I'm gonna need everyone to put some love on Louis's name REAL quick
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
occasionally subtle
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Product Placement
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
RMH

titsay
Cosmic Funnies
$LAYYYTER
Sweet Seals For You, Always

roma★
macklin celebrini has autism
we're not kids anymore.
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

pixel skylines
YOU ARE THE REASON
todays bird
Not today Justin
Noah Kahan

seen from Poland

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Israel

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia

seen from Switzerland

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Australia

seen from United States
@glitteringpoet1685
I'm gonna need everyone to put some love on Louis's name REAL quick
rolin jones
Armand de Leyendecker
i guess it should have been predictable that the natural liberal reaction to 2 seasons of a show that ostensibly intended to be deliberately thoughtful about race is to 'balance it out' with 2 seasons of being deliberately thoughtless about race
Okay now that there's only one last episode away, about Gabrielle(/a)
So what is it called riding your female character of their deep contempt for and rejection of patriarcal control that manifested as gender non-conformity and writing them as someone who to this point, main's decision driver on the show has been mostly been just wanting to fucking her son really bad??
Like...
"If you complain about the best queer show on tv, they'll cancel it"
The show has 3x better ratings than expected, constructive criticism isn't going to get it canceled
You don't seem to understand how progress works. Are you familiar with the overton window? Bc you don't get the gay black vampire show in the first place by keeping your mouth shut and being grateful for whatever slop Hollywood decides is good enough for you. Ppl had to keep speaking up and being exceptionally annoying to get where we are and they will actually keep taking more and more away from you if you do keep your mouth shut. When the director of Silence of the Lambs heard the feedback about transphobia, he said that militants are important to continuing progress in society and media. If that guy can take the criticism and be cool, so can Rolin Jones. And stop leaving it to the ppl who are directly affected by racist writing to do all the work.
This show has become less explicitly queer now that it has been made/come out during the second Trump term (James Dolan, friends with Trump is a ceo of Amc and was at the Lestat premier) the marketing has downplayed the diverse characters, the nonwhite characters have far less screentime (even Armand who has much more of a prescence in books 2 and 3). This is not a coincidence. This is a pattern in history when goverments become more fascist and conservative. If you're genuinely curious to learn more, the "You Must Remember This" podcast has a series about the red list in old Hollywood where basically any progressive hollywood creative was blacklisted especially if they were anti nazi "too soon" before the US decided to do anything about WWII (bc facsism was kind of our thing you see). And understanding the Hayes code, how it was implemeneted and fluctuated to suppresse any remotely peogresive ideas is important to understand. Margaret Killjoy also has a few episodes on her "Cool People Who Did Cool Stuff" podcast about the progressive gay film making happening in Germany just before fascism took hold. Don't comply ahead of time. It does you no favors.
"You're risking the jobs of the actors of color by complaining"
Black writers and a director already lost their jobs. Do they not matter also? We can get into the pedantic arguments about whether the writing was racist or not, idrgaf. At the end of the day, getting rid of your black writers is a racist action in and of itself. Did they leave of their own volition? Maybe (and I'd be curious to know why ALL left if that's the case) but why not hire new black writers? At least one? You still have black main characters even if the new protagonist is white. Did AMC make them do it? Maybe so in which case it's worth yelling at AMC about it. And even if they did, I've seen showrunners quit over less so maybe Rolin sees caring about diverse stories as a 2020 fad that he's over now 🤷♀️
The poc characters have far less screentime already. Perhaps voicing our desire for them to have more screentime might I don't know...achieve something. Or you can just sit bk, be grateful for what they give you as they keep stripping away anything of value. Up to you I guess. I'm going to keep being annoying.
Also this argument is so deeply disingenuous. You should be supporting black creatives sure but maybe put that energy towards supporting black creatives who actually having creative control of their work. Directors, writers, producers. Also, no one has been complaining about the poc actors. Every complaint i see has been couched in "obviously Jacob/Delainey/Assad are amazing but..."
"Shouldn't you care about what black ppl are going through in the real world instead?"
You're never going to believe this but a lot of us can do 2 things at once. In fact, most of the ppl I see criticize the racism of the show care about real world shit. Scroll down our blogs and you'll find current events, history, mutual aid fundraisers, commentary on what's happening in the world. It's almost as though caring about racism in reality might translate to caring about representation in media. It's almost as tho caring about racism in the real world might have attracted us to the initial themes of the show in the first place.
"You guys just don't like complicated characters or understand gothic horror/you didn't read the books"
Most of the criticism I've read are from knowledgeable books fans. Gothic horror fans. Ppl who liked the nuance/morally grey aspect of the characters. Even ppl who shipped Loustat at the end of season 1. They have a lot of suggestions on small changes that could be done to that seance scene to fix it. (While still keeping Claudia's anger and character intact) perhaps you could read their input (I share a lot of what I see on my blog) instead of being disingenuous about what their actual criticism is.
"Only white ppl are complaining about this. Black ppl don't care amd they like the show"
So that's a lie 🤷♀️ the ppl I learned from about the nuanced ins and outs of this are black. Scroll on down this blog. Click on their blogs. Check em out. Learn something. I get that you got excited about the couple of black ppl you found to agree with you but, can't believe i have to say this, black folks are not a monolith?
"The show was always racist"
The show always dealt with themes of racism. Daniel said racist microaggressions. Lestat was racist. Yes. Correct. I haven't seen anyone argue that that was not the case. What i have seen them argue is that the show (without black writers to advise) has Daniel and Lestat say racist things for more shock value/humor with no pushback, in the exact same ways when culturally they would be different. It's almost as tho the writers are just making racist jokes they find funny. I recommend you check out Rolin's first tv show, Weeds, to see the same pattern. The show started as a critique of white wealthy sheltered suburbanites who were framed as being shitty for saying racist things. There were nonwhite characters who were not (at least not fully :/) stereotypes to show that the viewpoints were false. Then over the seasons, the racist white characters are just funny little blorbos who constantly make racist jokes unchecked with no poc of that group around to check them...sound familiar? No one is constradicting Lestat's narrative. Daniel has not been able to push bk on him the way he did on Louis. And Louis was not around Daniel to push bk on the kentucky fried chicken comment and Claudia is not around to push bk on Lestat's racism bc when she is around she's the one saying racist shit to Louis and says almost nothing negative to Lestat. At a certain point you're not making commentary, you're just reveling in saying racist things. And the ppl i see arguing against this are the same ppl i see repeating the kentucky fried chicken comment as their own joke. So i have a hard time taking them seriously when they claim that the writers aren't racist, they are just writing dialogue for a racist gothic horror character. Are the writers giving you dialogue too?
Not telling you to not like the show. Hollywood is racist. Our society is racist. It's going to be really hard to find media that isn't going to fuck something up (particularly ableism). Post about your love of the show. I'm not going to come for you. I'm still going to post things i like about the show. You can pry Armand from my cold dead hands. No matter how cartoon villain they go with it. You need not take the criticism from ppl with lived experience and knowledge on this personally. Just...maybe learn...maybe even yell at AMC.
They were all like, oh, you're angry Assad isn't getting enough promotion? We'll give him more 🙌 Also we're reducing his screen time. Bitch.
i hate this whole revisionist idea that claudia died without a shred of love for louis. claudia loving louis is WHERE all the hurt and pain should have came from in that scene. it tarnishes claudias portrayal in the first two seasons. yes, that was claudia though louis' eyes, he glorified her life and romanticized her death. but you mean to tell me louis was that fucking delusional that ALL the love claudia felt for him was entirely fabricated?
I don’t remember who it was but whatever victim of Apollo’s psychic dodgeball said that the writers were going to throw every character (especially Claudia and Armand) under the bus for the sake of woobifing Lestat and pushing Louis back into his arms; I’m so sorry you were right
The more I read about the seance, the more horrific it seems.
With Adam O’Byrne in the Backstage Pass referring to it as Loustat “dealing with the problem” and with Jacob in the After Dark saying Louis’ arc this season has been about humbling himself, and now with Sam’s words here. It really does seem like the biggest narrative reason behind the seance is to whack Louis down so he would be open to getting back with Lestat. That that is the primary intention behind the scene. That Louis has…. been too uppity by refusing to get back with one of his abusers, so the narrative uses Claudia to beat Louis down enough so that he would.
(By the way this is not me coming at Sam or at Jacob. They’re only explaining how they were likely directed to treat the scene.)
Both Loustat abused Claudia, but Lestat abused both Louclaudia. So, in what way does the seance “even” the playing field? How does it “deal with the problem”? Because they were both horrible to Claudia? What about Lestat being horrible to Louis? Why does Louis need to be “humbled” into re-entering a relationship with one of his past abusers, who hasn’t shown much change since that period of their lives?
Season 3 was supposed to be about getting to know Lestat and contextualizing who he is. He, understandably, hasn’t come anywhere close to growing as a person yet. I was prepared to not get any real Loustat (outside of Dreamlou) until Season 4. But they’re already seeming to come back together. Am I supposed to be happy about this, or am I supposed to be alarmed?
As they are now, Louis is the only one who’s actually grown since their lives on Rue Royale. Is the implication here that Louis was the problem when they were together? And now that Louis has changed, Loustat have a chance again?
This only makes sense if you interpret S1 Loustat as either A) the “mutual abuse” myth or B) not abusive at all and Louis’ pride being the biggest issue in their relationship.
Season 1 was clear on Lestat’s patriarchal / marital abuse and Season 2 only reinforced that. So this switch to the 2 options I listed above make no sense. How do you give us the Santiago-Lestat meta criticism that abuse shouldn’t be excused, only to arrive to shaming a victim?
UNLESS they’re trying to pull a “Lestat doesn’t view himself as having abused Louis” and that’s why this is all coming off like this, since it’s from his POV. Why Louis has been saying sorry nonstop and why he’s been getting whacked so much. That the writing is saying that Lestat, himself, views the only wrong that deserved apologizing for was the drop.
And, alarmingly, this actually makes sense if you interpret Lestat as being truthful and not lying (like I had assumed he was!) the multiple times he’s said he did something to punish Louis & make him miserable for not being happy with him. That would actually fall in line with Louis’ treatment this season. That the “Louis humiliation ritual” could, terrifyingly, be a continuation of that given this has all been from Lestat’s POV.
But if this is the intention, then it just frames all of Loustat’s romance this season as nothing but a horror story. As a Lestat who hasn’t really changed and a Louis forever stuck in a cycle of abuse.
Is that what I’m supposed to be taking away from the season? That they might be doomed to repeat Rue Royale over and over again? I really don’t want to view Loustat or Lestat in this negative of a light, but what else am I suppose to be taking away from all this? Either the writers want to torture Louis or Lestat does.
I can't get over the phrase of "even playing field"- how?? How are they doing this whole 'even playing field' when the story started with a black gay man living in Jim Crows South. It has not been an even playing field then or now. See people keep sending me asks about how the Merrick scene is in the book; they are doing book accurate stuff, I need to read the books etc etc But I didn't read the books back in s1 and I still understood the story that this version was trying to tell...So what happened, that NOW I will have to read the books to understand? I was never following the books to begin with! Because it doesn't matter at this point what's in the books! Also heard that Merrick was Louis's second fledgling. Agjkljkllppl and they do this?? I always had a suspicion...like how are they going to address this, Rolin is so insistent on driving Louis back into Lestat's arms...how will that look like after the trial, after the drop? Well now I know.
💬 0 🔁 7 ❤️ 16 · Sam teasing episode 7 · SAM: It's really crazy. It's really wild. AUTUMN: I can't wait to watch it cause I've got to say
at this point i don't even care if they're portraying armand as cuckoo bananas because the rest of the season is already totally fucked for me. like i'm ready to scrap the whole thing. just give me some good assad zaman acting and screentime and i'll even be thankful.
repeating this to myself as a list of daily affirmations
like idk it feels BAD that they turned lestat’s entire band into way bigger characters than they are in the book, while the preexisting characters of color get sidelined, ridiculed, and have to compete for screentime and story relevance. i like the band fine in the book but they’re barely characters. how do they get more screentime than ARMAND???
oh ok cool so claudia finally gets a chance to address her lifelong tormentors and abusers to their faces and they turned it into the absolve lestat monologue. very cool. yeah cool I’ll just kill myself no worries
Guys. I can't believe they really sent Claudeleine to super hell...
TVA should be required reading before anyone in this fandom is allowed to even have Armand’s name in their mouth. At least skim the wiki page.
new szn has me so stressed im making assad zaman prayer candle images. this is it gang the extramarital gay sex was fine but idolatry is the one thats sending me to hell fr
STOPDBEUEUFJSJW