Why is ‘incel fish man’ a very real genre of character
d e v o n
No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium

No title available

if i look back, i am lost
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Cosmic Funnies
will byers stan first human second
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Kiana Khansmith
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
tumblr dot com
taylor price

Origami Around
noise dept.

blake kathryn
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Palestinian Territories
seen from Mexico
seen from Venezuela
seen from Costa Rica
seen from France

seen from Morocco
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ukraine

seen from Russia
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Poland

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
@kandiiken
Why is ‘incel fish man’ a very real genre of character
"Whimsy" is truly a wretched term. What maketh thee so carefree?
thy mother
Art thou for fucking real
every single conversation i’m forced into on this website is either “guac is extra” or “you hate pancakes”
i honestly don't really understand why "some people prefer watching gameplay online rather than playing games themselves" is treated as such a taboo when being a spectator is considered a pretty mundane way to engage with most sports, game shows, reality tv or even just like. chess.
is this a safe place to say that i think the deep’s gills are actually really cute
reblogs were off
just casually leaving this here for no particular reason
You know what? Fuck it I'm adding more context. Sesame Street has talked about the topic of death more than once and it's done with such gentle carefulness without watering down or censoring the heaviness of the situations. It treats heavy subject matter with respect and dignity and has been for DECADES. From the early 1980s:
To 2025:
Hell, they even cover the devastating heaviness of MASS SHOOTINGS without censoring or watering anything down.
They've been doing this for YEARS, and it's ALWAYS handled with dignity, respect, seriousness, understanding, and love.
Whenever I see people censoring words because it "might offend" someone or the big ad companies that are currently trying to run everything? I just want to say to them: "What? Is Sesame Street too mature for you?" Because really...what the hell are we doing.
I'm back with even more examples! Sesame Street once again to this day is out here handling extremely difficult subject matter with incredible care and respect. "We can't let kids learn about uncomfortable things!" Oh, really now? Even though they're things that happen in everyday life that they'll face one day at some point anyway? Interesting. Let's see what else this show has covered that people (for some reason) think should be avoided and hidden. Here's more on death of loved ones and greif:
Or how about when someone is put into the foster care system because their home isn't safe anymore and their needs aren't being met?
Maybe some discussions about group therapy/getting help and support?
Hey look! Here's a segment about gender expression vs taught expectation, including unlearning harmful biases and what to do when you hurt someone on accident because you didn't know it was wrong!
Look! The topic of race and diversity! The importance of unity and equity!
They even also have a more allegorical take on discrimination and being looked down on for who you are, featuring Big Bird. The conflict is about how he's not being let into a club because the one bird running the club personally decided he didn't want someone like Big Bird there.
Big Bird goes out of his way to keep changing parts of himself in order to "prove" he can fit into this club if he just changed enough. The truth comes out though, and there's nothing he can do to gain the approval of that bird. He will never be good enough in his eyes, and Big Bird starts to hate himself. His real friends see this finally put their feet down, emphasizing that you should never change yourself just to fit into one singular narrow idea someone else has.
There's A LOT of different situations this can be an allegory for. Racism, sexism, homophobia, basically ANY form of exclusion is put on full blast in this 15 minute clip. Sesame Street can be both blunt and allegorical when approaching difficult topics, and it NEVER misses or looses the point.
It does an exceptional job in both styles of representation WITHOUT watering anything down. The more sanitized everything gets, the more radical Sesame Street is suddenly considered, hence why so many "particular groups" want it gone. Hmmm! I can only imagine why that could be, in this current political climate! (I'm being sarcastic)
When Sesame Street is suddenly labeled as "questionable" or "politically/agenda motivated" content...it says A LOT about where we currently are and who gets to decide what's "best" for kids or not. Don't fall for the censorship and topic-dodging excuses that are covered by the "But think of the children!!!" movement. Never fall for it, because you know which side you're on if you do.
Sesame Street proves kids can be taught and trusted with learning about these topics when it's handled with the right amount of understanding and care. It shows what all this "controversy" is all really about. What it's always been about, actually.
Don't fall for it, always side with Sesame Street.
There was also an episode where Big Bird’s home was destroyed in a natural disaster—an earthquake or something. It was incredibly heart-wrenching and beautiful, and in one of the documentaries, the writers talked about how long and hard they worked to figure how out to talk to children who had lost everything.
You could say Homelander is.. Open minded.
day one of having a fandom mutual: you like The Character too? no way!
day three hundred of having a fandom mutual: The Character probably gets vivisected recreationally. no doubt
You know that whatever character did those problematic things isn't like. Real, right?
You are aware that a fictional character is just a rhetorical construct designed to fulfill a narrative/thematic purpose right? That their actions are written by an author who wants to use them to explore complex ideas and moral gray areas within the safe confines of fiction right? That they aren't a real person who has killed real people right?
i literally JUST added homelander
im a noob-level creative who put all stats into idea making and nothing else. sorry i cant write or draw a comic or book or code video game but i can make up things like nobody's business
She was fujoshing out ✌️
At one point, while I was messing around, it occurred to me what would have happened if Deep had come to his senses and redeemed himself, and if Homelander hadn't died 🤔 idk
im sorry but deeplander hate is so forced. how are you actually trying to moral grandstand and pretend any other homelander ship is somehow morally superior when literally any pairing involving homelander is like. inherently fucked up. yes i’m sure your ship involving the murderous meglomaniacal serial abuser is the more righteous one to support. are we serious bro. and it’s BUTCHlander fans calling deeplander fans weird is killing me. you’re in the same boat.
homelander: fuck u deep i hate u stupid fish fucker no one likes u ur stupid get out of my face
deep: aw :( okay
*later*
homelander: i meant what i said but also let me crack that
deep: YAYAYAYAYAYYAYAYAYAYAY
"it's just growing pains" -> "you're too young for that to hurt that bad" -> "you just need to get in better shape" -> "welcome to being old, everyone is in pain"