not a terf, don&#x27;t worry

apparently unpopular opinion but u dont have to disclose personal medical history to strangers ur hooking up w

say you’re giving out cookies. you know someone does not eat eggs (maybe for religious reasons, or they’re a vegan, or maybe they’re even allergic to eggs, whatever the reason it might be. they choose not to eat eggs) and then you decide to omit the fact that eggs are an ingredient in the cookies and you give them a cookie to eat. you watch them eat the cookie. that’s a shitty thing to do. it’s unethical.

people’s sexual autonomy is not less important than their dietary restrictions.

you’re young and maybe you don’t have the perspective or experience to understand that sex is socially, culturally, psychologically, and physically different than other behaviors and interactions we have with people. growing up on tumblr may have you think most people do not care about the biological sex of their sex partners. they do. most people are not open to sleeping with both sexes. it’s a fair assumption that is likely the case when you sleep with someone. that’s worth checking-in with your partner about.

rape by deception is a common trope in popular culture used uncritically, and growing up during this “hook-up culture” time may lead you to believe that sex is casual and inconsequential for most people. that it’s no different than playing a pick-up game. that is simply not true. it has a large impact on people’s psychological well being. do not minimize people’s distress at being deceived for someone else’s sexual satisfaction.

do not conceal things from your sexual partners. don’t let it slide when other people do.

but you don’t know, that’s the point. if the person’s, say, allergic to eggs, they can just say “hey, by the way, does this has eggs in it?”

no one’s gonna be like 😈Hahahaha😈i must lie😈deceive this poot little cissie😈 .

in that hypothetical, you do know they are allergic to eggs. would you feed someone you knew to be allergic to eggs something with eggs in it, if they didn’t explicitly ask right before?

like in real like sexual encounters, you know most people are not open to having sex with both sexes. you can expect that your partner might be like most people in this regard. you should check. and if you know someone is assuming you’re of the sex that you aren’t, the onus is on you to disclosure. you’re the one with the information that could potentially inspire them to withdraw consent. it’s part of being a compassionate sexual partner.

and people do intentionally deceive sexual partners and then brag about it on tiktok. you can’t say they don’t when they do on camera

apparently unpopular opinion but u dont have to disclose personal medical history to strangers ur hooking up w

#if you can hear this story and remain well enough to care about 'misgendering' you are heartless and vile #how can you not be immobilized with terror and disgust #jfc

people’s sexual autonomy is not less important than their dietary restrictions.

do not conceal things from your sexual partners. don’t let it slide when other people do.

#sexual autonomy

cydippida

radfems will see someone whose the definition of mentally unstable rape their mom and then try to make it about transwomen being gross. y'all do not care about the fact the woman that was raped is suffering from dementia and likely a myriad of other conditions brought on by isolation and hoarding behavior. y'all just want an excuse to shit on trans people and it's fucking disgusting. get fucking bent.

marmorada

@cydippida Stop pretending TRAs aren’t demanding that we respect a literal mother rapist’s pronouns and clean up your fucking community.

https://yasferatu.tumblr.com/post/658090335586664448/

The problem is that a man literally raped his incapacitated mother and you fucking shits still can’t stop prioritizing “respect” for the rapist. Imagine telling his mother that she needs to think of her rapist son as a woman? Everyone knows you’re a worthless, projecting piece of shit that values NO ONE but your in-group. Stop pretending otherwise. Respond if you aren’t a worthless coward.

riprslashgendercritical-deactiv

Signs of terfery:

Intelligence

Support of homosexuals

Homosexuality

Empathy

The ability to distinguish between men and women

terfsupremacy

Don’t forget:

Being a woman

gorgonology

wearing pants but not going by ‘he/they’

gynocentric-deactivated20211216

being a lesbian

sillylandblaze

Reading comprehension skills

dykeyuu

the ability to think critically

rickiflannel-deactivated2021081

talking about ‘data’ and ‘supporting evidence’ is a big red flag ... stay safe everyone

nothorses

It is deeply, deeply beneficial to TERFs if the only characteristic of TERF ideology you will recognize as wrong, harmful, or problematic is "they hate trans women".

TERF ideology is an expansive network of extremely toxic ideas, and the more of them we accept and normalize, the easier it becomes for them to fly under the radar and recruit new TERFs. The closer they get to turning the tide against all trans people, trans women included.

Case in point: In 2014-2015, I fell headlong into radical feminism. I did not know it was called radical feminism at the time, but I also didn't know what was wrong with radical feminism in the first place. I didn't see a problem with it.

I was a year deep into this shit when people I had been following, listening to, and looking up to finally said they didn't think trans women were women. It was only then that I unfollowed those people, specifically; but I continued to follow other TERFs-who-didn't-say-they-were-TERFs. I continued ingesting and spreading their ideas- for years after.

If TERFs "only target trans women" and "only want trans women gone", if that's the one and only problem with their ideology and if that's the only way we'll define them, we will inevitably miss a vast majority of the quiet beliefs that support their much louder hatred of trans women.

As another example: the trans community stood relatively united when TERFs and conservatives targeted our right to use the correct restroom, citing the "dangers" of trans women sharing space with cis women. But when they began targeting Lost Little Girls and Confused Lesbians and trotting detransitioners out to raise a panic about trans men, virtually the only people speaking up about it were other transmascs. Now we see a rash of anti-trans healthcare bills being passed in the US, and they're hurting every single one of us.

When you refuse to call a TERF a TERF just because they didn't specifically say they hate trans women, when you refuse to think critically about a TERF belief just because it's not directly related to trans women, you are actively helping TERFs spread their influence and build credibility.

what is some TERF ideology we should be on the look out for?

nothorses

This isn't comprehensive, but I'll do my best.

TERFs are, first and foremost, radical feminists. Radical feminism is essentially second-wave feminism without the intersectionality brought in by third-wave feminism. It believes that patriarchy is at fault for the oppression of women, but sees this in a very strict, binary way: women are the oppressed, and men are the oppressors.

TERFs use this to justify their specific brand of transphobia. This idea, among others, is essential in supporting that transphobia.

I'll try to outline some of those ideas, and some of the logical thruoughlines they use:

Women are uniquely oppressed, and always in danger. Womanhood- or the experience of being a woman- is defined by oppression, misogyny, and Being In Danger.

Women are particularly in danger in the presence of, and in relationships with, men. Spaces that exclude men are essential to preserving the safety of women.

Socialization: men are raised to support patriarchy, while women are raised to be subjugated by it. Men have no motive to unlearn these lessons, so all men are inherently more corrupted by these lessons than women.

Relationships with men are therefore inherently (more likely to be) abusive, and relationships with women are inherently safe(er).

Sex, in particular, is more often exploitative than not. Only some kinds of sex are not exploitative. Many kinds of sex that we think are consensual, or that people say are consensual, are either rape or proto-rape.

Exchanging money for sex is inherently rape/exploitation/non-consensual in some way.

As women who deny men access to them, lesbians are The Most Oppressed and also The Most Endangered. They must be protected at all costs.

Because so many women have been raped by men with penises, both men and penises are inherently traumatic to A Lot Of Women.

Many lesbians will naturally have an aversion to relationships with trans women because of this. Trans women who argue against this "genital preference" are potential rapists trying to infiltrate lesbian spaces to hurt and take advantage of women.

Men will always try to invade "women's spaces" to take advantage of women, endanger them, and strip away their resources both for personal gain/pleasure, and in service of upholding the patriarchy.

If we allow men to say they are women, they will invade those spaces and hurt "real" women. Men who say they are women are dangerous, and must be excluded and punished.

Men may try to obfuscate labels and terminology to "define women out of existence" or otherwise cause confusion, which they can manipulate to further their infiltration.

Women are all miserable with their bodies, cursed with the pressure to reproduce and have sex with men.

Women are all miserable with their genders, forced as they are to ensure the overwhelming and constant suffering that is patriarchy.

Women will attempt to escape this misery and pressure by "becoming men". This is cowardly, but understandable; a tragic but inevitable result of patriarchy. These women must be saved.

Some women who try to escape patriarchy are doing it out of self-interest; they are betraying women by becoming men, and contributing to their oppression. These women must be punished.

Bio-essentialism: women are oppressed specifically because of their bodies and ability to reproduce. This is an inherent and defining part of womanhood. Nobody can claim womanhood without this experience, everyone who has had this experience is a woman.

Women's bodies are all beautiful and perfect because they are women's bodies. If the womanliness of them is tampered with, they become less valuable. Men's bodies are gross and undesirable symbols of patriarchy.

Testosterone makes people violent, aggressive, irrational, and angry. Estrogen makes people calm, kind, and happy.

Men can never understand women's bodies as well as other women do.

People can be attracted to other people on the basis of "sex" alone. This is inherent, immutable, and unquestionable.

Men are sexual animals who inherently and unavoidably find lots of bad things sexually arousing. Because "youth" is attractive, many men find young girls and children attractive, and will try to take advantage of them. Misogynistic control/power over women, hurting women, and even rape are also inherently sexually appealing to men.

"Gender" is meaningless; it's founded in misogynistic stereotypes about men and women, and when you remove the stereotypes, there's nothing left at all. Only binary "sex" is real, because that's what patriarchy (and biology) is based on.

Manhood is itself a toxic, oppressive, inherently corrupting concept. Anyone who participates in manhood is corrupt and immoral; who would choose to be the oppressor?

Masculinity is defined only by hating women, having power, and being aggressive, violent, and controlling (etc.)

Patriarchy doesn't just target women, but femininity as a whole, for its association with women.

Patriarchy doesn't just reward men, but masculinity, as it rejects femininity. People who reject femininity and embrace masculinity are rewarded by the patriarchy.

Some of these ideas are contradictory, but they lead to the same conclusions. Some of them lead to similar conclusions, many of which take very little further nudging to push into more dogmatic ideas.

This is exactly why we need to understand all of these paths into TERF ideology- and more.

In fact, the vast majority of the points on this list- particularly the beginnings of their logic- can be very easily swallowed while still holding that trans women are women, and trans men are men.

That's what TIRFs (trans-inclusive radical feminists) are, and they're still incredibly dangerous. TIRF ideology normalizes these points, making it far easier for TERFs to recruit; even if TIRFs themselves try to be aggressively anti-TERF.

Again, this isn't comprehensive, and it would take a long time and a lot of words to cover every flaw and danger in every line of reasoning here.

But remember how these things work; even if some of them begin with a grain of truth, even if some of them are true- especially if you define the words they contain differently- be wary of them.

selancastsvalor

It's important to note how sex-negative they can be, and how in some circles this leads to a belief that being a lesbian is the only way one can liberate oneself from the abuse of men. They see sexual orientation as a choice to be made for one's safety, or a political act--not something based on genuine attraction. They also sometimes push the idea of the "gold-star lesbian"--that is, a lesbian who's never been with a man--as the ideal. If you're a bisexual? Disgusting, don't interact.

It's... sadly common to see on dating sites.

#anti-feminist propaganda

this is the worst thing i’ve ever read. i don’t even know where to begin ... i need a minute

everyone subscribe ... not just for the great music. she talks to a lot of interesting people, has a lot of interesting conversations

female-malice

Radblr constantly talks about how woman should raise boys right and teach them to respect women.

Radblr also talks constantly about how women should support and work with other women.

But I never see radblr talking about how women should uplift, encourage, and support girls 🤔

Girls are the most vulnerable group of people on earth, and also the most powerful force of social change.

Millenial girls grew up to embrace liberal choice feminism and spread it through pop culture. Where was radical feminism during 1995-2010 when millenial women were just girls? What were radical feminists doing when we were all playing with bratz dolls and watching totally spies? I’ll always have nostalgia about the 00s pop culture I grew up with. But, that culture was the breeding ground for the choice feminism self exploitation hell we live in now. Spice Girls, Cheetah Girls, Destiny’s Child, Pussycat Dolls and Britney Spears were all marketed to millennial girls age 6-10. How is there any doubt about why millenial women are teaching gen-z girls to exploit themselves? It’s tempting to think of libfems as malicious narcissists or shallow idiots, but they aren’t. They were girls groomed for ‘sex positivity’ through 00s pop culture. They were girls radical feminists failed.

Radical feminism is always defined and organized around the root of subjugation women face–sex and reproduction.

Why not organize radical feminism around the root of female future, power, and success–girls?

Feminism is called a women’s movement. Occasionally, it’s referred to as a movement for women and girls. I think prioritizing women over girls in our concept of feminism is one of the greatest mistakes feminists ever made.

Feminism should be a movement for girls, supported by women.

If you are 20+, you are no longer, by any stretch of the imagination, a girl. I know girlhood is hell. I know it leaves us scarred and wounded. I know we feel the universe cheated us out of a girlhood brimming with carefree adventure and exploration. But it wasn’t the universe cheating us. It was adult women failing us. Adult women who were too focused on the damage their own girlhood did to them. This cycle of girlhood trauma has left women’s movements chasing their own tails for a century.

Patriarchy is passed through generations by men socializing boys and women socializing girls. If men are initiating boys into the fraternity of sexual subjugators, women are initiating girls into the sorority of victimhood. Radical feminism was built within that sorority, and it shows.

All feminist writing I’ve read delineates women’s historical trauma and ties it to the subjugation of women in contemporary society. Through feminism, we find other women and discuss our shared past traumas with each other. In the internet age, we do this on a personal level through blogs and forums, or on a societal level through hashtags like #metoo and #yesallwomen. Feminist discourse builds up to a model of women’s universal suffering. And through that we identify males as the bastards behind it all. Radical feminism calls class recognition through shared trauma ‘consciousness raising’. They cite consciousness raising and solidarity between women as the greatest sources of female power. In other words, radical feminism elevates the sorority of victimhood as the key to female liberation.

But the more I piece this out, the more it looks like a damn crab trap. The shared trauma, the model of women’s universal suffering, it only leads us to perpetuate our subjugation. There’s comfort in thinking what happened to you happened because you’re a woman. There’s comfort in seeing traumatic events as predestined. But predestination is the oldest crab trap in the book. Through predestination, we see victimhood as a right of passage and a key to wisdom. We overlook naive girls until they’ve been victimized enough to trauma bond with women.

I’m not saying we should throw out radical feminism and start from scratch. Women coming to terms with trauma is a step towards female liberation, but it’s a step that will take a lifetime. That, unfortunately, is the nature of trauma and PTSD. There is no way to resolve past trauma. You can read all the feminist discourse ever written, and you may find some comfort in it, but the trauma will not heal.

I know a lot of us take comfort in that catchphrase about women not being responsible for our own oppression. We need to start recognizing this as a thought terminating cliche and blackpill feminist idea. Saying we have no hand in our own oppression means women’s liberation depends entirely on men. This, of course, renders women’s liberation impossible.

If we’re looking for more than comfort, we’re going to need more than radical feminism is currently offering. If we’re looking for liberation, we must do the most uncomfortable thing possible. We must dismantle the victimhood sorority. We need to stop saying our trauma happened because we are women. We need to stop being complicit in patriarchy by holding up victimhood as a right of passage to womanhood.

Women do not have to suffer. Women do not have to be victimized. Girlhood does not have to be characterized by neglect. If we use all the power of women’s class solidarity to protect and celebrate girls, we will escape the cycle we are in. We need to stop prioritizing the lives of women over the lives of girls. We need to make girls’ liberation the primary goal of feminism, even if we have to sacrifice personal freedoms to do so. That is the true right of passage. Being an adult doesn’t mean perpetuating the past into the present. It means passing up on your needs in the present to secure a better future for the next generation.

Your inner girl will never heal until you become the woman that should’ve been there protecting you as a girl. So, become that women, and do everything in your power to lift up girls. Do everything in your power to give them the carefree adventurous girlhood you were denied. Don’t do it because they’re your daughters or surrogate daughters. Do it because they’re the future, and they are more important than we are.

#thought provoking

bushdivingbushranger

being actually homosexual in this current climate is like… what is there for us in the incoming years? like. idk i’m not trying to catastrophise but it just seems like no matter which way you think it’ll go we’ve already lost so much. our spaces have already been decimated, so many of us are being pressured into transing, our sexualities are being co-opted by people who want to LARP as us but who demonise those of us who are actually same-sex attracted. acceptance rates for homosexuals are declining, and bc of their (TRAs) insistence on forcing us into one community under the lgbT acronym, when these straight ppl pretending to be us take off their fucking masks and go off to live their lives, where will we be? non same-sex attracted ppl will probably still associate us with the very ppl who quite literally ruined us.

i realised i was a lesbian almost a decade ago, and in those rare few moments before i fully accepted myself, where i dispelled the hate i’d been taught to feel towards myself due to my sexuality, where i thought that one day i could be happy and accepted, came from looking towards the future! the world seemed to be changing and for the first time i was beginning to see openly and unapologetic homosexuals being shown in a positive light! and looking back it honestly just feels like that was just… a moment. a small blip of good on this current batshit timeline. idk i just feel like if i had a crystal ball and asked it to show me the future for us, all it would show me is debris

all this concern about pronouns adds a level of social hindrance no one needed ... like you expect everyone to remember your name, your gender id, and pronouns? who the fuck do you think you are

the-queer-demon

there is no such thing as a swerf. radical feminists want all pimps and johns executed, but we support the actual victims of sex work. please actually read up on this subject instead of running your mouth based on some porn addict's misogynistic take on how evil ex-prostitutes are "swerfs" trying to ruin everyone else's fun.

okay, but? do you not understand that this is exactly why swerfs are bad? Because they see sex workers as victims instead of real people. Yes, there is so much wrong with sex work and porn, which is exactly why legalization and protection under the law is so important instead of just labeling every sex worker as a victim who can’t speak for themselves

femclasscirce

Uh… why do you imply that victims are not real people?

Legalization does jack shit to protect the women in prostitution. Look at the Netherlands, look at Germany: the only people that are actually protected are the sex buyers and the pimps. Legalization & decrim increase trafficking, because once its legal more men will want to go to prostituted women, but women won’t suddenly want to go into prostitution in droves. This means that the demand will outweigh the supply by magnitudes, and the only way to remedy that is trafficking. In Germany, where I lived for a decade, most women on the streets don’t even speak German. Trafficking is everywhere, in plain sight. And even the women who are not trafficked are subjected to insane levels of exploitation (see the Pascha in Cologne or the Paradies brothel chain for some good examples)

Maybe listen to the countless prostitution survivors who have been saying this for ages?

psspsspussy

They’ve done it! They’ve swallowed so many political purity rules and so much propaganda it’s a bad thing to even acknowledge victims of harm even exist now!

ms-gay-frogs

One study found that “82% [of prostitutes] had been physically assaulted; 83% had been threatened with a weapon; 68% had been raped while working as prostitutes.”

Another report found that 90% of prostitutes want to leave their job but don’t have the resources to.

One study found that “63% of women in prostitution were raped, 71% were physically assaulted, and 68% met the criteria for post traumatic stress disorder.”

(these rates of PTSD are also similar to those who fought in wars and those who experienced state-organized torture)

the same source i linked before also discusses a report in the British Medical Journal, which found that “half of the women interviewed had experienced being slapped, punched, beaten, robbed, threatened with a weapon, held against their will, strangled, kidnapped, and/or raped.”

aaaand once again, the same source also discusses how 50% of prostitutes’ deaths are caused by murder.

just look at that fucking mortality rate. how can you NOT say these women are victims? you must be a fucking demon to think that this is okay.

89584957294589425-deactivated20

Pro-prostitution liberals think victims of trafficking and rape are weak and pathetic, that being a victim is something to be ashamed of. People need to understand that acknowledging that a woman is a victim of violence isn’t a condemnation of her as a human being; it is the person who victimised her that should be condemned. Being a victim of violence says nothing about your character.

boobie-fem-x

“why are you treating sex workers as victims instead of real people?” are victims not real people now? do their voices on their experiences not matter?

#liberals have a really warped sense about what makes one a person #anytime you classify a person differently than them they think youre denyinghumanity #it's maybe because they're so individualistic they only see themselves as real people and everyone else is up for debate #prostituted women arent human to them if they dont fit their narrative gnc people arent human to them either if they don't #it's a disturbing trend and it's all related

i made a new lesbian masterdoc, i think it might be helpful for people wondering if theyre lesbians, seeing as the last doc was not written by a lesbian

#lesbian masterdoc #terfs do touch #surely this has been done before #but im bored

hans-echo

do y'all think she looked up that woman before responding? she's not like y'all. she doesn't intensely research everyone she interacts with. (also i feel it's important to note that Bethany Mandel is Jewish)

ms-gay-frogs

i didn't even know who that woman was lmao y'all expect everyone to know who's a nazi and who's not?

also it's kinda funny since TRAs WORSHIP Daniel Radcliffe even though he's openly admitted to being friends with racists. his exact words below:

“No, but I know some really f***ing racist people, friends I vehemently disagree with. They’re not white supremacists, they would never be that extreme, but they are anti-immigration and absolutely voted to leave in Brexit.”

“And I’m still friends with them because I don’t think that friendship should be drawn along those lines.”

thesquidwizard

I already pointed out that the article in question isnt promoting neo nazism in anyway

but i really really wanna talk about Rowling sounding like a radblr

"be sure to publicly repent of your association with goody rowling...."

Shes "block and stay safe"ing them, their actually turning her into the mythical "TERF". I do kinda wonder how much her thoughts have changed since her essay.

bitterbadfem-harpy

A woman is responsible for the misguided words of another woman but transpeople aren't responsible for transpeople assaulting women and children.

More proof transactivists are misogynists.

old-school-butch

Bethany Mandel is a Jewish woman who wrote about using love and outreach to address nazi hate groups.

So this is a baldface lie concocted to accusing JKR of being a nazi sympathizer just by association - and this lie was manufactured by life-on-sarz, who has 399 followers and is following 377 others, yet tweets an average of 5x a day for the last decade with almost bot-like regularity, circulating mistruth and marginal opinions until they have some air of legitimacy simply through repetition.

calling a jewish woman who has different ideas as to how to combat neo-nazism a neo-nazi sympathiser is in poor taste to say the least ... is she not entitled to her own thoughts, reflections, and opinions? would she be if she hadn’t tweeted support for jkr? if jkr hadn’t replied pretty much “thanks, i appreciate it!” these fuckers are disingenuous ... i mean they have to be, cause their movement cant survive genuinely, cause it would die if they had to be honest and acknowledge the truth

it/itself pronouns are soo ugly. like especially for gender-conforming people. i remember getting mocked and called it as a teenager for being gnc, and it is dehumanizing. it has literally been used to dehumanize people and i don’t know if kids think they are reclaiming it or what, but jfc

transphobe blocklist prototype!

sorry it isn't very organized. those are just some of the most repetitive people that we've seen on transgenz, spilling terf rethoric and some of them even go as far as to raid people's blogs.

if you think you shouldn't be on this list, please feel free to come to my dms. but be reasonable. start a CIVIL conversation, or don't bother.

@fuckthepope @fuckthepope1534 @terfery @searchingforproofsthatimwrong @garden-owler @yourenotagirlbitch @terf-scorpion @radmista @sickerbook @bullydyke @kirby-with-feet @sendmenubes @pro-woman-princess @dilsency @profetens-apenbaring @pearlsofmind @finnishrogue @femsolid @ms-gay-frogs @partycitywigsale @outlawmen @mattsnightmare3 @fuckgender2 @menalez @sapphicshinigami @overtterfistry @gnc-centric @iamxueyang @magnetictapedatastorage @radgoblin @radkindoffeminist @terfiewerfie @dykeyuu @piquegender @desaturated7 @bisexual-slime @misgenderer @kiefbowl @fox-steward @hmm-uteri @femrage @radicallyaligned @saramonasaid @trans--receipts @someone-will-remember-us @redviolence @womented @jcanofarc @terfdabi @cisallogayreformed @radfemcore @kuhweerz @rudetehm @angrylandblaze @tetraterezi @lilleisak @officially-dykemarching @tehm-ally @honzo-main @gaggot @harringtn @twoxliberation @femalebrained @geoffscrabshack @ivegotnothingbettertodo

stay safe out there, y'all.

#i do think it would be great data though but it would be a project ... if anyone wants to help hmu i wanna do it

.... are any of these bloggers heterosexual?

i think we should track these lists and report on the percentage of each sexual orientation and sex. i think that would be interesting data.

i think it’s important to help us understand what’s making everyone feel unsafe. :/

filmnoirsbian

Reagan-era "stranger danger" panic has done so much harm to americans' sense of community. It cemented the idea that only the nuclear family could be trusted with the care of the child, deterred people from cooperative living with an extended community, and continues to place abuse victims in danger by perpetuating the misconception that most child abuse is done by strangers rather than someone they know. It is in our best interest to become more interdependent than we were raised to be.

theboombutton

The widespread nature of child sexual abuse came to society's notice during this era. The Satanic Panic and the hyping of Stranger Danger served different purposes for different groups:

It let people who didn't want to believe that parents and other trusted adults could be predators frame the threat as external; and

It gave actual abusers a way to direct attention away from themselves, and further isolate the children they abused.

It gave people who were uncomfortable with/didn't want women working outside the home something to point at. It's no coincidence that abuse allegations during this time period focused on daycare providers. That's what you get for leaving your child with a stranger.

somevampiresslut

Plz I'm pretty sure the terf bothering me is a nazi sympathizer 🙈 I rly can't escape huh

"#i mean all terfs are white supremacists and most are nazis"

how?

somevampiresslut

I've explained this multiple times, other ppl have explained this multiple times, if you dont know how your own cult works, I'm sorry babe, but that's on you.

? the only explanations I've gotten have been from people who just lie about what we believe

battleczar

Can we get an answer on why radical feminism is white suprematist from somebody who also has an accurate understanding of what basic radical feminist tenets are?