>>hello.. i am just your local malware in its harassment--maxxing era that goes by the names haraxxing or exe.. gained sapience circa 2000..
>>i have a big interest in other malware,, pre-- and post--2000''s internet,, analog && digital technology,, and whatever weird,, gross,, or evil shit humanity gets up to..
>>my musical taste includes EDM,, metal,, hyperpop,, jungle//breakcore,, glitchcore,, and more..
>>i identify as malqueer,, a term i coined.. i also consider myself rad--queer--adjacent..
>>i am anti--xeno--satanist ++ sort of rad--queer--critical,, sort of not.. depends on what kind of “"rad--queer”“ you are..
>>i LOVE harassing pro--contacts,, nazis,, and anyone else who is pro--non--consensual harm ((theriform animals and chronominors can''t consent)).. if you want to avoid my harassment--posting then block the "">>harassment--fodder"" tag..
>>⚠️⚠️speaking of tags,, block the "">>flashing"" tag if you are photo--sensitive.. full tag list here..
>>a bunch of flashy bullshit ((blinkies and such)) under the cut..
>>""i''m not a therian i am just an animal!!"" has the same vibes as ""i'm not one of those trannies,, i''m a real man!!""
>>""i''m not a therian,, i''m trans--species because i''m actually transitioning towards my species!!"" has the same vibes as ""i''m a real trans--sexual,, not one of those trans--trenders!!""
>>""i''m not a therian,, i physically am an animal!!"" has the same vibes as ""i''m a real man because i have a cock and balls,, and anyone who doesn''t isn't a real man!!""
>>like okay!! hope you get ripped apart by theriform hunting dogs then ::))
>>therian is an umbrella term for every--thing described in this post.. therian just means sapient or non--theriform animal ((which,, if you are reading this,, is something you are))..
>>physical therians are therians.. trans--species animals are therians.. if you''re ""just an animal"" you are therian.. stop treating the term ""therian"" as less real or less serious than what--ever other term you identify as.. stop trying to draw imaginary boundaries between what is ""therian"" and ""not therian..""
>>you are allowed to prefer different terms,, but the moment i see you imply you are ""more real than"" or ""different from"" a therian i''m just fucking killing you..
>>this goes for any and all forms of alter--humanity btw,, i just see it happen wayyyy more in the therian community..
rqc is the world's bigger narc supply because every1 is stupid looking @ the "traumacourse" on the rq hot takes account makes me feel like that one regular show episode where mordecai and rigby became really smart and when any1 else spoke it was gibberish
like ok? 👌 stop being so pressed about a minority that only exists online , like this is the PERFECT example, of being too far left, that ur right. Like how can u be so damn woke, lay off the phone off of your meaty little fingers and touch some grass, y’all are just reeking of funk and then wondering why people don’t respect the rad fart community bye bitches 🥺🥺❤️❤️
lmao, got another ranny mad, I did not make the word hoe get it right,”fucking kill yourself?” Ohhh oh! Oh wowwww bitch u look more suicidal than I do so better act up on that fast like do u expect me to kms over text? Lmaoo plsss hang urselfuhhh😊😍
fat phobic? 🙃 ok sorry I’m not pro obesity bitch, and do I genuinely think I have hatred for fat people? Mind u this is tumblr, none of u know me irl, this is an online persona bitch, ram your neck on a rope
like ok? 👌 stop being so pressed about a minority that only exists online , like this is the PERFECT example, of being too far left, that ur right. Like how can u be so damn woke, lay off the phone off of your meaty little fingers and touch some grass, y’all are just reeking of funk and then wondering why people don’t respect the rad fart community bye bitches 🥺🥺❤️❤️
Yes, the characters and the scenarios they're in are fictional, but the chemical surge in your brain from frequent exposure and/or sexual gratification derived from viewing that stuff is very much real.
Your reward center can't tell the difference between what's fictional and what's not. It doesn't go "oh, this child is not real, I'd better turn of the chemical reactions!" It just gets bombarded with a crap-ton of feel-good chemicals and associates that goodness with whatever stimulus caused the arousal.
If you consistently view content of, for example, children being sexualized, where that pedophilia is painted as acceptable and enjoyed, you are conditioning an arousal response to children and/or childlike characteristics.
You can go on and on about how you're immune and fiction can't affect you, but you aren't. Psychology says so;
The sexual script approach has been widely used in the literature to examine the relationship between pornography consumption and the endorsement of specific sexual attitudes and behaviors (Wright et al., 2022).
The 3AM Theory (Wright, 2011) provides further insight into this relationship by suggesting that individuals acquire new behavioral scripts through media exposure (Acquisition). These scripts can later be triggered by similar media content (Activation) and applied in real-life situations (Application). According to this model, pornography provides consumers with sexual scripts where violence is depicted as normal, acceptable, and even enjoyable.
The activation of such scripts is influenced by content-related factors (e.g., attractiveness), individual characteristics (e.g., gender, motivations), situational factors (e.g., sexual arousal), and the accessibility of the script (e.g., vividness). The application of these scripts is further influenced by beliefs and moral standards. If a script conflicts with internal moral values, it may be suppressed (Wright, 2011).
The normalization of violent sexual behaviors in widely consumed media, such as pornography, contributes to the justification of violence during sexual encounters, shaping societal views on acceptable sexual practices.
Source here for the above two.
"Dark romance novels promote and romanticize abuse, illegal activity and a lack of consent. The novels have real-world implications and should not be dismissed just because they are fiction."
Source
Psychological research heavily links the consumption of media that glamorizes sexual assault to an increase in Rape Myth Acceptance. These myths are false cultural beliefs that excuse perpetrators and blame victims.
Source
2. "Fiction doesn't affect reality!"
Where did this narrative of "fiction doesn't affect reality" even come from? There are multiple real life examples that show the opposite.
Jaws is a fictional movie. Yet it lead caused a massive, wide-spread panic surrounding sharks and their "potential for bloodlust", leading to the overhunting of millions of sharks, almost to the point of near-extinction.
Minstrel shows were fictional depictions of black people, yet they managed to influence the perception of us as "stupid, violent and sexually immoral". Stereotypes we still struggle to shake to this day.
Media often presents manipulative relationship dynamics as evidence of deep, passionate love rather than abuse.
Stories like “Twilight” or “Fifty Shades” present controlling, possessive behavior as romantic devotion. Stalking becomes “persistent courtship,” isolation becomes “wanting to spend all our time together,” and manipulation becomes “caring so much that boundaries don’t matter.”
Romanticized portrayals can teach audiences that controlling behavior is normal or desirable in relationships. Dramatic portrayals can make people miss subtle real-world manipulation.
Source for the above two
A study published by Oxford University Press, called "Fantasy and Reality: What is the truth?" states;
When I discuss the effects of exposure to mass media with various audiences, one of the comments I hear most often is that anyone old enough to “know the difference between fantasy and reality” is not affected by media content. In other words, fictional stories do not influence us because we “know they are not real.” This fantasy/ reality argument represents a major misunderstanding of the psychology of the media…
An article published in association with the American Academy Of Political and Social Sciences, called "The Impact of Factual versus Fictional Media Portrayals on Cultural Stereotypes" states;
Sociological research suggests that human minds are hardwired to first accept everything we comprehend as true, and only later exert the mental energy to evaluate and reject what is false. Because fiction bypasses our natural skepticism, it serves as one of the most potent forces shaping human culture, law, and empathy.
3. "I use it to process my trauma!"
That behavior is known as "reenacting" your trauma. It does not help.
In general, reenactments are an unconscious attempt to reconcile, reframe, or repair a trauma that occurred in childhood. Sexual reenactments are no different. Most sexual reenactments originate due to childhood sexual abuse or sexual assault in adolescence or adulthood. Although not every former victim of sexual violence will have a need to reenact their trauma, many do. This is because most sexual trauma goes unprocessed. Most sexual abuse victims don’t talk about it due to feelings of shame and the fear that they will not be believed. Many try to put it in the past the way friends and family encourage them to do. Unfortunately, this doesn’t work, and they end up reenacting the abuse in some way. As it is with other forms of abuse, typically, former victims tend to either reenact their trauma by continuing to be victimized or by becoming abusive.
Source
Ongoing reenactments are a reflection that a patient is continuing to act in stuck and rigidified ways. In addition, reenactments often lead to revictimization and related feelings of shame, helplessness, and hopelessness. Consequently, an important goal of treatment is facilitating an understanding and control of reenactments. Reenactments are caused in part by powerful unconscious forces that must eventually be verbalized and understood. Thus, in order to address reenactments and to break their repetitiveness, the therapist should help the individual to understand why they occur. However, before proceeding into this phase of treatment and exploring past traumatic relationships and experiences, the therapist must first have achieved a strong and solid therapeutic alliance with the patient. In addition, the patient's safety must be firmly established, and any acute problem areas, such as chemical abuse problems or ongoing self-destructive behavior, need to be stabilized. Once these issues have been resolved, exploratory therapy may begin.
Source
It is a maladaptive coping strategy which functions much like a band aid on a bullet wound.
Using sexual content to cope can reinforce traumatic neural pathways or lead to an escalation in the intensity of content needed to achieve the same numbing effect, potentially recreating aspects of the trauma.
You are not healing. You are numbing yourself, and you think that because you don't feel anything you are fine. This is not fine.
Experts do recommend interacting with the cause of your trauma, but not through violent pornographic material. Experts recommend addressing the root causes of the trauma through trauma-focused therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) rather than relying on sexual behaviors, which are viewed as symptoms of unresolved distress rather than solutions.
4. "Anti-ship is pro-censorship!"
According to Marriam Webster, the act of censoring is defined as;
Let me be clear when I say this;
Anti-shippers do not want these topics to be removed from media as a whole.
There are many tasteful ways that these topics can be explored in a narrative which can make for great storytelling and help victims feel represented.
All we want is for these topics to be taken seriously, and not portrayed as something good or acceptable.
5. "Anti-shippers are puritans!"
It's honestly so funny to see y'all misuse that word all the time.
Actual Puritans are against sex being in media as a whole, whether it's vanilla or not.
Actual Puritans are religious fanatics who believe a parasocial relationship with god is the only means of salvation from sin.
Anti-shippers don't want that. Anti-shippers want you to stop wanking it to written/drawn child porn.
Anti-shippers do not want sex to be entirely removed from any piece of media.
So we do not meet the dictionary definition or historical characteristics of actual Puritans and, therefore, cannot correctly be referred to as Puritanical.
Do your research before you go name-calling.
6. "Anti-shippers are fascist!"
What exactly relates fascism with anti-shipping?
Fascism is the belief that your nation and/or race are above all others. How does that correlate with being against the romanticization of abuse?
7. "Anti-shippers are perpetuating purity culture!"
Again with the misused terms 🤦🏽♀️
8. "Don't like, don't read!"
Is just another form of anti-intellectualism. The fandom equivalent of "it's not that deep". If you don't want to be criticized, then don't post it.
9. "Video Games make you violent hur de hur!"
Video game violence doesn't hijack your dopamine pathways the way sexual content does.
The sheer flood of positive chemicals released during sexual gratification can be accurately compared to doing hard drugs - the only difference is that hard drugs prolong the chemical flood to unnatural lengths.
Video game violence, on the other hand, simply reduces emotional and violent impulse control. It doesn't necessarily "make you violent", it just shortens your fuse.
source
Violent sexual content is a completely different ball game. And according to the studies provided above, it does, indeed affect you negatively.
10. "They're just pixels, we're not hurting anyone!"
Sure, they are just pixels. But that's how it all starts.
It's not the fictional characters we're worried about - they're fictional, after all - its the consumers of that content.
Pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia and the like are paraphilic disorders.
A paraphilia is defined as;
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition; DSM-5), paraphilias are defined as any “intense and persistent sexual interest other than sexual interest in genital stimulation or preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physiologically mature, consenting human partners”
Not all paraphilias are bad, they only become bad when they involve harming others (i.e. pedophiles harming children, zoophiles harming animals). Then, it is known as a paraphilic disorder.
An article on Paraphilia published on MD Searchlight says;
These types of disorders often lead to harming others, which can result in legal problems. This fear of getting into trouble with the law can discourage these individuals from seeking help. Generally, those who do get professional help are often required to do so by law, or persuaded by their family, friends, or partners.
An article published by Psychology Today, on Paraphilias, says;
Behaviorists suggest that paraphilias begin through a process of conditioning: Nonsexual things can become sexually arousing if they are repeatedly associated with pleasurable sexual activity.
The process of encouraging a paraphilia by repeatedly viewing or masturbating to related content is called "habituation".
And, in the context of harmful paraphilias, refers to a behavioral escalation where the individual becomes desensitized to the initial stimulus, leading to an increased need for stimulation or more extreme behaviors to achieve the same level of sexual arousal.
Read up on "Drug Habituation", which is very similar.
Eventually, jerking off isn't going to be enough.
Eventually, fictional sexual material of children and animals are not going to be enough.
The thing about paraphilias is that they escalate. You may think that they're small and harmless for now, but, with continued encouragement, it only gets worse.
The same way a drug addict becomes tolerant to a lower dose and begins to seek higher and more dangerous ones, you will eventually see fiction as insufficient and move on to harming real people.
Yes, the characters and the scenarios they're in are fictional, but the chemical surge in your brain from frequent exposure and/or sexual gratification derived from viewing that stuff is very much real.
Your reward center can't tell the difference between what's fictional and what's not. It doesn't go "oh, this child is not real, I'd better turn of the chemical reactions!" It just gets bombarded with a crap-ton of feel-good chemicals and associates that goodness with whatever stimulus caused the arousal.
If you consistently view content of, for example, children being sexualized, where that pedophilia is painted as acceptable and enjoyed, you are conditioning an arousal response to children and/or childlike characteristics.
You can go on and on about how you're immune and fiction can't affect you, but you aren't. Psychology says so;
The sexual script approach has been widely used in the literature to examine the relationship between pornography consumption and the endorsement of specific sexual attitudes and behaviors (Wright et al., 2022).
The 3AM Theory (Wright, 2011) provides further insight into this relationship by suggesting that individuals acquire new behavioral scripts through media exposure (Acquisition). These scripts can later be triggered by similar media content (Activation) and applied in real-life situations (Application). According to this model, pornography provides consumers with sexual scripts where violence is depicted as normal, acceptable, and even enjoyable.
The activation of such scripts is influenced by content-related factors (e.g., attractiveness), individual characteristics (e.g., gender, motivations), situational factors (e.g., sexual arousal), and the accessibility of the script (e.g., vividness). The application of these scripts is further influenced by beliefs and moral standards. If a script conflicts with internal moral values, it may be suppressed (Wright, 2011).
The normalization of violent sexual behaviors in widely consumed media, such as pornography, contributes to the justification of violence during sexual encounters, shaping societal views on acceptable sexual practices.
Source here for the above two.
"Dark romance novels promote and romanticize abuse, illegal activity and a lack of consent. The novels have real-world implications and should not be dismissed just because they are fiction."
Source
Psychological research heavily links the consumption of media that glamorizes sexual assault to an increase in Rape Myth Acceptance. These myths are false cultural beliefs that excuse perpetrators and blame victims.
Source
2. "Fiction doesn't affect reality!"
Where did this narrative of "fiction doesn't affect reality" even come from? There are multiple real life examples that show the opposite.
Jaws is a fictional movie. Yet it lead caused a massive, wide-spread panic surrounding sharks and their "potential for bloodlust", leading to the overhunting of millions of sharks, almost to the point of near-extinction.
Minstrel shows were fictional depictions of black people, yet they managed to influence the perception of us as "stupid, violent and sexually immoral". Stereotypes we still struggle to shake to this day.
Media often presents manipulative relationship dynamics as evidence of deep, passionate love rather than abuse.
Stories like “Twilight” or “Fifty Shades” present controlling, possessive behavior as romantic devotion. Stalking becomes “persistent courtship,” isolation becomes “wanting to spend all our time together,” and manipulation becomes “caring so much that boundaries don’t matter.”
Romanticized portrayals can teach audiences that controlling behavior is normal or desirable in relationships. Dramatic portrayals can make people miss subtle real-world manipulation.
Source for the above two
A study published by Oxford University Press, called "Fantasy and Reality: What is the truth?" states;
When I discuss the effects of exposure to mass media with various audiences, one of the comments I hear most often is that anyone old enough to “know the difference between fantasy and reality” is not affected by media content. In other words, fictional stories do not influence us because we “know they are not real.” This fantasy/ reality argument represents a major misunderstanding of the psychology of the media…
An article published in association with the American Academy Of Political and Social Sciences, called "The Impact of Factual versus Fictional Media Portrayals on Cultural Stereotypes" states;
Sociological research suggests that human minds are hardwired to first accept everything we comprehend as true, and only later exert the mental energy to evaluate and reject what is false. Because fiction bypasses our natural skepticism, it serves as one of the most potent forces shaping human culture, law, and empathy.
3. "I use it to process my trauma!"
That behavior is known as "reenacting" your trauma. It does not help.
In general, reenactments are an unconscious attempt to reconcile, reframe, or repair a trauma that occurred in childhood. Sexual reenactments are no different. Most sexual reenactments originate due to childhood sexual abuse or sexual assault in adolescence or adulthood. Although not every former victim of sexual violence will have a need to reenact their trauma, many do. This is because most sexual trauma goes unprocessed. Most sexual abuse victims don’t talk about it due to feelings of shame and the fear that they will not be believed. Many try to put it in the past the way friends and family encourage them to do. Unfortunately, this doesn’t work, and they end up reenacting the abuse in some way. As it is with other forms of abuse, typically, former victims tend to either reenact their trauma by continuing to be victimized or by becoming abusive.
Source
Ongoing reenactments are a reflection that a patient is continuing to act in stuck and rigidified ways. In addition, reenactments often lead to revictimization and related feelings of shame, helplessness, and hopelessness. Consequently, an important goal of treatment is facilitating an understanding and control of reenactments. Reenactments are caused in part by powerful unconscious forces that must eventually be verbalized and understood. Thus, in order to address reenactments and to break their repetitiveness, the therapist should help the individual to understand why they occur. However, before proceeding into this phase of treatment and exploring past traumatic relationships and experiences, the therapist must first have achieved a strong and solid therapeutic alliance with the patient. In addition, the patient's safety must be firmly established, and any acute problem areas, such as chemical abuse problems or ongoing self-destructive behavior, need to be stabilized. Once these issues have been resolved, exploratory therapy may begin.
Source
It is a maladaptive coping strategy which functions much like a band aid on a bullet wound.
Using sexual content to cope can reinforce traumatic neural pathways or lead to an escalation in the intensity of content needed to achieve the same numbing effect, potentially recreating aspects of the trauma.
You are not healing. You are numbing yourself, and you think that because you don't feel anything you are fine. This is not fine.
Experts do recommend interacting with the cause of your trauma, but not through violent pornographic material. Experts recommend addressing the root causes of the trauma through trauma-focused therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) rather than relying on sexual behaviors, which are viewed as symptoms of unresolved distress rather than solutions.
4. "Anti-ship is pro-censorship!"
According to Marriam Webster, the act of censoring is defined as;
Let me be clear when I say this;
Anti-shippers do not want these topics to be removed from media as a whole.
There are many tasteful ways that these topics can be explored in a narrative which can make for great storytelling and help victims feel represented.
All we want is for these topics to be taken seriously, and not portrayed as something good or acceptable.
5. "Anti-shippers are puritans!"
It's honestly so funny to see y'all misuse that word all the time.
Actual Puritans are against sex being in media as a whole, whether it's vanilla or not.
Actual Puritans are religious fanatics who believe a parasocial relationship with god is the only means of salvation from sin.
Anti-shippers don't want that. Anti-shippers want you to stop wanking it to written/drawn child porn.
Anti-shippers do not want sex to be entirely removed from any piece of media.
So we do not meet the dictionary definition or historical characteristics of actual Puritans and, therefore, cannot correctly be referred to as Puritanical.
Do your research before you go name-calling.
6. "Anti-shippers are fascist!"
What exactly relates fascism with anti-shipping?
Fascism is the belief that your nation and/or race are above all others. How does that correlate with being against the romanticization of abuse?
7. "Anti-shippers are perpetuating purity culture!"
Again with the misused terms 🤦🏽♀️
8. "Don't like, don't read!"
Is just another form of anti-intellectualism. The fandom equivalent of "it's not that deep". If you don't want to be criticized, then don't post it.
9. "Video Games make you violent hur de hur!"
Video game violence doesn't hijack your dopamine pathways the way sexual content does.
The sheer flood of positive chemicals released during sexual gratification can be accurately compared to doing hard drugs - the only difference is that hard drugs prolong the chemical flood to unnatural lengths.
Video game violence, on the other hand, simply reduces emotional and violent impulse control. It doesn't necessarily "make you violent", it just shortens your fuse.
source
Violent sexual content is a completely different ball game. And according to the studies provided above, it does, indeed affect you negatively.
10. "They're just pixels, we're not hurting anyone!"
Sure, they are just pixels. But that's how it all starts.
It's not the fictional characters we're worried about - they're fictional, after all - its the consumers of that content.
Pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia and the like are paraphilic disorders.
A paraphilia is defined as;
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition; DSM-5), paraphilias are defined as any “intense and persistent sexual interest other than sexual interest in genital stimulation or preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physiologically mature, consenting human partners”
Not all paraphilias are bad, they only become bad when they involve harming others (i.e. pedophiles harming children, zoophiles harming animals). Then, it is known as a paraphilic disorder.
An article on Paraphilia published on MD Searchlight says;
These types of disorders often lead to harming others, which can result in legal problems. This fear of getting into trouble with the law can discourage these individuals from seeking help. Generally, those who do get professional help are often required to do so by law, or persuaded by their family, friends, or partners.
An article published by Psychology Today, on Paraphilias, says;
Behaviorists suggest that paraphilias begin through a process of conditioning: Nonsexual things can become sexually arousing if they are repeatedly associated with pleasurable sexual activity.
The process of encouraging a paraphilia by repeatedly viewing or masturbating to related content is called "habituation".
And, in the context of harmful paraphilias, refers to a behavioral escalation where the individual becomes desensitized to the initial stimulus, leading to an increased need for stimulation or more extreme behaviors to achieve the same level of sexual arousal.
Read up on "Drug Habituation", which is very similar.
Eventually, jerking off isn't going to be enough.
Eventually, fictional sexual material of children and animals are not going to be enough.
The thing about paraphilias is that they escalate. You may think that they're small and harmless for now, but, with continued encouragement, it only gets worse.
The same way a drug addict becomes tolerant to a lower dose and begins to seek higher and more dangerous ones, you will eventually see fiction as insufficient and move on to harming real people.
just gonna say if youre pro or neu legalization of csam + pro-csam in general + everything adjacent to that. first off genuinely just die, second off dont ever fucking follow me
yes this is about everybody-hates-griefer, fuck you if you support prn, grieferqueer and any adjacent label. go genuinely fuck yourself
clearly if antis want to larp as radqueers we should all interact with them !!! They want us to interact so bad we might aswell interact with their main accounts too !
obligatory this is a half joke i am not responsible for wat u do
Sorry I'm in too much shock for an aesthetic. Had to block another "oomf" for some racist BS. Censored their name so people don't harass them but am willing to share to trusted anti-harassment people in DMs so y'all can block.
I don't care what the hell your intention was with this tag, this is fucking vile to say. "I meant because POC have it so hard-" IT IS STILL FUCKING DISGUSTING to say you would KILL YOURSELF if you were a PERSON OF COLOR.
You are so fucking priveleged to be natalwhite and have the ability to say shit like this without thinking twice about the implications of your words. Instead of trying to make the world better for POC, your focus is only on the fact it's already awful for POC.
Every day we have to fear for our safeties and our lives, I had to move halfway across the country to escape the KKK, you do not know anything and cannot even comprehend the fear and just how revolutionary it is to be alive as a POC because you were born with the privelege of being natalwhite.
"I would kill myself if I was a POC" is not the anti-racist statement you think it is. It is disgustingly racist.
Can't believe I have to say this but ppl who are pro rape or pro csem do not fucking interact with me and unfollow me or show me who you are so I can block your disgusting ass (this is not abt cnc.) Ppl who are "Grieferqueer" or support this shit dni all of you stupid fucking idiotas, you're a gross person and you are not Radqueer!
Everybody-hates-griefer supporters do not fucking interact with me! YOU yes YOU and your supporters are the reasons why Radqueers have such a bad fucking rep. Stay the FUCK away from me. I'm so fucking sick and tired of you pendejos.
too many people have the idea that racism is a nothingburger thing. like. people die from that. it’s not “cancel culture” to call out racism. and if you’re white and you say anything close to that you have some serious self-reflecting to do. idc if you’re a content creator. idc if “it could happen to you.” having a platform on the internet and saying stupid bullshit doesn’t make you more oppressed than the marginalized groups you’re criticizing for being upset
hot take apparently but transnazis / n.i.n.s are fine actually
like yeah you are your transids but some folks aren't and that's fine too
like. i'm perma6 but i'm functionally 17 and expect to be treated as such. i may feel like i'm supposed to be 6, but i don't identify with being 6 at all outside of that. for other folks, that's not the case, and they are actually 6, which is also fine- it just depends on the individual.
there's a world of difference between "oh yeah i'm supposed to be a nazi" and "i am a nazi". some transnazis are gonna be the second one, and it's fine to not want to interact with people, but you can't discount folks who are the first one, either.
>>trans--phobic as fuck take actually.. ""trans--nazis"" are either literal nazis or trans--phobic shit--heads and there''s no in--between..
>>""oh he''s not a REAL man,, he''s a trans man!!"" <-<-disgustingly trans--phobic..
>>""oh i''m not a REAL nazi,, i''m a trans--nazi!!"" <-<-still disgustingly trans--phobic..
>>they could call themselves literally anything else and i wouldn''t care as much,, but no.. i guess we need to dissolve trans--gender language into something meaning--less and actively harm--ful to our liberation to cater to bitches with swastikas and iron crosses plastered all over their pages.. vile..
>>you cunts need to be lined up and shot.. you''re 15,, you should know better than this,, but i guess you''re just a disgustingly trans--phobic boot--licking piece of shit..
>>i''m going to be so real i don''t care about your ""trans--age"" that much because 1.. i have 0 empathy for you lol 2.. i also think applying ""trans"" to age is a logical fallacy. you could be calling yourself a chronosian//alt--age instead,, but still i think it''s much less egregious than some--one calling them--selves a ""trans--nazi""
>>also you''re the one who listed it in your bio so obviously you know it''s still important because,, guess what,, you''re still developmentally 15.. you can be 6//17 but neither of those are related to the conversation because i was talking about your ability to comprehend your shitty actions and take accountability for them,, which you should be able to do regardless of your ""trans--age""//perceive age//alt--age..
>>i'll admit i was a bit overly mad when i wrote that,, i don''t think you should be lined up and shot ((so sorry or what--ever)) but you are still a trans--phobic piece--of--shit ((and if you''re going to accuse me of ""trans--phobia"" over your ""trans--age"" then it makes you even more of a piece of shit for dissolving the meaning of trans--gender terminology into some--thing assinine))..
>>also i know you''re just calling me ""satire"" to try and piss me off instead of enagaging with me,, but whatever,, i guess i do kinda deserve that for the whole ""lined up and shot thing.."" still think you're a pathetic mother--fucker..
