no one asked but I need to share my thoughts about the nolan odyssey with someone because trust I HAVE MANY
so for starters, I'm a big fan of Greek mythology, I love the original texts but I am by no means a snob who wants every word form homers poem to appear. I watched almost every odyssey and Iliad adaptation with a friend once and honestly I find the way people choose to adapt the story very fascinating. Whether it's more faithfull like the 1997 version, unfaithful but beautiful like Troy, whether it zooms in and explores Odysseus emotional state like the Return or wether it's plain old bad like Troy the Odyssey, I can find something to enjoy in each of those.
That being said, Nolan's Odyssey is not necessarily bad, I can see what he was going for. The way he changed the Laestregonians, Polyphemus, Circe and Agamemnon I think the major thought behind it was that it was sort of about the fear of something unknowable and dark. All of these characters break Xenia in ways that are important to how Nolan frames the story and it's reflected in the sort of strange and scary way they are designed. They are all sort of gnarly and alien looking in comparison to Odysseus and his crew, who have a very regular guy vibe. In the end, when it's revealed that Odysseus and his crew actually are the monsters for breaking Xenia with the Trojan Horse (the whole goofy ass sea people thing?) it kind of makes you reflect on that assumption you could make based on how the monsters vs Odysseus are meant to be seen by the audience.
Still, I think the message is greatly put down by what is utlimately a somewhat infantile fascination with cool action scenes. The whole movie spends way too long stretches on action scenes, which yk, are technically well done, but kind of undermine Odysseus as a character.
If we are meant to question the violence, why are we unquestionably portraying Odysseus as a hero? Let's reflect a bit, if we're doing what the Return tried to do with the whole 'Odysseus has PTSD and is remorseful' thing, why is he like this? Odysseus, in the original text, cries all the time. He is, frankly, miserable. His entire demeanor is not one of a stoic Hollywood action hero, it's one of a snide mischievous little trickster, who gets his comeuppance for disrespecting the gods and repeatedly trying to avoid accountability. That fits the message Nolan was seemingly going for perfectly, after all, the Odyssey never gives you the impression that Odysseus is some righteous guy who respects others. Then why change it?? Why take out his iconic tricks like his scene with Polyphemus?
I think ultimately, they slammed the Odyssey into a box of this dark, gritty and realistic Nolan formula, that just doesn't leave room for actual introspection when it comes to the action hero archetype. It just needs to uncritically reproduce it so some 14 year old on TikTok can make a Phonk edit of Agamemnon aura-farming. That's probably why the remorse Odysseus showed at the end felt so tacked on. Frankly, it was barely present throughout the movie because they were pre-occupied with making Odysseus look cool. You can't have a snide trickster, you can't have colorful armor, you can't have the gods and you can barely have the monsters Odysseus fights when doing something like that. It may look cooler to Nolan's target audience, but I'm having a difficult time seeing how there is anything more to it.
Overall, not for me. Clearly I'm not the target audience. If you are either and are looking for something that studies Odysseus as a character, watch the Return. If you want something more faithfull, watch the Odyssey from 1997 and if you want something to hate-watch, Nolan is not that bad, this is not the movie for it. Watch Troy the Odyssey, that's the peak of so bad it's good.