Good afternoon sluts and those of us who wanted to be sluts but never got around to it
Xuebing Du
Sweet Seals For You, Always
tumblr dot com
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
NASA
hello vonnie

if i look back, i am lost

Love Begins
EXPECTATIONS

shark vs the universe

Andulka
The Bowery Presents
taylor price

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

roma★

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available
todays bird
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Iraq
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Türkiye

seen from Guatemala
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam

seen from Germany
seen from Chile
seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ecuador
seen from Thailand
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from United States
@itsmadinotmaddie
Good afternoon sluts and those of us who wanted to be sluts but never got around to it
Happiness Will Come To You.
when tho
When You Least Expect It. Probably Late March
reblog for happiness to come for you in late march!
I reblogged this last year and I hung out with blink-182 backstage on March 30. Reblogging again because it worked the first time.
honestly, last year one of the best days of my life happened in late March
I GOT A FUCKING RAISE THE POTATO WORKED WTF
This potato works. Every. Fucking. Time.
Then bring me luck
the day after I posted this last time I was notified that I was selected for a really cool mentorship gig and got an unrelated glowing review at work
Oddly specific. Got a deposit for 6,837 today
fuck it, i never ever do those “reblog for X, this one really works!” posts, but this one doesn’t have any of that BS, this is just straight up wishing us good things; and then the comment doesn’t even say any of that either. Zero claims on this post, all positive vibes
May you end this week feeling ever more certain of a future you’ll love
May you end this week feeling ever more certain of a future you’ll love
oh so they’re just saying the quiet part out loud? Good to know they’re just out and open now
That’s not the quiet part.
There’s something else, something they might not even be fully aware of themselves. The real quiet part is that if it was *their* child or *their* ectopic pregnancy they’d pull out all the stops to save their life or get their grandchild aborted. Planned Parenthood sees reactionaries and regressives all the time, and they are every bit the nightmare patients you’d imagine them to be. But the one thing all those patients have in common is that *their* abortion is *justified*, and the next week they’ll be outside the clinic again, rejoining the protestors for “killing their baby”.
It’d be one thing to have ghoulish principles, but the far-right have none at all.
When the Anti-Choice Choose By Joyce Arthur Copyright © September, 2000 Available in a French translation Available in a German translation
When I was younger and had more time to waste on the internet, and spent a lot of time in various online forums getting into arguments -- on purpose -- I made up a game I called Six Degrees of Slut.
The game (which is a variation on the well known Six Degrees of Bacon) was very simple. In any discussion of abortion, see whether you could get the other side to articulate, within six back-and-forth exchanges, some variation of The Filthy Sluts Must Be Punished. Regardless of where their argument started, the goal of the game was to get them to admit that.
I never once lost a game of Six Degrees of Slut. On a few occasions the match was inconclusive - the other person left off arguing before we reached round six - but I never lost; I never once reached six rounds of debate with a prolifer without them expressing some variation on this sentiment. But what was really remarkable to me was, a lot of times, that there was no effort involved at all -- they would blurt it out themselves, with effectively no provocation.
Scratch a prolifer, and you'll find right under the surface the conviction that The Filthy Sluts Must Be Punished. I have never once yet found an exception. Sometimes you don't even have to scratch.
bye to a real one… add your favourite smash mouth tweet
I have a hard time talking about American law enforcement, because I have ptsd (like a therapist told me this and everything) from my own experiences with cops and because it’s so balls quaking insane.
Like, a cop in the United States can pull you over for any reason. Which is a nice way of saying no reason, because literally anything can be used after the fact as justification. A cop can say its cuz you looked at him, or didnt look at him, or it looked like you were holding something, or looked like you were driving too perfectly for it to be natural. It’s insane.
There are apparently no circumstances where a cop can’t just kill you. The line the courts have applied is “reasonably believed” you were a threat, but that’s such a nebulous nothing limit that people get shot for reaching for their license, having their phone in their hand, you’re running away with no weapon, not being able to follow conflicting commands, like anything. And cops are almost never charged, because every court is going to believe he could “reasonably believe” he was threatened. Fuck, if you give me enough time, I can make any situation seem juuuuust plausibly threatening enough to pass that bar. It’s insane.
A cop can just rob you. Like tell you to give him your wallet, take all the cash out, and just walk away with it. Exactly like you would imagine getting robbed in an alley would go, except no one can help. And he doesn’t even have to hide it, he just drops it in a box at the station and they put it in their bank account. It’s legal. You can’t prove it wasn’t drug money. I can’t prove any money wasn’t at some point drug money. It’s insane.
If a cop just walks in your front door and says “I’m here to kill you and your entire family” YOU ARE GOING TO PRISON IF YOU STOP HIM. There is no positive defense for assaulting a police officer in the United States, and doubly so if you kill him. You have effectively no defense against a homicidal cop, which happens same as any other job. Unless for some reason you have cameras all thru your house and clearly caught the audio of him saying that he’s there just to kill you, you have zero chance of not going to prison, probably for life. And that’s assuming you aren’t killed “resisting arrest” while being taken into custody. It is a crime, in this country, for you to defend yourself under any circumstances if the person you’re defending yourself from is a cop. That’s insane.
You don’t have civil rights if a cop says so. You have the right to have a gun, right? A lot of states have open carry. A cop can shoot you if he sees you have a gun. Doesn’t matter if you have a license and everything. So you effectively don’t have the right to bear arms if a cop can shoot you for exercising it. You have the right to protest. Unless a cop tells you to stop. He doesn’t need a real reason to tell you to stop. And if you don’t stop, you can be arrested or shot. So you don’t really have the right to protest, do you? A cop cant just search your car or house, right? Unless he claims he heard something, or smelled something, neither of which can be proven. So a cop can search whatever he wants, as long as he pretends there was a “reason”. So you dont have protection from unreasonable search and seizure, do you? These are no longer rights- they’re things the cops allow.. for now. But legally, those rights have already been found to not actually be rights, because any random cop can decide to take that right from you, for any reason. It’s insane.
These aren’t like crazy things that I’m just making up, these aren’t some weird twisted way I’m looking at something, these are all very real things that we all just.. ignore? Police abolitionists and the media bring these things up all the time, and the overwhelming response to it is: so what? Don’t break the law and it won’t matter. Blue lives matter. More police funding. Cops should have tanks. It’s insane. And I always feel like im just rambling and sound insane when I say this kind of stuff because if you wrote a book and had the dystopian government doing the stuff that the police in this country do every single day, those same people who “back the blue” would line up to say stuff like “*Books government* wouldnt have a chance before us real americans stopped them” on twitter and not even get a hint of the irony.
requested by anonymous:
RATING: TBC*
*I am holding off on rating this due to the complexity of the subject. Whilst some of the content is technically inaccurate, it may be true from a practical standpoint - for example, ‘It is a crime, in this country, for you to defend yourself under any circumstances if the person you’re defending yourself from is a cop’ is factually untrue in terms of the law, and yet forceful resistance against excessive force is almost never found to be defensible in US courts.
In the US, officers do not need ‘probable cause’ for a traffic stop, but they do need ‘reasonable suspicion’ of criminal activity - which, while broad, is not ‘any reason’.
Source: ‘we held that the police can stop and briefly detain a person for investigative purposes if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity “may be afoot,” even if the officer lacks probable cause.’
Whilst there have been a few occasions where police officers were found guilty of murder or manslaughter, such as Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd, it is very rare. The vast majority aren’t held accountable.
Source: ‘Yet even with footage from an unblinking cellphone camera, officers usually aren’t held accountable for killing someone. A Wall Street Journal report in 2015 found approximately 1,200 people had been killed by police, but no officers were found guilty of murder or manslaughter. In 2016, several officers have gone to trial, including six in Baltimore accused of killing Gray, but so far none of them have received jail time.
That’s in large part because Initial investigations of police-involved deaths usually have to prove that an officer knowingly and intentionally killed the victim without justification or provocation, experts say. State laws give wide latitude to police when it comes to use of force‘
Source: ‘Former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin was sentenced Friday to 22 ½ years in prison for the murder of George Floyd,’
The fourth paragraph seems to be referring to Civil Forfeiture. It is more complex than stated in the post; the government does have to prove in court that the property is linked to a crime, although the standard of proof varies in different states. A South Carolina judge has ruled it as unconstitutional.
Source: ‘Civil Judicial Forfeiture: An in rem (against the property) court proceeding brought against property that was derived from or used to commit an offense, rather than against a person who committed an offense. Unlike criminal forfeiture, there is no criminal conviction required, although the government is still required to prove in court that the property was linked to criminal activity.’
Source: ‘John’s ruling in Horry County went far beyond the Supreme Court ruling, declaring that South Carolina’s forfeiture statutes violate the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and the sections 3 and 15 of the S.C. Constitution.
If money or property is seized, it’s up to the owner to claim it and fight to get it back. The owner must bear the cost of a lawyer, and the burden is on them to prove there’s no connection to criminal activity.‘
You do legally have a right to defend yourself against excessive force or unlawful arrest from police officers. Despite this, US courts rarely find forceful resistance to be defensible.
Source: ‘It’s rare that someone being placed under arrest has the right to forcefully resist. But in most states, if the arresting officer uses excessive force that could cause “great bodily harm,” arrestees have the right to defend themselves. That’s because most states hold that an officer’s use of excessive force amounts to assault or battery, which a victim has a right to defend against.
[…] if a reasonable person would have felt it necessary to resist in self-defense, and if that person used a reasonable degree of force when resisting, the resistance is typically justified. But this is a very high standard to meet—so high that courts hardly ever find that an arrestee’s forceful resistance was defensible.’
It’s an awkward mismatch, because “technically inaccurate” isn’t quite accurate itself – OP was making a point about what happens in real life, rather than what’s legal on paper. The statement “It’s technically illegal for a cop to do X, but the court will believe the cop who lies and claims it didn’t happen” isn’t actually incompatible with “Cops can do this to you and face no consequences.”
Because they can.
@athingbynatureprodigal hi, thanks for your feedback! I think I may have been unclear in my post, so I will elaborate here. I understand that those two concepts are not mutually exclusive, and that was the point I was trying to make - otherwise I would have rated it as unreliable.
In the context of the post, I think it is probable that the OP is talking about the real life outcomes as opposed to the law on paper, but if taken literally, some of this would be incorrect. For example, ‘It is a crime, in this country, for you to defend yourself under any circumstances if the person you’re defending yourself from is a cop’ is factually incorrect if taken literally (which some people may do, particularly autistic people).
The purpose of this blog is primarily to state whether information is correct or incorrect. I have attempted to take the context and intent into account here, but I want to make it clear for people who may read this literally that a literal reading would not be accurate.
If anyone feels this needs further clarifying, feel free to message me or continue the discussion!
As with most legal questions, the best answer is “depends on what the judge finds convincing.” I think is-the-post-reliable is attempting to capture some of that but the notion that law only matters to the extent that decisionmakers care that it matters is one that is so foreign to the ears of people living in democracies that it sounds insane.
(Before anyone comes in and says “African-Americans understand this,” please note that I said “people living in democracies.” I have argued since 2016 that minoritized populations, especially Black ones, in the United States are at best living under a competitive authoritarian regime, if not full autocracy.)
[id: tweet by user ziibiing from August 24, 2023 that says “If you share Trump’s mugshot today, please share that the Fulton County Jail it was taken at, is at 3x it’s capacity, infested with bugs, is holding 87% Black people, most of whom haven’t seen a day in court.
Six people have died in custody this year. Fuck cops, fuck jails.” /end id]
but no yeah lets have the conversation:
"the CEO doesnt want to run that kind of website" Excuse, shouldnt have bought the 'go nuts show nuts whatever' website if thats the case. APPEAL DENIED
"we have to follow the TOS of the appstores we're hosted on" Excuse item one, no you dont, item two, you have since those days implimented infrastructure that would allow pornography and sex work on this platform Without violating TOS of any applicable app store. APPEAL DENIED
"we own the site we get to make the rules" Incorrect, this site has only ever made profit when the users willed it. we collectively own the site as a hive mind and no legal change in ownership will change that. APPEAL DENIED
"we have to keep this website safe for the children who use it" Argument based on fallacy banning pornography and sex workers does not prevent pornography and sex work from occuring on the site, it only forces aforementioned users to hide and avoid labling their content appropriately, which REDUCES the safety for children and sex workers alike instead of increasing it, this has been shown to the point that making this argument at all is tantamount to admiting fascist intent APPEAL DENIED
Reblog it. I want this to be on Tumblr radar by end of the week, i want my notes to be useless from the discourse, i want every single person on Tumblr to have seen this post at some point
the post that’s like i don’t need a period tracker because once i start drafting my suicide letter then i know it’s close
Favorite genre of post
oh to have a silly little house like this...
the inside has to look like this.
Crow skiing down a roof with a small lid or something….