A quick note--
This zine is still an ongoing project! It will still happen. The new due date for submissions is August 31st. Please get in touch if you have questions via our ask or email: [email protected]

Kiana Khansmith
wallacepolsom

roma★

JVL
No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Product Placement

No title available
ojovivo
Jules of Nature
Stranger Things
$LAYYYTER
sheepfilms
Keni
Claire Keane

#extradirty

blake kathryn
🪼
Cosmic Funnies
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Iraq

seen from Venezuela
seen from Iraq
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@inpraise-blog
A quick note--
This zine is still an ongoing project! It will still happen. The new due date for submissions is August 31st. Please get in touch if you have questions via our ask or email: [email protected]
Stories about queer women helped me conjure a world of my own, where I could let myself live on the margins of reality and what it had to offer me.
something that i think about a lot and that really stresses me out is archiving fandom like
over time fandoms go through so many distinct phases, and use such particular language and phrases, and have so many trends and reactive movements, and just this huge behind the scenes unique culture where so much is created. Not just fic and fan art, but the whole fan culture of a particular fandom moment. Like the popular ships, and crack theories, and specific jokes and memes that get passed around.
I know the fanlore wiki has a lot of this stuff for older and bigger fandoms, but i still get stressed because i don’t want anything to be forgotten. Like i don’t want all the wild harry potter crack theories to be lost, of les mis fandom memes, or the legendary a;tla ship wars (even the bad parts of fandom should be preserved for people to learn from, because this same shit inevitably repeats itself). And in addition to wanting to preserve current fandom cultures or ones from the recent past, i also love learning about the culture of much older, established fandoms like star wars and stark trek! Like the fact that skysolo was a thing back when the OT was coming out and that george lucas hated it so much that he did everything in his power to shut it down. That’s such an important part of the sw fandom culture! Or how fan perception of characters evolves and changes over time, like with the ewoks.
i think part of what makes it so hard is that even though fandom these days mostly takes place on the internet, it still has many of the same drawbacks and flaws that things considered “oral tradition” might. Like things are rarely published in an official sense; tropes, theories, and jokes are often collaboratively created; information is shared in the form of text posts and on message boards. It’s even harder with older fandom material that comes mostly from zines and early-internet message boards that are unfortunately often lost or deactivated.
hopefully there are starting to be more people out there who actually document these things. I actually had a class just this past semester where we briefly studied harry potter fandom trends and there were actual scholarly articles that cited fics on ao3. But yeah i spend way too much time on the fanlore wiki and way too much time thinking about this but fandoms are an important cultural element that should be documented and archived for future generations
Episode 46: The Fits
This week, Morgan and Gavia discuss Anna Rose Holmer’s 2016 indie The Fits. Topics include the horrors of middle school, hysteria outbreaks, kids on film, and the movie’s masterful use of cinematic language.
Listen on iTunes here
Links
“Review: In ‘The Fits,’ a Graceful Tale of a Girl Who Follows Her Own Beat,” Manohla Dargis, The New York Times
“Anna Rose Holmer on Directing The Fits and the Power of Contagion,” Julia Felsenthal, Vogue
It's Just Fan Fic...
I got an email from a reader earlier. The sender was a lovely young woman who had just re-read my first published fic and wanted to tell me how much she enjoyed it—how it made her feel, how it made her smile, how it made her cry, how it made her excited to get home each night and curl up in bed with it, how it helped ease the pain of a difficult patch in her life, and how much she misses it now that it’s over. It was a beautiful letter, and my reaction to it must have been visible enough to make my saner half take notice from across the room. He shot me a questioning look, and I turned the laptop around and gestured to the screen.
I followed his eyes as they scanned each line, saw his lips tip up in a smile that grew broader as he read, then braced myself for the good natured snark I’ve come to expect when my little literary hobby comes up in conversation.
“Wow.” He said. “That was kind of amazing. How does it feel to be someone’s favorite author?”
“Don’t be a dick,” I said, slapping him on the shoulder.
“I’m serious,” he replied, gesturing to the screen. "That’s what she said—right there: You’re my favorite author.”
“I think she means favorite fic author. Not real author.”
“Is there a difference?” He asked.
“Yes,” I said, rolling my eyes. ”Of course there is.”
“Why?”
“Because, as someone in this room who isn’t ME is fond of pointing out, self published gay mystery romance novels aren’t exactly eligible for the pulitzer.” I said, turning the computer back around.
“So what?” he shrugged, “Something you wrote inspired a stranger to sit down write what it meant to them and send it to you. A lot of total strangers, as a matter of fact. You write, people read it and react. That makes you an author.”
“Huh.” I said, very eloquently, then got up and went into the kitchen to start dinner.
Hours later, sitting down to reply to the letter in question I find myself writing this post instead. Because here’s the thing: That wonderfully crazy man who lives in my house is right. (But please don’t tell him I said that)
From the moment I realized that letters made up words and words made up sentences and sentences made up worlds that were mine to explore any time I wanted to I’ve been a reader. I have fallen in love with perfect phrases and epic stories and countless characters pressed between the pages of the thousands of books I’ve read in my life so far—and sitting down to string together those same 26 letters into tens of thousands of words of stories I felt needed telling? That makes me an author.
I have adored the work of countless authors in numerous genres, and the world of fan fic is no exception. I have admired and cherished and savored the words of talented writers whose work is no less legitimate for the fact that their names include random keyboard characters and their words don’t live on bound paper on a shelf.
It’s not JUST fan fic. It’s literature. It’s published. It’s read. It’s loved.
It matters.
Thanks to all of my favorite authors for every word on every page on every screen that I’ve ever loved.
Reblog for the sweet anon who asked me if I thought fanfic was as important as “real” fiction. Hope this answers your question. :)
Thanks for reading my work, so happy you’re enjoying In The Library!
Read this. Take it to heart. REMEMBER IT.
Comments are the best
They really are. Anything that manages to touch another person, make their life – their day, a particular minute – better is invaluable.
“Let us not desert one another; we are an injured body. Although our productions have afforded more extensive and unaffected pleasure than any other literary corporation in this world, no species of composition has been so much decried. … There seems almost a general wish of decrying the capacity and under-valuing the labour of the novelist, and of slighting the performances which have only genius, wit, and taste to recommend them.“
–Jane Austen, defending that most reviled of genres: the novel.
As Joanna Russ says in How to Suppress Women’s Writing, “Jane Austen … worked (as some critics tend to forget) in a genre that had been dominated by women for a century and one that was looked down upon as trash, a position that may have given her considerable artistic freedom.”
This is us, now. This is fanfic.
Russ also writes that “women always write in the vernacular. Not strictly true, and yet it explains a lot. It certainly explains letters and diaries. … It explains why so many wrote ghost stories in the nineteenth century and still write them.”
As I’ve said before, what is more vernacular in the 21st century than ephemeral, fannish internet porn? This is us. We are part of the long tradition of women writing and being told their writing is not real and does not matter, that the things we love and value are worthless and foolish, for so long that we even begin to believe it.
Our work is real work. Our writing is real writing. Our stories matter. Our community matters. We are here, together, doing this thing. This is real life. This counts. If you write something on the internet, you write it in real life.
Fanfic matters. Fanfic is literature. Fanfic is literature that breaks the bounds printing technology and capitalism once imposed on the wide distribution of the written word. Copyright law, royalties, the logistics of producing and selling paperback books, none of those can touch the heart of what a story is. None of those make your story any less a real story that can really touch another person.
If anyone tries to tell you different, you can tell them Jane Austen begs to differ.
Fanfic is never just fic.
I’ve had someone tell me I literally saved her life, by giving her something to look forward to, to keep reading. I’ve read stories that’ve made me get teary and smile and stay up until 3am.
Fanfic works on an emotional, connective, affective, aesthetics-of-pleasure level. This is a different function from most ‘mainstream’ literature, as the professors over at fangasmspn have pointed out in their academic book on fandom. It serves a different purpose–one that’s closer to romance novels or other ‘pulp fictions’. This is not to denigrate either function–we need to know how to read Shakespeare or Chaucer, how to think objectively and analytically about lives lived in other places and times, how to read factual scientific pieces for data, how to engage with the literature of ideas–by which I mean idea-driven rather than character-driven (and most literature blends the two; it’s not a hard-and-fast boundary).
Fanfic serves a different and equally valid purpose: community, social engagement, empathy, emotional catharsis, subversion of traditional conceptions re desire and sexuality, exercise of pleasure and reclaiming of the importance of pleasure, aesthetic appreciation, creativity plus appreciation for others’ creativity, and as Larsen and Zubernis point out in Fandom at the Crossroads, a form of healing that’s potentially both individual and collective, involving a space for exploration of identity and identification.
#i’m thinking of bourdieu’s ideas on cultural capital #highbrow versus lowbrow #the first being the *legitimate culture* #it’s kind of where it always comes back #the idea that there’s a legitimate culture #a superior one #linked to class ofc #it’s so useful to reframe the discussion #it erases the gender politics part of the equation #and instead of thinking in terms of different functions #you think in terms of different audiences and of *quality* (via @and-then-bam-cassiopeia)
Thank you Cass for bringing Bourdieu in your tags! It’s such a crucial part of the discussion about fanfiction, and why it is always judged as the opposite of “true” (read “noble”) literature. Yes, there is a gender aspect to it, but we should never forget that when we talk about “culture”, we necessarily talk about class.
as someone who spent a lot of time this week arguing for the basic legitimacy as fan fiction as a fucking form (and i’m not even a big fic reader), this resonates. this is so good.
@humantrampoline85 @jesslovestype
Fan. D’oh. Metrics.
🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕
(Music) Fans across the globe mourned the loss of Chris Cornell (No. 6). His music left a lasting impression on so many, and he will be incredibly missed.
(Web Stuff) Oh, man. Car Boys, a game-streaming show from Polygon, debuts at No. 5.
(Video Games) The debuts of Destiny 2 (No. 20) and Injustice 2 (No. 13) gives our Video Games list some fresh blood.
(Anime & Manga) K, a show that follows a boy caught in a psychic war, debuts at No. 4. K!
👆👆👆👆👆
(Web Stuff) The Adventure Zone jumps five spots to No. 1 after their brand new episode dropped.
(Music) She tells us there ain’t no crying in the club, but Camila Cabello’s (No. 2) new song is in fact titled Crying in the Club.
(Movies) We see London, we see France, we see Captain Underpants leaping twelve spots to No. 8.
(Ships) Bellarke (The 100’s Bellamy Blake and Clarke Griffin) ascends five spots to No. 4.
👇👇👇👇👇
(K-Pop) DAY6 fell to No. DAY16.
(Celebrities) King Kylie Jenner (No. 20) crumbles ten spots down to the absolute bottom.
(Anime & Manga) One Piece fell to pieces, spiraling five spots down to No. 15.
👿 The Season 12 Finale Supernatural Effect👿
(Television) Supernatural rounds out season 12 with a bang, propelling them nine spots to No. 1.
(Celebrities) Which led way for Misha Collins (No. 4) and Jared Padalecki (No. 10) to make a super cool return to our list. Jensen Ackles inched seven spots up to an impressive No. 2.
(Ships) Cockles (Jensen Ackles and Misha Collins) makes its debut at No. 19, while longtime fan fave Destiel (Dean Winchester & Castiel) floats up twelve to No. 3
“Being an adult is hard, so you might as well as much as you can do the thing you love to do while living in this hard world. I encourage you to do that if writing is what you want to do, or any artform. A lot of people discourage – especially, it’s interesting—people of color from pursuing art as a career. I think there’s just a lot of fear about not having enough and you don’t want to struggle. But I just was like well, I’d rather struggle doing what I love than have a lot of money and be depressed and sad and angry and bitter because that’s what I would be if I wasn’t creative and if I wasn’t doing what I want to do. So that’s what I did, yes. People discouraged me but I did it anyway.” –Renée Watson
It’s been 10 years since we first started taking the Hobbits to Isengard. I mean, it’s been way longer - the Hobbits could have fucking walked there, back again, managed to get served several times at the downstairs bar in Doggett’s and got a Southeastern train service all the way to Charing Cross since Tolkien put pen to page. But (and believe me, this is deeply unusual for me) let’s put J R R aside in this.
Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy is kind of… well, both too faithful (total lack of critical interrogation of Tolkien’s absolutely awful concepts around race, gender, etc.) and not faithful enough in that it appeared to miss all the points your correspondent’s teenage self managed to find in the series. Specifically, where Lord of the Rings is an obsessively detailed but ultimately quite modest and traumatised epic, a huge amount of which is two small, starving creatures crawling around in mud having moral dilemmas. The Jackson films take themselves as seriously and grandly as the books came to be and as I suspect their author probably never did.
Taking the Hobbits to Isengard, on the other hand, is a pure and perfect work and I will hear no ill spoken of it else ye never receive a pint in a round bought by me again.
It takes as its base the Hovis-theme-ripping-off music from The Shire - the small-worlded part of the films, before any grandeur is truly injected into the bloated beastie that is the trilogy. The Hobbiton theme is supposed to be homely, reassuring, quaint - like anything that succeeds at that, it sounds fucking amazing played on an airhorn.
The simplicity of the Shire’s theme is what allows it to so naturally accept the kitchen-sink style auditory ornamentation that is ‘a donk’. A classic staple of rave, it needs no introduction even in a world as apparently dislocated from two WKDs and a honk on some poppers as the miruvor-quaffing pipeweed fiends we see here.
As a lyrical piece, Taking The Hobbits is discursive - like many of the very best pieces of pop. One only has to consider the sweet, sweet tension of Fleetwood Mac’s The Chain or Brandy and Monica’s iconic The Boy Is Mine to recognise that dialogous pop is, when it works, a particularly sublime genre.
It doesn’t matter that the lines are, ostensibly, orphaned from their original place in the script - from the eponymous ejaculation to Gollum’s hissed What did u say??? they’re all perfectly addressing each other in the sort of gloriously confused cacophony usually reserved for a misunderstanding-based brawl outside a kebab shop at 3am.
I remember the first time I heard Taking The Hobbits To Isengard. It was quite a momentous occasion because I still had dial up, so it took roughly the length of a decent pop song to load and it was very difficult to tell if it was deliberate or a bandwidth-related glitch remix for at least 30 torturously disrupted seconds. I’d imagined it would be a fairly quick joke - most internet video based things were, at the time, but no; a fully fledged song. That just kept going.
The initial air horns! These are funny, yes because we remember them as the Shire theme, which isn’t even the music for this bit. The stuttering sample of the original line! Which sustains itself as Sheffield Dave-style shout out far better than it should, given it’s old seriousface Elf ears himself yelling off a horse.
(In retrospect, should have equated that with Sheffield Dave earlier)
Then there’s …polka bit. Few pop songs manage to maintain a polka interlude - Bohemian Rhapsody springs to mind but Taking the Hobbits To Isengard manages to repeatedly insert it without losing coherency around its original rave premise. If you don’t think ‘Tell me where is Gandalf, for I much desire to speak with him’ delivered over a little eurodance handbag bit is not both extremely funny and excellent pop, I can’t help you.
Taking The Hobbits To Isengard would score reasonably at Eurovision. Not because Eurovision is actually the home of comedy trash but because if France (and it would probably have to be France in order for the Elven analogues to take themselves seriously enough) scooted in on an artpop platform and wanged loads of fucking airhorns round the stadium it would be entirely in keeping with European sensibilities of solemnly considering the totally whimsical due to our inherent reservedness about experiencing joy.
(The slightly older and wiser part of me has to question the repeated use of Gollum’s ‘stupid, fat, Hobbits’ which makes sense in the context of what he is but isn’t inherently funny, unlike a context-dislocated, bass-intoned ‘A Balrog of Morgoth’)
The great thing about Taking The Hobbits To Isengard is it actually gets funnier the more it goes on. Like Star Trekkin it not only sets out to commit to a fairly one-note premise but to hammer that note until it falls out through the piano and becomes a transcendent free agent, cascading through the strings.
It takes a premise; that the Lord of the Rings films, in their overblown format, are very, very silly and runs with it extremely, deadly seriously. This is the core of not all but a fairly substantial chunk of really good pop, as well as an excellent manual for life. All things are here - a manic sense of imminent implosion, troubling past associated with racist ideologies, handcarts, hell, what did u say???
Very seriously; Taking The Hobbits To Isengard is a superb piece of fan work and it has substantially enriched my life to listen to it on loop for the past 45 minutes whilst watching a parliamentary debate on mute. Creators of this piece: thank.
My friend Hazel wrote a Very Serious post about a Very Serious and Important fanwork and you should all read it immediately
Reblogging for the Star Trekkin reference (and everything else)
We love hating the things teenage girls love. Fandom is just one example.
Stands up on soapbox, holds up this article like it’s the opening of the Lion King.
Y’all should read this because it is FIRE, but also because a post from the Time Lady Project was linked in this!
Historically, whenever young women are interested in a form of media, we like to tell them it is bad for them and that they are bad for liking it — unless the media goes mainstream, in which case it becomes no longer feminine and hence okay. Novels are dangerous and cause insanity, until they become classics worthy of being studied in college. Beatlemania is the province of “the dull, the idle, the failures,“ until the Beatles become a band that everyone loves.
Young women are so attacked for loving the media they love that it is a radical act for a young woman to love something unashamedly. And transformative fandom is the most radical act of all, because it reverses that “lady thing to respectable thing” process.
Emphasis added. It’s so good- go read the whole thing.
In this way, machinima, at its core, is not markedly different than vids. What truly differentiates machinima from vids are how each genre is perceived, evaluated and categorized within mainstream culture and its analysis within the academic community. This difference in evaluation is rooted, again, with cultural constructions of masculinity and femininity that align technology, material production and work in the public sphere with masculinity and function to marginalize the labor, interests and concerns of women by associating them with the private, symbolic and bodily.
Hampton, Darlene Rose. 2010. “Beyond Resistance: Gender, Performance, and Fannish Practice in Digital Culture.”
Really interesting look at how two forms of fan-made video (vids and machinima) are perceived differently based on the (assumed) gender of their creators.
Hey Harry Potter fandom, does anyone still have or could point me to really old meta and theories from when the boos were first being published? I suddenly really want to see what fans were thinking when only the first 2 books were out, what they was gonna happen, what their analyses of the characters were. I want to see into Potter Fandom History.
i have two approaches to canon
So if we extrapolate from this one-off line in episode fifteen, as well as this tweet by the creator and the answers given at this comic con panel from 2014, we can infer that this character’s relationship with salad is more complex than it first appears …
*pulls down sunglasses and points a flamethrower at the source material* Death of the author, baby.
The Ao3 Tag of the Day is: The ultimate fix-it
AND THIS IS WHY I LOVE FANFICTION.
IN PRAISE is a zine dedicated to fandom in all its forms. We’re looking for critical looks, funny stories, and interesting theories about fandom in all its forms. We have examples of content on our About page and you can ask questions here!