i'm begging you, you cannot use "sex positive" to mean "enjoys having sex." sex positivity is a pro-sexual liberation political stance, emphasizing sexual autonomy, and freedom from the stigmatization and criminalization of consensual activities. it is good to be sex positive, and everyone should learn to be sex positive. but YOU DO NOT HAVE TO LIKE SEX TO BE SEX POSITIVE. if some people are saying "everyone should be sex positive, being sex negative is wrong," and some people are also saying "sex positive refers to people who like sex," do you understand how dangerously that muddles the message? it makes it sound like the message is "everyone should have and enjoy sex, and not doing so is wrong." which is actually the complete opposite of promoting sexual autonomy. you can't have sexual liberation if sex is something you HAVE to have to be a good person. i genuinely don't want to go nuclear rage on people for making what's often an innocent mistake, but as a person who is politically sex positive, and personally sex-repulsed/averse, it sounds like you're implying i'm actually sex negative, just for not wanting to have sex personally. people on this godforsaken planet constantly get pressured into sex as is, we can't let "having sex is politically good and saying no to sex is politically regressive" gain any more traction