At any moment, we can find ourselves inside The Box. Remember, the purpose of The Box is to control us to do another’s bidding; hence, when someone uses it on us they want us to do what they say to do.
Right from the start, what they say or how they say it may make us feel uncomfortable. The directive itself may go against our values or desires to do it. The tone may sound too demanding or sinister. The urgency of the directive might be frantic or pushy. And, if we are face-to-faced, the looks on their face and gestures may add to the emphatic directive itself. If it is too demanding, it causes an emotional reaction within us.
Our history with those directing our behavior, especially our cognitive and emotional experiences with them, affects us as well from the start. If we feel they are safe, reliable and fair, we have a good feeling at first. But, if our prior experiences were not good, we may feel wary, uneasy, afraid or even angry. We may even continue with a certain level of caution or misgiving even before they spell out the rest of what’s inside The Box. In other words, it doesn’t take long for us to calculate our response in this situation.
Then, as they stipulate, suggest, or imply rewards, we quickly judge whether or not it is rewarding enough to do it—sometimes even deciding no rewards are necessary if we’re already leaning to comply. But, if the directive is questionable to begin with, rewards might take on a greater meaning. If the rewards are good enough, we might change our mind a little and become more ready to comply. Of course, they might not even offer rewards. Again, our history with these people hangs in our mind prompting certain levels of trust or caution each step of the way to this Next Box.
Tolerating What Happens Inside the Box
If they continue and threaten or promise punishment, we would react according to the nature of the punishment itself and/or to a memory of punishment done by these people. We quickly begin to decide how the “deck is stacked”—for or against us. The size, if you will, of the rewards and punishment alone may be enough to make a decision whether or not to comply. Usually, however, our experience with these people will be a major factor in our decision.
Sometimes, we add something more to the history we have with a person or group of people directing us to do something. Sometimes we’ve already got a trust or distrust of the kinds of people they seem to be. For example, certain authority figures such as parents, teachers, coaches, bosses and the like may seem more or less OK to begin with. A few of us have a general easiness or uneasiness with all authority figures. Again, our history of who and how The Box had been commonly used on us can predetermine how we react to those who use it now.
The final “kicker” to round out The Box is whether or not they try to make the task we are to do, or the learning itself fun. In the final analysis, it seems we all prefer to have a good time if possible when we are told to do something. Sometimes, we just go along with it because it will be fun—they have made it entertaining. This is not to be confused with entertainment given as a reward follow our task—this is entertainment merged within the task itself like “whistle while you work”. Entertainment, a devious component to The Box, leads to the growing attitude among workers: “If it ain’t fun, I ain’t doing it!”
In the short-term, our decision to comply, challenge, revolt or escape are based on our immediate reaction to the Current Box, which typically relies on our history with the people involved or ones like them.
In the long-term, our decisions depend on our extremely complex and vast history inside The Box after another. Yes, we can form a general “pro or con” attitude toward The Box regardless of who is using it. In fact, we might be using on ourselves – which only adds to the complexity making it hard for us to ever feel free.
Read the full article