❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
RMH
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
h
Sweet Seals For You, Always
pixel skylines
Phantogram Three
The Bright Sessions
official daine visual archive
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Fai_Ryy
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available
No title available
Claire Keane
blake kathryn
The Bowery Presents
Love Begins
#extradirty
seen from Türkiye
seen from Morocco
seen from Italy
seen from Taiwan
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Kenya
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Poland
@lesbianchaosinthechi
i’m a masc lesbian protector.
i’m a butch lesbian protector.
i’m a stud lesbian protector.
i’m a trans masc lesbian protector.
i’m a he/him, they/them lesbian protector.
i love all my masculine, androgynous, non-binary lesbians so much and i stand on that. 🎀
It feels like lately I'm in this really interesting and frustrating space where I'm open to being in a monogamous or non-monogamous relationship. I'm actually so ambivalent about it.
I feel polysaturated at one so as long as I'm investing in my friendships and feel like I'm getting enough attention from my partner sexual exclusivity doesn't ruffle my feathers. I'm a relationship anarchist that finds it important to maintain commitment to my friends no matter what my relationship status is so I already feel like I have multiple platonic partners.
I mean, I'm definitely not low maintenance but I still believe in having independent lives. I'm not looking to merge households with someone anytime soon. At least not until my early 40. It'd be nice to see someone a couple times a week though. Maybe one night in, and a date night. I could be open to seeing each other more often if the vibes are right but I have to have my alone time and I have to see my friends.
I digress. I personally do not require sexual or romantic exclusivity as long as there is clear communication. I don't feel the need to possess my partner in that way and I want my partner to have as much love in their lives as they feel they have capacity for. Obviously if my partner is seeking other partners I'm open to meeting someone else but I'm not inclined to intentionally search. I kinda only want more than one partner if I happen upon someone who's the right fit and I have capacity for it. The problem is I've met very few non-monogamous folks who are looking for multiple committed partners. Most are just looking for something casual. I value consistency above all else and only once have I met a polyamorous person with a committed partner who was interested in me as another potential committed partner. I don't do hierarchies. And I don't want a cis man involved (no offense to our awesome bi/pan folks, it's just as a lesbian, I'm at capacity for close relationships with cis men).
The problems I run into with monogamous people, even though they are more often looking for a committed partnership is 1) I flirt with everyone I meet and 2) A number of my friendships feel romantic. I would like to believe that there is a monogamous person who is secure enough to manage that, but I have yet to meet them.
My relationships with my closest friends are very deep. We write each other love notes, we kiss each other all over the face (no lips!), we cuddle, and we flirt. We deeply care about and support each other. I feel like an insecure person could feel threatened by that. I'm also a big bubbly personality and I love to love on queer black people in public. I'm very complimentary and with consent, I am a hugger. These are things I don't want to change about myself.
I don't know what to do lol. My past experiences in dating make me feel like the person I want doesn't exist. I fear that I have whittled my dating pool down to such a small number. The chances of me finding someone for me feels so slim. And my standards are already so high.
I'm feeling very much like a stereotypical Sagittarius right now. I cannot be in a relationship with the wrong person or have to limit my connection with other people (who have been in my life longer) just to be with somebody. I gotta feel free in the context of my relationship or I don't want it at all.
Love isn't just for lovers. It's in friends, fleeting moments, family, the breeze, your favorite meal. Loving life in all its forms makes the heart lighter.
The thing about "Let's Marry Harry" is that he says he's dating to marry but he doesn't sound like he's ready for marriage and he doesn't move like he's ready for marriage. Like, I think only 3 people on this show are old enough to really conceptualize what is necessary to maintain that level of commitment healthily. I mean I guess that's the point, the kind of connection that's good for TV and #relationshipgoals isn't the kind of relationship that's actually built to last.
Because SOMEHOW people need to be reminded of things from literally ten years ago:
"Free the nipple" never meant "free to not wear a bra" or "free to breastfeed." Those were adjacent conversations that of course "free the nipple" supporters would boost, but that was NEVER the core of free the nipple.
The core of free the nipple was always that the breasts of people perceived as women ("female-presenting nipples" to use some Tumblr speak) are in no way different than the breasts of people perceived as men. And that since the chests of people perceived as men are not sexualized and are allowed to be exposed, so too should the breasts of people perceived as women. If men can be topless, so can women. If it's inappropriate for women to show their chests, neither should men. It isn't sexual assault for a woman to walk around barechested, because it isn't sexual assault for a man to do so either, and breasts are NOT sexual organs.
Claiming breasts are inherently sexual organs is factually and morally wrong, it is sexist and controlling, it is a tool of oppression, and it defines normal body parts (and bodily functions) as sex which leads to inherent sexualization of people with those parts. It leads to 12 year olds with large breasts being accused of seducing 40 year old men or trying to distract and corrupt their classmates.
"Free the nipple" doesn't mean "free the nipple in a god-fearing way." It means FREE THE NIPPLE, full stop, end of sentence. It means to free the nipple of the faulty social constructs that cast it as a sexualized, malicious force of seduction instead of a normal body part that should be free of expectations of shame or "modesty."
Breasts and nipples aren't shameful, sexual, immoral, porn-adjacent, kinks, a distraction, or things to be feared. They are a part of your body just like your elbows and ankles, and being afraid of them, thinking they will corrupt some innocent person or that being exposed to them is trauma akin to sexual assault, is the entire fucking problem.
Free the nipple, not just for breastfeeding, not just from bras, but from the fucked up social constructs that cast them as malicious instead of innocent. Stop trying to sanitize "free the nipple" for puritanical, conservative audiences who already hate you and the rest of us. You aren't helping anyone.
Free the nipple means FREE THE NIPPLE.
"Let's Marry Harry" is making a mockery of the institution of marriage and honestly I'm here for it. I'm going to hate watching this but I'm not going to be able to stop.
What an honor it is to be Black! 🙌🏿
racist white canadians and europeans want you to believe the slave trade worked like this
it did not. it is public knowledge the slave trade worked like this
and in fighting antiblackness within canada and europe it is so so so important to acknowledge these places's participation in and benefit from the transantlantic slave trade. Slavery is not just the US's dirty past, it is a triangular industry lasting centuries that white people in the united states, canada, and europe benefitted from and continue to benefit from to this day. Slavery was good for white canadians and white europeans. They liked it. they encouraged it. they had slaves, they profited from the slave trade, and they used products grown from US slave labour in every day life. The slavery of Black people would not have been possible on the sheer scale at which it happened if it were not for active, consistent participation from europe and canada.
Her soul is so beautiful she makes the heavens weep.
op disabled reblogs but I think the point still stands
reminder that the books themselves also suck ass actually. there's an entire plotline endorsing slavery. the one character who advocates to end slavery is bullied and made fun of. the one slave who doesnt like being enslaved is bullied and treated as an outcast. the bankers are the picture of racist stereotypes of jewish people. the one asian character is named fckn Cho Chang. the worldbuilding SUCKS. fuck harry potter and fuck rowling. stop giving her your money.
anyone who uses the r slur at this point needs to just be recognized as a hateful bigot and we cant be quiet about it anymore. genuinely. get mad at people for this. point it out and be annoying about it. no you cant reclaim it you just want an excuse to be bigoted
we are never going to be free until it literally doesnt matter whether a person is ugly or not
calling the cops on someone you believe is having a psychotic episode to “help them” will never be helpful ever
