Also like. I know that the idea of "transandrophobia" is a pretty heated topic but I think, regardless of where you stand on the topic... it's weird that ISFF is so willing to accept self-admitted pedophiles and rapists into her community in the name of "nobody is disposable!" But has pretty much said she doesn't think transfems and transmascs can share community because transmascs have to POTENTIAL to be abusive and transmisogynistic (which is something I'm not denying, btw, anyone in any demographic has the potential to do terrible things!).
Are they disposable because they MIGHT hurt someone? Why is it when some transmascs are abusive she shuns the entire group because "That's not what a brother does!" But when it comes to Sophie's documented cases of abuse, suddenly it's about "caring deeply for [sophie] as a sister"?
And not only that, but flat-out telling transfems speaking up about their experiences that THEY'RE the dangerous ones and they're "not her sisters". But nobody is disposable, right ISFF? You should have that transfem's back no matter what, right? Or does that only apply when your rapist buddy wants to take a fun little birthday trip to New Zealand? With sisters like ISFF, who needs enemies???
No yeah I was literally thinking about it earlier, when it comes to the subject of trans women being raped, abused, or otherwise mistreated by a partner, she’s so quick to jump on it as long as the perpetrator is a trans man or otherwise TME. But when it comes to multiple trans women claiming to have been raped and abused by another trans woman, she won’t even hear them out and basically just says they need to shut up about it or they’re a danger to their sisters.
Almost like… she doesn’t actually care about victims of assault unless she can conveniently use them as a cudgel against groups of people she doesn’t like! 🤯