I always come back to the example that edgylords love to use as a shield: Mel Brooks.
These status quo warriors always whine about how Muh EssJayDoublueEws or whatever would keep Brooks from making a movie today because "they don't get satire." Well, let me tell you, I spend a hell of a lot of time in leftist and social justice oriented circles, and plenty of people in those circles, myself included, love Mel Brooks.
This might catch a few people off guard. How could I enjoy Brooks's work with my ideals? Because Brooks knew how to use satire to punch up.
Take Blazing Saddles, the go to example for the "it's just a joke" crowd. I've seen this movie more times than I can count, it was one of the first rated-r movies I got to see, so trust me when I say I know this movie backwards and forwards. I think these people think because certain words are used in this movie, it would be ran out of town by a pitchfork wielding mob.
Here's the problem though, Brooks only uses those words to show a character is either 1) evil, 2) stupid/ignorant, or 3) both.
The main villain uses a slur to demonstrate that, hey, this is a bad dude, this is a bad guy. The residents of Rock Ridge use slurs against Sheriff Bart to demonstrate that they are ignorant, and you'll notice they stop using it once they're on his side.
The movie goes out of its way to show that the racist people in Rock Ridge that used slurs against Sheriff Bart are stupid because of it:
The very first scene, the Railroad one, goes to great lengths to show the ranch hands/cowboys, the people who would be heroes in a traditional Western and the archetype worshiped by the cultural right in this country, to be idiotic henchman that believe in wrongheaded stereotypes ("y'know, the Camptown Ladies!") while the railworking black men are cunning and intelligent. If that scene was made by any of these selfproclaimed satirist chuds, the cowboys would ask the the railworkers for a song and the railworkers would burst out into a lively rendition of the Camptown Ladies in an over the top minstrel-show style and that would be their satire.
I really hope you can see the difference there.
These are people that think that Eric Cartman and Archie Bunker are meant as relatable role models rather than over-exaggerated jabs at those with social power.
This only a snippet of Brooks's work, I recommend (if you have the time) to watch Lindsay Ellis's video essay on why Mel Brooks isn't the Edgelord God people think he is: