
roma★
Mike Driver
The Stonewall Inn

Kiana Khansmith
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Noah Kahan
official daine visual archive
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
macklin celebrini has autism
No title available

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

No title available
Today's Document

@theartofmadeline

titsay
Fai_Ryy
h
★
YOU ARE THE REASON
Sade Olutola
seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Peru

seen from Germany
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Morocco
seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Thailand
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from Lebanon
seen from Tunisia
@junkratz
comm for 2ilvervictory, thank you very much once again!
Var det ovanligt snålt med topping på pizzan jag köpte i helgen?
Ja, det är för lite
Nej, det är normalt
Anthony Hurd (American, 1975) - You Have This Hold Over Me (2025)
decaying sanctum
Being able to draw older people as attractive without reducing or erasing the visual signs of aging, and in fact showing that they're attractive because of those signs, is an artistic skill that should be valued so much more. Honestly, it should earn you an immediate fortune because holy fuck is it a rare commodity. There are so many artists who seem to think attractiveness and aging exist in opposition to each other, so they smooth every wrinkle, erase every crease, and de-age the character until they're basically thirty with silver hair. But when an artist can look at crow's feet, smile lines, weathered skin, deep-set wrinkles, and all the little traces of a life well lived and say, "No, that's what makes them beautiful," that's a level of artistic observation and care I wish we celebrated more often.
Truly @meanbossart
curiouser and curiouser
i forgot Most people are not always in the state of cowering in the corner like a scared dog. y’all just be doing stuff
oh? can you please tell me more about what line has the You>you slip up english only having a formal pronoun really fuck with some dynamics sometimes and im so curious now cause i cant read russian
yessiREE okay so in the russian version, at some point, conversation goes like this :
Бакалавр … чудовищные смеси из толчёных таблеток, да! Они их называют «порошочки». [...] Да… я слышал. Более того… я проверял. Так что и вы не смейтесь надо мной, коллега. Как вас там… эрдэм. >Ты проверял?.. То есть… вы проверяли? >Я не эрдэм. Эмшен скорей -- но так не слишком скромно. Хирурга у нас называют «яргачин», как мясника.
this exchange, if you choose the first option, is followed by Dankovsky's:
Можно и на ты. Да, проверял. [...]
or, translated (through deepl, because, well. i don't read russian either Thumbs up emoji) as it stands, is:
Bachelor : …monstrous mixtures of crushed pills, yes! They call them "[shmowders]". [...] Yes… I've heard that. In fact... I've tested it. So don't make fun of me either, colleague. What's your name... Erdem. >You(informal, singular form) checked?.. I mean, uh... You(formal, singular form) checked? >I'm not an Erdem. Emshen rather - - but that's not too modest. We call a surgeon "yargachin", like a butcher.
and followed by Dankovsky's:
You can use you(informal form). Yes, I checked.
In the english translation this sentence of Burakh's & Dankovsky's response go as follow:
B: Holy shit… Sorry, excuse my language. So you've checked, then? D: You don't have to watch your tongue with me. Yes, I've checked. [...]
as you can see, in the original version, Burakh slipped INTO the informal, friendlier, and maybe less respectful "ты" FROM the more formal, respectful "вы". Since the english language has no distinction between a formal and an informal singular you/You, the translator had to go around it, and make it about cursing instead of the pronoun switching. on one hand, #respect because translation is a hard annoying hair-pulling job. on the other hand, i feel like this strippppsssss the scene of its...... tension. slipping from вы to ты is a way to show that burakh started considering himself real buddy-buddy with dankovsky. or maybe lost some of the (potentially convention-mandated) respect in speech he held for dankovsky. it's a hint that he had started to, subconsciously, see dankovsky as less Above him, keeping the formality by convention. AND, dankovsky telling HIM he can use the informal form, and doesn't have to keep using the formal one, is a way to recontextualize, and to reshape their relationship. he's shedding the distance of respect and and formality that was between them, he's actively telling burakh to forgo it.
in the english translation, i feel like this shedding of distance and formality is more accomplished in dankovsky's response alone: You don't have to watch your tongue with me. It's an authorization to curse, on this one, yes, but also to more openly discuss painful, annoying things, even if you gotta slip a fuck(THE CURSE WORD) in there.
i'll always be so so sad about the lack of english's formal/informal singular you distinction. makes for a very neutered language. the inherent closeness of accidentally calling someone ты/toi instead of вы/vous and not being called out on it............
☝️ give this blogger a true actually
(more tags on prev I just had to pick thank you for your knowledge we love to read it i love to read it) Dankovskys response of Можно и на ты does not contain a you for Burakh [(ты) можешь/(вы) можете] I translated it with one in line with what was done in English but it loses some of the subtelties elaborated upon in prev (for something closer I might have gone for a passive voice, even though it'd have sounded like shite in English)
And something funner even is that Dankovsky himself in his "Так что и вы не смейтесь я надо мной, коллега [...]" (the don't laugh at me, colleague line) uses the formal You. get outta here!!!!!
formal/informal you differentiation is an ➡️➡️➡️EROTIC⬅️⬅️⬅️ component of language that carries hierarchical, affiliational(sic) and relational weights within a dynamic. it highlights the space between two people as a load-bearing component of the relational triangle (the lover, the beloved, and the space between them) by making explicit its prehensible state as something that can be stretched or shrunk by interactions, something one has control over through words.
and every day i weep and i start attacking people when i'm done weeping over the fact that contemporary english doesn't have it because how am i supposed to write in such circumstances. well i do it anyways.
in a way john watson is a fantasy (what if you had this brilliant enigmatic friend and what if he liked you in particular and what if he offered you the excitement of youth and adventures and a way out of boring society life and all without having to actually give up your status as a gentleman so you could have the best of both worlds) and in a way sherlock holmes is a fantasy (what if someone never got tired of you despite your various strange habits and mood swings and instead of simply tolerating you they genuinely liked you and what if you didn’t have to live alone forever and what if you never had to give up doing the things you love) and of course there’s the most fantastical part of it all (what if you could afford london housing prices)
Well, famously they can't actually afford London housing, that's the whole reason they met.
Audition (1999) - ''She always gets a part''
underrated aspect of being bilingual: going on an absolutely wild goose chase to find a perfect translation for a sentence that formed in your head in one language while you're writing in the other, only to come out of places you would not dare tread otherwise with a scowl on your face and going "yeah sure i guess 'distort' is about as close as i'll get to this, i hate it here (in the english language)"
decide her fate
put into a small little bed
pelt with 483 tomatoes
highschool calculus class
calculus class won the vote! good luck kitty youre really gonna need it