A fun read that even goes as far as to include a color survey from XKCD.
art blog(derogatory)
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
h
todays bird

Andulka
RMH
No title available
No title available
tumblr dot com
Xuebing Du
KIROKAZE
Fai_Ryy

No title available
untitled
NASA
🪼
official daine visual archive

titsay

tannertan36
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Indonesia
seen from Australia

seen from Ukraine
seen from Ukraine

seen from Vietnam
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from Paraguay
@linguafile-blog
A fun read that even goes as far as to include a color survey from XKCD.
A video of the Tangier dialect.
Written by Ben Zimmer, this article concerns itself with the New Yorker and it's writer's stance on prescriptivism and views on descriptivism. Further in the read, you'll come to find that Pinker has also responded to this whole Pre vs De dichotomy, surmising the entire argument.
A fun article that was made culturally relevant a year ago when this viral video came to be. Though the video shows twins imitating, the article goes on to talk about the validity of twin-speech, another avenue that may help humans understand how language came to be, much like creole languages and certain deaf cases have (or haven't) done.
List of Famous Linguist
This is one of my favorite pages to read on Linguist List. I find it humbling to see these important people as just that, people.
A special from BBC about Language Acquisition. There are six videos. By clicking on the Youtube symbol, you can browse through each video.
Tentative Plan for LinguaFile
Hey everyone! Thank you for following me. I hope I've been able to entertain you all so far! As you may or may not know, I am currently living in Japan. I return home towards the the beginning of this August. It is then that I am going to try to muster up an awesome group of people and begin creating videos for LinguaFile's Youtube page.
The tentative schedule will be to release videos starting in January 2013. Till then, I am going to put a hiatus on my Linguist and Language of the week post. However, I will still be posting news, videos, and other odds and ends relating to linguistics.
Text will have to do for now, but I look forward to expressing my passion via organic language, the way language was designed to be expressed.
A U.S.-Netherlands research collaboration delving into this tie discovered that actual actions on objects, such as physically stirring a spoon in a cup, have less of an impact on the brain’s understanding of speech than simply gesturing as if stirring a spoon in a cup. This is surprising because there is less visual information contained in gestures than in actual actions on objects. In short: Less may actually be more when it comes to gestures and actions in terms of understanding language.
This blog is hosted by the Alaskan Native Language Center. This piece covers the latest proposal by locals to create a language preservation council called Alaska Native Language Preservation and Advisory Council (ANL-PAC).
A fun video of Steven Pinker talking about language and the mind, as presented by RSA Animate.
John Miller brings signing home for many students via Signing Savvy, an ASL online dictionary.
Language: Hawaiian Creole English
Language: Hawaiian Creole English
Number of L1 Speakers: 600,000
Classification: Creole, English Based, Pacific
Vitality: Vigorous
Video overviewing HCE; Video of a woman speaking HCE (not vetted)
Hawaiian Creole English (HCE), often referred to Hawaiian Pidgin English, is a Creole Language spoken in Hawaii. Though colloquially known as Pidgin, the language is not technically a pidgin language. Pidgin languages and creole languages differ in the fact that creoles come from pidgin and that creoles have a set form of grammar whereas pidgins sound like a foreigner with little knowledge of the local language, seemingly grammarless and a very limited vocabulary.
HCE has an entertaining history. As with all creoles, they begin with a pidgin, and the pidgin's themselves begin with 'languageless' environment. In the late 1800's and the early 1900's, sugar plantations in Hawaii began to produce on a wide scale and needed more workers to keep up with the production. Many of the workers came from China, Japan, The Philippines, and Korea. The interesting part is the rate of return to one's home country between 1852 and 1930. The total number of foreigners workers coming into Hawaii at this time tops at nearly 370,100 people with a return rate of Chinese was 38%, Japanese 55%, Korean 16%, and Filipino 36%. This data suggest that over this period, around 199,300 people from these different lands with their different languages stayed in Hawaii. This number crunch excludes the rate of return of Portuguese immigrants, but approximetely 20,000 Portuguese came to work and live in Hawaii around 1913. This brings the number up to nearly 220,000 immigrant workers that stayed.
With many different nationalities coming together to work, there was little time to learn each other's languages. English being the language of work, short sentences with basic English vocab backed by one's individual language were constructed to get meaning across. This was the creation of the Hawaiian pidgin. And over time with many workers claiming home to Hawaii, the many languages that came from abroad and the local languages of English and Hawaiian, eventually the creole was born.
This birth comes about from the children of these workers. It would seem that since more than likely homogeneous couples would come together, this would prevent a creolization to occur. But most of the migrant workers were actually men. This, in a way, would ensured heterogeneous relationships. So with many children coming together, with parents that spoke a similar pidgin but not similar native language, they began to 'invent' grammar and vocabulary, things that lacked in their parents' tongue.
As for the actual production of the language, two aspects stick out the most. One involves pronunciation and the other is grammar. On the pronunciation front, the voiceless and voiced dental fricatives, [θ] and [ð], became the voiceless and voiced alveolar plosives, [t] and [d]. In grammar, the copula 'to be' is omitted from sentences where it is a stative verb. Also, sentences containing the absent copula can be inverted to show emphasis. For example, Da baby cute (or) Cute, da baby would translate as The baby is cute in English, with the noticeable omittion of the word is. Furthermore, if the verb to be is used as a temporary state or location, it is swapped out for the word stay. An example of this would be the HCE sentence Da book stay on top da table, which follows in English as The book is on top of the table.
For a quick read on HCE, check out its Wiki article. For more information on HCE, I suggest reading works by Derek Bickerton.
How to Speak Pidgin
Hawaiian Pidgin The Voice of Hawaii
Another article over Daniel Everette's book Language: The Cultural Tool. Eugenie S. Reich writes about Everette's work but also elaborates on the problem with studying endangered languages. Often, these dying languages are only studied by one linguist, making any data somewhat unreliable because it cannot be compared and tested by anyone else. However, new studies are being conducted on Pirahã and Reich sheds light on this fact.
Gov. Luis Fortuno plans to require all public schools to teach courses in English instead of Spanish.
Why can't we just accept "they" and "their" as third person singular indefinite pronouns? It is already so widely used that it is not even a colloquialism but an integrated part of the English language. Example: I don't know who keeps calling me, but they are really getting on my nerves. Nobody ever uses "one" or "he or she." Ever.
This is a fun subject for me. There are many people in this world that believe language should be concrete, never-changing. Take, for example, L'Académie française (The French Academy), and its unwillingness in allowing English words into the French language, despite the huge influence from English media. Better yet, take any of Shakespeare's works. They are similar in grammar but different from how English is spoken now. So, does this make Shakespeare wrong? I like to imagine that if I could bring Shakespeare from his time to ours, how funny and out of place he would sound. I dare say that many English professors would think he spoke incorrectly. But how is this? If his English were 'correct' during his time, why is it wrong now? Moreover, when was English ever the most correct? And who speaks with the most barbarous of us all?
Fact is, language evolves over time. In some cases, and maybe more than I am inclined to consider, it changes everyday (this would be your slang and internet-speak). My favorite example of language changing has little to do with vocabulary, but grammar itself changing. Here is an example sentence, "I'm gonna go to the mall." Now, take this string of words face value and stretch them out to "I am going to go to the mall." The sentence seems redundant. One could easily say, "I'm going to the mall." But one doesn't say that, because it doesn't convey the meaning one is trying to portray. By adding 'gonna' to the sentence, it shows intention that one will go to the mall fairly soon but not now. 'Gonna' has been condensed from 'going to' and stripped of its physical meaning of displacement to a spacial meaning of displacement. In other words, it has been grammaticalized. Another point that language changes over time.
So let me answer your question. 'They' and 'their' are accepted by many speakers of the English language as TPS indefinite pronouns. The problem arises when the people that believe language should stay as it is, less it get bastardized by the uneducated majority.
A case, though, that can be made for 'they' and 'their' NOT being TPS indefinite pronouns. I'm inclined to believe spoken language is an instinct, much in the way that walking is. More specifically, all humans have the instinct to acquire language. Writing, on the other hand, is no different than being taught to become a baker, a musician, a typewriter, etc.. Writing is an art. And as an art, it is confined to its own set of rules that many people have made up over time. So I believe it safe to argue that written language is much different than spoken language. Writing may not allow fragments, prepositions at the end, well vs. good, and "sexism", but Speech sure as hell does.
Food for thought, what would a prescriptivist English teacher do if they were magically whimsicalled away to Shakespeare's time? It would be tough living a life believing you are the only one that is right.