Absolutely, @demonicintegrity!
Mind you, I am going to be providing not just sources for Lucifer, but the content I will be suggesting as good “reads” will provide holistic avenues to expand your knowledge in a way that is not keeping you in a vacuum of information. Other knowledge will support your ecosystem and garden of experience.
Lucifer: Princeps by Peter Grey
The Occult Philosophy of Lucifer by Jeremy Crow
Frater Acher’s books: His works are not Luciferian per se. His books explore spirit work, magical practice, and animistic approaches that many Luciferians find useful. Much more grounded than the "become a living god" ecosystem.
Jason Miller as a whole. Not Luciferian.
But if someone's actual goal is:
relationship with spirits
Then Miller often provides more usable instruction than many explicitly Luciferian authors. In fact, the work that Miller does will be useful for many many different praxis.
Again, not specifically Luciferian.
But if someone wants Western esotericism without stumbling into extremist recruitment pipelines, DuQuette is often a much healthier starting point. So check him out.
His series on the history of the Devil is still one of the best scholarly treatments available.
Lucifer: The Devil in the Middle Ages
Per Faxnels’ “Satanic Feminism”
Not Luciferian ritual materials. But one of the best studies of how Lucifer and Satan were reinterpreted by occultists, radicals, feminists, and esoteric thinkers from the 19th century onward.
For some “Video/Audio” content for you…
Angela Puca for academic discussion of occultism and esotericism.
Dr. Justin Sledge for rigorous historical treatment of Western esotericism.
Foolish Fish for book reviews and practical occult discussion.
I do want to emphasise something critical.
The problem is not Luciferianism itself. Obviously. I myself am Luciferian but I didn't "need" these texts to build my own praxis as I grew up with it ingrained in my family traditions.
The problem is that certain sectors of modern occultism overlap with accelerationist, neo-fascist / neo-nazi, white supremacist, and O9A-adjacent networks. Seek out authors whose work stands on scholarship, practical experience, and transparent methodology rather than elitism, racial mysticism, or shock-value transgression. If a text or an author seems to rely on these or references Blavatsky, then be aware and proceed with caution as you enter rhetoric that is racist or keyed to those habits.
origamiaround
2087
prguitarman
titsay
