can make decisions of an increasingly terrible nature. they can stop taking risks on kindness. they can discover how much they can get away with. they can find religion, or abandon it, with negative effects on their moral creed. the character has to develop. the character does not have to grow.
Apologies if this will be hijacking your post, but I have a minor fascination with how professional writers tend to classify character development and how it related to the story's themes and I cannot pass an opportunnity to yap about how I tend to classify them.
Professional writers tend to divide that into positive, negative or flat character arc, then further divide negative one into different forms. But I been toying with an idea of clasiffying them by starting point as such
Character begins beliving a lie. Over the course of the story they are confronted by the truth, which will be related to the main theme of the work. From that point on they can either reject the lie and accept the truth, which is your standard positive character development, or they can reject it and keep beleiving their lie or even more likely escalate it - the downfall arc. Former is Tony Stark in first Iron Man movie, the latter is Magneto in X-Men: the First Class movie.
Character begins the story already believing the truth, but the story tests their belief. If they withstand and keep believing in the truth, they get a flat arc where they do nto change, but world around them changes. Paddington 2, James Gunn's Superman or the movie Nightcrawler (in which case the truth is a very cynical one) could be examples of it. But if they reject the truth and embrace a lie, we get the corruption arc. Michael Corleone from the Godfather is likely best-known example.
Now this is a bit of Death of the Author thing, because what arc the viewer thinks the character got also depends on their own own read of the story. There are debates if main character in Whiplash has a corruption arc, or a flat arc depending on whenever the viewer sees the finale as him buying into Fletcher's bullshit or deciding to carve his own path to greatness.
Sorry again for hijacking the post.
There’s one of these in Boston, the Vilna Shul (https://vilnashul.org/about/our_history). The interior painting was primarily a Lithuanian thing, hence why most of them have been destroyed. The Vilna is one of few surviving examples and the murals are perpetually in need of preservation funding.
Eastern European Jewish immigrants arrived in the city of Boston in large numbers beginning in the 1880’s. With little or no income, they lo
College football's latest existential crisis, summarized:
Medium-term background: Over the last ten and especially last five years, college football has gone from the fiefdoms of stuffy provincial old farts so devoted to the mirage of amateurism that programs could get in trouble for putting cream cheese on bagels, to a free-for-all wild west where players go shopping for new teams every season and whoever has the biggest firehose of money wins. This is in large part because the athletes being unpaid in the first place was never legally sustainable and only lasted so long out of inertia and coordination issues. If you're pro-labor it's a good and necessary thing overall, but for smaller programs, their fans, and anyone with a bit of romance about the game, it's been a disaster. On a related note, sports gambling has gone from something only legal in a handful of US cities to infinitely accessible to anyone with a smartphone over the same five years. Some would say these are both part of the same trend, namely very rich people getting to do anything they want because no one gives a shit about rules or ethics anymore, but that's neither here nor there.
Short-term background: A year or two ago, Texas oil billionaire Cody Campbell basically bought the Texas Tech athletic program. Tech has historically been a B-to-C-tier team with a massive chip on its shoulder thanks to never being able to get past the A-tier schools. Campbell is now chairman of the board of regents, i.e. the boss' boss' boss of most of the other people in this story. This past offseason he paid $5 million to recruit a quarterback named Brendan Sorsby, previously with Indiana and Cincinnati.
Last few weeks: Sorsby is outed as having a massive gambling addiction, from the stereotypical "up 'til 3 AM betting on Malaysian soccer" stuff to betting individual balls and strikes in baseball games to (brace yourself) betting on his own teams to lose or underperform. For example, to paraphrase a redditor's take, 'he saw his teammate struggling and instead of wanting to help him get better, he put a hundred bucks on the guy to get Under 2.5 Catches next game'.
From most of the Chicago White Sox in 1919 to Pete Rose in 1989, any professional athlete who has done anything remotely like this has been banned for life from their sport and made persona non grata. But again, college sports is a lawless wasteland right now and Cody Campbell didn't get rich by taking losses on his investments, no sir. He paid for Sorsby and Sorsby's gonna play. After the NCAA (college sports' governing body, a shambling rotten corpse of its former cream-cheese-outlawing self) seemed to have finally found a rule they could enforce without a labor-law suit bitchslapping them, banning Sorsby, Campbell more or less went judge-shopping until he found a retired judge willing to issue an injunction allowing Sorsby to play.
To be clear, Campbell and his puppets (head coach, athletic director, university president; their collective inability to shut the fuck up throughout this has led people to suspect that Campbell basically ordered them to go all-offense in PR.) aren't disputing that Sorsby is a gambling addict who bet on his own team to lose. They're saying that it would be discrimination against the mentally ill to not allow him to play. The words the judge used were 'irreparable harm'. Analogies spread on reddit over the last few weeks have included "holding AA meetings in a bar", "letting a drunk driver go scot-free because alcoholism is a disease", and "a banker caught stealing from customer funds getting a promotion".
The entire college football world, which had spent the last five years tearing itself apart over TV money and private equity, immediately united against Campbell and Tech. Several colleges wiped any games with Tech in any sport from their schedule, their conference intimated that they can and would expel them by member vote, the attorneys general of Oklahoma, Utah, and Kansas all promised to take action. And to be clear this was a truly existential, all hands on deck crisis: if the athletes are taking dives for money, then there is no sport. It's a bunch of mercenary hustlers dressing up like football players to pretend to play football. Even the vampiric sportsbooks themselves don't want this: nobody bets on fixed matches.
Bear in mind also it's not out of the question that Sorsby could be arrested for this: he was under 21 for much of this and sent money across state lines for family and friends to gamble with. So Campbell got his own lawyer: Ken Paxton, Texas state AG and current senate candidate. While Reddit hates every Texas Republican politician, the Texan posters do seem to regard Paxton as uniquely stupid and incompetent. He was impeached three years ago, which, how do you manage to do that as a Republican AG in Texas?
Anyway, this is where my law-fu gets a little weak, but apparently Paxton's filing on Tech and Campbell's behalf was so incompetently written, so wildly aggressive without any authority to actually see it through, that it opened up his clients to legal vulnerabilities that wouldn't have existed otherwise and sets the prosecution up for a thorough beatdown. So, late last night, Tech dumps mutually parts with Sorsby, rumored to have kept around half of his $5 million payday for barely avoiding becoming the Shoeless Joe Jackson of football. Campbell gets told "no" for the first time in years and loses millions of dollars for nothing. Paxton was (admittedly they say this every time) apparently in a tight race with Democrat James Talarico, and now he very publicly has argued that the 5th-most-popular college team in his own state should let their quarterback fix games for gambling rings because his billionaire sugar daddy threw a tantrum over it. May end up mattering, may not.
Everything in the world has been like this for the last six years.
It's like 2 am but.
A) what is a CRPG?
B) What is an Immersive Sim? The entire post I was thinking about the game if the sims and I'm very confused
A) Computer Role Playing Game
B) Immersive sims are games all about player choice. Its a game with an essentially multiple choice answer way of going about its missions/objectives/whatever in ways that aren't meant to break the flow of gameplay with obvious binary choices. Somewhat similar to the play it your way of gameplay many open world sandboxes sell themselves as, a big part though is that the world is meant to react to your decisions more so as you play.
An example I just thought of: If you constantly barge in the front door armed like Doomguy enemies will start to arm up more maybe start putting turrets in their front rooms & wearing body armor. NPCs might become more annoyed with your waste of bullets or downright dismissive of your intelligence. Paths and resources might become out of reach as the enemy takes a more firm hand against you and yours.
Basically an immersive sim is meant to have escalation that is reactive to your gameplay style and have tools at your disposal to circumvent problems in ways that make sense logically but never tells you outright.
You are given a gun to build walls for combat, but if you aim it right you can build steps to climb, so you climb the outside of a building to a window and break in. The game tells you none of this but your own mind brain figures it out
I have heard from other people that its a genre that wants players to break its systems apart and play with them but ehhh idk if that helps.
(Doesn't always have to have combat as a main feature they just often do)
what the FUCK is going on right now. what is going on
this post is so funny because it has over 10k notes and no context but all you have to do is look at the time stamp to know exactly what the context is
LOGIC!
Is it just me or does the HtP crew really like ass shots?
For example:
Stig
Markus
Kitten
I noticed it happens the most to Big D, don't mind it, just thought i point it out in case someone hasn't noticed.
I am deeply shocked how there aren't more people thirsting over this man.
He seems perfect thirst-material.