Monterey Bay Aquarium
ellievsbear
roma★
occasionally subtle
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
🪼
tannertan36
tumblr dot com
we're not kids anymore.
Claire Keane
ojovivo
Jules of Nature
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
taylor price
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Origami Around
hello vonnie
Misplaced Lens Cap
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from India
seen from United States
@muzzledin2017
wow so powerful. what film is this?
Lajja. This film is called Lajja. Lajja, in a general translation from Hindi, means Shame.
It talks about different women in different situations overcoming the shame instilled by the society to keep them under the control of men.
Women aren’t better multitaskers than men – they’re just doing more work
“But a new study, published today in PLOS One, shows women are actually no better at multitasking than men. The study tested whether women were better at switching between tasks and juggling multiple tasks at the same time. The results showed women’s brains are no more efficient at either of these activities than men’s.“
“My colleagues and I recently busted another relevant myth – that women are better at seeing mess than men. We found men and women equally rated a space as messy. The reason men do less cleaning than women may lie in the fact that women are held to higher standards of cleanliness than men, rather than men’s “dirt blindness”.“
men are fucking lazy and water is wet
Unfriendly reminder that, as a detransitioned woman, I do know what I’m talking about when I say that the trans movement is a goddamn cult. Read the below and tell me, I mean really look me in the eye and tell me in all seriousness, that it’s not:
Ten warning signs of a potentially unsafe group/leader.
Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability.
No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry.
No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget, expenses such as an independently audited financial statement.
Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies and persecutions.
There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil.
Former members often relate the same stories of abuse and reflect a similar pattern of grievances.
There are records, books, news articles, or television programs that document the abuses of the group/leader.
Followers feel they can never be “good enough”.
The group/leader is always right.
The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing “truth” or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible.
[source]
If we want to talk about responsibility we must stop talking about violence against women in a passive way.
Because one thing is to ask “ how many women are killed by men every year “ and another is to ask “ how many men kill women every year “.
Can you see the difference?
The subject of the sentence is important.
Let’s stop putting the woman as a subject because it leads to phrases like: “ yes, but she’d been drinking? How was she dressed? “
Begin to put men as the subject “ How did he act? How did he take advantage of her? How did he kill her? “
Disclaimer: this is not the right post to argue with phrases like NOT ALL MEN or WHAT ABOUT WOMEN WHO BEAT MEN? Not because they don’t have sense in general, but because right now we are not talking about that.
This sounds like a very informal and non friendly to debate. Assault and rape is terrible sure, but I think talking about it should be more informational then biased.
How is it not informational? How is it more biased than the other way around? Considering that men commit 97% of sexual assaults with women as the majority victims of their crimes why the hell should this be a “friendly” debate?
Rape (revised definition): Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. (This includes the offenses of rape, sodomy, and sexual assault with an object as converted from data submitted via the National Incident-Based Reporting System.)
Oh look, the FBI chose a definition which specifically excludes the main ways in which women can rape people.
Your 97.1% gender split is meaningless without, say, rape by envelopment data, or forced oral sex of the other kind that the FBI doesn’t mention.
Ah yes I keep hearing about this supposed epidemic of female rapists that would totally make the sex crime statistics the 50/50 split “egalitarians” so dearly wish they could argue so they can go on pretending that women aren’t oppressed as a sex and class.
I’m sure you have studies and data on this. You know, burden of proof, innocent until proven guilty, all those things that matter so much until MRAs want to deny reality.
Sure thing! Here’s the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey on the subject. You can find it here.
Notice how the men who were raped outnumber the number of women who were raped over a 12 month period, and the number of men who were specifically raped by being made to penetrate still somewhat outnumber the women who were raped.
Elsewhere, some of the other numbers suggest parity between the sexes. Some definitely do not. But none of them come anywhere close to suggesting a 97% gender imbalance for perpetrators.
That’s what happens when you consider all kinds of rape.
Alright. So for starters: here’s their data on the report fact sheet.
Nearly 23 million women and 1.7 million men have been the victims of completed or attempted rape at some point in their life.
An estimated 6.8 million men were made to penetrate another person in their lifetime
So something doesn’t add up here. Already that’s nowhere near a 50/50 split of victims by sex, and that doesn’t even cover the sex of the perpetrators of these rapes. Let’s go see what those tables you posted are actually saying and how they reached those numbers!
Let’s start with those tables. Let’s get a better look at them:
The first thing that leaps out to me is this:
Now I’ve proven myself to be no mathematician but I’m pretty sure 812,000 and 844,00 don’t add up to 1,473,000. In fact they add up to a bit of a higher number of 1,656,000. So it looks like these numbers were singled out.
So all together that would make the total 3,129,000 for rape in a 12 month period for women.
On the male table those two things weren’t recorded for the 12 month period because the survey writers determined it fell into their below 30% margin of error rule, so we only have the total under “rape” and then “made to penetrate”…
…which together come to 1,934,000. I trust you can tell which number is bigger.
And then there is the sex of the perpetrators:
Sex of Perpetrators
Across all forms of sexual violence, the majority of female victims reported that their perpetrators were male. For example, state estimates of female victims of completed or attempted rape reporting only male perpetrators ranged from 91.1% to 100% (50 states), and ranged from 87.0% to 100% (50 states) for female victims of sexual coercion reporting only male perpetrators.
The majority of male victims of completed or attempted rape (86.5%) reported only male perpetrators with no statistically reliable state estimates.
The majority of male victims who were made to penetrate someone else reported only female perpetrators (78.5%), with 7 reportable state estimates ranging from 71.8% to 89.7%.
Now the remainder of their charts would take more complex math than I’m capable of (someone else is welcome to it) but looking at their final conclusive numbers of 6.8 million for made to penetrate and the collective 24.7 million of completed or attempted rape and count them together with the percentages of either sex that perpetrated the crimes that would mean men are still responsible for roughly 76.5% of all rapes according to this particular survey.
Not exactly your “it’s totally 50/50″ you were hoping this study proved for you by just cherry picking a couple of charts out of it, not actually reading them, not paying attention to the survey’s conclusion and not actually looking at the full report: [link]
Speaking of the full report, they randomly dialed 41,174 people over three years and interviewed them, though those were just the ones who completed the survey. A pretty good sample size, but still what they extrapolated from to get their numbers. They cite the definitions they’re operating on from other CDC papers but they don’t list the precise questions asked.
So there ya go!
So can we get back on the topic of not using a passive voice when it comes to violence against women?
I have already said that it’s not 50/50. My contention was that it’s not 90:10. Or even 97:3, which was the original claim.
But honestly, my brain is fried as far as mathematics go right now, so if you want 76% to be ~close enough~ to 97%, have it your way. I’m sure there’s nothing dishonest about that.
Sucks when we’re BOTH wrong, doesn’t it?
Meanwhile, the passive voice is necessary for this message because it puts the focus of the sentences on women. It’s a conundrum: women can’t be both the active voice in the sentence and the subject of it, unless you want to go a victim-blaming route like “How many women get themselves killed by men every year?” Which is a problem, because I’ve seen schools of feminist thought saying that not making women the subject or the active voice makes them a subservient part of the sentence. But you can only solve one of these problems at a time. So they decided to forget about the “subject-object dichotomy” (previously peddled by Anita Sarkeesian and others) and focus on the “passive voice literally makes women sound passive” angle.
What was that old feminist saying? “Why does a movement for women become so misunderstood to the point where it’s still about men?” That’s what removing the passive voice has done.
Was it worth it?
I have already said that it’s not 50/50. My contention was that it’s not 90:10. Or even 97:3, which was the original claim.
The original claim being the complete FBI crime metadata for the year of 2015, which I’m going to presume has a sample size greater than around 40,000. If someone good at the maths would like the aggregate the two statistic sources go ahead.
But honestly, my brain is fried as far as mathematics go right now, so if you want 76% to be ~close enough~ to 97%, have it your way. I’m sure there’s nothing dishonest about that.
Hey man, you were the one who plucked two blurry tables out of a report you didn’t even read, parroted a misrepresentation of them and then let me do all the leg work.
That 76.5% is, again, my best estimate of the figures according to this report, that interviewed around 40,000 people over a 3 year period and extrapolated their results from that. And even according to this report, which again you misrepresented a tiny slice of data from, you still got 23 million female victims vs 8.5 million male victims and in no 12 month period were there ever more men raped than women (even barring that no single 12 month period was the same one for all participants). So that talking point can be put to bed.
So no, you were pretty wrong. I on the other hand am just left with two statistical sources I’m incapable of aggregating and you won’t even bother trying to cause much like “oh I bet its totally 50/50″ as long as you can convince yourself “we’re both wrong” you still feel justified using your inept at best and deliberately dishonest at worst argument.
Meanwhile, the passive voice is necessary for this message because it puts the focus of the sentences on women
And that’s only gotten us with the onus put on women to protect ourselves while acting like male violence is just some unpreventable force of nature. You know. Victim-blaming while ignoring the problem.
With the language in the OP its putting the responsibility on the men who commit these actions against women. The men who actively choose to do these things. So as not to let society pretend this violence is just an unfortunate, perpetratorless thing that just happens to women sometimes.
That was the point you were derailing with your inept misuse of data you didn’t actually understand here.
remember that this only happens to women’s issues and it is deliberate
Andrea Dworkin, Life and Death: Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War Against Women
I mean
It’s funny ‘cause he thinks it’ll be the same as movie actors being wacky and messing up their lines, while in actuality it would be women having mental breakdowns on set.
Fucking disgusting.
They have this shit on EFUKT and it is horrifying. Just compilations of women crying, begging for it to stop, being laughed at and abused. What an idiot manbaby.
Put a shooting squad at the end of every porn video where they shoot every single man on set and then show the address of the man watching so he knows they’re coming for him next
Yeah going off the EFUKT thing…my male friends in HS would watch the porn bloopers videos at our lunch table, and by default, I saw some.
Its women freaking out on drugs, babbling, while still getting fucked and laughed at. Its women “going psycho” on a director or male pornstar for changing what was supposed to be done that day and suprising them with something they didn’t agree to (usually anal). Its women curled up in a fetal position sobbing while the men in room mock her or tell her to get back into position. Its young women, teenagers, nervously asking if they really have to do that with that many men. Its women clearly passed out from drugs or alcohol still getting fucked. Its women clearly unstable, speaking nonsense, still getting fucked. Its women talking about childhood molestation on set, and men in the background jokingly yelling out “that’s why you’re here now!” and “that’s hot!” at her expense.
Its fucked.
Nobody hates ‘sex workers’ more than johns and porn consumers.
“Its women “going psycho” on a director or male pornstar for changing what was supposed to be done that day and suprising them with something they didn’t agree to (usually anal).”
This meets the US federal criteria for human trafficking, btw.
Petition to refer to TERFs as FARTs, which stands for Feminist Appropiating Reactionary Tranaphobe
“Trans-Exclusionary-Radical-Feminist,” when you think about it, is a VERY kind term. To be called a TERF is for the person to admit that they still consider you a feminist.
But what kind of feminist excludes so many women from their movement? If you hate so many women for what they are, you really don’t deserve to be called any kind of feminist, radical or otherwise.
The kind of women who knows women are raped because of their vaginas
The kind of women who knows female child are drowned because they are born females
The kind of women who acknowledges that female child being thrown in dumpsters isn’t about identity
The kid of of women who acknowledge ghat Brazil pays for TW auguries but abortions is still illegal
The kind of women who acknowledge that majority of Restavaks in Haiti are female
The kind of women who knows women were not allowed to vote because they are female
THE KIND OF WOMEN WHO KNOWS TRANSWOMEN WERE ALWAYS ALLOWED GO VOTE
The Kind of women who knows that many Islamic countries award ownership of children to the husband because they beleive the sperm is more important than the egg
The kind of women who knows activist in Saudi Arabia face death penalties for wanting to drive
The kind of women who is concerned where Iranian women re put in jail for not wearing the Hijab
The kind of women who is absolutely horrified that lesbians are getting publicly caned for having sex
The kind of women who is concern that there is no Domestic Abuse laws in Haiti
The kind of women who is is angry that women are being inprisoned for miscarriages
The kind of women who acknowledge rape was a weapon of war
The kind of women demanding where Transwomen were when women couldn’t vote, couldn’t own House, property, a credit card.
Kind of women wondering where the fuck transWomen were when black women were being made to be mounted and rape to create chattel and slaves.
THE KIND OF WOMEN WHO DOESNT BELEIVE ITS HER JOB TO CATER TO THE MALE SEX NO MATTER HOW THEY IDENTIFY
FEMALE WOMEN “APPROPRIATING” FEMINISM IS THE BIGGGEST ENTITLED MALE BULLSHIT IVE READ ON THIS WEBSITE
MALES CLAIMING THAT FEMALES ARE APPROPRIATING FEMINISM IS WHERE WE HAVE FUCKING REACH
The amount of hatred I have for western liberals. The amount hatred I feel in how western feminist have literally allowed males to steer the plight women’s oppression to the point where males being happy about female rage is acceptable in feminist circle because you liberal westerners don’t actually give a single fuck about the female sex….
AND IM SUPPOSED TO GIVE A FUCK ABOUT MALES? Who feel like women?
WHERE WERE TRANWOMEN WHEN THIS SHIT WAS HAPPENING?
Conveniently not in attendance? But now they are here rejoicing at the pain of females white they ursurped their realities.
Excerpts of a Salon article about female pornographer Janet Romano-Zicari or “Lizzy Borden” who is a co-owner of the porn company Extreme Associates.
here’s your feminist porn, your woman-created porn. how d'ya like it so far?
Anyone who defends this is literal garbage.
CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT TRIGGERS. Read with caution.
This is showing you that porn is still a violent and objectifying thing no matter who is directing it.
A little known black history fact
There is a closely guarded secret that has been deliberately buried by mainstream media and historians: After the Civil War (and during the
I remember learning this my senior year of hs.
“I think like a woman.”
I am old enough to remember a time when we would recognize Sam Smith’s statements as sexism 101. 👇🏻
Actually the Stranger Things kids are still kids and they will be for a while and even if you wait until they’re 18 to make comments I’ll call you a pedophile 🙃
not voting isn’t refusing to play the game. You’re in this country, you’re subject to the game whether you like it or not. The only way not to play is to leave, and the vast majority of us don’t have that option.
Not voting is playing the game but saying ‘pass’ every time your turn comes up and then wondering why you lost.
Making young people not vote is actually a tactic used in politics to keep the satus quo. The young vote is always the one for change, so dissuading them from voting at all is actually a political tactic used by the people in charge to keep themselves there. Voting is rebellion.
“Voting is rebellion” is literally one of the stupidest and embarrassing things I’ve ever heard!! Wake the fuck up!! We live in a constructed reality where all real resistance has already been co-opted and the people are so brainwashed they will badger free thinkers with a real spirit of rebellion into playing within the terms and boundaries setup by our overlords... “voting is rebellion” is the sad ignorant cry of the barnyard animal who can’t see the fence.
This thread!
Male hypocrisy and entitlement
