Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

if i look back, i am lost

No title available
Sade Olutola
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
$LAYYYTER

tannertan36
Misplaced Lens Cap

ellievsbear

No title available

No title available
ojovivo
NASA

pixel skylines

Kiana Khansmith
h
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Russia
seen from Netherlands

seen from India

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Tunisia

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from South Africa

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Russia
@justwildman
No I dont have small feelings about the woman in my ear buds, I don't have small feelings about anything, I have big feelings about everything and everyone. And I nurture that, I want to love as much as is possible,
Protect girls, protect boys, elevate women, heavily scrutinize men.
Shout out to the second sons
Your death doesn't matter to the bloodline,
your secondary nature makes you obsolete
Superiority is a concept we absolutely must get past.
In our critique of the world, it must totally be free of superiority. We cannot fairly examine in a right/wrong paradigm. The universe is not dualist, and applying a black and white filter only serves to put us in a mental position that often ourselves at the top. But we can clearly recognize when others are putting us below. And it's simply an illusion.
Haunted by my past love,
for all the love I Still hold in my heart.
Hi! I'm genuinely curious here - re: your response on the soulmate post and your stance that sexual energy is the most powerful type of energy, how to you account for/include ace and/or aro people? Does celibacy equate to a loss of power, and does that vary based on reasoning (religion, personal preference, medical circumstance)? If someone is widowed young and never pursues another romantic relationship, but does form several deep friendships, what does that mean? Do you have thoughts on polyamory? Sorry for all the questions, we just clearly have very different understandings of the world and I'm very curious!
When I say sexual energy, I'm referring to love. I believe Love is the most powerful energy in the universe, and that sexuality is one of the easiest ways to raise, direct, or otherwise utilize that energy, via intention. For instance, manifestation.
But there are plenty of ways to raise and direct energy, the solo practitioner can develop their own breathwork and visualization to move more energy than an unconscious(to subtle energy) person having intercourse can.
Think of the potent, vital life essence that is released during ejaculation. An unconscious person can drain themselves of the energetic aspect of this, through intentionless masturbation, and I believe people observing celibacy can actually have stronger energy centers and stores.
But I also think sex is a broader thing than just intercourse. I think if you and a friend really enjoy bowling, and go out bowling together, you can raise a lot of love energy between you in that, as well.
So really, as long as you open your heart to the fullest, you'll never experience any loss of power. Whatever that means in a way that is appropriate to you and the people around you.
Community and the structure and support that it provides is more generally potent than the specific application of sexual energy.
Polyamory can be great, as long as everyone involved is in agreement. It's a lot more work, but I think it can be more rewarding for that work. Whatever is right for you, wherever you find the most love, in whatever form that takes, that's where your power is.
Hey, I'm just purely curious - why don't you like the idea of soulmates? I personally find the idea fun though entirely made up, but since following you I've been trying to open up to the fact I have a very allo-mindset. Anyway, what are your thoughts??
well I guess the thing is that pretending everyone in the world has a singular perfect romantic match floating around somewhere that they're meant to find just seems kind of silly. respectfully. I don't think love is a thing just waiting to be found fully formed in a specific person but rather something that has the potential to be chosen and cultivated in infinite permutations with countless people throughout our lives. but that makes me a killjoy or something.
By the end of your life, you will have spent more time with one person than you will have with anyone else. I don't think love is found fully formed there, it's the person with whom your ability to love expands the most, that's your true love. I disagree with the infinite permutations concept. Marvel multiverse has fried some people's brains. There is only the One life you have. You will not be traveling to the parallel universes of potential, there is the person you will end up with. That will be fact, by the end of your life, even if you don't know it now.
end my sentences with commas because there's so much more to say,
Source
Hey, so this is bad
Hey, they already were. Look into church voter guides. They've already been doing this a long time.
It's kinda hard to "attribute to ignorance rather than malice" when that ignorance is the product of centuries of malice.
It's more of a case of "is this conscious individual malice or the constant background malice that permeates all things?"
And I do think it's necessary for all leftists to bear this in mind dealing with individuals. I'm sure most people can recall in their political education a period of ignorance they had to overcome. Individuals are not at fault for their ignorance, there IS centuries of malice that was specifically designed to mislead people. We cannot get out of this situation by excluding the ignorant. We cannot do away with them. We absolutely must guide them into the light of knowledge.
statements like "It's wrong to masturbate about a person without their consent" and "It's wrong to do something that quietly arouses you while you are in public even if no one can see it" show that a person's understanding of morality basically involves magical thinking. like I wrote this post on the toilet. That's not the same thing as me literally shitting on you
Counter point involving magical thinking, energetic connections are real, just because they're unseen doesn't mean they don't exist. Scientific Materialism's failure to explain something does not equate to non-existence. Sex is the most powerful energetic connection you can form with another person, it is literally the body's most powerful means, it creates a connection so powerful, at least chemically, it produces life. In Magic (for our purposes: the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will), people find real tangible results from masturbating over sigils created with a specific intent, and charged through this act. It's not exactly morality, I'm not making a statement on that. Right and wrong are relative positions and not necessarily inherent truth. However, every action has an equal and opposite reaction, as an alchemist once said, and ignorance of the consequences of our actions do not absolve us from the energetic consequences returning to us. Outside of orgasm though, totally fine. Arousal is just like rubbing your hands together to generate heat. You could say it's just filling your aura with more energy. You should absolutely be so horny in public that it looks like heat rising off the highway around you.
Blue flower, red thorns. SHREK (2001)
part of what makes Shrek a timeless classic is that this is a stage play, and that's what lends authenticity to the piece. We can look at the graphics now and see it for a hand painted scene it is.
Total global disarmament now.
the redefining of ‘ materialist ‘ to mean materialistic is hilarious
They co-opted a whole school of thought. This is an added layer the average person has to now work through to really analyze what's going on. To really apply a materialist lens and see things for what they are.
If it's not something that negatively affects the final product I enjoy finding "flaws" in mass-produced goods, like the misaligned slicing this loaf of bread got. I don't think I have the education or vocabulary to explain it properly so I'll just say that I enjoy being reminded that not everything is under perfect control at all times. Seeing little glimpses of the fragility of highly-regulated systems keeps me optimistic.
There's an aspect of industrialization and mass production, where so many of our conveniences were created to take things off our plate. So we don't have to think about them, and we can focus on our work, or "enjoy our free time." As a result, we don't think about much of anything, and where it comes from, and it alienates us from products we use, especially food. I love these types of imperfections, as it is a reminder of the factory. It gives us a chance to pause, reflect on the work it took to get to us, and gives us an opportunity for gratitude to all the workers who helped to deliver this our daily bread.