recommend me other games where i can die repeatedly
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Show & Tell
Jules of Nature
Fai_Ryy
No title available

Discoholic 🪩

#extradirty
macklin celebrini has autism
trying on a metaphor

Andulka

No title available
The Stonewall Inn

bliss lane
Monterey Bay Aquarium
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
ojovivo
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird
Keni
Sade Olutola

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Ecuador

seen from Malaysia

seen from Colombia

seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Colombia
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Iraq
seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@latenitesandovertime
recommend me other games where i can die repeatedly
ancient greek word of the day: κακοθερής (kakotherēs), unfitted to endure summer heat
this literally means “bad at summer” pass it on
Reblog if you, too, are bad at summer
World Heritage Post
(tone of complete and utter exhaustion) this is the day that the Lord hath made
-facedown on the floor- let us rejoice and be glad in it
in this terrifying world you continuously have the power to offer someone else a little relief . why would you withhold that. do you remember what a little relief feels like? it feels like a lot
excuse me? are you suggesting i frolic directly into someone's emotional space and assume what brings them relief, potentially causing more stress? are you encouraging people to reach past their own boundaries to help, increasing net suffering if it costs more than the other gains? surely not; that would be advocating for emotional self-harm.
this is a post about the woman who waived my late fee at the bank .
good for you, good for her, the wording on the initial post feels closer to blaming people who don't reach out than celebrating those who do by a large enough margin that i feel the need to hit back
you are a tar pit
I know I’ve reblogged this already today but I like. this point
"you are a tar pit" is instantly in my vocabulary. Excellent.
So wrong. Matt needs to read John 11:35. Biblical men are extremely expressive. Stoicism as masculinity is a western idea. Expressing emotions is not a gendered facet of humanity
I usually agree with things I see from Walsh, but this one has me itching to break a cast iron skillet over his head.
Jesus wept. You saying the King of kings, the LORD of Heaven’s Armies, is acting like a woman (derogatory)? He in His humanity is our ideal as a species, He as Christ is YOUR (men’s) ideal as a husband, and you say this behavior He exhibited is beneath the male ideal?
…
Come here. There’s a logo on the bottom of this pan, I think you should see it.
The post this stems from is even worse.
Walsh should tell that to the American soldiers who broke down and wept upon hearing the news of the Japanese surrender in 1945 as they were preparing to board the planes for the invasion. They cried because they realized that they were going to be allowed to live the rest of their lives instead of bring torn to shreds by gunfire as they planned.
How dare somebody get emotional after a robbery when they have a moment to take in what happened. He's thinking about how his entire life could have just been taken. His future wife, future kids who he'd never know because they would never exist, all of his future experiences for the next half century were in the hands of a senseless, violent maniac.
And for the people countering about how men need to demonstrate their ability to be protectors, this isn't about that. This isn't to say you should have a breakdown during a stressful event. You can handle your business and do what is necessary and then release some emotion afterwards when the danger has passed.
I'd rather see a man cry from frustration than see the back of his hand because he thinks he needs to deal with his emotions in a more "manly" way.
Okay, so this post keeps coming back to my mind, and it's occurred to me that this man who claims Christ is actively pushing men to be proud.
Yeah, yeah, we can pull out the whole Jesus wept thing. He cried for Lazarus, and He cried for Jerusalem. But He is hardly the only man who has cried. Jeremiah earned himself the moniker "the weeping prophet." David was moved to tears when brought face to face with his sin. Elijah cried about his situation. The Bible does not shame men for their tears. There is no verse that says women must remain the sex to cry while men must remain stoic, with the exceptions of birth and death. There is no verse.
The Bible does not promote the idea that you must have it all together. In fact, it speaks to being honest, sharing burdens with people of the church. While there is something to be said for men and women groups in a church, the Bible very clearly does not say burdens must not be shared with a spouse. By refusing to cry in front of your wife, you are not upholding a picture of Godly masculinity, but rather are using masculinity as an excuse to be proud.
You don't want to look weak or vulnerable in front of the one you are one with? Like seriously, your wife, your husband, is one with you. The Bible clearly states that. And that is the person you will not be vulnerable in front of? Whatever for? It boils down to pride. Matt Walsh is promoting and endorsing prideful behavior, when as Christians, we are not supposed to.
"We can't look weak to the women"- your Savior was beaten, stripped, and hung on a cross for a criminal's death for all to see, and you know which disciples sat and watched? Who did not lose respect? Who did not lose love? The women. The women were right there, watching Jesus at His weakest and most vulnerable moment. And Matt would have men remain stoic around their wives. So they don't look weak.
Have some humility.
There are times when tears must be held back. There are times when it goes from emotional overflow to just being whiny. That is true regardless of gender. That does not mean men should not cry in front of their wives. Yes, some men are naturally more stoic, and there's nothing wrong with that. But for heaven's sake, that is not some arbitrary standard for all men.
And for the argument of, "Well, every woman I've cried in front of found it repulsive," I will say this- if you teach men that it is unmasculine to cry, you teach women it is unattractive in a man. It's not a justification for that behavior- but I would hardly call it a natural response. This whole thing isn't a biological reality. It's a cultural view, and one that runs counterculture to what Christianity teaches.
I love this thread and more people need to see it because I'm so sick of the narrative that men can't freaking cry. If men aren't supposed to have emotions, WHY DO THEY HAVE THEM?????????
what they dont tell you about adulthood is that it’s startlingly easy to go long periods of time without having any fun at all not even a little bit. btw this causes ur brain to try to kill you with knives and hammers.
the phrase really should be "eat your cake and have it too" im with the unabomber on this one
you know what's crazy? when it's very very cold you can just do a few jumping jacks or run around and you will be warm. when it's very very warm you can do nothing but die
The apple they fed to snow white wasnt poision at all it was just a red delicious
Putting the term "Catholic guilt" on a high shelf where fandom can't reach it until everyone learns how to identify characters who are very very clearly coded as Protestant.
If you mess up a social interaction you can say "Failed Experiment" and move on
Cannot stress enough that you say this in your head
I just ate one
You can lie when you name things
It is a great tragedy that donuts are bad for your health.
It is equally tragic that Stop, Drop and Roll hasn't been invented yet in this setting.