puts the boots to you. medium style @mg-dl - Tumblr Blog

Dill, 27, ✡, M. Married. Blood type: A-. I like vintage Corningware, beets, and the color blue. This blog contains opinions, questions, and lots of text. Not always SFW. I block minors.

#post #text #updated lol #reply

dogpuppy

ozempicofficial

I’ve been shaving my head for half my life because I like it that way. I hate it when people ask if I want to grow my hair out

Look what I put on my CV

#much to think about

armandology

rice is like a best friend and a lover to me

bruzum

emotargaryen

one of the tweets of all time to me

1794

mustard snob canon

targetedknowledge

mewvore

"we detected a mature post" yeah I'm in my 30s

oliviawebsite

huge fan of disgusting. massive supporter of gross and nasty

byjove

I do not agree with veganism as a moral standard. If it is your personal moral stance, that is fine. If you think humans eating meat is inherently immoral, I don’t want to deal with you, you’re hopeless. Vegan ideology behaves more like a sect of evangelical Christianity than a dietary choice.

literallycrashingoutrn

Veganism is better for the environment, but claiming that it's a morally superior choice ignores cultural and economic factors that make people eat animal products.

byjove

It is not inherently better for the environment. That is the thing. When you begin trying to explain that local, sustainably sourced animal protein is better for the environment than imported plant proteins that are farmed 3,500 miles away using slave labor, they start tuning you out. Down is better for the environment than polyester stuffing, leather is better for the environment than pleather. We should work on making animal agricultural practices more sustainable instead of trying to shame everyone into eating plant products that are also farmed unethically and unsustainably.

elfwreck

Veganism - vegetarianism, even - is only viable for

Wealthy people

People who live in a very small part of the world that produces enough protein-based plants year round to sustain the locals.

For everyone else, it's a diet based on colonialism and imports. The ancient nordic people were not omnivores because they disdained plants as real food; they were omnivores because THERE ARE NO EDIBLE PLANTS IN WINTER.

Repeat for desert regions that have several months of "it's too hot and dry for plants to feed people and still survive themselves" and rocky coastline areas with "if you don't eat fish & eggs, you won't get any protein because there aren't enough seeds or nuts and you can't grow things that produce them."

We do live in a society where most people can afford to be vegetarian. We have plenty of imported plants, including protein-heavy plants. But locavore beats the hell out of herbivore for sustainability and ethical environmentalism.

wizardshark

hey can you guys keep an eye on my red explosive barrels while i go take a nap

do NOT smoke weed beside them

blappature-executive

Visit Original Link

sacred-portal

mexicain-sans-frontiers-v2

beardedmrbean

derinthescarletpescatarian

I love visiting people who have some kind of pet reptile because they're always like "would you like to hold the reptile" and I'm like "of course I would" and then the rest of the conversation happens with me just holding a random reptile and the reptile Has No Feelings about the situation. They always just sit there, probably vaguely wishing to return to their heat lamp but clearly exuding an energy of This Might As Well Happen. and then I put it back in its enclosure and go home and the reptile very clearly has no strong feelings about the situation.

dogpuppy

iliiuan

“I am all for immigration, but I draw the line at midwestern transplants” is one hell of a take.

“I hate how they don’t incorporate into the beautiful tapestry of my city. They have different social norms and I expect them to assimilate immediately and completely.” Do you hear yourself?

“This is not the same as anti-immigration sentiment I swear.” Uh well you’re wrong.

I want to fucking scream.

I was working on an essay about how states within the US have open borders with each other, and how this makes us an economic powerhouse, but apparently I was thinking of directing my essay at the wrong fucking group. God damn.

To summarize: Immigrants are good. “Transplants” (e.g. immigrants from another jurisdiction who have no legal barriers to said migration because they’re from the same country) are good. People being able to move to new places and live their lives there is good. I fully support people being able to move house wherever they damn well please. Always and absolutely. (Caveat: as in, buy a house in an existing settlement, not build a house in whatever random ass place they choose. Just in case anyone was misunderstanding.)

I am so over this shit.

cannoli-reader

"not build a house in whatever random ass place they choose"

Whyever not? I am assuming, of course, that they own or lease the land, otherwise building a house would be a really weird thing to do. But if they do, why not build it wherever they want?