[kcenvs3000f24-deactivated202412]

Blog Post #10: Describe your personal ethic as you develop as a nature interpreter. What beliefs do you bring? What responsibilities do you have? What approaches are most suitable for you as an individual?

As I journeyed through this course and deepened my understanding of nature interpretation, I found myself progressively reflecting on the personal ethic that guided my approach. What beliefs do I bring to this work? What responsibilities do I have? How do I translate my unique personality and insights into a meaningful experience for others? These are questions that have shaped my learning and will continue to shape my practice as a nature interpreter.

At the core of my personal ethic lies the belief that nature interpretation is more than just educating or entertaining, it’s about fostering a connection between people and the natural world. As emphasized in Chapter 1, interpreters “enrich experiences by expanding awareness and understanding” (Beck et al., 2018). This resonates deeply with me, as I view interpretation as a bridge, a way to connect the visible wonders of the environment, like a towering oak tree or a meandering stream, with the intangible meanings they hold, such as resilience, interconnection, and history. This belief aligns with Freeman Tilden’s first principle of interpretation: connecting what is being described to something within the personality or experience of the visitor (Beck et al., 2018). For me, this means finding ways to make nature relatable. Whether it’s through a story about a bird’s migration or a hands-on activity that uncovers patterns in nature, I aim to create moments of revelation that inspire awe and curiosity.

As a nature interpreter, my role is to share knowledge in a way that is both captivating and easy to understand, while remaining true to the facts. This responsibility extends to ensuring that my interpretations are inclusive, acknowledging the diverse ways people experience and relate to nature. The concept of the “invisible backpack” mentioned in Unit 03 reminds me to be mindful of privilege and how it shapes access to natural spaces. For instance, not everyone has the same ability to engage with the outdoors due to historical, social, or economic barriers. Recognizing this as an interpreter involves crafting experiences that are inclusive and equitable for all. Furthermore, I am committed to ethical storytelling. This includes honoring the voices of Indigenous communities and other stakeholders whose histories and relationships with the land might differ from my own. Interpretation must be rooted in authenticity and a high regard for truth (Beck et al., 2018). For me, this means not only sharing the stories of the land but also questioning whose stories are being told and whose are being left out.

Given my learning style as a visual learner after completing the Unit 02 activity, “What’s Your Learning Style”, my approach to interpretation would gravitate towards using visual aids like diagrams, charts, and demonstrations. These tools not only help me process information but also allow me to cater to others who share this preference. However, I recognize the importance of adapting to different learning styles. Whether my audience consists of active learners who thrive on hands-on activities or reflective learners who prefer quiet contemplation, I aim to create a flexible interpretive experience. The constructivist approach described in Beck et al., (2018) informs much of my methodology. This approach emphasizes building new knowledge on visitors’ prior experiences, allowing them to construct their own meaning. For instance, while leading a guided hike, I might invite participants to share their observations and interpretations of the environment before offering further context. This approach honours their perspectives and fosters a sense of personal connection to their learning journey.

One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned in this course is the importance of sense-making. Interpretation is not about delivering a lecture; it’s about creating opportunities for visitors to connect with the material in their own way. As stated in Chapter 1, “interpretive professionals are in the business of creating and managing opportunities for enjoyment” (Beck et al., 2018). This requires a deep understanding of my audience and a willingness to adapt based on their needs and interests. In practice, this means blending information with art and emotion. Unit 07 brought to my attention that music, for instance, offers a unique gateway to nature. The rhythms of a song can mirror the flow of a river, while the call of a loon can evoke a sense of solitude and wilderness. Drawing on these connections can make interpretation more memorable and impactful. Technology also plays a role in reaching larger audiences. Unit 08 emphasizes that while tools like apps and social media can enhance interpretation, they must be used thoughtfully to avoid detracting from the experience. For example, a guided tour might incorporate augmented reality to visualize historical changes in the landscape, but it should also encourage participants to engage directly with their surroundings.

Ethics in interpretation goes beyond the content I present; it shapes how I engage with others and the environment. Unit 03 mentions the precautionary principle, which inspires me to embrace a thoughtful and deliberate approach to interpretation, specifically when exploring sensitive subjects such as climate change or endangered species.These are areas where scientific uncertainty might tempt us to simplify or exaggerate information. Instead, I strive to present balanced narratives that empower visitors to think critically and act responsibly. Moreover, I see interpretation as a form of stewardship. By helping visitors develop a deeper appreciation for nature, I hope to inspire them to become advocates for its protection. The ultimate goal of interpretation is to cultivate well-informed stewards of cultural and natural heritage (Beck et al., 2018).

As I continue to develop as a nature interpreter, I recognize the need for ongoing reflection and growth. Kolb’s experiential learning cycle, explored in Unit 09, serves as a guiding compass, illuminating my strengths while uncovering opportunities to grow and evolve. For instance, I’ve realized the importance of integrating risk management into my practice, as illustrated by the “Lemon Theory” in Unit 04. By anticipating potential challenges and preparing accordingly, I can create safer and more rewarding experiences for my audience. I am also inspired by the work of citizen science initiatives, as highlighted in the article by Merenlender et al., (2016). Through these programs, we witness the transformative power of collective action and how interpretation inspires a deeper commitment to environmental stewardship. Incorporating elements of citizen science into my practice could provide visitors with a sense of agency and a tangible connection to conservation efforts.

Overall, developing a personal ethic as a nature interpreter is a continuous journey, enriched by the wisdom I gather from this course and my own encounters with nature. My ethic is rooted in the belief that interpretation is about connection, connecting people to nature, to each other, and to their own sense of wonder. It is about creating opportunities for discovery, reflection, and action. As I move forward, I will continue to draw on the principles and practices I’ve learned, adapting them to suit my audience and the contexts in which I work. Whether through storytelling, visual aids, music, or technology, I aim to share my passion for the natural world in ways that inspire and empower others. After all, “interpretation opens minds to wonder and new ways of perceiving the world” (Beck et al., 2018). And what greater responsibility and privilege could there be than that?

References

Beck, L., Cable, T.T., & Knudson, D.M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage for a Better World. Sagamore Publishing.

Merenlender, A. M., Crall, A. W., Drill, S., Prysby, M., & Ballard, H. (2016). Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12737

[jshsbeowbssb]

Hello! I really liked how you talked about interpretation as a way to connect people with nature and the more profound messages they can find in nature. Your reference to Freeman Tilden's idea that interpretation should be linked to visitors' experiences really hit me because that's an essential part of making interpretation valuable and powerful.

I also liked how you pointed out privilege and obstacles to getting to nature. A big part of making interpretation more inclusive is recognizing the "invisible backpack" and how people interact with the world around them. Your dedication to preserving the stories of Indigenous people and other views that aren't often heard adds to your moral integrity. It teaches that interpreting nature is more than just sharing facts. It's also about being aware of whose stories we're spreading and choosing which ones to support.

I also really liked how you linked your learning method to your interpretive method. You are thinking about what you want to say and how your audience will best understand and interact with it. This is shown by your visual tools and your focus on adapting to different learning styles. In your example of a guided hike, you asked people to share their observations, an example of a collaborative and constructivist method that encourages shared learning. That is a great way to make the experience personal for your viewers and help them remember it.

Another great thing you said was how you talked about combining art, feeling, and technology in interpretation. Using music to show the rhythms in nature is very clever, and I agree that it can make people feel connected and emotional. But you're careful about using technology, like balancing augmented reality with direct interaction. This shows that you maturely understand how to improve experiences without taking away from them.

What interested me was your thoughts about ethics and the cautious principle. Talking about challenging issues like climate change reasonably and empoweringly is tough. Your promise to do so correctly shows that you want to make people aware of the problem and give them power. Everything fits together so well because you stress stewardship as a driving principle. You see interpretation as a way to teach and inspire people to care about nature for a lifetime.

Finally, I really liked how you talked about interpretation as a path of growth that is always going on and can be improved by both thinking about it and doing it. Using risk management and citizen science in your work is a brilliant way to improve it and give people the tools they need to help with protection.

Your post really got to the heart of what it means to be an interpreter: to connect, inspire, and give others the tools they need to connect deeply with nature. Thanks for sharing such an exciting and enlightening point of view! You'll make a big difference while learning and practicing your skills.

[hgmenvs3000f24]

Final Post

Describe your personal ethic as you develop as a nature interpreter. What beliefs do you bring? What responsibilities do you have? What approaches are most suitable for you as an individual?

Understanding and defining one’s personal ethic is a highly individual journey, particularly in fields deeply connected to values and beliefs, like nature interpretation. Ethics can vary widely between people, and for good reason: each of us brings our own perspectives, life experiences, and guiding principles to the table. For me, one foundational belief is that there is rarely one “correct” answer; rather, there are often multiple valid decisions that depend on the person, context, and situation.

When I say there’s no real right answer, I mean that each decision is subjective and based on a unique blend of factors, especially in the context of nature and human experience. Consider the question, “Is summer camp beneficial for kids?” The answer isn’t black and white. It depends on the child’s interests, physical capabilities, and socioeconomic background. A child who thrives outdoors and loves adventure might find camp life-changing, while another might feel anxious and out of place. This way of thinking is part of my ethic as a nature interpreter: respecting the diversity of people’s experiences and the idea that different paths can lead to meaningful connections with nature.

In my journey through this course, I have felt that this field of work reminds me of characters like the Lorax, who famously “speaks for the trees.” Though it may sound crazy, I see a similarity in my role. Like the Lorax, nature interpreters spend extensive time immersed in natural environments, making a connection that’s mental, physical, and emotional. We act as intermediaries between the natural world and people who might not have had similar experiences, guiding them to explore and appreciate nature in a safe and meaningful way. This role comes with a profound responsibility to share our understanding and to inspire conservation efforts. Maybe the most critical aspect of my ethic as a nature interpreter is the responsibility to use my knowledge and experiences in ways that support activism and conservation. Knowing about the natural world isn’t just a personal advantage; it’s a tool to be used in the service of preservation. Our planet’s health is a shared responsibility, and I believe that those of us with the privilege of deep interaction with nature have an obligation to help where we can.

The role I see myself playing is one of advocacy, although not necessarily on the grand scale of figures like Greta Thunberg. Thunberg’s impact as a climate activist from Sweden has captured global attention since 2019, particularly with her powerful words: “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words…We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money, and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!” (Britannica, 2024). Her courage and passion are qualities I admire. This statement, especially, feels like a kind of call to arms, and it resonates with my hopes to protect the natural world for future generations. What connects me to an activist role is precisely the meaning in Thunberg’s words. Much of my motivation in pursuing nature interpretation is driven by my concerns about the future. I relate to Thunberg’s frustration and urgency because, like her, I am deeply invested in helping the environment for those who have yet to experience it, whether they are unborn or otherwise. I’m grateful for the experiences I’ve had in nature, which have provided me with a sense of purpose and emotional growth. It’s difficult to imagine future generations missing out on these same experiences. Knowing that the beauty of natural places might not be there for future children if things don’t change is so difficult to imagine.

Every role in nature interpretation is valuable, and I view the field as a collective movement working toward mutual goals: understanding, protecting, and communicating nature’s value. While my focus might lean toward activism, there are countless ways nature interpreters can foster respect and love for the environment. Whether it’s through educational programs, immersive experiences, or leading conservation efforts, each approach is vital. After all, each step toward connecting people with the natural world ultimately contributes to the broader mission of protecting it. In my view, showcasing the beauty of natural landscapes is essential to encouraging others to value and protect them. When people experience awe in the face of a forest, river, or mountain, it stirs something within them. This awe can be a powerful motivator, urging people to support conservation efforts and perhaps even act against environmental challenges like deforestation, pollution, and climate change. Through guided hikes, storytelling, and sharing personal experiences, nature interpreters have the unique opportunity to influence perspectives and inspire positive change. One of the most rewarding aspects of nature interpretation would be helping others see the world with new eyes, whether they’re encountering a familiar landscape in a new season or observing a species they’d never noticed before. By offering these moments of connection, we help people build a personal relationship with the environment. Ideally, these relationships evolve into a sense of responsibility and commitment to the well-being of the planet.

In conclusion, my personal ethic as a nature interpreter involves advocating for thoughtful, inclusive approaches to experiencing and understanding nature. By respecting diverse perspectives and embracing multiple “right” answers, I would aim to create a space where all individuals feel welcome in exploring the natural world. With this approach, I would hope to inspire respect, protect fragile ecosystems, and pass on the same love for nature that has given my life such meaning. For me, the path forward involves not just interpreting nature, but using my role to stand up for it and protect it, and to ensure that its wonder and significance are preserved for future generations.

It was awesome reading everyones posts through this course and seeing everyones responses. You all did amazing!

References

Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia. (2024, November 12). Greta Thunberg. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Greta-Thunberg

[jshsbeowbssb]

I related a lot to your post, especially how you linked your ethics as a natural interpreter to having more than one "right" answer. Lastly, I would like to know someone who understands how different human situations can change how we connect with nature. Your story about summer camp is so great because it shows various ways to connect with nature. That point of view is critical when it comes to understanding because one size doesn't fit all.

You're not only suitable when you say you're like the Lorax. It is a huge duty to speak up for nature and connect people with the environment. Like you, interpreters should encourage people to protect nature, not by forcing them to. Instead, they should show people why nature is essential and why they should care for it. Your focus on advocacy made your post stand out, and how you linked it to Greta Thunberg's action gave it more depth. Even though we don't all work on a world scale, even small acts of advocacy can have huge effects. I admire your drive to safeguard the earth for future generations, and I can tell how important this job is to you.

I liked how you talked about awe as a reason to protect nature. I agree wholeheartedly—those times of awe can change everything. Beautiful views or small things like noticing a new plant or bird are things that people remember and often make them want to protect what they've linked with. Also, I liked how you stressed the importance of giving people time and space to connect with nature independently, whether through led hikes or stories. That mix of showing beauty and helping people connect with each other is so potent.

Your idea of nature understanding as a group movement also spoke to me. It's true that all jobs, whether teaching, campaigning, or running immersive events, help protect the natural world. It makes me think of how we are all linked in this work and how each step counts, no matter how small.

You've put a lot of work into creating an ethic that is thoughtful, open, and based on a love for nature. Thanks for sharing such an honest and moving point of view. It's been great learning from you in this class. Best of luck as you keep getting better as a translator and environmentalist!

[ivenvs3000f24]

10: Interpretation ethics

As an ex-Catholic, I spent a good amount of time in my teens thinking about how my personal ethics and rules on morality both differ from and sometimes agree with Catholicism. However, I haven’t really taken the time since  then to extend my personal ethics past post-Catholic discourse and relate it to my environmental values. I think it’s very valuable to be aware of your own ethical stances in terms of interpretation. Our ethics are the filter that shapes how we interpret nature, whether or not we acknowledge it. And that interpretation is then past on to our audience.

The first belief I bring to nature interpretation is kindness. Showing kindness to the nature around us means walking lightly and respectfully as we explore. Showing kindness to each other means creating a space where everyone feels able to ask questions and learn. I believe that kindness is one of the key elements that goes into creating a welcoming environment. And welcoming environments set up the possibility for growth and learning.

I also believe that curiosity and discovery lead to caring. It’s very difficult to care about something that you don’t know much about. But by encouraging questions, sharing facts/stories, and pointing out the beauty all around us, a nature interpreter can create connections between their audience and nature. In tandem with curiosity and discovery, is the power of awe. I want to get people excited about that cliff, that leaf, that creek. Wonder is a very powerful tool.

Spent a very long time staring at this view awestruck when I visited Vancouver last summer

Interpretation also comes with many responsibilities. When you act as a nature interpreter, people are putting their trust in you to act responsibly in your role. The basis of this trust is safety. Like we learned from the Timiskaming Tragedy, a lot of things can go wrong in outdoor education spaces. Physical safety means being prepared for hazards, natural disasters and changing weather. But emotional safety also play an important role. Words have power. And that power can be used to harm others if wielded carelessly or irresponsibly. Sensitive topics have to be addressed with care and nuance. Your audience should feel welcome and included in the space you create, through the language used and interpretation employed.

I also think that nature interpreters have a responsibility to convey accuracy whenever possible. This is especially important when interpreting for children, who may not have the skills to properly fact-check your claims. Adult audiences also deserve access to well researched and meaningful information. Working as a nature interpreter means positioning yourself as an expert, and your audience is placing their trust in you to know what you are talking about. I believe in putting in the time and effort to research a topic fully before you share it with others.

There are several interpretation approaches that work best for me as an individual. And those approaches vary greatly by age group. For kids, who often have short attention spans, I think that exploration and games work best. Exploration allows kids to experience nature on their own terms and form a more personal relationship with the world around them. It also allows for the reintroduction of unstructured play that is missing from many kids lives. Giving kids a magnifying glass and a simple objective (eg. “Find as many colour as you can!”) gives them the opportunity to look closer at their surroundings and discover something new.

Games are also a powerful tool for interpretation. Minds often wander during lengthy explanation, but games keep kids focused and their attention on the task at hand. They can also help simplify complex topics and break them down into bite sized pieces. As an example, at my summer job last year, I ran a workshop for 10–12 year-olds who were planting a pollinator garden at their school. I wanted to convey the importance of building new pollinator habitat and introduce them to the concept of habitat fragmentation. So, I created a game that was kind of a mashup of musical chairs and shrinking islands. I placed picnic blankets (“habitats”) on the floor and told the children to pretend to be their favorite pollinator. As the music played, they could fly around, and when it stopped, they needed to find a habitat to stand on. As the game progressed, the habitats kept getting smaller and smaller as I folded down the picnic blankets to represent habitat destruction. Near the end of the game, we added another picnic blanket to represent the new habitat the students were creating. The game showed the students the importance of their garden, while also engaging them with the power of fun.

For adults, I think the best approaches for me to use are storytelling and writing. Stories have staying power, and also allow people to come to their own conclusions in a very fluid way. If I tell you about how I tried (and failed) to stop a park tree from being cut down when I was in the second grade, the take home message can be very different depending on how I spin the story and your own personal beliefs. You might walk away thinking about the importance of urban trees, the emotional bonds kids form with nature, or how privilege impacts how people engage with activism.

Article from The Stoney Creek News

From a personal standpoint, I think that writing is an approach that I am very drawn to. I enjoy the act of writing and like that I can fine-tune my words until I am satisfied. Evocative language can really come alive on the page, and writing allows lots of space for larger ideas to be explored. And, as a creative writing and ecology student, writing about nature in an interpretive way seems like the natural way to blend my two areas of study.

I know that my personal ethic will continue to develop and change as I grow as an interpreter. I’m looking forward to adding more nuance and challenging my own perspective.

[jshsbeowbssb]

I really liked reading your post and how personal and thought-provoking it was. Your focus on kindness as a fundamental moral principle in nature reading really hit home for me. Setting up a place where people and nature are treated with respect is a great way to meet and learn. I really liked how you stressed that kindness is not just a value but something that we do, both when we interact with nature and when we interact with other people. That has a lot to do with making places where people feel welcome and where wonder can grow.

What you said about how curiosity and finding make us care is so true. You can't love or protect something you don't know or haven't had a chance to connect with. As you said, a great way to help people see nature in a new way is to get them to ask questions and share their stories. I also liked how you focused on awe. Those times of wonder can change people, and it's incredible how just pointing out a cliff or a creek can help them see beauty they might not have seen before.

You were very thoughtful when discussing obligations, especially regarding safety. Thanks for recognizing the power of language and the need for care when talking about sensitive topics. I like how you linked physical and mental safety. Such care for the little things shows how much you value your job as a speaker and people's trust in you. It was also clear that you cared about getting things right, which is very important when working with kids who may remember what they learned for the rest of their lives. Your focus on the public is admirable.

It was really clever and fun to use the pollinator habitat game to illustrate a serious idea like habitat separation. It's much easier to understand something when you do it yourself. Games like the one you mentioned make learning fun and help you remember what you've learned. It was even more powerful because you connected it to something the students did in real life—building the garden. I bet those kids felt better about the world and proud of their work when they were done.

I really liked what you said about telling stories to adults. People are naturally interested in stories that they can relate to. Your example of the park tree story shows how flexible and thought-provoking this method can be. Writing as a way to understand also stood out—you clearly know how to use vivid language to convey your point in a way that people remember. Combining creative writing and ecology is a great way to merge art and science.

It's great that you're willing to change your personal code of ethics as a translator. Undoubtedly, you care strongly about this work and want to keep getting better at your job. Thank you for your very thoughtful comments! I can't wait to see where your career as a translator takes you.

[fbenvs3000f24]

Unit 10 Blog Post

Describe your personal ethic as you develop as a nature interpreter. What beliefs do you bring? What responsibilities do you have? What approaches are most suitable for you as an individual?

Throughout my life, and now throughout this course, my love for nature has grown and evolved quite a bit leading to the interpreter I am today. I feel that each week through the assigned textbook and supplemental readings, along with the blog prompts and getting to read others’ posts, I have been able to learn a lot about my personal ethic as an interpreter. 

Me out in Lake Erie enjoying nature!

For me, I believe that the interpretation of nature through a variety of goggles is the best way to go about it. In fact, I believe that you cannot only interpret nature under one lens, you need a mixture of outlooks to truly understand and appreciate the natural world. As a science major, it is easy for me to believe that science is one of the most crucial ways we can interpret nature because it brings along an understanding of what exactly we are seeing around us. Understanding why plants are green or why chipmunks may be burying their food helps to provide a deeper understanding and appreciation of our environment. As mentioned in one of week five’s supplemental readings, complicated issues such as the loss of biodiversity gain a lot of support when community members are taught about, and engaged in, the science behind it (Wals et al., 2014). By interpreting nature through a scientific lens we are better able to make sure people are informed about what is really going on around them and hopefully inspire them to take action when the natural world around them is at risk. 

Sea stars I collected for experiments in a marine research course!

Even though I believe that science is necessary when interpreting nature, I do not think it would provide someone with everything they needed to love nature for all that it is. While science provides an understanding of what is going on, it sometimes lacks emotion. I believe that a major part of nature is the emotions that it provides to the interpreter and one of the main ways to feel those emotions is through forging a more personal connection through the arts. Whether that be through painting, drawing, crafts, music, or any other form of art, it is what truly connects us to nature. Taking something as simple as a lone tree in a field and interpreting it in a way that is personal to you, making something physical out of what you are seeing, is the most pure form of interpretation in my mind. Boeckel et al (2015)., mention that there is a disenchantment of the world occurring along with a loss of direct nature experiences. I feel that by taking what we see in nature and making something out of it we are effectively reconnecting with it because we have to take the time to be immersed in it to generate ideas on what to make. 

Park near my house where I like to go and paint what I see!

Without artistic interpretations of nature we lack connection, but without scientific interpretations we lack understanding. This is why I believe we cannot simply pick one method of interpretation and run with it.

As an interpreter I believe that I have many responsibilities. First of all it is my responsibility to ensure that everyone feels included. This involves unpacking invisible knapsacks as learned in week three. Making sure that each and every participant has the same tools available to them, either literal or metaphorical, to truly understand and appreciate what is around them is key. If someone felt like they were at a disadvantage due to a lack of education, experience, or anything else then they would not be properly able to enjoy nature as they may be feeling othered. It is a responsibility of mine to be extra observant and make sure that this does not happen. Another responsibility I carry is making sure that everyone is being respectful with the natural world, myself included. Whether it's leading a hike or a camping trip or anything else outdoors there is a possibility for people to treat nature unkindly. Maybe it's by throwing their food wrappers on the ground or unnecessarily killing bugs around them for being “creepy”. When we are in and around nature it is our responsibility to treat it with care so that future generations can have the same experiences as us. As an interpreter I feel a sense of leadership and responsibility that includes keeping our forests, beaches, and other environments clean. Another responsibility of mine is to appeal to each and every learning style. In the course content we discussed tactile, auditory, and visual, but the textbook goes on to provide many others. Things like logical-mathematical, inter- and intrapersonal and many more were mentioned (Beck et al., 2018). I feel it is my duty to truly understand what each one involves and what strengths/weaknesses someone with that learning style may face when it comes to interpretation. A final responsibility I feel I have as an interpreter relates to what I wrote about above. I feel it is my duty to ensure that all aspects of interpretation are being included when out in nature. Providing the science behind why something is the way it is then going into artistic interpretations of it to make sure that everyone gets the whole picture is key. In the future I will strive to interpret in a way that incorporates it all to give participants the best shot at finding something they can connect to in nature. 

As an individual I feel I am best suited to do all that I have mentioned in this blog. I am a science student which helps me with scientific interpretations, but I also have a love for being creative which would help me with the artistic part. I definitely feel as though these weekly blog posts have helped me better understand who I am as an interpreter and what works best for me. I have learned quite a bit about myself during this course and I cannot wait to use all that I have learned in the future to be the best interpreter I can!

I cannot wait to read everyone else’s blogs this week and I hope everyone has a great rest of their semester!

References

Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Interpreting cultural and natural heritage: For A Better World. SAGAMORE Publishing, Sagamore Venture. 

van Boeckel, J. (2015). At the heart of art and earth: an exploration of practices in arts-based environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 801–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.959474 

Wals, A. E.J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence Between Science and Environmental Education. Science 344,583-584. 10.1126/science.1250515

[jshsbeowbssb]

I appreciate you sharing such a well-thought-out blog post. Your view on interpreting nature is motivating, and it shows that you deeply understand what it means to connect with nature. I liked how you stressed the importance of looking at nature through different scientific and artistic views. This is a wise realization: science tells us the "how" and "why" of what we see, but art lets us feel and talk about the human connections that make nature so important. Your vivid description of the lone tree in the field and how it can spark imagination made that point clear.

Also, you needed to focus on being open to everyone. I agree with you about "unpacking invisible knapsacks" and ensuring everyone has the same tools to connect with nature. It's simple to forget that someone's past, schooling, or other things can affect their ability to enjoy nature fully. Your determination to remove those obstacles displays a deep understanding of others and a strong sense of direction, both essential for a nature interpreter.

Another thing that stood out to me was how you treat the natural world respectfully and set a good standard. These small things can make a big difference, like telling people not to litter or getting them to be more kind to animals. This is an excellent reminder that interpretation isn't just about giving people facts; it's also about making them feel responsible for the world.

Finally, one of your greatest strengths is that you can connect with people who learn in various ways. By combining scientific explanations with artistic expressions, you not only teach people about nature but also help them find their own personal links to it. Using both approaches really makes the experience better for many people, making sure that everyone gets something useful out of it.

It's clear how much this course has helped you grow in your writing about interpretation and how severe and passionate you are about it. I can't wait to see how you use these ideas in the future. Thank you for writing about your story. It was moving to read.

[jshsbeowbssb]

Final Blog Post

Thinking back on my path to becoming a wildlife interpreter, I see how very personal and vital it is to grow personally. Being a nature interpreter is about igniting in people curiosity, respect, and a feeling of stewardship, not only about imparting knowledge about the surroundings. This road has helped me to consider my own ideas, obligations, and, most importantly, methods of approach. These ideas help me to evaluate the obligations accompanying the position and shape my will to share the beauty and relevance of nature.

One of the fundamental ideas I bring to nature's interpretation is that, whether or not one recognizes it, everyone has an inherent relationship to nature. Interpretation enables people to "gain a sense of place" and "respond to the beauty" around them, therefore allowing a close connection with their environment (Chapter 3). Nature is the background for our lives and a fundamental component of who we are. Writing blog entries and listening to/creating podcasts have helped me to see how interpretation gives people chances to rediscover this connection, look above the surface, and sense the relevance of the surroundings. Growing up, I always felt a close relationship with nature, but I know many people might not have had the same experiences. This perspective shapes my interpretation since I want to meet individuals where they are and guide them toward their own road of connection.

This view carries a great sense of accountability. Sharing facts or knowledge is insufficient; interpretation must establish emotional and intellectual links, transcending "simply communicating factual information" (Chapter 1). Interpreters must ensure every contact advances respect for the natural world and a better knowledge of it. Making these blog entries part of reflective practice has strengthened the need to provide information ethically and precisely, fostering inquiry and sustainable practices. This work has an ethical responsibility to respect the integrity of the presented stories by ensuring they have truth under foundation. This obligation calls for constant learning and a careful, respectful approach to every interpretive point of view.

Authenticity demands approaching interpretation in a way that speaks to me personally. One great instrument that generates a "tangible sense of the world" is storytelling (Chapter 8). Stories help complicated concepts to be relevant, unforgettable, and meaningful. The readings and podcasts have strengthened this approach since they helped me to realize how often facts fall short in capturing the beauty and resiliency of the earth. As a storyteller, I have the chance to vividly and personally bring nature's complexity to life. My stories should be windows into a world many people might not be able to experience on their own, encouraging interest and respect for the natural world. I aim to inspire others to learn more, care, and act by doing this.

Being a natural interpreter also helps one to realize that the interpretative process includes my own path. The interpretive profession is constantly changing, so interpreters must be receptive to change and development (Chapter 21). As I finish these blog entries and consider each event, I see that interpretation is a dynamic exchange—about giving and receiving, teaching and learning. Every interaction, every narrative, and every natural moment presents chances for personal development, and for others, I come across. This path as an interpreter is a lifetime dedication to sharing, learning, and advancing a more excellent knowledge of our planet rather than one with a destination.

As a nature interpreter, I embrace the idea that nature is fundamental to our sense of self, the obligation to respect and preserve that link, and the method of applying narrative to involve and motivate. These values will help me stay on this road, shape my interpretation of what it means to be near nature and guide me. Employing interpretation, I am not just imparting knowledge but also helping to forward a more general goal: one in which people are motivated to preserve nature since they understand its significance. This is the core of my dedication—a will to enable others to view the world as it is and as it could be if we all assist in caring for it. References: Beck, L., Cable, T., & Knudson, D. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World. Sagamore-Venture Publishing.

[jshsbeowbssb]

Embracing Natures Unknown

People don't always notice the parts of nature that are alive in places where they don't think to look. It's not always loud or dramatic. Most of the time, it's quiet and hidden in areas where the sun has difficulty getting to or where the shadows are the longest. My heart is drawn to these hidden places, to times when nature whispers instead of roars.

Animals that lived just below the waves on the rocky shores where I grew up were among the most fascinating things I've ever seen. I remember how exciting it was to move rocks by the water's edge and find small crabs running to hide or starfish clinging to the bottoms with their tiny tube feet gripping in quietly. Most people thought they were just small animals, which didn't matter. But to me, they were the guardians of an underwater world, and each one showed how life can continue and change.

I remember being angry or stressed out and just sitting by the sea and watching. Something very peaceful about their quiet determination struck me. The sea anemones moved slowly with the current, unaware of what was happening around them. On the other hand, small fish darted in and out of cracks, looking for safety and food in the unknown. Every living thing in the tide pool was essential to its delicate balance. It was like a small ecosystem that lived in its own way.

But this secret isn't just on the shore; it's all over nature. The world below the leaves in the forest is like a universe. Microbes and insects that you can't see constantly break down dead matter into nutrient-rich dirt that plants and trees can grow in. It's amazing to think that a lot of nature's magic is going on in the smallest, quietest places while we gaze at the trees and the mountains.

I am most interested in the fact that these secret worlds are essential to the whole ecosystem. Like my peers, who talked about wolves, owls, and mountain lions, these quiet players keep the balance. They might not be as noticeable as a dog moving through the bushes, but they are an essential part of the web of life that holds everything together. Nature isn't just about the big or apparent things we see; it's about every part and relationship, even the ones we don't see.

That might be why I like these forgotten parts of nature. They put me down. They tell me that everything has a place and a reason for being there, no matter how small. Our job as humans is to respect and protect these systems, no matter how big or small they are. I feel part of something bigger than myself by the ocean or in the woods. It's a basic, old web of life that is beautiful and humble.

When you're next in nature, stop and look at something other than what you see. You can look under a log, lift a rock, or just sit and listen. You might find that the world you can't see is just as fascinating as the extensive views and dangerous animals and that it is just as essential to protect.

[awenvs3000s24]

Unit 9

There's a quiet moment just before dawn, a stillness so deep that you feel as though the world has paused to let you breathe. Out there in the woods, right before the sun’s first light spills across the horizon, the air is dense with anticipation. It’s my favorite time to be in nature. But there’s one thing in particular I always find myself thinking about, something that, as a hunter, fills me with awe every single time: the primal, hidden world of nature’s silent hunters.

Predators in the wild have perfected the art of survival over millennia, developing instincts and abilities that are nothing short of awe-inspiring. Picture this: a wolf, lean and powerful, moves like a shadow through the underbrush. Its eyes glint, piercing through the twilight, ears twitching to every sound, nostrils flaring to catch the scent of its prey. There’s a thrill in knowing that while we may be seasoned hunters ourselves, we are always being outclassed by these masters.

The art of the hunt is one thing, but what really amazes me is the way nature has designed these animals for silence and efficiency. Take the owl, for instance. Unlike any other bird, the owl’s feathers have a unique structure that muffles the sound of its flight. Imagine that: nature itself engineered silence. A rabbit won’t even hear the approach, and to witness an owl in the act, swooping down in complete silence, is like watching a ghost materialize out of thin air.

But the marvel doesn’t stop there. Think of a mountain lion, hidden among the rocks. You’d think it would take brute strength to bring down its prey, but no; it relies on patience. That cat could spend hours or even days waiting, honing in on the rhythm of the landscape, learning the patterns of its prey. And when it finally moves, it’s pure power and precision, no second chances. There's something almost spiritual about the patience of a predator in nature; it’s a reminder of the balance and unbreakable cycles that exist in the wild.

So, why does this captivate me as a hunter? It’s not just admiration—it’s respect. The more you watch, the more you learn, not only about the animals you pursue but about yourself. Nature, in its simplest and wildest moments, teaches us humility. It reminds us that out there, in the deep woods or open plains, we are part of something far bigger than ourselves, something primal that binds every hunter and hunted together.

To experience this, to be there, breath held, feeling the heartbeat of the forest, is to understand that nature isn’t just a place; it’s an adventure. And for those few, fleeting moments when you witness the craft of a predator, you’re glimpsing a piece of wild knowledge that’s older than time itself. That’s what makes every dawn, every quiet moment in the woods, worth it.

[jshsbeowbssb]

Your post does a great job of capturing the magic and reverence of early mornings in the wild. I could almost feel how cold it was outside and how excited you sounded. Being around some of nature's best hunters makes you realize that no matter how much you know or experience you have, these animals have an instinctual ability beyond anything we could achieve.

I like how you describe how the owl flies quietly, and the mountain lion waits. It makes me feel like each predator is a finely tuned instrument in the natural world's music. It amazes me how nature has made these animals able to survive and be very accurate and balanced. It makes me think of how every ecosystem comprises many complex layers, each playing a part in a giant loop that we're lucky to see for a moment.

Your thoughts on respect and humility hit home for me very strongly. Seeing these animals in the wild and learning from them teaches us something important about our place in the world. It reminds us that all living things, both hunters and prey, are essential to these ancient processes. Thanks for sharing such a clear and well-thought-out point of view; it helped me understand nature's essential beauty.

[agpenvs3000f24]

Blog Post 8: Interpret the most amazing thing you know about nature? Bring the field to your armchair reader.

There’s something special about canoe tripping that makes you see nature differently. You’re not just passing through on a trail; you’re moving with the water, right at the level of everything living there. One of the coolest creatures you might encounter is the northern pike. They’re not exactly the friendliest fish in the lake, but spotting one from a canoe is like catching sight of the lake’s top hunter, quick, silent, and a little intimidating.

Pike are built to hunt. They have long, muscular bodies that let them cut through the water with barely a ripple, covered in green and white camouflage that blends perfectly with lake weeds and shadows. When they’re still, you’d swear they’re just another log. They hang out in shallow waters, near reeds, or under fallen trees, waiting for something to swim by. And when they strike? It’s fast. If you’re lucky enough to witness it, it’s one of those moments that makes you sit up a little straighter in the canoe. Once, I was paddling through a slow part of the river with my boat partner, barely moving and just watching the water. Suddenly, a flash below me was a quick blur of movement. It was a pike darting after a smaller fish, and in a split second, it was over. Watching that felt like a scene from a nature show, but I was right there, in the wild. It’s a reminder of the hidden world below, where animals are constantly hunting, hiding, and surviving.

What’s amazing about pike isn’t just their hunting skills, it’s how they fit into the whole lake ecosystem. Pike are known as “apex predators,” meaning they’re near the top of the food chain in freshwater. This role is crucial because they help keep fish populations balanced, which is essential for the lake’s overall health. When pike populations are stable, they prevent any single fish species from overpopulating and disrupting the ecosystem. Our textbook (Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World) highlights how interpreting these interactions can make people aware of their responsibility to protect nature. Every canoe trip where I spot a pike reminds me that these waters have their own rules and rhythms. While I may pass through, these creatures rely on clean, healthy waters to survive.

This makes a very important point… pike and other aquatic life depend on these ecosystems staying healthy. Pollution, rising water temperatures, and human interference all put added stress on their habitats. When we paddle through these places, it’s worth remembering that we’re responsible for helping keep these waters safe so that pike and all aquatic life can keep thriving.

So next time you’re out on the water, whether canoeing or just by the shore, take a moment to imagine what’s going on beneath the surface. Pike might be down there, blending in, waiting for their next meal. It’s a reminder that there’s more to these waters than what we see, and that’s worth protecting. Bringing the wonder of these encounters to those who might never paddle a canoe, as the textbook suggests, allows us to inspire a wider circle to care about preserving such remarkable habitats.

[jshsbeowbssb]

What a vivid picture of canoeing through the secret worlds of nature! Your encounter with the northern pike shows its dangerous nature as a hunter and its essential role in maintaining the lake's balance. I like how you pointed out that pike aren't just exciting hunters; they're also crucial to the environment because they help keep population dynamics in check, keeping everything in balance. Your comment makes me think about how each species has a part to play and how, as translators, we can make people feel responsible for these fragile systems.

Also, hearing about a pike made me laugh because they are mean in a game I play called Stardew Valley! That they're known for being hard to catch in the game makes them seem even scarier when you hear that they're real-life top predators. Your words brought that link to life for me, mixing the virtual with the real. It's crazy that their fierce character goes beyond games and nature!

Seeing these things happen, like a pike quickly striking from a canoe, feels like a luxury that comes with the duty to protect these places. You're so right that as we glide over these seas, we can see the fragile balance below us. The idea in the textbook is to use interpretations of natural events to make people more aware. Your post shows that even minor things can make people feel responsible and amazed. You brought the lake to life in a fundamental way.

[jshsbeowbssb]

Blog Post 7

Music and nature have an ancient relationship as if they have always danced together. What exactly does it mean to ask, "Where is music in nature?" or "Where is nature in music?" These two concepts describe a lovely interplay in which melodies emerge from the soil, and the rhythms of nature reverberate in the music we create.

Nature is naturally musical. Harmonic, evocative, and spiritual soundscapes can be created without instruments or human participation. Nature's symphonies include the rustle of leaves in the wind, the crash of waves on a rocky shore, and the song of a bird at dawn. The steady beat of rain against a window, the murmur of bees in a meadow, and the distant roar of thunder all have a cadence that could easily fit into an orchestral concert.

Consider how a river flows: the gurgling and bubbling of water as it tumbles over boulders is more than simply noise; it is a composition. Nature's music is ambient, omnipresent, and instinctive. It talks to us without words, stirring up something primitive inside us, as if to remind us that nature had already composed its own eternal scores long before humans learned to write.

Nature creates its own music, and the music humans frequently make mirrors or reflect the natural environment. Many composers and musicians, deliberately or subconsciously, have drawn inspiration from nature. Electronic music's looping beats use a repeated wave pattern. A bird's song's rising and falling pitches may be replicated in a flute melody. Nature's rhythms are not limited by time, yet they resonate with the rhythms that propel our lives, finding their way into the songs we write, the music we play, and the lyrics we sing.

For example, folk music frequently recalls landscapes, seasons, and natural forces. Traditional instruments, such as the wooden flute or acoustic guitar, carry earthy textures, producing warm and organic tones. Nature not only inspires song content but also influences how we feel when we listen to music—grounded, uplifted, or nostalgic.

Van Morrison's song "Into the Mystic" immediately transports me back to the wildness of the sea. Whenever I hear the smooth, melodic guitar and the lines "We were born before the wind, also younger than the sun," I am taken to a specific location and time. I grew up in Lebanon, and the sea was often the focal point of my relationship with nature. I spent hours sitting by the Mediterranean, watching the waves crash and finding solace in the rhythm of the tide.

Van Morrison's voice evokes the same tranquillity I felt at the time—the soft draw of the sea, the warmth of the sun on my skin, and the impression that, like the song, the ocean was everlasting, both ancient and ever-changing. It reminds me of summer days spent by the water when I felt at ease with nature, the world, and myself.

The beauty of music is its ability to transport us. Sometimes, that conveyance is emotional; other times, it is physical — returning to a specific location or point. When I hear "Into the Mystic," I am transported back to the edge of the Earth, where nature's melody blends with Morrison's, creating a beautiful synthesis of Earth and sound.

Music and nature are intertwined, like two sides of the same coin. One inspires the other, both in terms of creation and experience. When we allow ourselves to listen to the music of nature and the nature of music, we discover that they are not two distinct universes but rather one continuous landscape of sound and emotion. Whether listening to the crash of waves or strumming a guitar, we're experiencing the same beauty. What song transports you back to nature, and what scene does it create for you?

[jshsbeowbssb]

Blog Post 6

In a society where new trends and ideas appear daily, it is tempting to reject history as irrelevant. "There is no peculiar merit in ancient things," Edward Hyams claims, and many of us would gladly agree. After all, we experience the present and anticipate the future. However, he discusses integrity — how we hold the elements of a whole together — and emphasizes the importance of the past. Without it, we lose the essence of who we are.

Hyams defines integrity as more than being honest or morally upright; it also refers to completeness. Consider a puzzle: each piece is essential in the assembly schedule, no matter how small or distant. Without one element, the image is incomplete. The past may appear to be a missing piece of a larger jigsaw, yet it is an essential component of the one we are currently experiencing.

Hyams warns against considering the past as disposable. He gives the example of a railway station: simply because our train has left doesn't mean the station has vanished. The station existed before we arrived and will remain once we leave. Similarly, past experiences, histories, and civilizations do not evaporate simply because we stop interacting with them. They continue to shape our path, even if we are unaware.

The essential point here is that memory—or our common consciousness of history—maintains integrity. When we lose that recollection, we become disoriented, separated from the events that shaped the present. Neglecting the past is similar to neglecting a house's foundation. The structure may stand for a time, but ultimately, it will deteriorate and collapse.

This is especially crucial in a world that occasionally celebrates "out with the old, in with the new." Hyams is not encouraging us to cling to the past or resist change. He admits that "there is no peculiar merit in ancient things." Not everything that is old has inherent value. However, it is essential to understand the past, where we came from, and why things are the way they are.

For instance, consider a tree. You can enjoy its leaves and branches today, but its growth, strength, and shape result from years of evolution, storms, and seasons. You cannot wholly appreciate its resiliency unless you understand its history. The same is true for human experience. Without remembering the challenges and triumphs of those who came before us, we miss out on the entire scope of our current reality.

In our fast-paced, future-focused world, Hyams' comment reminds us that integrity, wholeness, and completion necessitate living in the now and embracing and understanding the past. Ancient goods may not be precious, but the wisdom, teachings, and narratives they convey certainly are. They are bits of our puzzle, essential to who we are now.

[jshsbeowbssb]

Unit 5 Blog Post

Could a Protein Like PICK1 Hold the Key to Fighting Nasopharyngeal Cancer? Most of the time, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is not the first type of cancer that comes to mind. A very uncommon kind of cancer, though, attacks the back of the nose and the top part of the throat. This is a significant health problem in Southeast Asia and some South China. One thing that makes NPC hard to treat is that it is active and likes metastasizing to other body parts, like the lungs. However, a new study has found a promising way to help fight this cancer: PICK1. This is a protein that has a lot of potential as both a tumour suppressor and a diagnostic marker.

A study led by Ou and others was published in April 2024 in Cell Death and Disease. It looks at how PICK1 stops the growth of NPC. Researchers did several tests on both lab animals and honest people and found that higher levels of PICK1 make cancer cells grow more slowly and make it less likely that they will spread to the lungs. When PICK1 levels drop, on the other hand, the cancer gets worse and spreads quickly to other parts of the body.

How did they test this, then? The researchers created mouse models by giving the mice NPC cells with different amounts of PICK1. What they saw was amazing: mice's lungs with higher quantities of PICK1 had fewer cancerous cells. This proves that PICK1 is critical in preventing the disease from spreading. In this way, PICK1 could be used as a biomarker, which could help doctors guess how a patient's cancer might get worse.

What's really cool about PICK1 is that it might help improve cancer diagnosis. Regarding epidemiology, the precision of diagnostic tools is very important. For example, how well tests find disease and how well they rule it out are very important for good patient care. PICK1 might work a lot like these troubleshooting tools. Clinicians can tell if a patient's NPC is likely to be aggressive by measuring their PICK1 levels. This would allow for more personalized and targeted therapy.

But the story is still ongoing. Researchers didn't just find PICK1 as a diagnostic sign; they did more. They also looked into how it could be used to guide treatment plans. A patient with low amounts of PICK1 may need a more aggressive treatment plan. On the other hand, patients with higher quantities of PICK1 might not require intensive treatment. This could help cut unnecessary treatments and tailor care to each person's cancer profile.

One of the most exciting things about this work is that PICK1 could be more than just a marker. It could actually become a therapeutic target. We can stop or slow the spread of NPC if we can find ways to make PICK1 work better in patients. So far, studies show that increasing PICK1 levels may slow down the growth and metastasis of cancer. This brings up an interesting question: could this method also work for other types of cancer? Because PICK1 interacts with pathways involved in many types of cancer, this approach might be able to be used for more than just NPC.

Of course, it takes work to apply what we've learned from mice to people. Human biology is more complicated, and many things, like genes, culture, and other health problems, can change how a biomarker like PICK1 acts. However, the results of this study are a good start toward figuring out how PICK1 could be used in the field, not just for NPC but maybe for other types of cancer as well.

Cancer research can advance in an exciting new way with PICK1's role as a tumour suppressor and possible biomarker. By better determining which people are more likely to have aggressive NPC, doctors could provide them with more personalized care that is both more effective and less invasive. As scientists continue to study its potential, we might see PICK1 become very important in cancer diagnosis and treatment in the future.

What are the practical implications of this study's results in mice for people, especially when finding and treating NPC based on PICK1 levels? Could treatments that boost PICK1 activity be created to slow the growth of tumours? Could this idea be used for other types of cancer that use similar pathways?

While PICK1 still has a long way to go before it can be used in humans, this study is an exciting step forward in our quest to learn more about and fight NPCs. If more studies keep showing good results, we might be close to a big step forward in how we diagnose and treat cancer.

[jshsbeowbssb]

Blog Post 4

When we consider interpreting nature through art, the first question that may arise is, "Who am I to interpret something as grand as nature?" As someone connected to nature, interpreting it through art involves allowing my personal experiences to shape my perspective and expression rather than trying to capture its essence perfectly. Growing up in a region where nature was abundant and sacred gave me a perspective that allowed me to appreciate its beauty and fragility. I'm not a professional artist, but when I interact with nature through writing, photography, or simply observing it, I feel like I'm adding my voice to the continuing debate about the natural world.

Interpreting nature through art does not require expertise or the "right" perspective. It's about communicating what nature means to you—the emotions it evokes, the memories it brings back, and how it shapes your perspective. We all have the right to interpret nature, regardless of our background, education, or skill level, because nature uniquely communicates to each of us. This diversity of viewpoints is what makes natural interpretation so rich and meaningful.

When it comes to "the gift of beauty," I believe it transcends the visible. For me, beauty is more than simply what I see; it is also how nature makes me feel. It's the sense of tranquillity I get when I'm standing by the water, how the colours of the sunset awe me, or how the rustling of leaves in the wind soothes my soul. Nature's beauty is more than simply something to gaze at; it allows me to reconnect with myself and the world around me.

This "gift" reminds us of our responsibility to protect nature. The beauty we see and experience in nature is transient if we do not preserve it. The more I connect with nature and appreciate its beauty, the deeper my passion for protecting it becomes. I believe nature offers us this gift to remind us of what is at stake—to inspire us to notice the beauty in all ecosystems, not just the great or spectacular ones. It's about acknowledging that even the most minor, insignificant aspects of nature play a role in the big picture and need our attention and care.

Finally, interpreting nature via art is more than just recreating what we see; it is about translating how nature makes us feel and what it teaches us into something others may also experience. We all play a role in moulding how others understand and appreciate nature, whether through painting, writing, photography, or simply telling stories. And it's a gift worth sharing.

[alenvs3000f24]

Blog Prompt 4

Who are you to interpret nature through art? How do you interpret “the gift of beauty”?

To begin to answer this question I believe it is important to touch on what was learned in Unit 4 of ENVS*3000 about the concept of art. Art comes in many different forms including a song or a photograph. Pieces of art are able to, for example, capture something from the past and bring it into the future. This allows someone to witness its beauty over and over again without having to be there first hand. Allowing for someone to interpret nature in itself without having to view it in real life, giving them an opportunity to digest the beauty of it. Art can also allow us to interpret nature from the perspective of someone else which is another insightful point of view during the interpretation processes. When thinking of who I am as an individual, to interpret nature through art there are many aspects that need to be considered. Every person has their own experiences and opinions, no two people are the same. Each person can have a different interpretation of the art they are a witness to. This can lead back to last week's discussion surrounding privilege. The privileges that I have, which has allowed me to see and experience nature shapes how I would interpret nature through art. My personal connection with nature affects how I interpret nature through art. While everyone else may interpret the art in a different way due to their own personal experiences. This in itself is another interesting factor that can be considered when interpreting nature through art. Each person's experience with nature are unique therefore how each person will interpret nature through art will be unique. Overall, everyone has the right to interpret nature through art, the connections formed with nature are personal and are dependent on the individual interpreting the art. 

Nature interpretation offers so many “gifts” to its audience. In chapter 5 of the Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World textbook it lists 15 gifts which are affiliated to the Principles of Interpretation (page 84 in the textbook). One of these is the gift of beauty. The principle in association states “Interpretation should instill in people the ability, and the desire, to sense the beauty in their surroundings—to provide spiritual uplift and to encourage resource preservation”. After analyzing this principle I interpret the gift of beauty as the feelings that experiencing nature invoke within me. Whenever I am faced with hard times or sad feelings my mood can be uplifted by simply going on a walk and embracing nature. This is because when I am outside I admire the beauty of nature and the value that it holds in my day to day life. Seeing and appreciating the beauty that nature holds makes me for example place intrinsic value on all parts of an ecosystem. I am able to see not only the beauty that nature holds, but also recognize the importance of it. The gift of beauty is therefore the privilege and emotional attachment that is formed when immersed in nature's beauty. This beauty allows us to form a connection with nature and instills the need to foster protection of the environment.

[jshsbeowbssb]

I appreciated your perspective on how people's representation of nature through art is influenced by their experiences and ties to nature. Privilege indeed influences what we've seen firsthand, and I admire how you addressed this in moulding our individual viewpoints. It relates to everything we've discussed in class regarding privilege, how it affects our access to nature, and how we appreciate and understand it.

Your comments on the "gift of beauty" and its relationship to human well-being also struck a chord with me. I can relate to how being in nature can improve your spirits during difficult times, and it's fascinating to consider how that emotional connection shapes our perception of beauty. When we encounter nature's beauty, we cherish it for its aesthetic worth, how it makes us feel, and the sense of serenity or healing it can provide. As you indicated, a greater emotional connection to nature generates a stronger desire to defend it.

I believe you accurately captured the heart of interpretation—how it is such a personal, one-of-a-kind process that no two readings will ever be the same. This serves as a reminder that we all have something meaningful to contribute to the interpretation of nature through art since our experiences impact how we view and feel about the world around us. Thank you for sharing your opinions; it gave me a lot to think about!

[empenvs3000f24]

Unit 4 Blog Post

Hi Everyone :)

With one of my minors being Art History, I have learned to be more of a critical thinker when it comes to interpreting art and nature’s involvement in many of the pieces we view today. How many of these artworks are ethical, original, and ephemeral? I try my best to see the beauty in nature through art, while also giving myself the grace to understand the backstory to the piece/landscape. With today being the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation (Orange Shirt Day), I’ll touch on Indigenous art and how we’ve done a disservice to Indigenous talent in Canada’s art world.

In terms of the Group of Seven who really put Canada on the map via showcases in predominantly Canada, The United States, and Europe. Their art expanded worldwide and pretty much dominated galleries in Canada for decades, pushing out other artists and Indigenous works. In hindsight we can understand that their more popular pieces did not exactly depict Canada for what it was at the time. Many of their landscapes were painted in Algonquin, Algoma, and out West; where major logging and pollution was occurring. Some of the artists painted scenes of Indigenous communities, but failed to represent the cultural genocide and residential schools tearing those families apart. Canada was depicted as this abandoned land, solely made up of landscapes and tranquility. Moving forward we can look into Indigenous artists to learn about how they interpret nature through art and the concept of ‘the gift of beauty’ through their lens. 

Interpreting art in nature is a great way to hit more than one of the learning styles. Even in a gallery setting, a painting can target visual learners, the plaque can offer a description for the readers/writers, and there are auditory options available in most galleries. We can also achieve this in nature interpretation; using multiple learning styles can enhance the ‘art’ aspect of nature and allow us to encompass some additional information to a picturesque landscape. This notion ties into the ‘gift of beauty’ and how there is more than meets the eye when it comes to understanding nature through art. 

The importance of immersing ourselves in nature is exemplified in Hahn’s Social Declines of Modern Youth. I feel like the use of social media and abundant technology is the culprit of these ‘social diseases’. We are all so accustomed to being able to see whatever we want, whenever we want it. We can google any image of nature and get a million different vantage points of it. I think this allows us to sometimes take for granted the fact that we could go outside and see the beauty of nature with our own two eyes. A big factor in experiencing nature in person is the stimulation of the senses; as opposed to only sight and maybe sound when we view something online. By stimulating all 5 senses in person, the experience becomes more holistic and memorable. 

Got off my phone and walked around the Arboretum this summer!

We can only learn from our mistakes as people and as a country. Understanding equality in art, risk in nature, and beauty in our daily lives, is built through the experiences of others; we simply have to listen. 

[jshsbeowbssb]

Hello, thank you for sharing this! Your perspective was thought-provoking, especially how you incorporate art history into the concept of nature. It's eye-opening to consider the Group of Seven's influence and how their portrayal of Canadian landscapes was more than just capturing beauty, as their work, intentionally or not, avoided some of the darker realities of what was going on in Canada—such as logging and the struggles that Indigenous communities were experiencing at the time. It's a viewpoint I hadn't considered before. I appreciate you bringing it up, especially on a day that emphasizes the necessity of remembering our entire past, not just the picturesque portions.

Your argument regarding learning styles and how art may engage us in many ways is something I had yet to consider before. It's exciting to consider how we may employ many methods of environmental interpretation to reach individuals in ways that resonate with them. It's a terrific reminder that nature is more than just something to see; it's also something to experience, which is why it's so unforgettable and powerful. How you relate that concept to the "gift of beauty" through Indigenous art is quite profound, especially since Indigenous viewpoints on nature provide a deep and holistic picture that is frequently missed.

The portion about technology and social deterioration also struck a chord with me. Indeed, we sometimes take nature for granted because we can view it on demand via a screen. However, as you mentioned, this only gives us a fragment of the overall experience. As you did at the Arboretum, getting outside and really immersing ourselves in nature activates all of our senses, making the experience feel much more genuine and alive. It's a friendly reminder to be more present and enjoy what we have around us instead of simply looking at it online.

[esenvs3000f24]

Unit 03 Blog Post

Why are we addressing difficult socioeconomic themes, such as privilege, in a course about nature interpretation? Well, if you feel compelled to ask this question, I’d argue that there’s still a lot more to unpack to fully understand nature interpretation as an approach to experiential learning.

By now, we have well-established that nature interpretation is centered around providing emotionally and intellectually meaningful experiences to the audiences that visit interpretive sites. Interpretation is an intensely personal process for every visitor. As I mentioned in my previous blog post, everyone enters an interpretive experience with their own values, preferences, life experiences, and interests that directly influence how they conceive meaning in a natural setting or perceive the natural world in general. In this sense, nature interpreters work with “sovereign audiences,” and should engage with individuals within the context of the unique understandings and values that they bring.

So, how does this relate to privilege? Well, whether or not you receive certain privileges in life based on age, race, gender, ability, sexual identity/ orientation, or class status will significantly influence your lived experiences. Perhaps it’s simply the economic privilege of owning a car preventing a person from accessing remote interpretive sites. For others, it may be a lack of encouragement or physical disability discouraging them from participating in interpretive nature experiences. Ultimately, since privilege can affect a person’s outlook on nature, interpreters must recognize the role privilege plays in the accessibility of their programming while taking the necessary steps to remove barriers and create more inclusive spaces.

I’ve included a video that highlights the intersectionality of privilege and illustrates how privilege can impact the lives of individuals in ways that often go unnoticed.

Video published by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s YouTube channel titled “What is privilege?” where 11 diverse participants undergo an exercise called “The Privilege Walk.”

Video retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3AMhtHPKNk

“Sitting in a place of having an unearned benefit because of a particular social identity or social group membership” (Williams & Franks, 2013), constitutes my working definition of privilege.

Following this week’s readings surrounding “underserved audiences" in nature interpretation, I took time to reflect on my mother’s experiences as a Hispanic immigrant. Immigrating to Canada from El Salvador at the age of twelve, my mother juggled far more responsibilities than I did at that age. Besides having to learn a new language/ adjust to Canadian society, my mother had to help out her parents constantly, look after her younger siblings, and despite wanting to attend university, she attended college as a more affordable/ quicker route to stable employment. As a recent immigrant, leaving the city to connect with nature was a luxury she simply didn’t have the time or resources for (at least not until later in life).

Taking a moment to unpack my own “invisible backpack,” I can recognize several unearned assets that I benefit from every day. As an English-speaking, educated, able-bodied, middle-class Canadian, I’ve never been short of resources or opportunities and it would be ignorant to pretend otherwise. I’m beyond privileged to attend this university, pursue my desired degree, be supported financially/ emotionally by both of my parents, and be afforded plenty of opportunities to explore my interests in nature.

In conclusion, as future interpreters, I hope we can continue to unpack our privilege and work toward making interpretive sites more welcoming and supportive to wider audiences.

References:

Williams, O. F., & Franks, C. L. (2013). Privilege. Encyclopedia of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.305

[jshsbeowbssb]

Hey!

Thanks a ton for really getting into this topic and sharing your thoughts. I appreciate it! You nailed it with your point about how nature interpretation is such a personal thing, influenced by each person's unique background. I like how you connected that to "sovereign audiences." It's cool to see that everyone has their own values, experiences, and challenges they bring to these spaces. That's a critical viewpoint for future nature interpreters to consider, and it totally ties into the idea of privilege.

Your story about your mom's journey as a Hispanic immigrant really resonated with me. It's a real eye-opener that nature, which a lot of us see as something everyone gets to enjoy, can actually feel like a treat for some folks. Getting into those spaces can be a real challenge because of time, resources, and even some cultural barriers. It's easy to overlook that something as straightforward as going for a hike might not be possible for folks who don't have the time or money to join in on those activities. Your thoughts on your own "invisible backpack" were super interesting! It can feel a bit awkward to acknowledge those unearned assets, but it's super important for making nature interpretation more inclusive.

I found how you highlight the importance of interpreters working to break down barriers in their programming to be enlightening. It's cool to recognize privilege, but we really need to put in the effort to make nature accessible for everyone, especially those who don't usually get that chance. Interpreters need to step up and ensure that everyone feels welcome in these spaces, whether that means adding more accessible trails or coming up with programs that reflect different cultural experiences. I totally agree with your hope for the future of interpretation, and I believe chats like this are a step in the right direction.

Thanks for sharing such a lovely and personal post!

[cbenvs3000f24]

Unit 03 blog post

Hey everyone!

This week's topic is definitely more serious, but it is something that needs to be addressed. I would describe my definition of privilege as certain individuals being put at a certain advantage for reasons such as race, gender, sexuality, physical ability, and socioeconomic status. People are usually born with privilege for any of those reasons listed above, as we cannot choose how we are born. I am a straight white woman in the middle class with no physical disabilities, meaning I have been privileged for most of my life. After reading through this week's unit, it has been very eye-opening for me. It is always easy to say that you acknowledge and can understand your privilege, but unless you are in the shoes of somebody else, you will never understand the full extent of it. 

Although it may not be obvious, privilege unfortunately does play a role in nature interpretation. An example that stood out to me is being in perfect physical health. Around 2.7 million people in Canada have a mobility disability. This implies that there are many opportunities that they do not have regarding nature interpretation. For example, going on certain hikes. It is much more difficult for an individual in a wheelchair to climb a mountain or a demanding trail with rocky terrain. Individuals without disabilities frequently have greater freedom to venture into difficult terrain or partake in demanding outdoor activities. Because many parks and trails are not made to be accessible, people with disabilities may have varied experiences in natural settings.

Another example that is important to acknowledge is economic privilege. Marginalized groups are frequently negatively impacted by environmental degradation. For instance, low-income areas may be closer to pollution sources or lack adequate green space. It is also important to note that many beautiful places around the world cost money to go see. For example, the Grand Canyon National Park requires a certain fee to visit it. Not only does it require a fee, but for those who don’t live near those places, a plane ride would be required which would cost even more money. And if an individual does live close enough, they would require a car to get there, which would cost money again for gas and insurance. Many people do not have access to a car meaning they cannot go see many areas of nature unless there is a bus that could take them there. 

Lastly, speaking English is a privilege that many of us don't even pay mind to. Think about when you go to the arboretum here in Guelph. Almost every single sign describing the plant you see is in English. Even though there are now ways to translate these signs, using apps like Google translate, is still an inconvenience, especially for individuals who do not have a phone. Speaking English also puts you at so many more advantages when it comes to jobs and careers in nature interpretation, specifically in Canada. Why is it that two people, speaking different languages can have the same passion and love for nature interpretation, but only one of them would get a job from it?

[jshsbeowbssb]

Hey!

Your post really hit home for me, especially the way you laid out privilege in different areas like physical ability, economic status, and language. It's vital to discuss how mobility disabilities can limit access to outdoor spaces and experiences. It's something that often gets overlooked when we chat about nature. It's a bummer that many parks and trails are challenging, making it difficult for folks who want to enjoy nature but can't do it like everyone else. This really shows that privilege goes beyond just money or status; it's also about something as fundamental as physical ability.

I understand what you mean about economic privilege; it resonates with me. You're right that getting out in nature can have some sneaky costs, like getting there, paying for entry, and finding the time to go on these trips. It's about being near a natural spot and having what you need to check it out and have a good time there. Yeah, like you said, a lot of marginalized groups tend to live in places struck by pollution and environmental issues, which really cuts down on their chances to connect with nature.

When you mentioned it, I had just considered how much language plays in interpreting nature. It's standard to overlook that many signs and educational stuff are in English, especially in Canada. If you need to be fluent in English, it can hold you back from diving into and learning about the natural world. And how it impacts job opportunities in nature interpretation is another layer of exclusion that often gets missed. It's annoying to think that two people can share the same love and know-how about nature, but only one gets the job just because of language.

I really appreciate you mentioning these key points! They’ve made me think a lot about how privilege affects people’s connection with nature.

[jshsbeowbssb]

Unit 3 Blog Post

Our interpretation and experience of nature reflect privilege in some fascinating ways. It's about who gets to enjoy specific areas without concern, not only about who has access to them. Living in Lebanon, where I grew up, my life revolved much on the natural surroundings. The waves always bring me serenity; even now, I carry that connection everywhere I go. But when I consider my experience, this link is a privilege.

The scene in Lebanon is breathtaking—rolling hills, immaculate beaches, and rich forests. This natural beauty urges you to explore and let yourself vanish in it. Still, even growing up there, I observed that everyone felt it differently. For many, particularly in areas affected by war, nature was not a place of serenity but something far away or even dangerous. For some, the perk was just being free to stroll in the forest without thinking about landmines or security.

While I considered sitting by the shore a haven, not everyone shared that experience. Some people, particularly those from more metropolitan or industrialized areas, needed more access to those serene settings. Growing up, they could not fly off and find peace in nature whenever life seemed unbearable. In that regard, privilege might be as fundamental as feeling comfortable enough to enjoy nature and having it within reach.

Large amounts of ammonium nitrate kept at the Port of Beirut in the capital city of Lebanon exploded on August 4, 2020, resulting in at least 218,000 homeless estimates in addition to US$15 billion in property damage and at least 7,000 injuries.

Even after relocating to Canada, I still hunt out beaches and lakes. Though I know that not everyone can do the same, I find methods to stay close to the natural environment. Whether in Lebanon or Canada, access to the environment is typically shaped by elements including money, geography, or even cultural heritage. Though it would appear that everyone might have grown up with respect for nature, this is only sometimes the case.

Studies support what I have observed. Whether in Lebanon or elsewhere, socioeconomic level is a crucial factor in determining who can really enjoy nature. Green areas are more abundant in wealthy neighbourhoods of cities, depriving others of access in less affluent areas. In nations like Lebanon, where the country is blessed with natural beauty, not everyone appreciates that equally. One could consider privilege as essential as the capacity to feel at peace by walking beside the shore.

My favourite place is in South Lebanon, Jezzine. Regarding nature interpretation—whether it's an instructional lecture or a guided hike—those with that access and tranquillity typically define it. This can result in a particular story that only captures one experience with nature, therefore omitting alternative means of interaction with the surroundings. For those of us who grew up feeling that solid connection to nature, it's easy to take for granted that it's not something everyone has access to or can value in the same manner.

In this sense, privilege transcends mere riches or prestige. It's about experiencing freedom and safety in nature. It's about not feeling like visiting a park, a forest, or a beach is a luxury or something out of reach. Having those encounters makes me grateful; they have changed my perspective on the world. However, they also remind me of how we may provide more chances for everyone to experience that same tranquility and connectedness wherever they live.