Nobody gets him š
noise dept.
YOU ARE THE REASON
šŖ¼
todays bird

oozey mess
Xuebing Du
Peter Solarz

JBB: An Artblog!
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

@theartofmadeline

No title available
No title available
occasionally subtle
i don't do bad sauce passes

ē„ę„ / Permanent Vacation
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day
tumblr dot com

shark vs the universe
Jules of Nature
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from Canada
seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Pakistan

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@meganwasbored
Nobody gets him š
>"if you don't kick Nazis out of your bar it's a Nazi bar!"
>look inside bar
>Jews asking politely to not get called Nazis
not even joking
āItās like asking Germans how they feel about Nazisā
No, itās like asking every Muslim post 9/11 what they think about Al Qaeda. Itās like being suspicious of any person who MIGHT look middle eastern.
Aka, fucking ridiculous and prejudiced.
If you can grasp why itās offensive to interrogate random Muslims about 9/11, then you can get why itās offensive to grill every Jew about Palestine.
Also, who wants to take bets on whether Yumemiya here sees someone online say they're German and immediately goes to ask them if they're a Nazi?
Actually, hang on, 'If you let a Nazi into a bar, it becomes a Nazi bar, same deal with ethnic groups'? Does anyone else get a weird feeling about this guy's thoughts on segregation?
Yeah, thatās really the thing, isnāt it: the point of āif you let a Nazi into your bar, it becomes a Nazi barā was never about how you should grill random German people about whether or not theyāre Nazis before you let them enter your space ā on the contrary, if your only focus was on German people, youād miss a lot of neo-Nazis who are, not to put to fine a point on it, actually majority not ethnically German. The original story was about noticing that the patrons in question were displaying an explicitly Nazi symbol. It had nothing to do with who they were and everything to do with what they were openly supporting.
How the actual fuck did we get from ālearn to recognize fascist dog whistles and have a zero tolerance policy about themā to āselectively interrogate members of minority groups you think are suspicious about whether theyāre one of the good ones?ā
Bruh letās imagine for a moment that two people walk into your bar:
Person A is not German, but is wearing a literal iron cross. You ask him if the literal iron cross is a Nazi thing. He says that sure, thatās maybe the origin of the iron cross, but obviously heās not a Nazi, and you need to stop jumping at shadows. The iron cross is really just a symbol of resistance against modernity, and embracing tradition. He wears it because he believes itās important to preserve ethnic divisions and maintain cultural purity. He thinks stopping modern degeneracy is critically important ā in the politics, and also in the arts. There are a lot of sick, evil people out there who are trying to destroy communities, but groups like his are trying to resist that. āWeāre stronger together,ā he says. āThatās why we need to protect our own.ā
Person B is dressed completely normally but he speaks with a German accent. You ask him to clarify whether or not heās a Nazi right this instant because āall Germans are Nazis until proven otherwise,ā and he tells you āfuck off, you racist piece of shit.ā
If you kick out Person B and let Person A stay, congratulations, youāre speed-running your way into having a Nazi bar.
"Jews think you can't criticize them"
"Vile stench"
"Victim complex"
"Global Jewry"
"Parasite"
"The extermination you deserve"
"The world is noticing"
"Clean Jewish people"
This person is a Nazi. If it wasn't clear before that the tactic of labeling Zionists as undeserving of life and then asserting that any Jew should be assumed to be a Zionist is bent towards Jewish extermination it should be now
The pug-ification of toothless' face is actually unreal dude what the fuck did they do to my aerodynamic dragon
no that's great i'm so happy for enola fans
if you thought the mandalorian and grogu was too unserious you must just not like the mandalorian in general because itās literally always been like this
honestly one of the all time tweets of all time tbh
i hate that "that that" is grammatically correct. why is english the joke language
by the way, this post was inspired by some writing i was doing last night where i wrote "that that" and got so mad that i had to take a break for the rest of the evening
it's understandable that that "that that" that ended your writing session would inspire a post like that
Just a friendly reminder: āthat thatā may be technically grammatically correct but if you just use one, I PROMISE the sentence will still make sense. Itās why every English teacher ever will mark one out if you have two.
True, it'll technically still make sense, but I'm ngl, when I read one "that" where two will make more sense, I find myself mentally adding a second "that"
love wearing all black in public i hope no large gaseous heat emitting orb in the sky comes along and makes my day worse
Girl whose most frequent mistake is inaction voice: wow I keep making mistakes I better not do anything
They're doing nothing to me #controlgroup
big fan of when you peel back all layers of a character and at the bottom of it there's love
why are they doing this? because they loved someone so much it caused the plot to happen. Grief counts btw
ESPECIALLY a big fan of when this isn't enough to make them a good person
love the genre of discourse thatās like āthe world used to be [thing it never was] but now society is [Iām over thirty]ā
evergreen post
they should invent a taking care of your own body thats easy
STOP disabling reblogs on your hilarious 900 note posts! I have people fighting over ancient 50,000 note posts in my notifs constantly and if I can handle that you can let me reblog your funni
coupons used to mean something now deals are like HURRY NOW! get 3 free napkins when you spend $75+ š
Mike Wheeler and the fact that repression has never really been his thing
For some reason Iāve seen the take that Mike is written as a repressed gay/bi character, and because I love overthinking character writing, I ended up doing a little analysis of my own and came away thinking: no, not really.
Not because Mike couldnāt theoretically be read that way in fanon, but because that reading feels very out of step with the way heās actually written from season 1 onward.
What defines Mike early on is not repression. Itās almost the opposite.
In season 1, Mike and Nancy have something in common: theyāre both smart kids, good students, the kind of children their parents donāt pay much attention to because they seem āfine.ā But thereās also a very important difference between them at that point. Nancy is still trying, at least partially, to move toward acceptance, popularity, and normalcy. Mike isnāt.
Mike does not spend season 1 trying to be less weird. He doesnāt reject difference in order to fit in. He accepts that he and his friends are different, bullied, outcast kids, and he actively defends that difference. He defends Dustin and Will when people are cruel to them. He leads the group because he understands that the strength of their friendship comes from the fact that they are different and loyal to each other.
That doesnāt mean he has no insecurities. He obviously does, especially about his appearance, because thatās exactly what the bullies target. But insecurity is not the same thing as repression.
And when Will goes missing, Mikeās instinct is not to stay quiet, obey adults, and keep his head down. His instinct is to do what feels right, even if itās risky.
That matters, because when he finds Eleven, he does the exact same thing.
His friendsā first instinct is fear, confusion, calling her crazy or weird. Mikeās instinct is protection, care, and curiosity. He has always sided with the different, the abandoned, the person no one else knows what to do with. Eleven is not an exception to that pattern ā sheās the most intense version of it. And his immediate connection to her gives him the courage to hide her and protect her anyway.
So no, Mike is not someone whose first impulse is to bury or deny what is unusual, socially risky, or hard to explain.
And I think that is exactly why Will likes him. Because out of all of them, Mike is the one who accepts difference most naturally, even before he fully understands it.
Season 2 keeps reinforcing this.
The season literally opens with Mike refusing to tell anyone where Eleven is. He will not betray her. The government can ask, adults can pressure him, it doesnāt matter. Mikeās personality is still being drawn in thick lines here: if he loves you, if he feels responsible for you, he tries to protect you.
And the same thing happens at home. Losing Eleven makes him angry, withdrawn, and deeply off-balance, but he does not repress that grief. He doesnāt hide it neatly from his family or his friends. He talks back at the dinner table. His grades drop. He makes his unhappiness visible.
Again: Mike is not written as someone who quietly buries what he feels in order to preserve appearances.
If he were written as someone developing attraction toward one of his male friends, I honestly donāt think the emotional logic of his character would be to suppress it into silence forever. I think he would try to understand it. He would probably be messy about it, awkward about it, even scared of it, but Mikeās whole character leans toward engagement, not denial.
That is also why the kisses in season 1 and season 2 are important. Mike is the one who takes the initiative. In both moments, he wants to kiss Eleven, and in both moments, he acts on that desire. To me, that reinforces the same pattern the show keeps giving us: Mike is not written as someone who suppresses desire into nothing. He is written as someone who feels deeply and, once he finds the courage, moves toward what he wants.
And the ācrazy togetherā scene is another good example. Mike is not ashamed to say that not having Eleven is making him lose his mind. He doesnāt try to package his feelings into something more socially acceptable. He embrace the strange, intense thing out loud. That same openness is what gives Will courage too, because Will is carrying his own terror and difference in that season.
Season 3 keeps the same pattern.
When Hopper tells Mike to stay away from Eleven, Mikeās first reaction is immediate rebellion. He literally calls him a ālying piece of shit.ā Only when Hopper scares him enough with the threat of never seeing Eleven again does Mike resort to lying. And even then, it bothers him immediately. He wants to fix it. He wants to make it right. Lying does not come naturally to him, and neither does repressing what he feels.
And season 3 is basically a teen romcom when it comes to the younger charactersā storylines, so of course when Eleven catches him in that lie, Mikeās whole world falls apart in the most lovesick teenage boy way possible.
This is important, because it shows that Mikeās not someone quietly hiding his feelings under layers of denial. He is written as a boy whose emotions are obvious, overwhelming, and often embarrassingly visible. What makes him clumsy is not repression of desire ā itās fear, youth, and the constant possibility of losing the person he loves.
And yes, this is the 80s. Being gay was stigmatized, dangerous, almost unspeakable.
But loving Eleven was dangerous too.
She was a hunted girl, marked as dangerous by the government, someone he absolutely should have stayed away from if safety and social acceptance had been the point. And yet Mike never once repressed his need to be with her. What changes as he grows older is not the existence of his feelings, but his fear of losing her. That fear makes him clumsy, insecure, hesitant in expression ā but never uninterested, never detached, never unwilling to fight for her.
He crosses the country for her. He plans to run away with her. He keeps choosing her.
That is not a character written around emotional repression. That is a character written around emotional devotion.
I do think season 5 tried to bring back more of that season 1 Mike ā the Mike who accepts difference and defends what feels right ā and they did it partly through Will, which also helps close Willās own arc of acceptance. (Whether they handled that well or not is up to each viewer). But even there, Mike is not frightened by what Will is. He is not disgusted, avoidant, or ashamed. He does not pull away from him emotionally before or after knowing he is gay.
I once saw Noah Schnapp say that Mike would have explored, and I agree.
If Mike were the kind of character who felt that kind of attraction toward boys, I think he would have explored it. Maybe awkwardly, maybe messily, maybe late ā but I do not think his arc would be built around suppressing what he feels until it disappears.
Because that is simply not who Mike is.
What we actually see, over and over again, is a boy whose emotional arc keeps returning to the same person. Mike Wheeler is not repressing love for someone else. He is trying, and often failing, to survive the intensity of what he feels for Eleven.
What Mike represses sometimes is not desire itself, but the language for his love when he is afraid. The possibility of losing the person he loves most makes him fumble. It makes him hesitate. It makes him feel like he is failing her.
But fundamentally, Mike Wheeler is not someone who would stop fighting for what he feels.