can i be real with you i'm gonna start biting people

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
official daine visual archive

if i look back, i am lost
taylor price

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
Keni
šŖ¼
No title available

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
d e v o n
The Stonewall Inn
YOU ARE THE REASON
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
Cosimo Galluzzi
RMH
The Bowery Presents

tannertan36

gracie abrams

seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Vietnam
seen from Canada
seen from Italy
seen from Russia

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Greece
@greyrowan
can i be real with you i'm gonna start biting people
Thereās an episode of Sesame Street (on Netflix! you can watch it easily!) where Elmo attends a toy-swap, where you offer up old toys you donāt play with anymore and receive someone elseās toys that are new to you. Cute!
But Elmo, after cheerfully surrendering his old toys, sees that the children who swapped toys with him are playing with his toys āwrongā! Theyāre imagining entirely different make believe scenarios! Theyāre pretending the football is a dinosaur egg instead of a rocket ship! Aaahhhhh!!!! And this is so distressing to poor Elmo that he does the unthinkable: He does swapsies-backsies and takes all his toys back!
This being Sesame Street, he learns that you canāt control how other people play pretend, but you can join in if you want to! And if you donāt want to, thatās ok, you can just play pretend your own way by yourself or with someone else who wants to play that way too. You can still be friends with people who play pretend differently than you (and arenāt being mean/harmful/etc, do not bad-faith-read this š¤Ø).
Anyway this is a post about fandom.
Also donāt treat Disneyland like that either.
ERROR: Swastikas aren't racist, the hakenkreuz is.
Coconuts have only been in the Caribbean for 500 years. They justā¦.floated on over from Asia and took root. Thatāsā¦hilarious.
Wait really? I always thought they were if not native at least brought over on purpose
Right??? Iām watching this nature doc and when the narrator said that I nearly spit my drink giggling. Theyāre remarkably buoyant and just bob their way to a new shore. So carefree. Truly a fruit destined to be in the Caribbean.
are you suggesting coconuts migrate
A few weeks ago one of my historical pet peeves was activated when I heard about a new Robin Hood movie that takes the groundbreaking, unprecedented, bold and visionary step of suggesting that the Middle Ages were a time of brutality, cynicism, and lawlessness.
Sarcasm alert. Everything I've heard about this movie sounds like it was created specifically to annoy me, so I'm going to try to ignore it and just talk about my pet peeve, which is this pop culture myth that the medieval period was particularly filthy, brutal, misogynistic and lawless.Ā
Which is simply not the truth, and here's a true story from 1348 that shows theĀ realĀ Middle Ages.
We know this story because it's a very important moment in the development of common law - that is, the facts and the conclusion of the story were written down and became the basis for how similar cases would be decided long into the future. This 1348 judicial decision (citation: I de S et Uxor v W de S (1348) yb 22 edw iii f 99) is still read by law students today when studying the tort (orĀ wrong)Ā of assault. That's nearly sevenĀ hundredĀ years of judges and lawyers looking back at a medieval judicial decision and saying, "Yes! That was a good and just decision!"
To set the stage, it's the 1300s - a century famous for the Black Death, the Hundred Years' War, the Peasants' Revolt, and the Babylonian Captivity of the Church that saw the papacy moved to the French town of Avignon as puppets of the French monarchcy. But that's not the only thing that happens in the 1300s. This century also sees the publication of Dante'sĀ Divine Comedy;Ā the Clockwork Revolution in which intricately designed clocks tracked everything from the hours of the day (which were measured in variable lengths) to the phases of the moon and the Sun's path through the zodiac; the creation of gorgeous books of hours and tapestries; the career of Christine de Pizan, the first woman known to have made a living from her pen; the writing of Geoffrey Chaucer and the radical social and religious reforms proposed by John Wyclif and his followers.
About the middle of this century a man known to history as W de S came in the night to the house of I de S and M, his wife, looking to buy some wine. The door to the taven was closed, so W pounded on the door with a hatchet, which he had in his hand. At this, M, the tavern-keeper's wife, put her head out the window and told him to stop. W responded by throwing the hatchet at M, narrowly missing her.
The tavern-keeper and his wife, contrary to what pop culture will tell you, responded exactly the way a couple of pub owners might respond today: they took the offender to court and argued that W had made an assault on M. W argued, in response, that he had committed no crime because the hatchet had not in fact struck M.
You might now be thinking that of course W would have won the case, since no actual physical harm was done to the woman he'd attacked. But you would be wrong! The judge in the case declared that the assault itself was harmful, and that W was liable to pay compensation for the fright he had caused M.Ā
"Ever since then," states my old Torts textbook, "the tort of assault has extended protection to a person's right to be free of emotional disturbance brought about by intentional threats of physical violence."
LawĀ didĀ exist in the middle ages. Women, as well as men, could expect to be protected by the law from assault. And not only physical, but evenĀ emotionalĀ damages could be awarded for assault...all the way back in 1348.
It wasn't a perfect time, but it was far from the callous brutality depicted on our movie screens.
#i just so happened to be perusing the dsa's religious socialism's website yesterday#and there was an interesting essay about this movie's exclusion of friar tuck!#friar tuck being a jovial character that ruins the grim dark fantasy i guess#but also friar tuck being a representation of systemic reform#or someone inside a corrupt system (the church) who actually partakes in the rebellion against it - via @jabletown
okay i can accept a lot but i'm supposed to believe adult toph shaves her armpit hair?
fuck off
hey gang this post was not about how i have an armpit hair kink and i don't really care to hear about the reasons you made up to justify its absence i just feel it makes more sense for toph's character for her to have armpit hair and i feel its exclusion is probably motivated by systemic misogyny and i frankly don't think this is that wild of a take like i think it's pretty basic feminism 101 here okay bye
it feels like thereās only like five people left on earth who know what the word whimsy means
contrary to popular belief it does NOT mean buying a bunch of pink plastic landfillcore bullshit
WHIMSY IS ABOUT DOING THINGS ON A WHIM!
it is about opening yourself up to doing activities unplanned simply because they pique your interest!!! i am an authority on this subject!
Reblog and put in the tags the book that is physically nearest to you at this moment.
@silly-signs
Official silly sign
"But AI can't do your job. It canĀ helpĀ you do your job, but that doesn't mean it's going to save anyone money. Take radiology: there's some evidence that AIs can sometimes identify solid-mass tumors that some radiologists miss, and look, I've got cancer. Thankfully, it's very treatable, but I've got an interest in radiology being as reliable and accurate as possible. If my Kaiser hospital bought some AI radiology tools and told its radiologists: "Hey folks, here's the deal. Today, you're processing about 100 x-rays per day. From now on, we're going to get an instantaneous second opinion from the AI, and if the AI thinks you've missed a tumor, we want you to go back and have another look, even if that means you're only processing 98 x-rays per day. That's fine, we just care about finding all those tumors." If that's what they said, I'd be delighted. But no one is investing hundreds of billions in AI companies because they think AI will make radiology more expensive, not even if that also makes radiology more accurate. The market's bet on AI is that an AI salesman will visit the CEO of Kaiser and make this pitch: "Look, you fire 9/10s of your radiologists, saving $20m/year, you give us $10m/year, and you net $10m/year, and the remaining radiologists' job will be to oversee the diagnoses the AI makes at superhuman speed, and somehow remain vigilant as they do so, despite the fact that the AI is usually right, except when it's catastrophically wrong. "And if the AI misses a tumor, this will be the humanĀ radiologist'sĀ fault, because they are the 'human in the loop.' It's their signature on the diagnosis." This is a reverse centaur, and it's a specific kind of reverse-centaur: it's what Dan Davies calls an "accountability sink." The radiologist's job isn't really to oversee the AI's work, it's to take the blame for the AI's mistakes. This is another key to understanding ā and thus deflating ā the AI bubble. The AI can't do your job, but an AI salesman can convince your boss to fire you and replace you with an AI thatĀ can'tĀ do your job. This is key because it helps us build the kinds of coalitions that will be successful in the fight against the AI bubble." - Cory Doctorow, The Reverse Centaurās Guide to Criticizing AI
another huge piece of advice: separate out 'tidying', 'cleaning' and 'organising' in your head. they're not the same thing and a lot of paralysis and overload comes from either misidentifying what your space needs, or trying to do all of them at once with conflicting goals.
TIDYING means clearing space, making your environment orderly and inviting. it usually entails removing clutter from surfaces, clearing the floor so you can move around easily, and creating psychological ease by putting everything visibly in its place. It's very visual, and can also involve things like straightening picture frames, squaring pillows, folding blankets on the couch, etc. It reduces chaos and noise and makes a space comfortable.
ORGANISING means sifting through belongings, ensuring that what doesn't need to be kept is thrown out and what does need to be kept is kept well. This often means categorising by room and function ā teaspoons go in the teaspoon drawer, and the teaspoon drawer stays in the kitchen. It can also mean indexing things so you can find them easily (markers sorted by colour, paperwork divided into topical folders, books alphabetised) and preserving things (moving photos out of direct sunlight, keeping open flour in a sealed container, sleeving trading cards).
CLEANING means removing built up dirt, dust and grime, reducing the level of environmental contaminants and making your space sanitary. Bacteria are a fact of life, they love to hang out in dust and cling to pet hair and multiply on any given surface. Cleaning is how you keep that stuff in check, preventing it from building up to the point it affects your health. This means wiping frequently touched surfaces with disinfectant, sanitising utensils (doing the dishes), washing bedding and clothes (and yourself), and sweeping/vacuuming and taking out the trash to physically remove dirt from your home.
Tidying is not the same thing as organising ā shove the mail, bills, dirty teaspoons and your gardening gloves in a drawer, and you've tidied the table. Sort the paperwork into piles by deadline, put the teaspoons in a cup, and roll the gloves together so they don't get separated, and the table is untidy but organised.
Similarly, a tidy or organised space can still be filthy. Just because all the yellowed newspapers and trash bags are sorted by date in the basement, out of sight, doesn't mean they're clean. A chaotic, cluttered space can still be very sanitary if it's being kept clear of refuse, and wiped and dusted often.
Sometimes tidying makes your space less organised, and vice versa. Organising often shakes out a lot of dust and makes the space dirtier. The classic "it's even worse than when I started" feeling is often the result of going into a room with the intent of tidying, then actually starting the task of organising instead. It's a lot easier to tidy an organised space, and organising first is usually the right instinct, but the distinction isn't intuitive so the sudden cluttering effect can be really demoralising. Remember they're three different things with different goals. Sometimes they overlap, but sometimes they conflict. That doesn't mean you're doing it wrong.
God will see you at the lowest point of your life, and say "what the fuck I thought I killed that thing." But you skitter too fast and you are too creepy.
2026 nonbinary name survey: results
While the big annual survey continues (until 13th August), I'm here to give you the results of the nonbinary name survey!
This is on the blog because it's technically a side survey for fun. The survey ran from 5th July to 3rd August, and there were 11,340 usable responses. You can see the spreadsheet of results here.
Top 20 names
Alex (1.01%, 204 people)
Jay (0.69%)
Sam (0.51%)
Charlie (0.49%)
Robin (0.48%)
Rowan (0.41%)
Ash (0.40%)
Max (0.33%)
Lee (0.31%)
Eli (0.31%)
Kai (0.31%)
Moss (0.29%)
Quinn (0.28%)
Wren (0.28%)
Aster (0.28%)
Jamie (0.28%)
Kit (0.26%)
Jack (0.25%)
Morgan (0.25%)
Ari (0.24%, 49 people)
Here's that top 20 as a graph, for the visual-brained folks:
The gender intentions of 18 of the top 20 names was "gender-neutral"; the two exceptions were Eli and Jack, where people were more likely to be aiming for something more masculine.
Here's the last name survey I ran, in 2023. The design was quite different, but the top 4 were the same names in the same order. The top 10 are the same names in a different order, but with one change: last time Kit was in the top 10 (this year it's at #17), and this time Lee is in the top 10 instead (last year it was #20).
This time I gave participants three slots to enter names. 20,118 names were entered in total, of which 2,358 (about 12%) were entered more than once. 22% of participants used all three slots, which seems like a lot to me, and maybe if I do this again I should provide more slots.
There were 8 names in the top 100 where people entering that name were more likely than not to be keeping a birth name:
Hannah (93.8% of Hannahs were keeping a birth name)
Elizabeth (93.3%)
Emily (91.3%)
Anna (86.8%)
Sarah (84.4%)
Emma (84.2%)
Laura (80.8%)
Claire (75.0%)
On the flipside, there were seven names entered over 20 times that were exclusively chosen by the participants themselves:
Aster (56 participants)
Rain (39)
Crow (29)
Niko (25)
Nyx (24)
Elias (22)
Briar (20)
Here's a graph of the gender intentions of each name:
Of the names that were not given at birth, here are the gender intention options and their top 3 names in each:
Gender-neutral:
Riley (74.2%)
Quinn (70.2%)
Sasha (68.8%)
Nonbinary:
Echo (50.0%)
Moth (35.3%)
Mars (34.1%)
Feminine:
Luna (64.5%)
Alice (34.3%)
Willow (30.3%)
Masculine:
Oliver (75.6%)
Alexander (70.6%)
James (65.9%)
Which means, this time, we have achieved our goal and discovered that:
the nonbinariest name is Echo! (24 people, 0.12% of participants.)
the most common name among nonbinary people is Alex, with an incredible ~1 in 100 nonbinary people going by this name.
And finally, despite the stereotype that nonbinary names are all three characters long, the most common number of characters in all names entered (including every name entry counted individually, and including names entered only once) is 4 or 5. Here's a graph:
As promised, the full spreadsheet of results doesn't contain individual responses, and any name entered only once is left out of the list. This is because names are identifying information and I don't want to risk anyone accidentally outing themselves due to having a very unusual or unique name.
Here's the results spreadsheet link again. Enjoy!
[ Take part in the 2026 Gender Census before 13th August 2026 ]
What is the 'more than likely' of keeping a birth name based on?
Over 50% of people entering that name said that it was given to them within a year of their birth.
I think the key to succeeding at writing things that end up the way I want them to be is never taking writing advice from people who write about writing advice, and to take all my cues from a bunch of fucked up weirdos from different mediums.
you ever have 8,045 bad mental health days in a row
you ever have 8,046 bad mental health days in a row
thats 22 years of bad mental health are you okay
you ever have 8,050 bad mental health days in a row
Theyāre deactivated now and I really hope they are okay, but my nihilism is telling me something else. :(
nah i just changed urls a few times. i came out and transitioned, graduated college, and got an amazing girlfriend who lights up my life. i had to delete the queued update to this post that said 8400 days for my 23rd birthday because iām in a really good place right now.
to everyone struggling: it really does get better.
I bet it feels good as fuck to not worry about Your Secret every single day just all day constantly worrying about Your Secret