MaybeGossips

We love to gossip

[maybegossips]

Jensen proving again sex ain't a thing anymore or at least, not with his first wife.

The man wanting to tap out so badly.

[maybegossips]

For all of those who theorize that Jensen is a Cheating Ass and Deserves Danneel Because She Cheated Too ...

If your hot take is still “Jensen’s a cheating ass who pairs up with fellow cheaters,” congrats, you’ve got the wrong headline and the wrong decade. We’ve been recycling this one for twenty years.

Now, let’s be real. The interesting question isn’t whether he was that guy. It’s whether he is now. And if you’ve been paying attention? The man’s 47. The fratboy energy is dead. For the past two years, he hasn’t even been giving “active sex life” vibes. At all. (Jensen, bro, DMs are open. Shock me.)

Which brings us to Theory Land:

He’s unofficially separated and taking his sweet time.

He’s mentally checked out.

Or he’s just done with the whole “sex just for the fuck of it” phase and looking for something else.

Either way? Whatever His First Wife is giving him, it’s not much.

[its-sassyboots]

Just because Jenneel have denied responsibility for what happened to Bryan de Lorenzo doesn't mean they aren't responsible. And from what we've seen their actions are causing that poor man more stress. If they donated to his fundraiser they'd just look like massive hypocrites.

If it wasn't for their lazy, slipshod management this awful tragedy never would've happened.

(if they do donate, which I seriously doubt they will, they should at least do it anonymously)

Exactly. The project doesn’t even exist without them. They are still responsible. It would be wild to claim a manager is not responsible for what happens in the store one day simply because they were out of town. No, you have a duty and responsibility to your cast and crew. Even if you just want to put your name on the project and walk away. You don’t get out of it like that.

What’s more, this was not the narrative they told people in promotion so an attorney can also use their own words against them insisting they claimed differently in public so what is the truth?

They could have helped him with his expenses when it happened. They also could have settled this case which they chose not to do. It seems they don’t care.

[maybegossips]

This discourse is honestly exhausting.

Y'all keep acting like this is a morality play where Jensen is supposed to swoop in with a cheque and make everything okay.

That's not how any of this works.

The "store manager" analogy is flawed from the start because you're assuming the very thing the lawsuit is trying to determine: who actually had operational authority over the decisions that day.

That's... literally why people sue.

But what really gets me is how every single conversation ends up revolving around one celebrity.

Why Jensen?

Why not the production companies? Why not the employers? Why not the people whose job it was to enforce safety protocols?

Why aren't more of you furious that, if the allegations are true, a crew member was allegedly put in danger in the first place?

Because Bryan isn't the first crew member to suffer a life-changing injury on a set, and unless something changes, he won't be the last.

Stop asking which rich person should save the day. Start asking why an entire industry keeps producing Bryans.

Charity doesn't fix broken systems. Accountability does.

[maybegossips]

The discourse around Bryan's lawsuit has been... fascinating. ( here )

So many people seem convinced that the solution is for Jensen Ackles to write a cheque.

And that's exactly the mentality I have a problem with.

Why is the conversation about a celebrity's generosity instead of the system that allegedly allowed this to happen?

If the allegations are true, then someone failed to enforce safety protocols. Someone made decisions. Someone had legal responsibilities toward the crew.

That's the conversation we should be having.

Not "will the rich guy save him?"

Without crew members, there are no TV shows. No actors. No celebrities.

I don't want an industry where injured workers have to hope a wealthy producer or actor feels charitable enough to help them.

I want an industry where workplace safety is enforced, labour protections actually protect workers, and employers are held accountable when they fail.

Charity is not justice.

And if your first instinct when a worker is seriously injured is to ask what a celebrity should do with their money rather than what the industry should do with its responsibilities, I think you're asking the wrong question. ( and I'm judging you, hard )

[hologramcowboy]

Regarding the video of Jensen giving a commencement speech at a high school graduation - It was striking to me that he spoke about his partnership with Jared… nothing about a supportive partner such as a spouse, at least not that I’ve seen.

Also, Jared brought up the speech at the con he’s at in Sweden saying that he and Jensen discussed it last week.

Interesting how hard Jensen’s been leaning in to his relationship with Jared the last while. Any theories on why that is?

For me, it’s obvious Danneel is incapable of providing with the mental, emotional, spiritual support he requires so Jensen is leaning in where he can find it: in Jared. As for him shifting the PR narrative from his wife to his best friend, that was to be expected with the failure of all of their Chaos Machine endeavours. In other words, Jensen is being smart and keeping his image clean.

[walkergirlsposts]

This right here should tell AAs about the state of that "marriage." And who the most important person in jensen's life after his kids is.

[hologramcowboy]

Exactly. 🧡

[maybegossips]

I think y’all wrong.

Y’all are doing the exact thing you accuse everyone else of doing.

A man gives a commencement speech about the value of friendship to a room full of teenagers and somehow the takeaway becomes: “See? Proof he’s divorced.”

The point wasn’t his marriage.

The point was that telling a bunch of 18-year-olds to value deep friendships is actually better advice than “go find a spouse.”

Not every statement is fandom evidence.

Sometimes a speech is just a speech.

[maybegossips]

From his speech:

« Then there's the other word in GFA motto, partners. I want to tell you what that word means to me, at least professionally. If I get into the partnership of marriage, that's a whole other speech, but if you're interested, find me. »

I was right.

Y’all were wrong.

So :

[hologramcowboy]

Regarding the video of Jensen giving a commencement speech at a high school graduation - It was striking to me that he spoke about his partnership with Jared… nothing about a supportive partner such as a spouse, at least not that I’ve seen.

Also, Jared brought up the speech at the con he’s at in Sweden saying that he and Jensen discussed it last week.

Interesting how hard Jensen’s been leaning in to his relationship with Jared the last while. Any theories on why that is?

For me, it’s obvious Danneel is incapable of providing with the mental, emotional, spiritual support he requires so Jensen is leaning in where he can find it: in Jared. As for him shifting the PR narrative from his wife to his best friend, that was to be expected with the failure of all of their Chaos Machine endeavours. In other words, Jensen is being smart and keeping his image clean.

[walkergirlsposts]

This right here should tell AAs about the state of that "marriage." And who the most important person in jensen's life after his kids is.

[hologramcowboy]

Exactly. 🧡

[maybegossips]

I think y’all wrong.

Y’all are doing the exact thing you accuse everyone else of doing.

A man gives a commencement speech about the value of friendship to a room full of teenagers and somehow the takeaway becomes: “See? Proof he’s divorced.”

The point wasn’t his marriage.

The point was that telling a bunch of 18-year-olds to value deep friendships is actually better advice than “go find a spouse.”

Not every statement is fandom evidence.

Sometimes a speech is just a speech.

[nancylou444]

🤣🤣

[walkergirlsposts]

He wasn't talking about canon queer love, you twit. He was talking about FANFICTION. You can compare any kind of fanfiction to, well, anything as it doesn't hurt REAL ISSUES. Now repeat after me........

[the-analytical-bostie]

See this is what gets me. I think they have to be being intentionally dumb just to be able to have something to be angry about. It’s very clear that he was comparing them in that they were both fanfiction. Not comparing incest to queer relationships. Yet somehow all of our side understands that, and all of the other side somehow doesn’t. 🤔

[maybegossips]

Yeah well no.

I mean yes, y’all right but the real issue here is to make it as some right wing agenda to remove rights.

That is fucking insulting. You wanna fight for rights? Get out of fandom and get into activism.

[hologramcowboy]

this TB episode pissed me off so bad, Jensen really let them massacre his character like that...

They are setting the scene for Vought Rising.

[the-analytical-bostie]

And that is Jensen’s fault how?

I don’t disagree. I was exactly pleased with what they did with SB in this episode. I’m mighty displeased to be honest, but blaming Jensen for “letting them” is definitely a choice.

[maybegossips]

@the-analytical-bostie is totally right

Kind reminder to « fans » that Jensen Ackles isn’t a god on sets and can’t singlehandedly decide whatever happens to his character, his lines, his actions and the direction of a show. Even less when said show is it’s in last season.

[justjensenanddean]

Jensen on the stupid divorce rumors (x)

[maybegossips]

We were this close 🤏 to get Jensen’s First Wife breakthrough at JIB.

This close 🤏

To be fair, wasn’t even us. I remember telling mutuals: Occam’s razor says he forgot his ring in his hotel room or somethin’ …

We’re more clever than X crowd … come on.

[walkergirlsposts]

That's called posing...........funny, I see no one mad over here! 🤣🤣🤣

[lightofraye]

I’m sorry… mad at what? Them standing there, ice cold, with literally no warmth between them? Jensen barely touched Danneel, can’t even look at her. Danneel had that awkward fist shoved into her pocket….

“Hoes mad” at what?!

The Padaleckis have a warm, loving relationship,

The Ackles have a business partnership.

I don’t know what we’d be “mad” about… but I do know what y’all are desperately trying to push and fight for. I just don’t know why.

[maybegossips]

this is not mom and dad. Y’all jenneel fan or danneel fans are delusional and crazy.

Second : I couldn’t care less for those two posing together like they’ve never done a red carpet a day in their lives.

Third : I’m no hoe. I don’t feel targeted by your stupid tweet.

[hologramcowboy]

I think Vought Rising's success will hinge greatly on what the final season of The Boys ends up doing with the Soldier Boy character. As a prequel series, it's at the mercy of what the character becomes in season 5 because. let's face it, if he just gets worse and worse and gets killed off, there's a large part of the audience that will be will like, "Why do I want to watch this if I know that this guy never finds redemption, just turns into Homelander 2.0, and then they kill him?" Logistically speaking, even though Jensen still looks great... beautiful... beyond what most men half his age could ever dream of... 2 years to produce 8 episodes of television means he'll be 50 if Vought Rising gets a season 2. Time won't be on his side for very long. Let's hope Kripke and the gang know what they're doing with Soldier Boy or we're in for another "Countdown." Also, sounds like it might be time to squeeze in that Supernatural mini-series he and Jared keep talking about.

Excellent points! I do hope Kripke knows what he is doing.

[maybegossips]

this is such a confused take.

you’re mixing up two completely different things: narrative stakes and actor logistics.

first : prequels don’t live or die based on whether a character gets a “happy ending.” we already know where stories go and still watch them anyway. that’s literally how prequels function.

House of the Dragon didn’t fail because we know the Targaryens crash and burn. if anything, that inevitability is part of the appeal.

second : the idea that a prequel’s success depends on Soldier Boy becoming “better” later on is just… not how storytelling works.

not every character is meant to be redeemed. and forcing that just to keep audiences comfortable is weak writing.

third : the age argument is honestly the least convincing part.

Jensen Ackles being “almost 50” doesn’t suddenly break the concept of a prequel. recasting exists. timelines can shift. flashbacks can be selective. this isn’t a new problem the industry just discovered yesterday.

we’ve had multiple actors play the same character across different ages for decades. somehow audiences survived. (Batman anyone?)

if anything, the obsession with a redemption arc says more about the audience than the character.

people don’t actually want complex characters, they want attractive ones to be morally reassuring. (You’re missing who Soldier Boy is and your moral compass is based on looks?)

and when they’re not, suddenly the story is the problem.

be honest: this isn’t about storytelling.

it’s about people wanting a bad character to be a good guy because he’s attractive.

[hologramcowboy]

Since I’ve been getting a few asks about why I “hate”Danneel, I wanted to get a thread going. Why do we dislike Danneel?

She’s a vulgar, trashy, no talent wannabe with delusions of grandeur. She’s a wife who cannot support her husband in his time of need and who devalues him constantly. She’s a mother who tokenises her children and miseducates them (whitewashing MLK, anyone remember?). She’s an actress that is the epitome of lack of talent and who only got ahead by selling her body and thanks to the casting couch. She’s model that used to be told by all photographers how bad she was. She’s an “executive producer”(vanity title only) who stained the Supernatural legacy with her ignorance and arrogance. She caters to hellers despite knowing the very real negative effect they have on her husband. She fatshames Jensen. I could go on and on but I’ll let others add their own perspective.

[maybegossips]

Every reason why His First Wife is Problematic is on @lightofraye blog - this post specifically :

Ramblings of a Writer (@lightofraye) on Tumblr

Call me Raye. Read my Portrait Of A Woman about my blog. Writer, celebrity gossip, mother, fan, survivor, a human being. Expert on Green-Eye

[neecy83]

I prefer my eggs hard-boiled or scrambled. What about the rest of you egg eaters? Lol

[hootiepgh]

i used to only like scrambled, but i've been eating them fried lately. i have no idea why. but only those two ways. i don't like them any other way.

[serenescreaming]

Poached, soft center

[klaatu51]

Poached, soft center or scrambled with feta and green onion

[hologramcowboy]

My favorite is scrambled with cheese and green onion.

[captaingatorgirl]

Oooh that’s how we used to do them when I was a kid 🤤

[lightofraye]

My favorite tends to be over easy eggs on toast. Very filling too. Easy to make!

[maybegossips]

Easter eggs

[hologramcowboy]

Jensen didn't bring Danneel but brought Daniela as his plus one.

😬😬😬

[maybegossips]

Girls … he didn’t bring Daniela as his plus one.

She works events and this is Roma. 1+1 : she invited herself … got contact, get seated next to Jensen. He’s the kind of guy to prefer bad company he already knows than strangers.

If his first wife hasn’t done a single red carpet with him in years, it’s not her birthday that’s gonna change that.

I’m all for the divorce but please, a bit of reasoning once in a while.

Daniela his plus one … lol, she dreams he would.

[hologramcowboy]

This was worded a bit rudely but I get where you are coming from. Seems like Danielle is obsessed with Jensen so she may have pulled strings to be sat next to him.

As for Danneel not being there, it’s very clear at this point that they are, in fact, separated. Jensen completely ignored her birthday when he could have spent time in Rome with her. If a man wants to, he will. It’s just that simple.

[maybegossips]

Right, because *you* didn’t see any birthday wishes from him absolutely means they’re separated and it is *check notes* fact.

Separation seems to be a thing but I wouldn’t take the lack of social media birthday wishes as proof.

[hologramcowboy]

Jensen didn't bring Danneel but brought Daniela as his plus one.

😬😬😬

[maybegossips]

Girls … he didn’t bring Daniela as his plus one.

She works events and this is Roma. 1+1 : she invited herself … got contact, get seated next to Jensen. He’s the kind of guy to prefer bad company he already knows than strangers.

If his first wife hasn’t done a single red carpet with him in years, it’s not her birthday that’s gonna change that.

I’m all for the divorce but please, a bit of reasoning once in a while.

Daniela his plus one … lol, she dreams he would.

[hologramcowboy]

[maybegossips]

Debunking this right now.

The photo is flipped.

Check the writings in the background.

Original here :