should be studying but instead I’m yearning

No title available
DEAR READER
Sade Olutola

PR's Tumblrdome
Keni
Three Goblin Art
hello vonnie
Stranger Things

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
occasionally subtle
Misplaced Lens Cap
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
almost home
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
d e v o n

#extradirty
we're not kids anymore.
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
dirt enthusiast

Love Begins
seen from United States

seen from Romania
seen from United States

seen from Switzerland

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
@jules90
should be studying but instead I’m yearning
Making a difficult choice 👑
(I want to do a comic of this scene eventually)
🗣️🗣️🗣️ 'I came of age in the Dark War. I was baptized in blood and fire." 🗣️🗣️🗣️
🗣️🗣️🗣️"I killed my own father, you think I won't kill your son?"🗣️🗣️🗣️
🗣️🗣️🗣️"The world can burn if my family lives"🗣️🗣️🗣️
“Kiss me again,” he says, drunk and foolish. “Kiss me until I am sick of it.”
In love with this art! Love the details ❤️✨
art by @/frostbite.studios on Instagram
Feels like yesterday that Taylor announced she would be re-recording her music. Here we are, exactly four years later, a little over two months until this sick beat is hers. 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵
refseek.com
www.worldcat.org/
link.springer.com
http://bioline.org.br/
repec.org
science.gov
pdfdrive.com
PDFDrive stopped working a couple months ago, but you can try oceanofpdf.com instead.
Okay something that bothers me is the fact physics is seen as the more prestigious of the three main sciences, with biology at the bottom and chemistry in the middle. Like. I doubt most people could name a famous biologist, but they could name 5 famous physicists. Why are Albert Einstein and Stephen hawking household names but Norman Borlaug and Jonas Salk aren't?
Not to dismiss the accomplishments of Einstein or Hawking, or their genius, but their actual tangible contributions to society have been miniscule compared to that of Borlaug or Salk who have each saved LITERALLY hundreds of millions, if not billions, of lives each. Half the food on your plate was probably grown thanks to Borlaug and Salk is the reason half your siblings didn't die of polio as a kid.
Sure Einsteins theory of relatively is important for modern satellite communications but really though how can it compare?
This is coming from someone who studied physics. I love physics, and years ago when i was at uni I looked down at biology and so did everyone else studying physics. And I know others did too. Retroactively of course I know this was so very wrong.
If society as a whole started treating biology with more respect then maybe more students would go into that field. If we had rockstars of medicine and agricultural science that were household names rather than just physicists? think of how many more lives could be saved, how many more lives could be improved.
I'm not saying physics isn't important, and more scientists of any kind is always good, but proportionally I think societies priorities are a little skewd.
Relevant xkcd
Julian Blackthorn, as promised 🥀
Paint splatters of course
“Chaos doesn’t mean that the system is behaving randomly, it means that it is unpredictable because it has many variables, it is too complex to measure, and even if it could be measured, theoretically the measurement cannot be done accurately and the tiniest inaccuracy would change the end result an enormous amount.”
— Michael S. Gazzaniga, Who’s in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain (via sumballein)
is mathematics dealing with absolute truth?
That question is really thrilling to answer, to be honest.
We have to define 'absolute truth' first.
If we consider this "absolute truth" as logical consistency, then I'd like to introduce Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems:
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, for instance, state that mathematics will never be complete, because it will always have parts that cannot be proven. Either it is incomplete, but consistent, or complete but inconsistent (in form of being self-referent).
Mathematics cannot prove itself by its own rules, WITHIN its own system.
As for another track of thoughts/perspctive: (Now it becomes an utter mess... And I am sorry for leaping between multiple different conceptions rn. My thinking process IS like what I describe here - a sort of "extraction process" of "truth", or correct and exact thoughts. )
The only "absolute truth" there is, is actually that there is none - as a kind of "structure" at least, as in a "static", non-chaotic linear axiomatic system (Classical logic). When it comes to non-linear axiomatic systems [networks] (inserting chaos theory in meta-math - neat feedback-loop INSIDE mathematics as recursive system itself btw) I would rather refer to such "truth" as a process of oscillating around the most exact reality description - the symmetry axis is hence the equilibrium state and the actual structure of absolute truth. But- this is exceeding the margin now - The absolute state is an information singularity I call "invertium". Reaching that equilibrium causes an 'inversion', a process of inner polarity. That recursive inner polarity IS that absolute truth.
Furtherly, I somehow sense a strange logical twisted mindfuck fusing Gödel's Incompleteness with my concepts on non-linear axiomatic [networks] (Quantum logic, in a sense). (Transcendence of a paradox, huh???)
Also, in regards of these trains of thought, "absolute truth" is what I would call a "superposed entangled state of all truths and lies" - like an information singularity. A state in which an Invertium happens - the indistinguishabilty of two extreme states - 100% dense information can't be distinguished from a 0% one. A singularity is hence, in a sense, an isolated [conservative] system itself, from a rough viewpoint.
What happens in this state? I suppose a desintegration of said information as "self/own complex", and integration of its information parts into its super-ordinate medium. (That is how I interpret entanglement) (The information strangely "dissolves"/integrates.)
Absolute truth bears every partial truth - and all partial truths, well, I would refer here to Feynman's Path integrals, virtual pairs in Feynman-diagrams and statistical mechanics.
And I am sorry for the confusion. Maybe one day I will be able to turn these highly compressed thoughts into fathomable chunks.
(In my upcoming book a lot of the concepts stated above will be some of the primary issues.)
Very important 0.2 frames trailer wesper scene redraw is finally done !!
SHADOW AND BONE SEASON 2 WILL DROP ON MARCH 16, 2023
Enola Holmes || That Girl's A Genius
Taylor Swift x Daisy Jones & The Six
Music legend Taylor Swift is as renowned for her heart-wrenching lyrics as she is for her striking beauty or captivating stage presence. Swift established herself as a rising star with the release of her country-folk debut album, First, in 1975. But it was her partnership with rock band The Six that propelled her into superstar status. The group’s collaborative album, Aurora, was the bestselling album of 1978 and its lead single, Turn It Off, earned them a Grammy award for Record of the Year. Although she retired from the music industry in 1979 following the band’s infamous split, Swift continues to be celebrated by critics and fans alike as a pioneering songwriter and fashion icon.
Us <3