wallacepolsom

oozey mess

@theartofmadeline
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Jules of Nature
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Peter Solarz
Claire Keane

Kaledo Art

No title available

Origami Around

★
Sweet Seals For You, Always

ellievsbear
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
taylor price

PR's Tumblrdome
KIROKAZE
h

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@mobtownlabs-blog
I bet you didn't know that the Smashing Pumpkins did a pretty awesome chill wave song on their last album.
Long day. Hipster moonshine. (Taken with Instagram at Berkeley Place, Park Slope)
Tom Waits hiding under my birthday banner. (Taken with Instagram at Berkeley Place, Park Slope)
Master thief. (Taken with Instagram)
Birthday Cake! (Taken with Instagram at LIRR - Merillon Ave Station)
Birthday Boy! (Taken with Instagram at LIRR - Merillon Ave Station)
People. They’re what makes life worth living. I was just in CVS and saw kids with neck tattoos and pants below their butt. And my driver is itching to move back to the Dominican Republic, where he’s a famous bassist and can get paid to play all night long. These are the stories we’re interested in. What makes people tick. How do you function in today’s society. But Carole King issues platitudes and rather than retire, Counting Crows hide behind P2P to gain publicity. Zuckerberg’s got it right. Be true to yourself. That’s all you’ve got. And I HATE Facebook!
- The Lefsetz Letter
Apparently I have a pet cow. (Taken with Instagram at Historic Ellicott City)
This filter I call "The Barbara Walters Soft Focus" (Taken with Instagram at Del Boca Vista)
Beach House - Myth
New song!!!
Frank Zappa Explains the Decline of the Music Industry (Hillarious)
Quant v. Audience: The Real Challenge and Opportunity is Using Both
Guest Post by: Matt Patton Esq. Director of Optimization and R&D at DoublePositive
Image via Wikipedia
Among the many nuances in the debate about which optimization algorithm represents the best RTB media buying strategy, the most prominent might be the audience retargeting v. audience agnostic approach. Although exclusive to our business, this dichotomy is conceptually no different than two Wall Street analysts debating about whether a pure qualitative approach is better than a numbers-only quantitative method in purchasing securities. My engineering training tells me that the only inferences that should ever be drawn as a basis for any decision should originate with the story told by what was actually measured. But my legal training tells me what I think is the more correct approach, which is, as every law school professor professed so eloquently, “It depends!”
The truth is that measured performance numbers, i.e. impressions, clicks, conversions, and audience data, i.e. categorical audience profiling, both have their own benefits and drawbacks, and will almost always provide you different oscillating returns on your media investment. On the surface, the only real difference between the two is that one is instinctual while the other is empirical. With audience data, we infer that a group of users with certain online buying habits will purchase what our clients are selling based on the categorical distance between things previously purchased and what we are currently selling. With fundamental performance data, we just care about which pieces of inventory have already yielded a statistically significant number of conversions regardless of who actually converted. Thus it is blatantly clear under the surface that both methods offer the same benefit, which is a calculated a priori probability of a conversion from which we can derive an expected value of an impression, or what my mentor at Advertising.com used to call the “Crown Jewel”, of DR advertising.
The obvious drawback of both approaches is and will always be the cost of learning. Because of the random nature of Internet advertising, we need to survey the biddable landscape before we can make any type of calculation, qual or quant. In the quant world, it probably takes more time and thus requires a longer discovery period, while in the audience buying game, those “selective” impressions can get quite expensive when we are still learning which audience represents our sweet spot. Since there is no such thing as a free lunch in this business, both are going to require some upfront cash that will initially skew our calculated CPAs.
Instead of simply accepting this as truth, I want to treat this as an opportunity to thwart the economic black hole of overcoming a campaign’s inertia when starting from rest. I see opportunity to utilize both approaches as a function of time and campaign maturity in order to get campaigns running more quickly and performing better long term. I see complex regression analysis and time series plots that will tell us on a campaign by campaign basis of when and how to use audience targeting and when the stats tell us that the audience is worthless. I see recurring real time cost benefit analysis algorithms telling us that we are paying too much for an audience or that an audience is underpriced. I see this as a first step towards creating a RTB marketplace where being smarter actually translates to being more successful. For the first time, I see a scientific approach to an age-old art and an artistic approach to centuries-old mathematics.
Will this be accomplished and will it even make a difference? I leave you as a lawyer by saying “it depends”.
Related articles
The Rise of Media Quants (adweek.com)
Hey Quants! Hedge Funds And Banks Will Fight For You In Bidding Wars And The Winner Will Be... (businessinsider.com)
New Survey Reveals Increased Focus on Risk Management in Wake of Financial Crisis (prweb.com)
Peter Muller's Quants Find a New Home (blogs.wsj.com)
Complex UI - There's a Time and a Place
Linkedin maps data visualization (Photo credit: luc legay)
I am currently working on a advertising and marketing reporting interface that is mostly grid driven and we are adding some data visualization to it because quite frankly the thought is that most users just don't have that 'ah-ha' moment when data is presented to them in a grid. Even if they are somewhat simple stats grids can be daunting to look at. That said, a well paginated grid (or better yet infinitely scrolling grid) can be the most powerful tool.
To decide whether to go more complex on a grid or to pop out data visualization you need to consider time spent on that particular part of the application. You also need to decide whether the visualization of the data is just to show off and be fancy or if it really has a use.
For example when presented with a grid of data from an online advertising campaign, it's easy to go through and see how much money you spent on a particular campaign for...say 30 days or even 90 days but once you get above about 100 rows you really need a trend chart to see where the spikes and troughs in spend are.
Another good use of a data visualization are nested trees or what the javascript d3 library calls a Dendogram. To zero in on, or drill down into data expandable rows in a grid are useful but if you want to come over many layers of nested data to see what is really driving value, a visualization is probably a better choice. That said, as a rule of thumb, I would always present the grid option so you can see precision in numbers once you have identified your 'significant' data points.
Related articles
Data Visualization Resources (secviz.org)
Visual Data Tools, Inc. Announces the Mac App Store Release of DataGraph, an Innovative and Powerful Graphing Application for Mac OSX (prweb.com)
Data Visualization - Is it Important? (mobtownlabs.com)
Cascades: Rich UI Development for BlackBerry Apps (devblog.blackberry.com)