stay vigilant. there are still people out there who will try to convince you that eating fruit is somehow bad for your body
$LAYYYTER

Origami Around
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

@theartofmadeline
occasionally subtle

#extradirty
Sade Olutola
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
official daine visual archive
Today's Document

oozey mess
YOU ARE THE REASON
RMH
Interview Vampire Daily
No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available

Product Placement
h

roma★
seen from Kenya
seen from Argentina

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Italy

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Pakistan
@hoodiehorder
stay vigilant. there are still people out there who will try to convince you that eating fruit is somehow bad for your body
in the age of repression and purity culture, getting more perverted is the only morally correct course of action
#(thousand-yard sex-disinterested aroace stare) cool opinion. love seeing this same sentiment 10000 times a day on this website
im also aroace. being disinterested in sex and romance is still sexual perversion in the eyes of the state. get more perverted in whichever direction fills you with the most joy!!!!!!
*takes the hand of a period drama writer gently* A queen consort is not a queen regnant. A dowager queen is not a queen regnant either.
There is very little intrinsic institutional power in queenship. The power a consort, dowager, or queen mother has depends mostly on how much the reigning sovereign (usually a man) is willing to grant her. Needing a queen to serve as regent is exceptionally rare, and the regent is more often a male relative.
I know this is a bit of a bummer. I'm sorry.
For clarity:
Queen regnant: woman who rules in her own right, not on behalf of someone else.
Regent: Someone who temporarily assumes the powers of the monarch on account of the monarch being too young or too incapacitated to govern.
Queen consort: Woman who is married to the monarch.
Dowager queen: Woman who was married to the monarch. The monarch is dead, and she is owed support as his widow.
Queen mother: Woman who is the mother of the monarch. Usually the dowager queen, though there are exceptions if there isn't a straight line of succession.
them and their miichains ☺️💖
just wanted to make a quick lil comic to say thank you for loving all my mii postings on IG and twt!!! 💚🧡
more and more and more and more :)
Special ❤️ Part 1
Special ❤️ Part 2
I think a big part of the reason Pokopia is hitting so hard for so many people is that we have had an absolute glut of post apocalyptic media that take the "humans are the monsters/disease/problem" angle. Even the most well meaning solar-punk I can think of often have this undercurrent of 'humanity's nature is inherently short sighted and exploitive and they must constantly be kept in check to protect the environment' which slides very quickly into 'the world would be better off without humans in it to complicate and threaten things'.
But Pokopia fully does not do that. The world is lonely without humans and lesser for humanity's absence. So much of the game is about how Pokemon miss humans and are struggling to make sense of a world without us, how the ecosystem is just as hurt by our absence as any other species, and how the things we left behind, even in ruins and burned shells, are often beautiful and strange and helpful to the Pokemon who find them.
Pokemon have always been this allegory for the natural world- back to the original idea of the games inspired by children who caught bugs and kept ant farms- and thus the relationship between Pokemon and humans becomes this allegory for the relationship between nature and humans. And Pokopia looks you dead in the eye and says "the world would be poorer without humans, and if we all vanished tomorrow the echoes of who we are and the things we did would still ring out for eons uncountable. We would be missed and mourned and searched for and the wound of our absence would be deeply felt on this earth for the rest of its turning. The actions of a few greedy short sighted humans will never change that."
And that. That hits.
u can just do whatever at any age all of the time nobody cares except teenagers
teenager will be like ur 40 with a hobby ? 💀 that’s sad <- nobody else thinks this way though they are just going through some stuff
this interview came out shortly after these episodes aired, and i've been sitting on it ever since you first declared that you had very little concern about whether Bakugou would go darkside. bonus handhold comment right after to spice up the would he/wouldn't he agony.
(do let me know if the "Did you know Viggo broke his toe in that scene?" commentary is too much lol)
WAAAA OMG…the second answer specifically regarding how it was actually kind of a sad scene because Izuku gave up on trying to be the one to reach out to bakugou…I literally made a note about it lmao
I’m debating on if it’s something I even want to add into my art notes because i don’t want to take the important bakugou and kirishima scene and just make it all about Izuku but the way he stepped aside and compromised his own ideals of heroism in that scene really broke my heart and, like horikoshi, I also had a feeling of wanting Izuku to do his best and save bakugou but the situation was so time sensitive and kirishima was the safest option
deleted episode sketch, thought id share the tokoyami crumbs
People who have a pervasive shit attitude toward everything are extremely exhausting to be around. No, this doesn't make you a bad person for having trauma or depression. You're allowed to go through hard times and lean on others for support. But there is a point where being negative and spiteful about things all the time is not only self-defeating but harmful to your relationships. There is a meaningful difference between talking about your struggles vs. almost pointedly refusing to engage with opportunities for positive experiences/emotions. The latter becomes contagious and fatiguing for people around you, because you're essentially expecting them to dig themselves into a hole, too. It can even start to feel like you're punishing others for enjoying things if you're not happy. And it's wrong.
Like my mother will often respond to a comment that's positive or happy by talking about how she's unhappy, upset, or angry about things, and she does it with a spiteful "good for you" tone. Absolutely nothing I say will get her to acknowledge that she's still being shown support and caring even if people aren't willing to be miserable with her all the time. It's a very unhealthy and emotionally immature trait. If this is you, I strongly suggest that you look at ways to improve your distress tolerance and consider the emotional impact you have on others. It is NOT others' job to regulate your emotions or fix all of the wrongs in your life for you. Other people's happiness or attempts at happiness aren't a betrayal.
The bottom line is that it does actually matter how you frame things, sometimes. A lot of the time. Are you committed to being miserable because you take some form of satisfaction in it, and is that maybe preventing you from being healthier and happier?
unauthorized fucking thing!!!!!!
(warning: loud chirping throughout)
source: hellgate osprey cam
Who you gonna call? CALL YUSUKE!!!
"I asked chatgpt-"
Well I asked the host of the community radio station of a small desert town and he said "Don't let numbers tell you what to do. You are blood and earth, not theory and chalk", so maybe think about that.
i made yyh keychains & stickers, get them here