I’ve recently discovered that I am most likely a system, due to an alter/headmate that has latched onto the name Minato (this is actually how I figure out most things about him he latches onto something and I get some sort of… I can only describe it as a feeling that “that is his name, that is what he looks like”) He appears to be a consistent co-fronter and I am at the moment what seems like permanently stuck in the front.
I know exactly what trauma would have caused me to form a system and how Minato acts backs up that theory, I suffered from emotional abuse from about the timeframe of 4th/5th grade - late 8th grade and now with mild gaslighting even through 10th/11th grade.
I had my first of my only two “black spots” in my memory in late 4th grade or early 5th grade, a kid got WAY too close to me and I was scared for my safety. My vision was black for a few seconds and when I came to I had kicked the kid. My other blackout was 6th/7th grade my friend snuck up behind me and put his hand on my shoulder and I blacked out and stabbed him with my pencil.
With all the terms and all the… fighting.
I just can’t find any resources at this point? One source says endogenic systems are fine the other says only traumagenic ones exist.
We THINK we are traumagenic, due to Minato and the time frames lining up and all
But I just don’t know and it’s hard to find literally anything about this… do you know any reliable sources?
Hey there, thanks for your question! I am very sorry for how long it has taken to respond.
I am glad you are seeking clarity on your lived experiences and introspections. Its not always easy to get a clear cut answer.
I am sorry you are finding it difficult to find resources. Unfortunately this is a community that is full of gatekeeping and misinformation everywhere, so I understand your struggle.
Personally, I wouldn't try to gather information from things such as personal blogs or Facebook groups because again, those are largely just people sharing personal experiences and more discourse than actual information.
I would recommend sources that are more on the scientific and medical side of things. I will say, these sources will predominantly use DID terminology and you will likely never come across the term Endogenic within it, and that's largely because the term has no scientific relevance to the study of multiplicity except for potentially the sociology/anthropology side of things. People will say that the science is biased towards DID, and that it ignore endogenic systems. I think a lot of the terminology debate comes from a lack of understanding of both multiplicity and lack of understanding of trauma and the various ways it impacts people.
You do have to take into account that the understanding and research into DID and multiplicity is still very new, and the majority of case studies for DID are generally in the more overt cases of it (which is already a very low percentage of cases) and generally as a result of very extreme and prolonged trauma. When people see this evidence, they like to try to compare traumas and pains and timelines. They want to be validated, but it is hard when you don't see your traumas represented or you don't know if you have been traumatised or don't feel like you've been traumatised. This is largely my understanding of how a lot of the endogenic and gatekeeping discourse came about. It is hard to conclusively extract just information from it because of how new the information is wrapped up in personal opinions and defensiveness of their own lived experiences. It certainly is complex.
I would personally start with https://did-research.org/ as I find their site very easy to navigate and relatively unbiased compared to other online sources. https://www.isst-d.org/ is also good.
If anyone else would like to share their own sources, please feel free to!
MWS (Magic Wishes System)