wallacepolsom
izzy's playlists!
No title available
h
ojovivo
trying on a metaphor
oozey mess
Three Goblin Art
we're not kids anymore.
Today's Document
DEAR READER
Not today Justin
⁂
JVL
No title available
Sade Olutola
will byers stan first human second
Xuebing Du
Stranger Things
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Lithuania
seen from Netherlands
seen from Iraq
seen from Belgium
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from Spain
seen from Malaysia
@gooooothmoooog
very quick pinned post ill make less bad later lol-
howdy if you see this blog in your notifs and you post tolkien, yea thats bc my main is tolkien!
If you do not and youre like "why is this tolkien blog talking to me" thats bc me from like 8 years ago was like yea ill have my main and fr sideblog be secondary on this account SO you probably know me as either sharkchimedes or ogord-fr! esp in places where you are chained to your primary name on tumblr lol
I haven't drawn it in a long time :,)
“eowyn and theoden” for tolkien women’s week day 1: love / family / lineage / companionship
@tolkienwomensweek
hey friends where is that picture of boromir with the gondor flag except its a pride flag?
Couldn’t find it so I made another because you’re right that it’s a crime and it’s definitely my duty to remedy it
I heard it was that time of year again.
Legolas & Gimli - Sketching last night with my two little hobbits :)
Boromir mischaracterizations are so funny because why is it always either "OwO! Must protect tiny Hobbit babus! I am their father now!" or "Hi I'm Bitchomir, get ready to be fucked"
some cuties for all of us
original babygirl
Must've been hard as hell in the day-to-day
Frodo: I just felt like I was really locked in … idk
Sam:
Getting notes on this post is like …. Girls you might be in burnout. Sorry I can’t help. 😘 though
we don't need a silmarillion adaptation bc we already have it. its called transformative work. get outta here w film rumors
Aragorn & Arwen - by Raymond-de-Péreille
There are multiple chapters that are set in hospitals where the characters are attempting to recover from injuries that never fully heal. I must once again stress that my experience in WWI was perfectly normal.
There is a giant horrible mudplain full of unrecoverable and perfectly preserved dead bodies that the characters have to walk through in a land where the air is poisoned gas, and on a compLETELY UNRELATED NOTE: WWI WAS TOTALLY FINE AND NORMAL!!
Uh??? Tolkien did not claim that???
"One has indeed personally to come under the shadow of war to feel fully its oppression; but as the years go by it seems now often forgotten that to be caught in youth by 1914 was no less hideous an experience than to be involved in 1939 and the following years. By 1918, all but one of my close friends were dead."
He talked about how WWI affected his writing all the time, he was not in denial for how it affected??? Am I missing something????
https://www.tolkiensociety.org/blog/2017/09/tolkien-as-war-novelist-another-way-of-dealing-with-trauma-through-writing/
what Tolkien was adamant about, which has been confusing people for several decades now, is that he wasn't writing about World War Two
He was also very clear that he was not writing allegory. Now, some people are not very clear on what allegory means. "Allegory" and "symbols" are not the same thing. Allegory is a type of symbolism, but there are a lot of ways of doing symbolism that aren't allegory ... and a lot of people are kind of fuzzy on that. The way allegory is most commonly used in literary and religious analysis is that there is a direct, almost 1:1 correspondence between the literary figure and what it is standing in for.
So, for example, Pilgrim's Progress is an allegory of Christian salvation. It's sort of a novel? There are characters who do stuff? but also they are very one-dimensional. The main character is a guy named Christian--yes, really!--who is journeying from his hometown ("the city of destruction") to the Celestial City (heaven). There is not much subtlety to it. It is pretty much what it is. There is no slippage, no playing around with the theme, no places where the symbolism is ambiguous. John Bunyan, the author, is hitting you over the head every step of the way with the Meaning That You Are Supposed To Be Getting From The Story.
Not all allegories are that crude or simplistic; the Narnia books are also allegory for Christianity. They have a lot more subtlety to them and a lot more nuance, and there's a lot of stuff in there that isn't allegorical, but on the crucial matters there is still a 1:1 correspondence. Aslan is Jesus. He's not like Jesus, he's not a character that has some similarities to Jesus or takes themes from the stories of Jesus, he is Jesus.
Tolkien is not doing allegory. Tolkien is taking the material of his life--his faith, his experiences in WWI, his linguistic and historical knowledge, his favorite books--and using them as the building blocks of his story. The themes and imagery and symbols draw heavily from all of that, the characters and settings draw heavily from all of that, but they are too complex to be allegorical. There's a lot of symbolism! It's not allegory.
So, for example, let's take the Dead Marshes referenced above. Does the experience of walking through this muddy wasteland with corpses all around that are rotting but still look like people draw from Tolkien's WWI battlefield experience of dead bodies in the trenches? Of course it does! but there are also a lot of differences. These dead are not from the current war, they are from a previous one--they are a reminder of old conflicts, of the ways the systems and powers of the current war have not come out of nowhere, there is history here. There is meaning that is not drawn from the Somme. And they are also drawing from literary references Tolkien was familiar with--primarily William Morris. Modern readers don't get the references because we have generally not read The House of the Wolflings, but that doesn't mean that the references aren't there.
So people read Tolkien's insistence that he didn't write allegory, and take that to mean that he's saying there isn't symbolic and thematic references. And that isn't what he meant! And also, we focus so much on the thematic references to WWI and Christianity, and we miss most of the other references, which makes it seem like Tolkien's only drawing on WWI, when he's actually doing something more complex.
@not-freyja
Happy 20th anniversary to They're Taking the Hobbits to Isengard specifically
now and for always
