Love when Soul is all flirty with Maka
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
d e v o n
The Stonewall Inn

bliss lane
No title available
we're not kids anymore.
todays bird
𓃗
will byers stan first human second
tumblr dot com
EXPECTATIONS

★
Claire Keane
YOU ARE THE REASON
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Today's Document
Misplaced Lens Cap

PR's Tumblrdome
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Cosmic Funnies

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Brazil

seen from India

seen from Türkiye

seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Maldives

seen from Czechia

seen from Canada
seen from Czechia
seen from Spain
seen from Senegal
seen from United States
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
seen from Indonesia
seen from Puerto Rico
@katkit-42
Love when Soul is all flirty with Maka
sit back fuckerinos while I link my GoFundMe for my woke vision of a Hamilton remake where all the founding fathers are girls
I just finished knives out and AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH
I GOT IT RIIIIIIGHT I FIGURED IT OUTTTTTTTT
I've never gotten a murder mystery right before but Umineko is the fucking boot camp of murder mysteries
tried to look at the knives out tag
hey..... he's going on a racist tirade..... that's not.... hot....
I just finished knives out and AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH
I GOT IT RIIIIIIGHT I FIGURED IT OUTTTTTTTT
I've never gotten a murder mystery right before but Umineko is the fucking boot camp of murder mysteries
i’m not even that much of a pervert i can just find the eroticism in anything. doesn’t get me bricked up necessarily i just like to appreciate it.
Soul is fighting for his life in these like bro are you ok? Are you even having fun? You can't just pose and smile like a normal person?
i think the world would be a happier place if we were all permanently stoned
the lottery by shirley jackson
hold on i have to read something real quick
dude
i love when curiosity drives me to see what's going on in the more obscure hypothetically Problematique ship tags of a fandom (incest pairings and the like), and almost invariably i find very little fic but the fic that does exist is always like, over a dozen works written singlehandedly by one Extremely Dedicated Pervert. we need to cherish these people. support your fandom's local pervert today they're a load-bearing part of the ecosystem
im realizing very fast that people do not in fact know that sometimes things in stories suck on purpose and it sucking is the point
"this story is misogynistic!!"
>looks inside
>about the pressures of societal misogyny and how its bad
starting the countdown until gaylors start saying that Adam Sandler officiating Taylor's wedding (sorry if this is how you found out) is actually proof that it's a sham because it's a reference to I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry (2007), in which Sandler and Kevin James play heterosexual men who enter a mutually beneficial fake gay marriage, a dynamic that Taylor is inverting as a queer woman pretending to be straight while cleverly flagging the obvious farce to those with the eyes to see
since the release of “candy scar” i’ve found that a very strong sense of dread settles in the bottom of my stomach every time i see a post pointing out how, despite everything, you gotta admit—mizi did look really hot in all those marketing adverts. it’s like the point of the entire music video flew so far over some people’s heads it must’ve entered the stratosphere. (tw: SA mention ⬇️)
mizi is in a highly abusive relationship with both her management company and the kpop industry as a whole. over the course of the mv, we see the light slowly begin to leave her eyes as she sells more and more of her soul away to her career. with every new advert she is wearing less clothing, and by the end of it they’ve got her in a bikini posing suggestively with half-naked men, the light in her eyes absolutely nonexistent by this point.
i feel like there’s an important point to this mv that a lot of people don’t seem to be picking up on: mizi is a lesbian. she is exclusively attracted to women, and—i cannot stress this enough—biologically unable to feel attraction towards men. therefore, mizi is physically incapable of wholeheartedly consenting to the suggestive and borderline sexual advertisements her company has her do with men.
this may come off as a more extreme interpretation of the events of the mv (many of which i recognize were purposely left vague), but i believe, for all intents and purposes, that mizi is forcing herself to endure non-consensual acts of a sexual nature with those male actors, i.e., experiencing a discreet form of SA. and, by taking a closer look at the gradual perversion of her as campaigns, you can find some fairly unsubtle visual evidence of this.
the first few are definitely suggestive, but arguably still tame in comparison to what she endures later on, evidenced by the light in her eyes in these scenes. over time, she’s forced to expose more and more of her body, and the light certainly begins to dwindle—however, we don’t see it completely nonexistent until she begins to advertise with men. up to that point, she’d learned to make herself numb to the degrading nature of her work, but they were still just solo adverts. as a lesbian, i think the point in the mv at which men become involved in her ads marks a pretty significant jump in the amount of inner turmoil she’s having to undergo behind the shiny kpop idol mask.
now, not only is she essentially selling her body to millions of people worldwide, but she’s also being coerced into unwillingly performing heterosexuality with men she otherwise never would have laid a finger on. to me, the very strong sense of lack of consent & bodily autonomy from this part of the mv forward serves to add an even darker, more depraved level of horror to an already plenty disturbing story.
all that to say: i just find it in pretty poor taste for fans to feel comfortable essentially slotting themselves directly into the roles of all the creepy men in hers and sua’s crowd post-infection. to further sexualize her body, even as the story strongly suggests the theme of dubious consent/SA underpinning every new advertisement, comes off to me as a pretty blatant insult to the message vivinos was trying to convey here. a message that was practically handed to the audience on a silver platter in comparison with alien stage. like, this shit is not covert, you guys.
but that’s just my interpretation as a lesbian alnst fan! some may disagree, but one thing i’ve known to be consistently true about vivinos is that she does not do coincidences, and not even the tiniest details in her work are safe from becoming a devastating metaphor or allegory. so, when that woman decides alien stage in fact wasn’t a clear enough metaphor for the rampant mental/physical/sexual abuse and mistreatment idols face at the hands of the kpop industry… i sit my ass down and listen.
I know people have already pointed out the RGU and Perfect Blue references in Candy Scar, but I think it's important to also remember the context of those references.
Right at the beginning of the bridge, we see zombie Mizi step in front of the swirly and then the camera switches to shots of human Mizi in a T-shirt, making poses reminiscent of RGU and Perfect Blue.
The one with Mizi biting her thumb and looking to the side is an exact replica of the rape scene in Revolutionary Girl Utena, where the titular Utena (who also has pink hair and is in love with another girl) has been groomed and manipulated by her schools chairman into being in a "relationship" with him. She is 14, he's much older. And engaged. (Also, in that scene, Utena is dissociating and thinking of Anthy, the girl she loves, to comfort herself--I wonder if Mizi was thinking of Sua as well during that photo shoot?)
The next scenes, where she rolls around, are recreations of a scene in Perfect Blue, a movie about an idol, Mima, trying to branch out into the entertainment industry beyond her singing/dancing. Mima is trying to break out of her family friendly role, so she jumps into a role in a gritty crime drama, where her character is heavily sexualized in the marketing material and is sexually assaulted in story. Her male co-stars do not assault her--all in all, they actually seem pretty polite and respectful to her--but the process of being forcibly put in those positions with men she barely knows, repeatedly having to scream and cry on command, and treated like a doll by the industry is incredibly traumatizing for her.
I think the context of both of these references need to be kept into account when looking at Mizi's situation. She isn't just looking pretty while being photographed for an ad, she's a wlw being manipulated and groomed into a sexual object for heterosexual men. She's not just doing a job that she agreed to, she is specifically being assaulted and abused, not by another actor (as far as we know, at least), but by the industry.
my instagram explore page loves showing me those like erotic dark romance novel tiktoks and i really have to wonder: why do all these straight women desperately want to fuck a mafia boss
Okay, let's try and break this down.
Sexual fantasies are, by their very nature, transgressive. Yes, even the fluffy, romantic ones. As long as general culture remains negative about sex and sexuality in any form that isn't cishet procreative sex within the confines of matrimony with the woman not as an equal actor but an object sex is performed onto, this is going to remain true.
And the thing about fantasies is that our brains like to take the things we crave the most and mix them up with our fears, anxieties, pain, and trauma into a melange of, sometimes, truly epic levels of fuckery.
But here's the secret - things we fantasize about, from the most wholesome to the bizarre to seriously fucked up? They are very, very often NOT what we literally want.
Being into dubcon or noncon doesn't mean you actually want to be raped or rape. Being into monsters doesn't make you a zoophile. And fantasizing about violent, obsessive men doesn't mean you wouldn't run as far the fuck away from a man like that the second one of them set their sights on you.
If you're really interested in the subject, I recommend reading My Secret Garden by Nancy Friday, a compilation of anonymously submitted women's sexual fantasies. And, as it turns out, women fantasize about a lot of really violent, uncomfortable, and just plain screwed up stuff.
And, for most of them, even when they don't actively realize it, it's about reclamation. Of fear, of trauma, of loss of power. It's about THEMSELVES and how THEY feel. As weird as it's gonna sound, the men featured in those fantasies don't really matter, they're just a vessel, a manifestation of the extreme version of what you're dealing with and/or crave. A safe, cathartic way to experience something profoundly unsafe, unwise, and terrifying.
For women fantasizing about criminals, villains, monsters, and anti-heroes, it's very often about the idea that someone like that - intense, violent, with single-minded focus, and immense power - would love her, want her, always put her first, go against all his instincts/training for you without a second thought and be a clear and present danger to everyone but warmth and safety for her and only her, and burn the world itself down for hurting her in even the slightest of ways. It's a sexual version of the fantasy of having a pet tiger, one that would never, ever attack you or hurt you in any way.
And just like the people who want to boop the forbidden snoot, the women fantasizing about their fantasy Mafia Boss Lover are very well aware of the fact that 1) men like that don't actually exist, 2) the criminal world of their fantasy has all but nothing to do with reality, and 3) that the thing they're actually fantasizing about is being loved, wanted, and safe... just in a REALLY intense, exaggerated way. And, let's not mince words, there's also often a more or less strong D/s dynamics at play in the scenario, too.
Now, you can choose to be judgy bitches about it (goodness knows plenty of you in the replies, comments, and tags are), in which case I would suggest you examine why you're feeling such a profound need to shame women for enjoying themselves in their own little world, or you can apply the YKINMKATO mantra and understand that straight women, living in the constant state of preyhood, sometimes consciously or subconsciously reclaim power over that situation through transgressive sexual fantasies.
Also, fuck this idea that queer people only fantasize about healthy and wholesome relationships, romantic, sexual, or otherwise, as if at least half of Tumblr isn't simping for, oh, for example, Hannibal fucking Lecter. Do you have ANY idea how many Mafia and Thug BL content there is out there?! FFS, Tom of Finland, a WWII veteran who fought against Nazis, drew art of exaggeratedly masculine men in Nazi uniforms in pornographic situations as a way to dissociate himself from those traumas and fascists themselves as far back as the 1950s!
So yeah. Less judgement, and more taking some responsibility for curating your online experience if seeing someone's kink truly offends you this much.
"Booping the forbidden snoot" is a good way of putting it
prev tags, text ver. below the cut
I'm going to try to explain this without sounding completely deranged but like, okay: IMO, there are two kinds of fantasies. let's call them horses and unicorns.
a horse fantasy is something that is theoretically possible. I do not currently own a horse, and the reality of owning a horse would involve boring stuff like paying for its food and mucking out its stall, but it is something I could do in real life. like, horses exist and can be owned by humans. lots of fantasies can fall into this category: traveling to a foreign country, living in a cute house with just you and a cat, winning a marathon, basically anything that is technically achievable even if it would be difficult to do so in real life.
a unicorn fantasy is something that is definitely (or almost definitely) impossible. I do not currently own a unicorn, and there is no version of reality where I could own a unicorn, because unicorns are not real. the actual logistical issues that might arise from owning a unicorn, like paying for its food or mucking out its stall, are completely immaterial because it's not something that could ever actually happen. and like, it's in my brain! I control it! I can imagine a unicorn that only eats marshmallows and shits potpourri if I want to!
I think the disconnect comes in when people assume that a unicorn fantasy is actually a horse fantasy. to use the tiger example from upthread: you can own a tiger. you can't have a completely domesticated tiger that would never hurt you, not even by accident. so saying "I want a pet tiger" is a unicorn fantasy, because everything necessary for that fantasy to work (it being completely domesticated and incapable of harming you) are not things you can have in real life.
now, serial killers/war criminals/normal criminals/etc. are all things that exist. and there are definitely people in relationships with them in real life! so it's tempting to assume that something like "I want to fuck a serial killer" is a horse fantasy: something you would want to do, and could do, if given the opportunity.
but for the vast majority of people, that's not the fantasy. the rest of the fantasy ("he's a serial killer, BUT he only kills bad people and he's nice to me and is both able and willing to protect me from literally anything and has sex exactly the way I want to because he magically knows what I want because, again, this is happening in my brain") is what makes it a unicorn.
This is obviously not exclusively a cishet woman thing but cishet women do deal with a different flavour of sexual repression than queer folks (not better or worse, just a different flavour!) and those fantasies really are about power, just not how you think.
The fantasy is that here is a powerful, aggressive, even violent man, and he wants you and needs you so much that he would burn the world down for you. The central fantasy of the romance novel is that the heroine is so desired and loved by the hero that he is both metaphorically and literally forced to his knees for her. I'm not with my books or notes right now so I can't remember the exact quote, but I think it was Jayashree Kamblé who said that this aggressive/Alpha male subtype of romance heroes is "a lion among men who is a lamb before his woman". That's the fantasy. It's really powerful! If your life experience has told you to expect to do all the care work and to minimise yourself and your needs to be palatable to others and to be grateful for any crumb of attention because you're too fat or too outspoken or just generally not perfectly feminine enough, the fantasy of someone going absolutely feral because they want you so much is really powerful and empowering!
Again, not exclusively cishet women, and also sometimes you just think a scenario would be hot if it happens within your mind where you are 100% in control and can just stop if it feels bad. That's also fine! That's normal! We need to stop shaming people for their romantic or sexual fantasies, especially those of us who clearly have no idea what a fantasy is and what it does for the person indulging in it 🙄
A lot of the "you're supposed to like X" cultural baggage is, IMHO, effectively dubcon with the coercion outsourced to some other actor, usually society, but with the "love interest" willingly profiting from that coercion, at your expense.
The effect is something like when you've got a persistent unwanted suitor doing "romantic" shit like sending you flowers at work and lovebombing you and otherwise making a big deal out of his feelings and your coworkers or your family or your friends are all encouraging you to give in because "it's so sweet" or "he wants you so badly, it's cruel of you to deny him" or "I wish my boyfriend did that for me, you're so lucky" and none of them will understand that a) what they want isn't what you want and b) the persistence, the control, the disregard for your wishes all make him the romantic equivalent of food that's been pissed on---and neither does he.
The whole effect is viscerally uncomfortable, and even the echoes or memories of coercion taint the whole concept.
And I think a key factor in the fantasy is a variant of that unicorn situation up above, to wit:
Your church, family, repressive upbringing, and/or purity-focused socialization will never approve of you dating a mob boss or a monster
Therefore
Your church, family, repressive upbringing, and/or purity-focused socialization will never force you to date a mob boss or a monster.
Therefore
Your fantasy about the mob boss or the monster is effectively free from the coercion you're used to in your real life and trying to escape.
It is, ironically, coercion-repellent, directed at the existing dynamics of coercion that might be present in your life or in your past.
Adding that a lot of dub-con/non-con fantasy is just: “imagine getting all the sexual satisfaction you want without having to undergo the mortifying ordeal of admitting you want it, or the even more mortifying ordeal of having to ask someone to give it to you.”
oh my god it hurts
and it's going to hurt forever
every now and then I see people passing screencaps of these posts around, and in the months after I made this post there were people checking in on me assuming I was going through grief or depression or something
to set the record straight, the context is that I had covid and was bleeding from my throat and lungs, but for some ungodly reason, I was feverishly driven to drink lemonade and kept screaming and writhing because I was pouring fizzy lemon juice on open throat wounds
Thinking about Round 1 of Zombie Stage, and how the game seems to work.
So the premise of this stage is the two performers compete, and whoever gets the least amount of votes gets a body part taken and then auctioned off. However, that doesn't quite make sense to me? Surely fans would want to buy the body parts of their bias. So wouldn't that mean the person who gets more votes--the one who the crowd likes more--should be the one auctioned off?
I could see the first round of fans thinking that, before they know the rules, but it seems Sua has gone through at least two other rounds before this: she is missing an eye and a leg, which means she must have lost twice before.
So fans would have known by now that the one with less votes is auctioned off. However, that would then mean fans would be trying to get their bias less votes, rather than more; thus all of Mizi's fans would be voting for Sua, and Mizi's fans for Sua. Now, is it possible that Sua has more fans? That doesn't quite seem right to me as Mizi is the one with a pre-zombie idol career, but anything is possible, I suppose. They were pretty neck and neck, after all.
Plus, that would be an easy way for fans to game the system. So perhaps there's another rule where only those who voted for the idol can participate in the auction. That would make it so fans would have to choose between making their bias lose (and thus getting the chop) or getting to participate in the auction.
Or perhaps Sua's losing streak is a hint that the whole thing is rigged anyway, and the votes don't matter at all. If Mizi is the more popular idol, it would make sense that the show runners would try to keep her as intact as possible. That way they can keep her fanbase strong, attracting more fans, and thus more potential auction buyers, which would drive up the price. Plus, putting her in comparison to the "lesser" idol Sua would make Mizi shine even brighter. Alien Stage Sua was prepared to sacrifice herself for Mizi's life; now, she is sacrificing herself to keep Mizi intact.
Umineko time.
So in Candy Scar, we see that bit where Mizi is on stage alone and the goat headed men dance up to her, to put her on the knife-throwing spinning wheel.
Now, I know Vivinos has referenced other things before (I've mainly noticed the Utena references but there may be others I missed) but I wonder if the goat headed performers are meant to be evocative of the goat headed servants in Umineko no Naku Koro ni.
For those who don't know, Umineko has muscular goat headed men who act as servants to the main antagonists. The goat heads represent an audience that consumes it's source material--the same way a goat will eat anything, the goat heads will "eat" everything related to their interest. The goat head also invokes the imagery of demons/devil, which helps associate their masters--the antagonists--with the devil.
In Umineko specifically, they represent the true crime fandom: "fans" who obsess over real life tragedies to the point that the stalk and harass the victims' families and will even make wild theories accusing innocent people of monstrous actions. The survivors of tragedies are constantly under threat of being torn apart by the goat heads.
Here, I think they could represent the industry that consumes idols: they are moving Mizi around like a doll, presenting her to the masses, putting her in danger for the purpose of titillating the audience. They are not the ones literally eating her (right now at least), but they are presenting her to be "eaten" by the audience. They are goats to associate that the main antagonist--the idol industry--with the demon/devil; in this case, Mizi and Sua have made "deals with the devil" and are now being consumed by them.
zombie stage is so good.
so. I'm a lesbian. and I love listening to female idol duets of poppy, happy tunes, because i can imagine them as lovers, singing love songs together, that I don't normally get to see. candy scar is just the type of song I would love.... if it didn't have the male fans in the backing vocals. when I first heard the guys in the background, I was legit like "gross I don't want to hear the men singing. can we get a version without the guys?"
but after thinking on it for five seconds I realized, no, removing the guys would be against the point of the whole series. removing the male voices would just be telling me a sweet lie that "of course these girls are in love and they're singing because they love each other and are happy together. there's no outside force exploiting them. you, listener, aren't exploiting them, you're different from the rest."
Just because I'm a girl who loves girls doesn't mean I'm exempt from dehumanizing them. Yes, my love for seeing MiziSua perform may be different from men in the crowd, but I'm not an exception from the other fans. Wanting to strip away the things that make me feel icky is itself dehumanizing to Mizi and Sua, who are people with experiences that aren't happy fluffy pop songs: they're suffering and we shouldn't try to paint over that.
Thank you vivinos, I almost forgot I wasn't an exception to the exploitative idol industry.
fujoshis who are not that into men or not into men at all are very funny to me. I loveeeee reading explicit fanfiction about two guys having sex. i see a shirtless guy in real life and i’m like okay so who asked for that