Love Begins
Andulka
taylor price
Noah Kahan
Color Me Curious
titsay
occasionally subtle
official daine visual archive
Today's Document
Xuebing Du
if i look back, i am lost
No title available
blake kathryn
gracie abrams
EXPECTATIONS
macklin celebrini has autism
shark vs the universe
PR's Tumblrdome
ellievsbear
Game Changer & Make Some Noise
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Tunisia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Portugal
seen from Venezuela
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Pakistan
seen from Philippines
seen from Colombia
@green-eggs-and-sam96
Kevin and Andrew, whose mothers were murdered in a car crash. Neil whose mother died while driving.
Andrew, who murdered his own mother. Kevin and Neil whose mothers were murdered.
Neil and Andrew, who in a certain way were freed by their mother's death. Kevin, whose mother died so he could be caged once and for all.
Kevandreil, my beloved
"Where's my Breakfast?" by Daniel Arthur
Hey so did you know that these takes can all be true at the same time?
1) Kevin was valid for keeping Neil's secret from Andrew.
2) Andrew was valid for his reaction to that (Neil was in MORTAL DANGER and Andrew was powerless and terrified and grieving and his best friend KNEW ABOUT IT AND DIDN'T TELL HIM *UNTIL* ANDREW WAS SCARED AND PETRIFIED AND POWERLESS AND GRIEVING).
3) Kevin DID NOT deserve that reaction (He has been mourning Neil since the moment he got to know the real him!!! In his mind, there was nothing that he could do against the might of the literal japanese mafia. Nathan Wesninski HIMSELF had fucking cops in the palm of his hands AND the approval of said japanese mafia to take Neil and do WHATEVER. And you think a 20 year old Andrew Minyard would have saved him? They would have died together!!! They had all already lost the fucking battle before it even started, and Kevin was the first to know. If not for Stuart Hatford's coincidental assasination plan, Neil Josten would have been a dead man point blank period).
So like... it's completely valid to say that you would choke someone too if you were in Andrew's place, but also, the someone wouldn't have deserved it. You still would though because feelings are irrational and, being Andrew, you have grown up your entire life knowing, deep to your core, that violence is the only way that people have ever listened to you. Has a "no", or even a "Please no" ever helped?
And being Kevin, this is terrible on all sides. You were powerless from the start. You lost your mother, had only her sport for a token, and instead got raised by vile people who abused you using that sport. And then you left. And then they followed you. And you knew this was it. You knew your best friend could not simply handle this fact, and you knew he would hurt you over it, but you did it anyway because what's better? A dead Andrew who tried or an alive Andrew who's betrayed?
You guys do realise that similar logic was used with Jean right? Kevin knew that Jean was going through fucking hell, but he still wanted an ALIVE Jean. That's why he did it all, even though he knew Jean would hate him for it. "Kevin wasn't there for Jean" Kevin sent Jean to the trojans. What would Jean have done if he stayed with Kevin? Watched him wallow in his own alcoholism? Kevin wasn't equipped to help Jean, and he fucking knew it. He sent him to people who could. And was he wrong?
Basically, the discourse over this scene is fucking insane lmfao like it doesn't need to be had. Both characters were valid, they both had their own points of view, and they both STILL love each other to bits by the way. Why are we fighting over something that has Been coexisting?
Anne Truitt, from a diary entry featured in Turn: The Journal of an Artist originally published in 1982
i need (abruptly stops talking & stares at some random fixed point with a vacant expression)
Maybe this is obvious, but I actually think that the FBI knows that Jean did not sign his documents back at Evermore . Idk, why would Nora specify so much that Jean sign the paperwork to receive his raven car and that he didn't know the conditions of his raven contract if the FBI doesn't suspect that his past signature is not his?. They could use his real signature (vs tetsuji fake one) as evidence in the future trial.
I just know they (correctly) think that jean is a trafficking victim.
rhemann and adi inviting jean and jeremy to dinner and adi assuming jean and jeremy are a couple because jean keeps referring jeremy as his ‘partner’
Mammal in a Sunday Dress, by Georgina M. Cox, 2026
today’s the only day you can reblog this
“There Will Come Soft Rains”, Ray Bradbury
I don’t see nearly enough hate for Jeremy Knox’s father on here.
Fuck Trent Knox.
this video has been going around for a while but the English subtitles didn't match the energy of the spoken French at all. i had to fix it.
reblog to spread this version
why did Tilda bother giving them a middle name and why did she come back for one of her babies is what i want to know
"whats your 5 year plan?" buddy I nearly go insane thinking about what I should have for dinner
just found out from this interview that nora did, in fact, try really hard to get tfc traditionally published before deciding to just publish it herself. on the one hand, i applaud her effort and persistence. on the other, i cannot stop laughing because like. can you imagine. being an agent in 2010 and thinking "wtf did i just read" and "how do i politely tell this lady that her book is absolutely unmarketable and unsellable and no agent in their right mind would take it"
