
Janaina Medeiros
Sade Olutola
we're not kids anymore.
No title available
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast
tumblr dot com
AnasAbdin

Andulka
d e v o n
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Product Placement
YOU ARE THE REASON

No title available
occasionally subtle
Peter Solarz

PR's Tumblrdome
trying on a metaphor
Three Goblin Art
KIROKAZE

seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Ireland
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Austria

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Ireland

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from France
@headed-for-valhalalla
i don’t think i understand discourse anymore
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/11/style/hoop-earrings-identity.html
same reason why it's cultural appropriation to wear black hairstyles if you're white - you are not viewed as unprofessional/villified for doing the same shit black women do
it might seem "silly" but that's really downplaying the feelings of WOC who have to go through this and that's not fair or right
that’s true, but i’m mostly confused about how getting the same earrings but in silver would be any better
Listening to this absolute garbage is discouraging. College students think this kind of shit is accepted in the world? You’re going to have a really really hard time when you leave academia.
DRAG HIM
What Bernie Sanders Really Got Done in His 29 Years in Congress
Mitt Romney made his money in the private sector, Bernie became a millionaire even though he’s supposed to be a public servant.
He’s supposed to make $700 per week during session. It would take 27 years working every week and not spending a dime to earn a million. He’s obviously using his office for personal gain.
Oh oh oh! My favorite! I love language games! Let’s look at the slant here.
“made his money”
“became a millionaire”
Nice.
Bernie made his money from real estate, investments, government pensions, and earnings from three books. When Mitt Romney was born, George Romney was a millionaire.
Not sure where you’re getting 700 per week. Sanders’s current salary is 174k. [EDIT: At first I thought maybe you were talking about per diem, or inflation adjustment from the days when that was a thing. But now I see you’re quoting the wage for Vermont State Senators, and you didn’t even do that right. It would be $693.74 per week, plus per diem during session.]
Are there any other knowing distortions you’d like me to expose you for, tonight? Or are you settled for a couple days?
Really not a slant since I wasn’t deliberately using my wording in that way but thanks for implying dishonesty, very charitable of you asshole.
But he’s still using his platform for personal gain because the books for example are mostly popular due to him being in office. And considering that he has been outspoken about how the wealthy are hurting this country it’s kind of weird that he owns several houses and has makes well above the median income of his state and will fly private jets to campaign events.
And even if you want to chalk up the wealth of the Romney family to being strictly inherited them it’s still privately gained and not made off of a position in government.
It’s pretty sleazy for politicians to make money on books. You have to pay money to see what they have to say? They are supposed to represent us and we have to pay to know their thoughts on things or what they plan to do? Just publish it online as a free download. It gets your message out and anyone can access it. Bernie want people to have free shit but his book is for sale.
A politician should only ever be able to earn as much as the median income of whatever districts they come from.
> the books for example are mostly popular due to him being in office
Well I guess Thomas Jefferson and like twenty other presidents should just fuck right the hell off for that, yeah? What a reach. Why don’t you reach right around and jerk my clownsicle? That way you’ll have one in each hand.
I hope you can understand that when a person makes errors and applies uneven standards in a certain direction, uniformly, again and again in near succession, only in line with a certain ideological camp and never against it, only against certain candidates and not others guilty* of the same or worse, then to any reasonable onlooker it might appear that they aren’t mistakes; they’re onpurposes.
You believe I implied you were dishonest.
Oh, apologies!
I never meant to imply anything.
You are dishonest.
Bernie earned his by profiting from his political position.
And blaming multimillionaires, while being a multimillionaire, is silly.
Particularly when you’ve been in office for nearly three decades but blame Trump for rigging an economy in less than 3 years.
No... a single figurehead doesn’t take the blame For every political and socioeconomic issue in the US... career politicians do.
In 28 years as a public servant, he has amassed wealth, and continues to live FAR above the average American. His bullshit is as hypocritical as it is idealistic and unsustainable.
Lmfaaooooo Norway just called the US a dusty ass bitch and they ain’t wrong
So, you bookin a flight, future expat?
In 1969, a group of children sat down to a free breakfast before school. On the menu: chocolate milk, eggs, meat, cereal and fresh oranges. The scene wouldn’t be out of place in a school cafeteria these days—but the federal government wasn’t providing the food. Instead, breakfast was served thanks to the Black Panther Party.
At the time, the militant black nationalist party was vilified in the news media and feared by those intimidated by its message of black power and its commitment to ending police brutality and the subjugation of black Americans. But for students eating breakfast, the Black Panthers’ politics were less interesting than the meals they were providing.
“The children, many of whom had never eaten breakfast before the Panthers started their program,” the Sun Reporterwrote, “think the Panthers are ‘groovy’ and ‘very nice’ for doing this for them.”
The program may have been groovy, but its purpose was to fuel revolution by encouraging black people’s survival. From 1969 through the early 1970s, the Black Panthers’ Free Breakfast for School Children Program fed tens of thousands of hungry kids. It was just one facet of a wealth of social programs created by the party—and it helped contribute to the existence of federal free breakfast programs today.
When Black Panther Party founders Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale founded the party in 1966, their goal was to end police brutality in Oakland. But a faction of the Civil Rights Movement led by SNCC member Stokeley Carmichael began calling for the uplift and self-determination of African-Americans, and soon black power was part of their platform.
At first, the Black Panther Party primarily organized neighborhood police patrols that took advantage of open-carry laws, but over time its mandate expanded to include social programs, too.
Free Breakfast For School Children was one of the most effective. It began in January 1969 at an Episcopal church in Oakland, and within weeks it went from feeding a handful of kids to hundreds. The program was simple: party members and volunteers went to local grocery stores to solicit donations, consulted with nutritionists on healthful breakfast options for children, and prepared and served the food free of charge.
School officials immediately reported results in kids who had free breakfast before school. “The school principal came down and told us how different the children were,” Ruth Beckford, a parishioner who helped with the program, said later. “They weren’t falling asleep in class, they weren’t crying with stomach cramps.”
Soon, the program had been embraced by party outposts nationwide. At its peak, the Black Panther Party fed thousands of children per day in at least 45 programs. (Food wasn’t the only part of the BPP’s social programs; they expanded to cover everything from free medical clinics to community ambulance services and legal clinics.)
For the party, it was an opportunity to counter its increasingly negative image in the public consciousness—an image of intimidating Afroed black men holding guns—while addressing a critical community need. “I mean, nobody can argue with free grits,” said filmmaker Roger Guenveur Smith in A Huey P. Newton Story, a 2001 film in which he portrays Newton.
Free food seemed relatively innocuous, but not to FBI head J. Edgar Hoover, who loathed the Black Panther Party and declared war against them in 1969. He called the program “potentially the greatest threat to efforts by authorities to neutralize the BPP and destroy what it stands for,” and gave carte blanche to law enforcement to destroy it.
The results were swift and devastating. FBI agents went door-to-door in cities like Richmond, Virginia, telling parents that BPP members would teach their children racism. In San Francisco, writes historian Franziska Meister, parents were told the food was infected with venereal disease; sites in Oakland and Baltimore were raided by officers who harassed BPP members in front of terrified children, and participating children were photographed by Chicago police.
“The night before [the first breakfast program in Chicago] was supposed to open,” a female Panther told historian Nik Heynan, “the Chicago police broke into the church and mashed up all the food and urinated on it.”
Ultimately, these and other efforts to destroy the Black Panthers broke up the program. In the end, though, the public visibility of the Panthers’ breakfast programs put pressure on political leaders to feed children before school. The result of thousands of American children becoming accustomed to free breakfast, former party member Norma Amour Mtume told Eater, was the government expanded its own school food programs.
Though the USDA had piloted free breakfast efforts since the mid 1960s, the program only took off in the early 1970s—right around the time the Black Panthers’ programs were dismantled. In 1975, the School Breakfast Program was permanently authorized. Today, it helps feed over 14.57 million children before school—and without the radical actions of the Black Panthers, it may never have happened.
I owe like 90% of my breakfast as a kid to the Black Panthers
Huh. It’s strange that I didn’t learn this in my white, middle class suburban high school 🤔
I can see how learning about this in schoo would have been great. A true feel-good and inspiring example. But to be fair, a lot of things aren’t taught in schools. Regardless of the predominant demographic/minority ratio.
This video. 😍
Good Girl... Hold it in your throat longer next time.
Yes. Give it all to me!
Like it was ever my place to give her a “pass” in the first place.
Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, wore brownface makeup to a party at the private school where he was teaching in the spring of 2001.
I dont like bringing up stuff from people’s past, but with his “progressive” attitude on everything and trying to prove to everyone how forward thinking he is, it’s kind of odd that he did this in 2001. This wasnt some 60 year old politician in the in the 50’s or 60’s. This was the same year as the 9/11 terrorist attacks (not sure what month the picture was taken).
He wasnt even a student at this private school. He was a teacher.
So cancel culture and bringing up the past (it happened 18 years ago) is ok when it’s someone you don’t like ?
This wasnt done in 50’s when it was acceptable. This isnt Terry Crews saying something light like how he thinks fathers should be in a child’s life. It isnt some tweet from 5 years ago that was acceptable then but not today. And it isnt some made up accusation with no proof.
It’s brownface from a person who has claimed for years to have been progressive minded and duperior to other politicians (specifically the from the US) for years.
And if you read my response, you will note that i did bring up the subject of bringing up the past. Though admittedly a little hypocritical, i see a difference. I’m not trying to “cancel” Trudeau. I dont care about his political position and i’m not trying to get him fired. I’m mocking him on his comparatively recent actions. Especially when his whole political persona is based on an image of being progressive. Almost ‘holier- than-thou’ attitude.
It calls into question of if he really changed his views on people and bigotry, or if he only does these things to look good to the public.
Dressing in character is NOT tantamount of racial insensivity. It’s a costume, not an insult.
Stop making issues where there are none. 18 years ago, people weren’t so weak that someone else’s innocuous actions had such a detrimental impact on their lives.
I’m short- grow up. Toughen up. Or shut up. Bc if you aren’t will to step up and make changes, but would rather sit around and condemn others, you’re only contributing to the whining and not bringing any solutions to the table.
18 years ago was 2001. Coloring your skin, especially not just your face, to resemble another race was certainly still offensive then. Literally Golden Girls made fun of how blackface is perceived when two of the Girls accidently came out in brown face cleansing masks in front of black guests. That’s Golden Girls. Which came out in 1985. This behavior was considered unacceptable long before 1985.
You cant use the “this was acceptable back then” excuse.
I feel like you didnt read the response before commenting.
I didn’t need to read the comments or responses to know what it was like. Life in 2001 isn’t conceptual to me and I don’t need to read others opinions to craft my own about life Was about or how people behaved. Iwas in college in 2001. I know exactly what life was like then. And no.. people did not live in a constant state of being offended.
Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, wore brownface makeup to a party at the private school where he was teaching in the spring of 2001.
I dont like bringing up stuff from people’s past, but with his “progressive” attitude on everything and trying to prove to everyone how forward thinking he is, it’s kind of odd that he did this in 2001. This wasnt some 60 year old politician in the in the 50’s or 60’s. This was the same year as the 9/11 terrorist attacks (not sure what month the picture was taken).
He wasnt even a student at this private school. He was a teacher.
So cancel culture and bringing up the past (it happened 18 years ago) is ok when it’s someone you don’t like ?
This wasnt done in 50’s when it was acceptable. This isnt Terry Crews saying something light like how he thinks fathers should be in a child’s life. It isnt some tweet from 5 years ago that was acceptable then but not today. And it isnt some made up accusation with no proof.
It’s brownface from a person who has claimed for years to have been progressive minded and duperior to other politicians (specifically the from the US) for years.
And if you read my response, you will note that i did bring up the subject of bringing up the past. Though admittedly a little hypocritical, i see a difference. I’m not trying to “cancel” Trudeau. I dont care about his political position and i’m not trying to get him fired. I’m mocking him on his comparatively recent actions. Especially when his whole political persona is based on an image of being progressive. Almost ‘holier- than-thou’ attitude.
It calls into question of if he really changed his views on people and bigotry, or if he only does these things to look good to the public.
Dressing in character is NOT tantamount of racial insensivity. It’s a costume, not an insult.
Stop making issues where there are none. 18 years ago, people weren’t so weak that someone else’s innocuous actions had such a detrimental impact on their lives.
I’m short- grow up. Toughen up. Or shut up. Bc if you aren’t will to step up and make changes, but would rather sit around and condemn others, you’re only contributing to the whining and not bringing any solutions to the table.