complete mask off moment whenever people state this. they're straight up stating they believe rape is something that is a woman's experience. we're not just used to it - it's so prevalent it's unfortunately a huge part of being a woman. even if you haven't been raped, you likely fear being raped and take measures to protect yourself from an attack. males don't worry about this because that isn't what is supposed to happen to them under a patriarchy. to males and their logic, rape is more traumatic for them because it is a woman's experience. the worst thing you could ever do to a male in his mind is put him at the level he believes women are supposed to be at. he views it as an attack on his masculinity.
Women's Rights Acrivists: We'd love it if you didn't rape us, groom us, beat us, sexualize us and kill us, thanks.
Man's Rights Activists: Please stop praising the molestation of young boys. Please stop justifying the sexual and physical assault of men by women. Please stop painting all 4 billion men on earth as sexists and rapists. Please stop ignoring that society treats men as innately worthless if they don't add value to the life of women while telling women they're perfect from the moment they leave the womb no matter what heinous shit they do.
Not only do men commit heinous and foul acts but turn around and accuse women of committing them instead.
Women in general are praising young boys being molested ? Y’all men are kings gaslighting!
Look at the comments of boys being molested! It is filled with men calling the male victim “king” and “lucky”. It is other men that do not take young male victims of women seriously.
In world where millions of baby girls are murder or burred alive for simply being female, it is women that are called prefect from the moment they leave the womb ? In world where men can commit evil and cruel acts and let it be seen as traditional or culture.
In world where billons of people worship male God, and follow religion that says women are inferior, it is men that are treated as worthless ? Lmao. You can’t make this shit up. Give it couple of years, men are going to claim women oppressed men under the Taliban ruling. Bc anything is possible with you males.
In which society do men have no basic human rights ? Where they can not vote, own a home or get education? For you to claim men are treated as worthless while living in the same world as women under Taliban. Are men not allowed to leave their homes ? Are they forced to cover from head to toe ? Are they honor killed for showing their hair ? Clearly men are not seen as worthless. You are so detached from reality and into your delusional male victimhood, it is insanity. Men have right to stay single, not marry any woman and enjoy their hobbies. No one is gonna honor kill them for that. Clearly they are not seen as worthless if they don’t add anything to women’s lives.
Plus
Men commit 90 percent of worldwide murder yet wonder why societies might try pulling way from them. Men act cruel, heinous, and vile towards others yet they demand people only show kindness to them. They go around destroying lives over any small inconvenience and will throw fit if anyone calls them out or hold them accountable. You think holding men accountable for their actions is oppressing men. Not surprised
Men have hindered the progress of humanity by suppressing geniuses from half the human population.
Women were prevented from making meaningful contributions to mathematics, biology, physics, chemistry, engineering, geology, ecology, etc. etc. for thousands of years.
Think of all the genius women who were forced to become homemakers and housewives, overburdened with 10+ children until their bodies gave in to stress and perished- their intellect only utilised when a man would steal their ideas without credit.
Men talk about how they "contributed everything" to history and science. The question that should be asked is how much more advanced would humankind have been were it not for the barbarity of weak men? How much have men slowed human progression because the genius of women made them feel emasculated?
women rly aren’t allowed to hate, to feel true undiluted hatred, without consequences and it’s so fucking annoying christ alive. even other women remind us of this constantly, that we shouldn’t hate, that it doesn’t serve us to hate anything or anyone. WHAT IF I DO HATE. what if there’s blinding hatred in my heart for certain people and things in my world. what if i’m a normal female of the species who hates. what then. do we all die? god
it’s so fascinating to me how certain psychological or semiotic “facts” change once you bring in a different perspective.
highly-sensitive person wouldn’t be a thing if the economy didn’t require indifference. maybe im just normal with an insane amount of traumatic events forcing people into apathy to survive. people wouldn’t “suffer” from ADHD if 12 hour, five-day workweeks didn’t exist and people didn’t need to focus on tasks in order to survive. would hyperfixation be great if we were foraging out in the wild? hunting? I wonder.
take the long, non-patriarchal view of history and the fetus could be categorized as parasitical, it’s just too controversial to claim because the potential man has to be a person.
is the female a weaker man? what are you measuring? is the blind girl better adapted to a world of dark than a seeing one? are we worthless, or are we just not suited to the system? when a world is tailored to serve a fraction of humanity, isn’t it kind of obvious the rest of us would be running up that hill like sisyphus? why should that make us unnatural? weak? people, animals, ecosystems, deemed worthless because they’re inconvenient, not because that’s objectively or innately true, but because we’ve been caught up in someone else’s cock-measuring contest. different animals in different habitats, but we’re all supposed to fit in one rigid kind of habitat.
is anyone interested in that difference?
i dream of how I’d thrive in a world built for me.
There's something so funny about the fn*f creator (Scott) being an openly unapologetic pro life, republican, Trump supporter while still having big YouTubers play his games AND having a movie being made, meanwhile JKR is critical (not even doesn't support) of one thing and nobody can even talk about Harry Potter anymore. She wasn't even in the fucking anniversary special of her own goddamn series. Scott literally donated money to trump's campaigns. He is an open republican. I have heard zilch against his movie. Nobody is hating on Josh hutcherson for being in it. No YouTubers is being slammed for playing his game. It may as well be like it never happened. Meanwhile there are posts on here with thousands of likes talking about how if you so much as think about Harry potter then you're a bad person and should kill yourself. Everyone is bummed about the fact M*rk*pl*er won't be in the movie, meanwhile there are people who are giving earnest pleas not to hate on the children cast in the HBO version of HP. Why does nobody care? What fucking gives? What the hell is this? Scott literally openly supports Trump and he's more beloved than a democratic woman who thinks maybeeee taking people to court for saying 'sex is real' is a bit far? Why aren't fn*f fans labeled as bad people? Why isn't their support of fn*f seen as support of Scott and his views? The fuck is this double standard.
This little girl was brought to the hospital after Israel bombed her house. The bombs led to several injuries and burn wounds that she permanently lost eyesight. She's talking to mohammed zaanoun but she's unaware of the fact that she lost her vision yet.
These kids are going through the unthinkable, and we also have to mention the journalists who risk their lives on the daily and yet they stay with children and comfort them. This is what Israel is targeting funded by the USA. Your tax money is being paid to cause this.
Trigger warning.
Today marks the 24th day of the genocide. Every day the bombing is worse than the one before, every night the image gets more brutal. We're seeing children injured in ways we never knew before. You have to speak up. Staying silent is siding with the oppressor, there is no neutrality in genocide.
genocide deniers lying again by providing misleading evidence and mocking the deaths of palestinians. luckily, it’s easy to counter lies with facts:
UNICEF is calling for an immediate ceasefire and for sustained and unimpeded access for humanitarian assistance
GENEVA (14 October 2023) – A UN human rights expert warned today that Palestinians are in grave danger of mass ethnic cleansing and called o
Rise in clashes between Palestinians and Israelis since Oct. 7 attack - Anadolu Ajansı
Nearly three dozen trucks entered Gaza in the largest aid convoy since the war between Israel and Hamas began, but humanitarian workers say
so strange when colonisers manage to have the same DNA as the ancient indigenous people, almost like your ancestors converting to islam and christianity doesn’t mean your ancestors were colonisers, just colonised. but who cares if your ideology is built on lies meant to justify the expulsion and mass-killing of indigenous people?
Recently, the geographical origins of Ashkenazic Jews (AJs) and their native language Yiddish were investigated by applying the Geographic P
“Remarkably, AJs exhibit a dominant Iranian (88%) and residual Levantine (3%˜) ancestries, as opposed to Bedouins (14%˜ and 68%˜, respectively) and Palestinians (18%˜ and 58%˜, respectively). Only two AJs exhibit Levantine ancestries typical to Levantine populations… Overall, the combined results are in a strong agreement with the predictions of the Irano-Turko-Slavic hypothesis (Table (Table1)1) and rule out an ancient Levantine origin for AJs, which is predominant among modern-day Levantine populations (e.g., Bedouins and Palestinians).”
so this study found that ashkenazi jewish people to not be levantine people, whereas palestinians are. but this is just one study. what do other studies say?
For more than a century, Jews and non-Jews alike have tried to define the relatedness of contemporary Jewish people. Previous genetic studie
“Two major differences among the populations in this study were the high degree of European admixture (30%–60%) among the Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Italian, and Syrian Jews and the genetic proximity of these populations to each other compared to their proximity to Iranian and Iraqi Jews. This time of a split between Middle Eastern Iraqi and Iranian Jews and European/Syrian Jews, calculated by simulation and comparison of length distributions of IBD segments, is 100–150 generations, compatible with a historical divide that is reported to have occurred more than 2500 years ago.2,5 The Middle Eastern populations were formed by Jews in the Babylonian and Persian empires who are thought to have remained geographically continuous in those locales…
Besides Southern European groups, the closest genetic neighbors to most Jewish populations are the Palestinians, Bedouins, and Druze. The observed differentiation of these groups reflects their histories of within-group endogamy. Yet, their genetic proximity to one another and to European and Syrian Jews suggests a shared genetic history of related Middle Eastern and non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestors who chose different religious and tribal affiliations. These observations are supported by the significant overlap of Y chromosomal haplogroups between Israeli and Palestinian Arabs with Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Jewish populations that has been described previously. Likewise, a study comparing 20 microsatellite markers in Israeli Jewish, Palestinian, and Druze populations demonstrated the proximity of these two non-Jewish populations to Ashkenazi and Iraqi Jews.”
(to simplify it for you, ashkenazim are more similar to southern europeans. after europeans, they’re closest genetically to palestinians. palestinians are the closest genetically to jewish people overall, indicating a common ancestry.
to spell it out for you, that means palestinians are just the people who never left whereas jewish ppl left palestine and mixed with other populations
Genome-wide data from Bronze Age individuals across nine sites in the Southern Levant
show strong genetic resemblance, including a component
“Israeli and Palestinian Arabs share a similar linguistic and geographic background with Jews. (p.631) According to historical records part, or perhaps the majority, of the Moslem Arabs in this country descended from local inhabitants, mainly Christians and Jews, who had converted after the Islamic conquest in the seventh century AD (Shaban 1971; Mc Graw Donner 1981). These local inhabitants, in turn, were descendants of the core population that had lived in the area for several centuries, some even since prehistorical times (Gil 1992). On the other hand, the ancestors of the great majority of present-day Jews lived outside this region for almost two millennia. Thus, our findings are in good agreement with historical evidence and suggest genetic continuity in both populations despite their long separation and the wide geographic dispersal of Jews.(p.637)” (Nebel, 2000)
this study found the same, which is that the people of the levant, including palestinians, are descendants of the canaanites.. an indigenous group to the levant:
were the ancient canaanites perhaps also pesky arab invaders, then? or does converting to islam somehow change you from indigenous to your own country to a coloniser? somehow, i dont think that’s how colonisation works at all.
but maybe that’s still not enough for you, so lets look at even more
Adherents to the Jewish faith have resided in numerous geographic locations over the course of three millennia. Progressively more detailed
“The closest genetic neighbors to most Jewish groups were the Palestinians, Israeli Bedouins, and Druze in addition to the Southern Europeans, including Cypriots. The genetic clusters formed by each of these non-Jewish Middle Eastern groups reflect their own histories of endogamy. Their proximity to one another and to European and Syrian Jews suggested a shared genetic history of related Semitic and non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestors who followed different religious and tribal affiliations. Earlier studies of Israeli Jewish, Palestinian and Druze populations made a similar observation by demonstrating the proximity of these two non-Jewish populations to Ashkenazi and Iraqi Jews (Rosenberg et al. 2001; Kopelman et al. 2009).”
The genetic profile of Palestinians has, for the first time, been studied by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene variability and haplot
“The comparison with other Mediterranean populations by using neighbor-joining dendrograms and correspondence analyses reveal that Palestinians are genetically very close to Jews and other Middle East populations, including Turks (Anatolians), Lebanese, Egyptians, Armenians, and Iranians. Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians, Mesopotamian, and Anatolian peoples in ancient times. Thus, Palestinian-Jewish rivalry is based in cultural and religious, but not in genetic, differences.”
A sample of 526 Y chromosomes representing six Middle Eastern populations (Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Kurdish Jews from Israel; Muslim Kurds;
Our recent study of high-resolution microsatellite haplotypes demonstrated that a substantial portion of Y chromosomes of Jews (70%) and of Palestinian Muslim Arabs (82%) belonged to the same chromosome pool (Nebel et al. 2000). Of those Palestinian chromosomes, approximately one-third formed a group of very closely related haplotypes that were only rarely found in Jews. Altogether, the findings indicated a remarkable degree of genetic continuity in both Jews and Arabs, despite their long separation and the wide geographic dispersal of Jews.
who needs studies and actual numbers when you could just use zionist propaganda, though, right? more than 8000 killed in the span of a few weeks isnt genocide somehow, despite several israel officials stating that their goal is genocide. despite there being historical evidence showing genocide. despite 110 palestinians being killed in the west bank recently. despite the gradual taking of land since the 1940s, despite the destruction of homes, despite the expulsion of palestinians & not allowing them back to their countries afterwards, and despite any other evidence.
woah almost like judaism is older than islam so jewish places of worship will be older by default. palestinians are still the descendants of the ancient canaanites who simply converted to islam and christianity when colonised by those groups: doesn’t make them colonisers. converting to a religion doesn’t mean you stop being indigenous. and it very much does make the europeans who violently displaced them and killed them not even 100 years ago in order to form israel colonisers. i’ve backed all of this up with studies, which you couldn’t even counter.
when your only counterargument is a meme, you know you’ve got nothing.
your admission that jews were there first but your inability to then follow "other people stealing the place are muslim colonizers". Just cause some of the natives converted to christianity in america doesnt make indians european, it doesnt mean the few levantines who became muslim makes the land theirs. Just colonized people
Jews in communities around the globe show more genetic similarities with each other than they do with their non-Jewish neighbors, except in
the muslims moved in by the ottomans in the late 19th century to counter jews returning to our homeland arent entitled to anything
Between the 1850s and World War I, about one million North Caucasian Muslims sought refuge in the Ottoman Empire. This resettlement of Musli
Between the 1850s and World War I, about one million North Caucasian Muslims sought refuge in the Ottoman Empire. This resettlement of Muslim refugees from Russia changed the Ottoman state. Circassians, Chechens, Dagestanis, and others established hundreds of refugee villages throughout the Ottoman Balkans, Anatolia, and the Levant. Most villages still exist today, including what is now the city of Amman. Muslim refugee resettlement reinvigorated regional economies, but also intensified competition over land and, at times, precipitated sectarian tensions, setting in motion fundamental shifts in the borderlands of the Russian and Ottoman empires.
There were small groups whove been there for thousands of years. They're mostly jews though, so sorry your muslim conquest of the mid east isnt complete anymore and jews cant be killed without consequences 😘
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-S
Israel was created by the UN in 1948. Its here to stay lmao.
Tens of millions of people moved around after world war two, when borders changed all over the world. Also your population stats are unsourced and way off, the so called nakba was literally half the arabs- the jew haters- moving 40 miles down the road 😂
Palestinian propaganda juggernaut has persuaded world public opinion that the term “refugee” is synonymous with the term “Palestinian.”
gazans are the only people who never moved on and stopped doing terrorism about their not special choice to move. The ones who stayed are citizens and dont do terrorism
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-S
Never again means never again. They fucked around one too many times and now the gazans will learn what that promise means
so you couldn’t counter any of what i said so you’ve gone on to just distract by using sources that are discussing something entirely different.
i already shared numerous sources which state that jewish people are genetically similar to one another and here’s the kicker: genetically very similar to palestinians, showing shared ancestry. palestinians also show genetic similarity to other levant groups. almost like, palestinians are indigenous. so your first source did not somehow contradict me. typical.
your second source is literally a wikipedia article. fun fact: people can convert religions! muslims aren’t an ethnoreligious group, they’re simply a religious group. yes, the country was not muslim until they converted. and yet, they are still the indigenous people because you do not need to be religiously jewish to be indigenous to your own country! genetic studies which you’ve failed to counter have already shown this.
your third source just shows how stupid you are. the ottoman empire had 1 million north caucasian muslims within it.. okay and? the ottoman empire was made up of over a dozen countries! are you arguing every single one of the one million just went to palestine? too bad the several genetic studies i’ve shared contradict your claim. here’s how the ottoman empire looked in 1850:
anyways genetic studies make it pretty clear that palestinians are not people from the caucasus. so that was irrelevant.
i didn’t argue antisemitism does not or did not exist, so i’m not sure what that link had to do with what we were discussing. only one of us is downplaying the struggles of another group here, and it wasn’t me. you were laughing at the idea of genocide, i simply proved it. there’s a reason that jewish populations are practically nonexistent in most of the muslim world now. it’s very sad.
and lastly, from the jewish virtual library, here are the numbers i showed:
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-S
i like your last sentence which shows exactly the genocidal intentions i was referring to. “it’s those gazans fault that hamas exists despite the israeli govt helping hamas get power! gazans will pay for this!”, thank u for proving my point. when you said “never again”, i thought we all agreed that we meant we should never allow genocide to happen again. but it seems you meant the opposite. i guess that’s where we differ.
"Women only started working very recently so a woman's place is the house-" shut up and feast your eyes at old photos of women from around the world doing physical labor only for them to return home and solely care for 5-10 children and the elderly parents of their husband.
Greek women represent:
These photos show Greek women doing the type of physical labor they would perform more often than not. At the luckiest working conditions for rural women (aka most of the country) they would start working the fields as children and when they got older they would work the same fields with their own babies on their backs.
On the way home from the fields, sometimes the women would carry the wood and the mule would carry the man so he could rest.
Of course, we can talk about the manual labor that is rubbing cloth and metal for hours on end, chopping and carrying wood to light a fire for a large cauldron your size, and stirring it for hours.
But we can also talk about how it wasn't for them to break and carry rocks in baskets for the making of new roads. They would gather salt, olives, and grapes and carry them on large baskets filled to the brim. For salt they carried thirty kilos each trip, doing fifty trips each, stepping shoeless on the grains of salt.
Carrying water was also their job, often moving large barrels with all the water a house of 10 needed upon hills that horses and mules had trouble ascending.
(more photos for salt mining and carrying here)
It's no hyperbole to say these women carried their incomes and households on their backs. "The good she-housekeeper is a slave and a lady" the old Greek saying goes. A "good woman" was a woman who could be strong and work at home and in the field, often described with the qualities of a mule. Men took their wives out in the fields so much that some who were a bit more educated had to make their husbands sign that they wouldn't ask them to work alongside them in the fields! (source in Greek)
Some of these photos are also from 1970. I'm missing a photo from Leukada showing women carrying baskets of the stones they broke, and I'll add it here when I find it.
Basically, women were out of the house forever. A woman who got to stay home and never perform any labor had some type of privilege (wealth, status etc). Same as the many privileged men around the world who didn't perform any labor at all.
===================================
If my posts have helped you in any way consider buying me a ko-fi 💖
God bless this post. My grandma did not start working in the mines at the sweet age of 12 (on top of household chores + agricultural work) for you people do go around with that tradwife bullshit.
I know it’s hard for those people to imagine a woman can be anything else but a white wealthy American straight out of a 1950s advertisement, but the truth is the only thing that’s recent is women’s (labor) rights…
Precisely! There's nothing traditional about being a Trad-wife! A modern "Trad-wife" in the US has significantly less children and responsibilities than women around the world the previous centuries. (Which is good, btw, I don't want any more women worked to death. But I'm saying that this restriction is a modern invention)
Also one income was NEVER enough to sustain a family. This was possible only in some cases and for a few decades, like... in the 1% of cases in Human history. Normally the whole family had to work!
Have these people forgotten that every state around the world at some point had to beg and threaten families to let children go to school instead of taking them to the fields, the sea, the mines? Have we forgotten the child workers at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution? Children with families, most of the time. Why do you think the parents sent their 7-year-old kids to the factory? So they could buy another yacht or another villa?
Photos of working women in the 30s and 40s in Spain.
As a previous comment said, women carried the weight of their family on their back. Furthermore in the 60s and 70s a lot of men emigrated and women stayed with the children and raised them while continuing to work. My grandmother's didn't attend school because they had to work.
Same with black people in the Caribbean. I understand that there were black people who practiced Christianity prior to the Trans-Atlantic slave trade but let’s not pretend that it wasn’t also used as a tool to beat them into submission.
pixelskylines
2087
jbbartram-illu
yousharknotpass
gummygunk
areudirty
dededos
jacobvanloon
prguitarman
theartofmadeline
