Aw: 總統府網站民意信箱-信件確認通知
The murderer group can say the black as the white.
To say the invaded illegal colonial slavery terrorist rules as a lawful Devil.
Why DPP has to give their allegiance to the Devil!
Tsai Ing-wen's accommodation to [the Devil] is exactly same as
Prime Minister of Greece, Alexis Tsipras
He won the election, but the wrong policy could not result the truth
I cannot see how Greece can survive its default!
Remember the Status Quo of DPP will cover the inner affairs of Taiwan
Tsai will win the election, and the result will be Bankruptcy of Taiwan!
Formosan stays in the Slavery of ROC in exile!
The illegal cannot result the Lawful! That is the truth!
C. K. Chen 2015-06-30
台灣比希臘更糟糕,嚴重的警鐘響起多次! 台灣人只有無奈!
民進黨不幸當選,70年來的爛攤子, 唯有破產一條死路!
侵略台灣執行70年殖民搾取民膏恐怖分子武裝集團的外來政權
懸案近70年的原罪; 諸如台灣民族屠滅案,228大屠殺案, 殖民搾取民膏的
恐怖主義在自稱中華民國流亡政權及失效憲法下的奴隸制度:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Risenhoover Dr. Paul Maas <[email protected]> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <[email protected]> Date: 2015-07-01 19:34 GMT+08:00 Subject: 總統府網站民意信箱-信件確認通知 To: [email protected]
Header 親愛的網友：您好！ 您的電子郵件我們已經收到，但仍需請您再次確認來信，以利儘速依序處理。您的來信內容如下：
請點選此連結完成信件確認的動作。［信件確認］
E-mail：[email protected] 姓 名：Dr. Paul Maas Risenhoover 聯絡地址：Tainan, island of Formosa 聯絡電話：0983-103160 信件編號：226ea7f47f6 發信對象：陳情或意見反映 標 題：基於美國LOGAN法案18 U.S. Code § 953 正式抗議有關條法字第1040800794 內 容： 基於美國LOGAN法案18 U.S. Code § 953 正式抗議有關條法字第10408007940號
有關貴司﹐您所稱﹕ “台端來信敬悉。中華民國為一主權獨立國家，臺灣及澎湖在第二次大戰後依據同盟國協議回歸中華民國，我國已在臺澎行使統治達70年之久，此一事實無庸置疑；台端係在臺外人，請遵守我國法律並尊重我政府立場，感謝您對外交事務之關心。 外交部條約法律司”
邏輯上﹐中華民國﹐就算自己1949流亡美麗島後﹐乃被我國國務院承認為整個中華大陸地區唯一合法統治當局﹐並未被承認為美麗島單獨佔領軍當局。 英國外交部長於國會答覆議員清楚告知(http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1955/may/04/far-east-formosa-and-the-pescadores)﹐美麗島尚屬不是中華民國固有領土。乃台北和約並未導致日本府歸還美麗島於中華民國。
因此貴司就算主張“中華民國為一主權獨立國家”﹐與後面所稱“臺灣及澎湖在第二次大戰後依據同盟國協議回歸中華民國”並無任何必然關係。美國等盟國可以要求日本帝國割讓美麗島給任何對象﹐乃可以依據我國國會允許島民自決。都屬尚未實施之戰勝職權之一。中華民國李前總統流亡紐約前曾要求助理邁向美國駐華大使館訴求美國基於戰勝權防衛美麗島不被中華統治當局(中共府)併吞.
然“臺灣及澎湖在第二次大戰後依據同盟國協議回歸中華民國”﹐所稱“協議”﹐若視為開羅宣言﹐顯然並非國際法所稱“協議”。宣言﹐基於中華民國李前總統助理所稱係無法律約束力之頂多視為道德義務。參照﹕ http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx?type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1949v09&entity=FRUS.FRUS1949v09.p0410&q1=formosa&q2=chu&q3=conquest
United States Department of State / Foreign relations of the United States, 1949. The Far East: China (1949)
Policy of the United States toward Formosa (Taiwan): concern of the United States regarding possible conquest by Chinese communists, pp. 261-471 PDF (74.8 MB)
Page 400
FOREIGN RELATIONS, 19 4 9, VOLUME IX 894A.00/10-2349: Telegram The Charge in China (Strong) to the Secretary of State CHUNGKING, October 23, 1949-noon. [Received October 24-4: 19 a. m.] Cantel 1221. As third major point in conversation on October 22 (Cantels 1219 and 1220, October 23 15) )Chu Chang-wei "I said President Li was anxious be informed of U.S. policy on Taiwan and declared Li authorized him say that Li was willing see Taiwan in hands of a friendly country rather than taken by Chinese Communists as they con- trolled by USSR. Chu stated Li would prefer a joint Sino-American Commission govern Taiwan but. if US not favor this proposal US could properly take over Taiwan "by right of conquest." To avoid charges that such action violated moral obligation undertaken by US at Cairo to return Taiwan to China, he explained US could promise cede Taiwan back to China some future time. Moral obligation of US respect to recovery of Taiwan by China had now become, he averred, responsiblity to keep island from Communist control. He declared that reference Taiwan problem to UN would be inadvisable because of Soviet opposition and urgency of problem. Disclosing that General Chen Cheng recently telegraphed General Pai Chung-hsi 17 his concern about Taiwan defense and referring pres- ent Communist military activity at Chinmentao 18 he asked for infor- mation soonest on US position regarding Taiwan. STRONG
此外﹐貴司聲稱﹕“我國已在臺澎行使統治達70年之久，此一事實無庸置疑”。所稱“統治”不知貴司是否原意參照美公開解密外交資料(美麗島上面有CHINESE MILITARY ADMINISTRATION﹐ http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx?type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1949v09&entity=FRUS.FRUS1949v09.p0372&q1=formosa&q2=chinese%20military&q3=administration (1) The final disposition of Formosa and the Pescadores, parts of the former Japanese Empire, awaits a decision at a peace settlement with Japan (2) Formosa and the Pescadores are at present under Chinese military administration because the United States Government enabled, the Chinese authorities at the time of the Japanese sur- render to assume control over the islands, the decision to do this having flowed from the attitude expressed by the President in the Cairo Declaration (4) It was certainly not the intention of the American people, whose forces liberated Formosa and the Pescadores at so great a cost in blood and treasure, that the Cairo Declaration and this Government`s action in facilitating Chinese control of the islands should have resulted in the creation of a menace to the stability and security of Southeast Asia and in the suffering which has been endured by the people of Formosa during the past four years )﹐乃英國國會質詢資料(http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1955/may/04/far-east-formosa-and-the-pescadores The document in question was the Cairo Declaration. That was couched in the form of a statement of intention, and as it was merely a statement of intention, it is merely binding in so far as it states the intent at that time, and therefore it cannot by itself transfer sovereignty. Undoubtedly that document does impose certain moral obligations on those who take part in it, but it is not really germane to the present legal argument on what is or is not today the present sovereignty over Formosa.)聲稱蔣委員長於美麗島係暫時臨時佔領軍司令為之﹐佔領軍屬同盟﹐非中華民國單獨所屬﹐責任在美國總統身為同盟統帥最高民間指揮司令權者。
此外﹐貴司聲稱 “台端係在臺外人，請遵守我國法律並尊重我政府立場”。。。本人不得不抗議您所稱“外人”。本人屬本土美麗島家庭家長﹐顯然並非“外人”。本島乃並無自己國籍可言﹐盟軍尚未允許獨立建國之前﹐美國尚未棄權或使得日本轉移或割讓主權前﹐美國人在台灣島上面非“外人”也。
美國國務卿聲稱美國於台灣島美麗島具有正當合法利益權益尚未甦醒實施﹐日本只是 棄權﹐但未歸還/回復/轉移中華民國政府。因此自國際(法)角度來講﹐我們更能正 當防衛美麗島﹐比起它是中華民國領土部份更為正當。 Dr. Paul Risenhoover
發信日期：104-7-1 驗證日期：
註：如欲再次來函，請勿直接在發信軟體上點選回覆之功能，仍請至總統府全球資訊網民意信箱填寫寄發。
新聞看板
Footer