@invitethewindinside - Tumblr Blog

allnonsensevampire

all of the emotionally abusive boyfriends watching midsommar in theaters sitting like

hunterschafer

EUPHORIA (2019)

mykukula

determinate-negation

new york freakin university baby

noblepeasant

Doxxing is illegal -_-

thyrell

so is child trafficking so i guess no ones perfect

kingalistairtheirin

“The dataset was compiled by New York-based activist Sam Lavigne, who trawled the professional profile website LinkedIn to identify some 1,600 people working for ICE. The database included public information like job titles or profile pictures of the officers.” all public infos so not illegal lmfao

dovewithscales

As stated, doxxing is not illegal. Hacking is illegal. Making threats of violence is illegal. Those are separate things unrelated to the act of sharing information itself. When the person you’re doxxing is an agent of a white nationalist regime which is in violation of human rights and international law, it’s not only legal, but also moral.

Here’s a short list (with sources) of things ICE has recently done which are both illegal and immoral:

Kidnapping

Homicide

Torture

Child Abuse

Sexual Assault

Child Neglect

Child Endangerment

Illegal Searches

More Illegal Searches

Lying About Warrants

Harassment of US Citizens

Wrongful Arrest

Police Impersonation

When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. Law does not always equal justice.

If those who create and enforce the law act in an immoral and abusive fashion, there is no moral obligation to follow the laws which they create to protect themselves and cow their victims into obedience.

The argument that one should prioritize law over justice and morality and refrain from standing up against oppression because the oppressor made it illegal is a fallacy, and it makes you complicit. The Holocaust was legal, standing up to the SS was not. If you have to cite law in a conversation about ethics, you’ve already lost.

mulukhiyah-deactivated20200604

me clicking on the new l word trailer

coaztal

How’s men

bluethundabomb

– (x)

taur

zendadya

euphoria: period.

03josten

it IS a phase, mom

pr0jection

show me a permanent state of the self, mom

accras

Toni Morrison dancing at a disco party in New York. March 5, 1974. Photographed by Waring Abbott

policewillbetheresoondontworry

On average, three people read an academic paper. At least 100,000 have read this—and a lot of them haven't taken it very well.

I hate Vice but love the headline.

What if I told you there was a paper on climate change that was so uniquely catastrophic, so perspective-altering, and so absolutely depressing that it’s sent people to support groups and encouraged them to quit their jobs and move to the countryside?

Good news: there is. It’s called “Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy.” I was introduced to it via an unlikely source—a guy formerly in advertising who had left his job to become a full-time environmental campaigner. “We’re fucked,” he told me. “Climate change is going to fuck us over. I remember thinking, Should I just accept the deep adaptation paper and move to the Scottish countryside and wait out the apocalypse?”

“Deep Adaptation” is quite unlike any other academic paper. There’s the language (“we are about to play Russian Roulette with the entire human race with already two bullets loaded”). There’s the flashes of dark humor (“I was only partly joking earlier when I questioned why I was even writing this paper”). But most of all, there’s the stark conclusions that it draws about the future. Chiefly, that it’s too late to stop climate change from devastating our world—and that “climate-induced societal collapse is now inevitable in the near term.”

How near? About a decade.