Pit Bulls Unleashed: My dissection (part 1)
So, I said I was going to tear this documentary apart, and now Iâve finally got the time to do it. I quit watching after less than 15 minutes the first time because I thought âI need to make a review and write it as I watchâ. So here you go.
(After a while I realized I would have to split it into several parts, because itâs already getting too long and no one would read any longer than this.)
Disclaimer about sensitivity: This film deals with the very real tragedy of a child being violently killed, and the trauma the babysitter suffered. I in no way wish to be disrespectful to this. I am not a parent myself, I have no idea what itâs like to lose a child, let alone in such a brutal way, and I have never been present for a brutal attack or death. That however, does not mean people in shock and grief know what they are talking about, and if I hear them saying false, misleading or ridiculous things, I will correct it, but that is all in the interest of getting to honesty and truth, not dancing on a poor childâs grave or their grief. So I donât need comments telling me how insensitive I am.
The film opens with a real emergency call of a woman screaming about two pit bulls attacking a child, cuts to footage with blood in the snow, then cuts to the same woman saying to the camera that she would ânever have imagined in a million years that my dog - my PET - would attack me, and kill a childâ.
It cuts to the childâs father graphically describing the sight of his son after the attack, with a picture of the toddler before it happened.
Overall, with the choice of clips and music, I get a very âmodern sensationalist drama-docu feelâ, similar to Blackfish and Fatal Attractions.
The first scene depicts about 30 dogs (a dozen of which being âpit bull type dogsâ) from a shelter in California being welcomed in Calgary. The organizer of this move explains they are taking in dogs on âdeath rowâ, that no one has so far shown interest in adopting, and if they didnât take them, the dogs would be dead. (Then the narrator says these airlifts are done by an âanimal rights groupâ - I think heâs a bit confused about what that term means.)
It cuts to a promotion video showing the pit bull as a perfect family pet, as well as celebrities owning and promoting pit bulls, including Cesar Millan explaining how he raised his kids around pit bulls, and that he hasnât had a negative story with them.
It then cuts back to the woman in the intro, Susan, saying she used to watch Dog Whisperer before getting âthe puppiesâ, and that the show and number of celebrities getting pit bulls was important in convincing her that the dogs were safe.
This is warning sign number #1 to me. They thought the breed must be fine, because âX celebrity has themâ. Iâve watched most Dog Whisperer episodes, and in every single one it says âdonât try this at homeâ, but I also know how much the average Joe doesnât understand at all whatâs going on in the show, and so they think they can deal with a dog and be more likely to end up being Mr Millan 2, than one of the horrible cases he deals with (and typically, the cases he works with did watch his show, they just didnât get the message at all or misinterpreted it horribly).
I may be reading too much into it, but it feels like sheâs blaming Cesar for her failure. Meanwhile, he has a vast pack of dogs, maybe half of them pit bulls, often with bad stories, and they never attack each other or a human. He said the breed is fine, he never said every single person can own them. He even lists them among what he calls the âpowerful breedsâ frequently.
It then cuts to big warning sign #2 for me, as the narrators say how Susan and her boyfriend âadopted two puppiesâ crossed between pit bull and staffordshire terrier. I couldnât believe it when I first watched and I hope itâs taken out of context, because it shows puppies maybe 3, 4 weeks old in her arms, and being fed milk in a bowl.
Again, I hope this is out of context and it doesnât mean that a person with perhaps no dog experience took in these young puppies without a mother, but whatâs certain is they took two littermates (or puppies the same age), and raised them together.
That is a horrible idea, as everyone with dog experience knows. You never buy two puppies at once, because you canât influence them as well as if you had them one-on-one, or only with older dogs. And if she really did take them at barely a month old, that is another huge alarm bell going off.
An animal taken prematurely from its mother will not be as mentally sound as if it had a mother. A human can never do the job as well as a mother of their own species. Let alone a human that perhaps never owned dogs before.
Iâm already not surprised it went the way it did. And of course sheâll blame the dogs.
She goes on about how the dogs were trained, socialized with other dogs, how friendsâ kids would come over, and that the dogs were loved. I donât doubt this at all. But this is the common error people make - they think that in order for a dog to attack, they must be abused. So in her mind (perhaps), if the dogs werenât abused, and they did attack, it must be the breedâs fault.
This is entirely false. All it takes is an owner who misunderstands and disrespects the animalâs nature, and with her ignorance displayed so far, thatâs pretty obvious to me.
She sounds exasperated at the fact that the dogs were cuddling with her in her bed âthat morningâ, and it again cuts to the image of the toddler boy, Dax.
The narrator explains how, on the morning of March 6th, 2013, Susan was babysitting Dax as she had many times before, and it cuts to his dad, Jeff, describing his boy. The narrator then explains how that morning, Susan let the dogs out while holding Dax, and that within seconds, the dogs went âfrom pets to predatorsâ.
âThey just kept coming at us, and Dax⊠they pulled him out of my arms, andâŠâ
I wasnât there, no one but her was there, to my knowledge there is no footage of the event, but what I can guess at is that the two dogs - brought up together as puppies by an inexperienced owner, perhaps allowed to jump and lick and play very ârambuctiouslyâ, because she thought they were âperfectly safeâ (no dog is âperfectly safeâ, unless itâs a 15 year old Chihuahua with no teeth), were running around, playing, engaging in normal predator-play fight behavior between each other.
Then they went over to Susan and Dax, and started jumping on her in a âplayfulâ manner, and she held Dax back (again, this is all speculation), something people almost always do when holding a child and dogs interfere.
What happens then is as you move the child (same if youâre holding an object, like food), it becomes a target. As it moves away, the dogs want to follow, and have it more. Then the two of them would have been jumping on her, still in predator-play/fight mode, and it switched very quickly from play to reality, to adult predator mode.
I said it the other day in the other post, Iâll say it again, because people need to get it - dogs are not rational.
DOGS. ARE. NOT. FURRY. HUMANS.
In 2012, a case happened in Sweden that could have led to a death, but didnât. Two Alaskan malamutes were out running in the forest, far away from their (irresponsible) owner. The dogs came upon a few women riding horses, and so chased the horses (prey animal). The horses bolted, and eventually, one of the riders jumped off as she could not control her horse, and the dogs proceeded to savage her.
She survived, but both dogs were killed. The owner faced no charges. Of course. Itâs what always often happens. I was enormously frustrated at this, becuase most likely, there was nothing wrong with the dogs. Nothing at all.
They were just predators (malamutes have this stronger than many other breeds, and they are very large and powerful, but all dogs have it to some extent) running together in the forest (pack behavior, egging each other on to a state neither dog could have been on their own), they found large prey animals, they chased the prey animals, all these hormones would be coursing through their systems, preparing them for âthe killâ, and then a human fell to the ground.
At that point, all rationality, all the years theyâve spent being loved by humans and perhaps never showing aggression even once, go out the window. The human is now just a piece of meat on the ground, a prey that has fallen. The dogs might have been completely normal, they just ended up in the wrong situation, because of a stupid, reckless owner, who went unpunished and could then go and just buy another two large, powerful dogs and set them loose in the forest and the same thing would happen again.
(Also in Sweden at the time, debates emerged about âIs the Alaskan malamute a dangerous breed?â Because apparently, there are âdangerous breedsâ, and there are âsafe breedsâ, but thatâs for later.)
Fredrik Steen, Swedenâs #1 âdog expertâ said the following (translated by me): âWe [in Sweden] romanticize dogs way too much. We forget that weâre dealing with predators, we donât understand that basically all dogs are fully capable of doing this.â
It cuts back to the original emergency call, with Susan screaming hysterically and crying for an ambulance.
Jeff explains how he was notified that Dax had been "bittenâ and was taken to the hospital, and he thought âitâs a dog bite, I was bitten by dogs before, how bad could it be?â
He describes that as he arrived at the hospital, he saw Dax being given CPR, and how his face was âjust gone, from here - down, was just mangledâ, and âthere was blood everywhereâ. The doctors could not save him.
I am making my own records from the list of âfatal dog attacks in the United Statesâ on Wikipedia, and by March 6th, 2013, I find this, with more details of the attack than in the film:
When babysitter, baby in her arms she went out into her backyard let her two 45 lb. , they became ânippyâ, jumping up at the pair, so she batted them off. The dogs then attacked, and bit & scratched her, shredding her clothing and knocking her down, causing the boy to hit the ground, whereupon the dogs attacked him. The babysitter tried unsuccessfully to stop the attack, and redirect the dogsâ attack onto her.
So I was right in my speculation that the dogs started by jumping and switched from previous play behavior to predatory behavior.
A neighbor heard screams but did nothing as he thought it was kids having a snowfight. She got the child away from the dogs and called 911 but left the baby unattended & totally naked on a cold hardwood floor. The boy was taken by ambulance to the hospital, and by helicopter from the hospital to a medical center later that day, where he was pronounced dead of dog attack. Before the attack, the veterinarian center where they had been spayed, neutered, and otherwise cared for had not seen them as dangerous, but one was described as âstandoffishâ while at the facility. The owner said she had got the three-year-old dogs as puppies and that they had never shown signs of aggression. After the attack, the dogs were euthanized and tested negative for rabies, and the authorities decided not to press charges against the babysitter.
They decided it was not her fault at all, while I often see these cases (again, in the list of cases in America) ending up charging the owners for âcriminally negligent manslaughterâ or similar things.
She went off completely free, despite it being her dogs, her responsibility, and she put the child in this situation. Maybe the dogs needed to be killed, I donât know, but I think itâs a disgusting tendency (also seen in said list), where dogs are killed immediately, with no evaluation, but the owner goes free without any charges.
And as for what the film does, this is a very common tactic. A film brings up a highly emotional, devastating anecdote, and tries to use it as their #1 argument. And the thing is that it works, because humans are emotional beings. Weâre not as irrational as dogs, but weâre still mainly guided by emotion.
If the film instead had said âin the years 2000-2015, X number of children were killed by pit bullsâ, it wouldnât at all have had the same effect as this one case did, showing it in such detail, talking about the boyâs personality and showing his pictures and footage. Documentaries on pit bull and âdangerous dogsâ almost always do this.
While of course the long list of cases where labs and huskies (or other ânon-controversialâ breeds) kill children, are completely irrelevant. If they had made a documentary about âkiller labsâ, and brought up one of these cases in the same way, it probably wouldnât have had the same effect, because the cultural narrative is that âpit bull = baby eating devil dogâ.
The film explains the same thing, how Susan was found ânot to be at faultâ, and Jeff goes on to say how she didnât do anything wrong, because âshe didnât abuse âem, the dogs were in good healthâ. This again. Iâm finding it very difficult to be respectful right now, because grief doesnât excuse you saying ridiculous, damaging things on TV.
Iâll repeat myself: You do not need to abuse, starve, beat or train a dog to fight in order for it to attack someone. Doesnât matter if itâs a pit bull or another breed. All it takes is an owner disrespecting the predatory nature of dogs and being the type of person who would say âI would never in a million years have imagined this!â
If you say that, you are the problem, not the dog. However, pit bulls are large, powerful terriers with a very intact killing instinct towards other animals, and it makes it even more important that they arenât placed with these idiot owners who think dogs are just living teddy bears/furbabies.
âThey were good-natured dogs until the day they werenâtâ Jeff says - spoken as a true ignorant person who doesnât understand animal behavior.
Susan then says âWho wants to admit for even a second that their family pet could kill one of their family members?â
^ See this guy? This is my dog. Eight and a half year old Mallorcan bulldog, distant cousin to other bulldogs and mastiffs. People who see him would think heâs a pit x rottie mix. Heâs bigger than a retriever, and a very serious guard dog. I raised him from a puppy, my first own puppy.
I trained bite inhibition with him from the start. He never bit a human in aggression, in fact after about 10-12 months of age, he never bit me even in play, unless I simply got in the way when he was chewing a stick or something. My mistake, not his. He knows not to ever bite people.
I trust him with my life, as a highly loyal guard dog, who loves us and takes his job very seriously. Does that mean I think heâs a âhumanâ, my âfurbabyâ and that he could never act irrationally, or out of character? Absolutely not.
When he was living with my man and his family for a while, my sister-in-law had a baby. I told my man to not let Wikus (the dog) in the room with the baby for any reason. I donât mean âunsupervisedâ, I mean at all.
He was six years old then, never showed aggression to a child in his life, in fact he lets neighborhood kids hug and pet him, under my strict supervision, and has been around my sisterâs young kids, just calmly ignoring them. I trust him with me. I didnât trust the people he was with, including my dear man, to read him right and be able to predict the situation. Wikus was fine with kids, but he had never seen a baby before, and I wasnât there to judge the situation. (Also, Wikus was not himself while living there and started attacking cats, after years of being completely fine with cats when with me.)
Iâm not going to be so stupid as to think âheâs a nice dog!â and leave it at that. Or feel a need to âproveâ how âsweetâ he is and let him nuzzle the baby.
So what do I do, briefly, do make sure my dog doesnât hurt anyone?
It sounds nebulous and abstract, but I ârespect him as a dogâ. I realize heâs a 70 pound case of muscles and teeth, and could do terrible damage in the right (wrong) circumstances. I realize he has strong protective instincts of the pack and territory, and though he has never shown predatory behavior, he still has the wild dog or wolf inside, buried very deep down.
I obedience- and recall-train. I only have him loose when other people and dogs arenât around.
If I thought he was dangerous, as a dog that might actually go after another animal or person (and you need to know this about your dog), I wouldnât have him loose in an unfenced area at all. (This might sound confusing. If I thought he had a 1% chance of attacking someone, I wouldnât have him off leash. I donât think thereâs a 0.1% chance even, but it still exists in all dogs. Not all dogs are equally dangerous, but the risk is never exactly zero.)
I made sure to socialize him with kids as a puppy, but in later years Iâve sometimes said no to kids asking to pet him, because while I can account for my dog, I canât account for their behavior, and kids often donât listen.
I do play tug-o-war with him, especially when he was younger, but it was always strictly structured and I needed him to have an âoff-buttonâ. As soon as I say stop, he stops, as soon as I tell him to let go (of the rope or stick), he lets go. If he has an object he wants (anything), he drops it when I ask him to.
Structure the walk. People let their dogs leave the house when over-excited, and thatâs the mindset that sets up the rest of the walk.
Build a working relationship with the dog, beyond âheâs my baby and I luv him and heâs so sweet and would never hurt a living soulâ, because you donât know that.
Susan continues; âWho wants to for a single second think that thatâs possible? Think that that could be a reality? I know I certainly didnât. I never would have imagined in a million years before this that my dog, my pet, would attack me, and kill a child.â
I hate to say it, but she is exactly what is wrong with this breed. People who are this ignorant, this naive, and this careless. And then either they or other people go on to blame the breed.
Years ago on a dog forum, I saw someone say, and this may seem ridiculous to some, but I like it: âBetter to think you have a lion on the leash and act accordingly, than to think you have a lamb.â
That is exactly what a lot of dog owners think, perhaps especially pit bull owners. They need to prove to the world that their dog is actually a lamb, and when this woman failed, she blamed the breed, she blamed people like Cesar Millan for speaking highly of the breed, she blamed everyone but herself, because it couldnât possibly be her mistake!
I often hear the same from people campaigning against exotic pets. Theyâre a failed owner, and so the animal must be banned. âIf I couldnât do it, and Iâm so awesome, then obviously everyone must be at least as crap as I was!â
Extremely arrogant and naive.
Listen, mistakes happen. Sometimes tragic, fatal mistakes. I donât want hate on her, I donât want her thrown in jail, but I want her and others like her to take some responsibility. Because if they refuse to admit their own mistake, they are doomed to repeat it.
You can never make sure something like this attack never happens again, you canât insure the world against mistakes and human error, but you can take actions to prevent a lot of them. And the first part of that is educating yourself.
Donât be like these people.
prguitarman
blakekathryn
ellievsbear
tangentwithtanner
romaincrisis
kianamaiart
yousharknotpass
gummygunk
