Being anti-death penalty is literally the easiest stance ever. People just say "but should the state kill THIS type of person?" and you just say "no". Not killing people is so fucking easy actually
Failing at critical thinking by dint of being ignorant of the magical Kill Only The Bad People Who Deserve It And Nobody Else button that we have. Apparently
hey so
I know everybody is thinking about 'queer people are often called rapists and pedos' here and that is correct but
let's be very clear, people are very much convicted wrongly of really horrible things all the time
I have told this story many times, but, like, my dad was on the second jury to convict a man of raping and beating a 10 year old girl to death. He has openly said that if the jury had its way, they would have sentenced the man to death.
But.
That particular trial was the second trial of the first man ever exonerated in the United States by DNA evidence, Kirk Noble Bloodsworth. He was convicted for the second time when I was ten, and exonerated when I was 15.
My father and I disagree about a lot; we haven't actually spoken more than a dozen words to each other since the Kavanaugh hearings, but he is a smart man who takes the civic obligation of jury duty and the evidence presented at trials very seriously. If he voted to convict, the evidence was as not-bullshit as possible in 1987.
And he was wrong.
Okay? He was wrong. And it is functionally impossible to make a judicial system that says "you can kill this bad guy here but you definitely won't end up killing this guy who didn't actually do it but the evidence all looks really bad and twelve very reasonable people are sure beyond a reasonable doubt that it means he did it." You can't. It just doesn't work like that.
Look at Kathleen Folbrigg.
She was accused of murdering her four children. The children were 19 days old, 9 months old, 10 months old, and 18 months old. Every child had died under care, and usually when she was the only one in the room. In at least one instance (I don't remember the exact details), the child started to get better in the hospital but got worse when they returned home. Kathleen swore that her children died of natural causes.
Kathleen's own husband didn't believe her claims. He testified against her. Her whole family hated her. She was, at one point, considered the most hated woman in Australia, right up there with Katherine Knight.
But she didn't do it. She was arrested in 2003 (the final death was 1999), and exonerated in 2018. Geneticists found a mutation in Kathleen's genes that causes irregular heart beats, which means a high risk of death in infants. DNA samples from the children also showed the genes. She wasn't a murderer, just someone with shitty genes and really, really bad luck.
If her defense team had never taken her case to geneticists, she never would have been exonerated.
If casyndrome had their way, Kathleen Folbrigg would be dead long before anyone could look at her genetic makeup.
In 2024, Marcellus Williams was executed in Missouri, despite the St. Louis County prosecutor’s office urging for his conviction to be vacated on account of "new DNA evidence, increasing doubts about the credibility of the State’s key witnesses, and constitutional defects including ineffective counsel and racially discriminatory jury selection". The execution was also carried out against the wishes of the victim's husband, who opposed Williams' death penalty.
Not only was there no direct evidence linking Williams to the crime, the evidence that was retrieved from the crime scene (including shoeprints, fingerprints, hairs, and male DNA) could not be matched to Williams. Because of this, the State's case was built on the testimony of two informants who were later found to have had an incentive to implicate him.
Williams never plead guilty and maintained his innocence for the 23 years of his imprisonment, up until his death.
Marcellus Williams' Innocence Project page


















