PSA to goyim: have a Jew in your life that you care about? Ask them how they're doing as a Jew. Please, I am begging, recognize that we are Jews and have had to shoulder so much grief this year and this week especially.
Jew haters really be like “Nobody actually hates Jews. you’re lying and exaggerating. Btw you’re to blame for every bad thing in this world. fuck you and die”
• the range of skin colors, hair texture, and facial features among Israeli citizens, and how a hypothetical American would categorize them on sight with no other indicators if they were standing on a random street corner in America, provided they were also perfectly silent and accentless and wearing """generic""" Western clothing
• the Tetragrammaton (especially trying to figure out how it "should" be pronounced!)
From a luxury campaign to a UN report read aloud to toddlers, the oldest hatred still picks the prettiest channels.
Last week, Prada named the musician Saint Levant one of its global ambassadors. He is gifted, the campaign is gorgeous, and a fashion house is free to choose any face it likes. But in much of the campaign’s imagery, a gold pendant rests on his chest in the shape of the land from the river to the sea, the whole of it, with no Israel anywhere inside the outline. It is a map of a country drawn directly over the living country it means to replace.
Saint Levant did not stumble into that pendant. In November 2024, days after gangs in Amsterdam ran Maccabi Tel Aviv soccer fans down with cars and chased others through the streets with knives, in what the city’s own officials called a pogrom, he stood on a stage there holding a Palestinian flag and thanked the people who did it. He sent a shoutout to his “Moroccan brothers” for “taking care of business,” and told his fans that Israelis had come to “a land that’s not theirs.” Saint Laurent built a campaign around him anyway. Now Prada has handed him an ambassadorship. The necklace is the courteous version of what he says with a microphone in his hand.
The same photograph reversed tells the story. An Israeli model, same Prada lighting, wearing a gold map of that same strip of earth with no Palestine inside it and no Gaza, the outline filled to its edges with a single Star of David. That campaign would not last the afternoon. The pendant would be called genocidal and supremacist, the model would be dropped by sundown, and every outlet that is silent today would find its voice. In this hypothetical, the shape is identical and the erasure is identical, but the verdict flips. The metal did not change between the two photographs. The neck did. And it is not only a hypothetical. The Israeli actress Noa Tishby, who lives in Los Angeles, has worn a pendant in the shape of that same land, and pro-Palestinian activists have attacked it as a symbol of supremacy and genocide.
That inversion explains the rest of the week.
On to Rachel Accurso, the children’s educator whom the internet calls Ms Rachel. This week, she posted a tearful video(s) about the children of Gaza, anchored on a report she called undisputable evidence that Israel deliberately targets them. Her tenderness toward children is real, and her fans are right about that much. The death of a child in Gaza is a horror and not a point to debate.
The trouble is that the word “undisputable” is sitting on top of a document that almost nobody who shared it has read past the headline. The report comes from the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry. As the name suggests the United Nations itself handed down a verdict. The media coverage, including CNN and BBC, were careful enough to add they “do not speak for the UN.” What it actually describes is a standing panel of three appointed commissioners, set up by the Human Rights Council, holding a distinction no other inquiry in the body’s history has: an open mandate with no expiration date and exactly one permanent subject: Israel. Its finding of genocide is the finding of those three. It has never been the finding of a court.
That gap is the whole story, and it is the part Ms Rachel’s audience is never given. No court has found Israel guilty of genocide. The case that uses the word, South Africa’s, sits at the International Court of Justice, which has issued interim orders and said in plain language that it has reached no conclusion that genocide occurred, with a judgment on the merits still years away. The other court, the International Criminal Court, is no ally of Israel. It indicted the sitting prime minister. And when its prosecutor drew up the charges, he left genocide off the list entirely. The gravest accusation in international law is being narrated to millions of parents and children as a closed question, and the only institutions treating it as closed are the ones built to reach that answer.
Her video is constructed to prevent one question. But that question is not whether children in Gaza suffer, which we know is true and which is terrible. The question underneath is why this report, and why this war which ended, of all the wars killing children on earth right now. In Sudan, the United Nations has verified more than four thousand children killed or maimed. UNICEF says outright that the world has looked away, and the appeal to keep those children alive is funded at sixteen percent. There is no studio lighting for them, and no tearful video. The grief is selective, and it keeps arriving at the same address.
We know why the people who built this report aim it where they aim it. The open question is whether the woman handing it her face and her enormous audience understands what she has been folded into. At her own press event, she gave the microphone to one of the three commissioners himself. Maybe she has never wondered who he is, or why a panel with a single country in its sights would be so grateful for her reach. I wonder if she has.
Which brings me to a state senator in San Francisco named Scott Wiener.
Wiener is Jewish. For years, he held a careful liberal-Zionist line, hard on Netanyahu and unwilling to use the word genocide. In January, the activists in his own primary cornered him on it at a candidates’ forum, his rivals lifted their YES placards, and the room jeered him as a sellout. Within days, he folded. He posted the video and said the word, and he paid for it by resigning as co-chair of the California Jewish Caucus while his own community’s organizations put out statements against him. He spent the most expensive thing a Jewish politician owns. Last week, a man filmed himself looming over Wiener at a bar, calling him a Zionist and ordering him out of the neighborhood, pounding the wall behind his head for half an hour. The word he paid for bought him nothing.
Just today, another video showed Wiener being accosted at a Pride event. His attempts to leave are thwarted as he is surrounded and screeched at.
Side by side, the three show the same pattern. A map that erases a country reads as heritage on one neck and as hate speech on another. A politicized panel’s verdict counts as indisputable when it indicts a Jewish state and turns invisible when the dead children are Sudanese. The label built to describe a foreign policy becomes a mark of shame that no amount of compliance can scrub off, the instant it is pinned to a Jew. In every case, the symbol holds still, and the meaning swings, and the thing that moves it is the same thing each time. Whose hand is on it? Whether he is one of us or one of them.
None of this began with Prada. The practice of carrying hatred of Jews on a culture’s most admired channels is old, and it is deliberate, because beauty and warmth travel where a pamphlet cannot. They reach the young and the many before an argument can begin.
I grew up the grandson of Jews who were pushed out of the Arab world, out of the very map Saint Levant now wears as jewelry, and I have spent my adult life being told that my existence is the provocation. So I know the pattern when I watch it work. The necklace, the report, and the name belong to one story, and this week it ran in the open while most people applauded the parts of it they found beautiful.
Coco Chanel is the cleanest case fashion has. Under the occupation, she lived at the Ritz alongside German officers and took an Abwehr officer as her lover. In May 1941, she wrote to Nazi authorities to seize full control of her perfume house from the Wertheimers, the Jewish brothers who had bankrolled it, on the argument that Jews had forfeited the right to own it. Declassified French files name her as an agent. The house came through all of it, and the name still sells. The glamour did what glamour is for, which was to make the woman behind it impossible to picture as a villain.
The same logic walked straight into the nursery. Julius Streicher, later hanged at Nuremberg, ran Der Stürmer for grown men and also published a children’s picture book called The Poisonous Mushroom, bright and simple, teaching small Germans to spot a Jew the way a parent teaches a child to spot a toadstool in the grass. The aim was reach. A boy raised on a friendly cartoon needs no argument for his hatred years later. It becomes as instinctual as washing his hands, brushing his teeth, and looking before crossing the street.
No one is calling a musician or a children’s educator a Nazi. What I am writing about is much older than Nazism. Antisemitism has always understood distribution better than the people it targets do, and it picks the runway and the playroom on purpose, the channels that arrive without tripping the alarm, because an idea wrapped in style or in tenderness is already past the gate before anyone thinks to name it. We have watched this story before, and we know how it ends. The only open question is whether we name it faster this time.
HARLEM, Manhattan (PIX11) — A New Jersey woman found her tires slashed and an antisemitic note on her car windshield while visiting family i
A New Jersey woman found her tires slashed and an antisemitic note on her car windshield while visiting family in Manhattan last week, according to police and family members.
“Zionist rats aren’t welcome anywhere but Antarctica or hell,” the hateful note said.
The vile note was found on a silver Kia parked on 124th Street in Harlem on Thursday, June 25, 2026, police said.
The 56-year-old woman was visiting her brother, Yaron, in Harlem on Thursday when she found the vile message on her silver Kia SUV parked near Marcus Garvey Park on West 124th Street at around 5:45 p.m., the brother and cops said.
“She was shocked. This is something that has never happened to us,” Yaron told PIX11 News on Monday.
Hours before the disturbing discovery, Yaron said he and his sister were walking along 124th Street when a passerby yelled, “Free Palestine.”
Yaron said they ignored the 6-foot stranger in a black baseball cap.
“It’s one of those things you feel would never happen to you, and if it does, it happens to someone else, not you,” he said. “This time it ended with vandalism. Next time it could be violence.”
Police said the antisemitic incident is being investigated by the Hate Crimes Task Force. There have been no arrests.
If you don’t want Israeli citizens to be targeted, then maybe Israel should stop drafting them! When military service is mandatory, then indeed, every citizen becomes a political target. You have Israel to blame for that.
*comically large incorrect buzzer plays*
So many countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden), have mandatory conscription but I bet you wouldn’t say they all deserve death as political targets. So no, not every citizen is a political target because they served in the military or could be redrafted. They’re living everyday lives. They’re innocent.
^^ this. AND certain percentages of israeli citizens are not actually required to serve. the only populations who are conscripted are: jews of all genders, druze men, and circassian men.
and this is at the age of 18. plus numerous israelis are exempt from service due to disabilities or illnesses, or they arent conscripted because they're haredi. or they do national service instead of idf service.
but yeah, the fave scandinavia has mandatory conscription. china has mandatory military service (and the ultra left + tankies seem to love china. and yes they do no matter what they say about it not being practiced, it's part of university for many chinese), south korea does, turkey does, estonia, greece, latvia, and lithuania, etc all do. numerous south/latin american and african countries have mandatory conscripted service:
Details about countries that require their citizens to serve in the military.
arab/islamized countries like egypt and iran and QATAR do lmao.
jordan does, aka the actual palestinian state. so do jordanians deserve to die?
also maybe we wouldnt need a conscripted military if palestinians and the general arab league stopped starting wars and attacking. just an addition.
plus if you only think israeli military members deserve to be killed, but you basically condemn killing PROVEN hamas militants, who ARE part of militaries (al qassam brigades is a military force, for instance)...you're an antisemite and a hypocrite who just wants jews dead. because do you actually know the other populations in israel? no. lmao
same goes for justifying the deaths of israeli civilians but condemning the deaths of palestinian civilians when many palestinian civilians turn out to be the opposite, plus hamas uses humanitarian zones and schools/hospitals to launch attacks.
There have been race riots in several countries. Masked men burning families out of their homes. Moral purity tests are back in. The political left and right are exchanging notes on antisemitism. American democrats are standing behind a man with a Totenkopf tattoo. A large number of the far left identifies with a terrorist organisation. Russia continues to occupy Ukrainian territories. Russian militias in Africa continue to exploit the region for monetary gain. There are currently 117.8 million people displaced by various conflicts around the world.
A lot of people like to say that they would always be on the right side of history. Well, here we are, and from where I’m standing, a great many of you are far, far away.
As hamas kills Palestinians, druze,Syrians, christians, jews, secular people. Lebanon/Lebanese people are being held hostage by houthis. Houthis has more military power and help than the country itself their citizens are trapped and used as human shields. They recent purged a ton of christians, the Islamic Iranian Regime killed more people in the three week they cut off communications to the outside world. These people who do not want to live by Sharia law. People that do want a government ran by tyrannical terrorists.
If you keep licking boots, eventually you'll taste the shit they stepped in.
I saw someone asked why Palestine doesnt have a military... and blamed Israel! Seriously? You are not holding a governing body that Palestinians voted (back in 2007/08). Palestinian Authority and Gaza are run by different "governments", but you didnt know that did you? You didnt know Palestine itself has the Palestinian Authority, meanwhile the gaza strip has hamas, a condemned terrorist group that is famously responsible for using child soldiers, sending them into locations to try to kill as many jews as possible. Someone mentions "its the only place to be LGBTQAI in the middle East", and people said "stop pinkwashing genocide", hamas group lynched every gay, tortured them, statically there are LGBTQAI people that are forced under threat of death from their own families, to stay in bodies or playing straight. You need to stop ignoring reality because of your antisemitic fantasy that will next be coming for you. They dont even want your support, you dont exist.
Honestly too many people cannot tell the difference between war and genocide, they have never seen a war, they live on stolen land they refuse to give back. That tells me a lot about this movement. Its either white/ colonial guilt, racism (thinking they cannot possible be as smart as you, therefore need saving), or projection of the fact colonies refuse to give land back to its indigenous peoples.
If your native and you support this, they are the people that refuse to give us our land back, people who refuse to admit their abuse and neglect of indigenous peoples for their own selfish interests. Stop supporting those clueless and selfish people, colonists constantly deny rights of indigenous people that lived on that land for thousands of years.
Supporting terrorists is not, and is the furthest from liberation.
Below is the "Doctrine of Hamas", they are terrorists, not liberators. They leave their people to die while they slaughter people in Syria.
Looks like we've got a specific left-entryist tactic launching across social media: Rebutting accurate criticism of racist or sexist actions by DSA entryists with accusation of racism in return, playing on the liberal reflex to instantly apologize for causing offense. Don't take the bait.
The instant response to El-Sayed being sexist and conspiratorial to Stevens, a highly accomplished female lawmaker is
"Calling a muslim mysoginistic is relying on the trope of Muslim Man as unrepentant savage"
Here it is:
If the good faith liberal apologizes, the dishonest interlocutor has won. This person is bigoted themselves, and is essentially super okay with using Platner/El Sayed/Chevalier/Mamdani to beat "Libs" and especially minorities who don't get into line, so if their representatives are accurately criticized for the bigotry they show (And they're all demonstrably bigoted) this is instantly flipped back on the good-faith liberal.
What this does is give DSA entryists and particularly Muslim men or people these predominately white, upper middle class DSAers are running defense for freedom to say and do whatever they want using the 'noble savage'/they just don't know any better/YOURE holding them to biased standards of western civility" attack. And it is an attack. And it relies on not holding public figures accountable for their own words and actions because they have the right enemies. Women, Black Democrats, Jews, and the other minorites who don't get into line. They're not here to fight the GOP.
Here it is in context:
Here's the same thing on Tumblr:
"Mamdani doesn't know any better and it's racist to call him out for what he may or may not be doing, you should focus on the WHITE DEMOCRAT CHRISTIANS. HES A BLORBO"
Here's a link to the post:
💬 47 🔁 139 ❤️ 194 · Ok but actually the Sadiq Khan analogy is EXCELLENT!
Like let's talk about this!
Khan has some views that I disagree
This is their new move. Policing by outright accusation, being bigoted about their Sufficiently Diverse Blorbos themselves (By holding them to lower standards) and then relying on other people to further police for them
The person on twitter said that any criticism of El-Sayed's misogyny was racist. The person on tumblr said focusing criticizing Mamdani (Like we only object to HIS antisemitism) was bigoted because he doesn't know any better.
Don't take any of that shit.
This is the new meta. Learn it.
This is why DSA, despite being 85% white, hides behind candidates of color. It's the exact same tactic the Republicans pull, like in the recent Virginia gubernatorial race.
A goyish friend of mine (who is not bigoted, just ignorant and watches too many youtube videos) was asking me about if the Rothschilds had anything to do with the founding of the State of Israel, but he had no idea who Theodore Hertzl was.
I then spent the next hour explaining to him why when you hear people go on about the Rothschilds it's a nazi dogwhistle and you should not take anything they have to say seriously.
But this also could just be cheap animation, notice how everyone in this series has the same 'cute' features? I.e the same button nose even with characters played by actors like Finn and Noah with more prominent noses.
This whole animated series just screams lazy cash grab to me.
Why are certain facial features seen as the default. Why is a button nose seen as “cuter” or more desirable? Why do some people think some features are easier to draw?
yeah, lazy/ignorant and bigoted are not mutually exclusive. in fact, a lot of the way bigotry exists in society, especially re: erasure (what is being talked about here), is due to (often unconscious) cultural assumptions about who is the default; so laziness and ignorance are often what leads to the erasure.
which is still a structural bigotry even if it isn’t always intentional; society gets built in such a way that it pushes out and rounds off the edges of difference, such as Jewish ethnicity.
the fact this can happen with even Stranger Things (a show with Jewish executive producers and multiple Jewish cast members) is sad but not surprising
ellievsbear
baratheonpilled
blakekathryn
kaledo-art
prguitarman
turnnoffyourmind
theartofmadeline
