All I Know Is Mingy

Training to be an artist. Can't wait to have a cat (maybe more) one day. Radical feminist. 🇳🇬

[domesticabuser]

how leftists look at you when you don't believe in "rehabilitating" people who permanently altered another human beings life out of a sadistic sexual desire

[kronkk]

Sorry I know this is controversial but I don’t think people should own pit bulls and they should be sterilized asap and we should let the breed die out. They are a blood sport dog and a creation of human cruelty. It’s not their fault for the way they were bred but it is our responsibility to stop breeding them and to stop letting them around another animals,kids, elderly, and tbh gen pop

[thefemaleterrorist]

what went wrong with feminism is that we started including males and started saying shit like “patriarchy hurts men too” does royalty hurt kings? does capitalism hurt billionaires? does white supremacy hate white people??

[gender-apostate]

"you cannot separate transmisogyny from racism" can we talk about how It is honest to god insane how so many progressive people (other black people included!!) have been convinced that comparing black women and girls (who have literally been abused and exploited due to our sex) to literal males is progressive and not at all racist.

How do you know the history of slavery and colonization and then conclude this. How does this happen, why did this spread and being parroted unquestioningly.

how do you find it perfectly okay to say that you can't tell the difference between a whole entire male and a female just because the female is black

what level of cognitive dissonance do you have to obtain to not realize you sound like a nazi

[gender-apostate]

"Black women were denied womanhood so that means trans women are women and you're just like a racist for saying otherwise!"

They knew exactly who to rape to make them have their children, they knew exactly who to force to breastfeed their babies, they knew exactly who to torture and experiment on the reproductive system of.

We were viewed as subhuman cattle.

Black women were not "denied womanhood" we were denied humanity.

[radfemyjasdottir]

radical motherhood

So I want to be a mother. To a daughter only. I’m deciding to do that by sperm donation. Because by natures own definition, that’s what males are there for. They were made “for reproduction” as they so claim we are.

I don’t want to waste time with a male. These women go through hoops with useless moids just to wound up as stress filled, penniless or burnt out single mothers. Then, they have to go through another stressful situation, which is child support court, just to get a little compensation and have to sacrifice the safety and wellbeing of their children, since most child support courts in the USA favor men’s rights. An abusive or pedophilic man is guaranteed 50/50 custody from the jump.

So why would I risk being a single mother by circumstance when I could just be one by choice? I choose when I have a child, by whom, when I’m ready. There is no need for the male when it comes to raising children. Seriously. Most moms I am friends with do it all themselves, and they have to ask their useless husband/boyfriend to care for their own children.

Single mother commune is the dream. I’d rather my daughter and myself be surrounded by trust worthy, warm, loving, compassionate and empathetic women than a useless and pathetic moid. Or an abusive and overbearing moid. Why risk it?

I believe women choosing single motherhood is a great step forward in feminism and matriarchy. It completely strips males of their power they hold against us. We once again control the means of reproduction — the very reason for the existence of patriarchy.

[lilacsupernova]

In Care and Capitalism, Kathleen Lynch notes it is 'quite common for well-educated White middle-class men to differentiate themselves from "traditional" men by highlighting their gender-aware ideologies, tastes and behaviours, while simultaneously retaining and protecting their male power in the gender hierarchy'. Lynch suggests that 'borrowing some "soft" feminine symbols and practices' can be a way to 'conceal male power by giving it a symbolically acceptable face'. Here I find myself recalling many of the anti-feminist protestors I have encountered at conferences and feminist gatherings in recent years. There is a belief that if you are playing cheesy disco music to drown out the testimony of a rape survivor, or dancing a 'queer joy' conga to stop women from entering a public space, or wearing a T-shirt which features death threats against feminists, but is also pink and shows a kitten holding a kitchen knife, this cannot be toxic masculinity. Even if what we have, when all extras are stripped away, are more male people demanding female people take up less space and rein in their self-expression so that boys can be not just boys but anything they want to be, all of the time.

The power of style to override substance makes it difficult for feminists to critique this dynamic without being dismissed as miserable opponents of other people just 'being themselves'. The fact that one person's expanding 'selfhood' requires the constriction of another person's – that it means women cannot, to quote [Andrea] Dworkin, 'feel a whole range of feelings, express a whole range of ideas, address our own experience with an honesty that is not pleasing to men' – is simply not noticed. The underlying hierarchy is the air we breathe; we only notice difference, and the 'difference' of a superficial rejection of one form of masculinity is enough to distract us from that which remains the same. Any feminist failure to get on board with the 'fun' of a boy in a dress destroying his sister's possessions, or a man in lipstick leading a woman's march, falls into the category of old-style feminists once again being bitter and humourless, if not actively hateful.

The truly gender non-conforming women – gender non-conforming in her resistance to male entitlement – comes off poorly in comparison to the 'fabulous' male who embraces every feminine norm bar that of being situated lower down the social hierarchy. She is sour-faced; he is joyous. She is limitation; he is freedom. It is not surprising that many 'progressive' men (and women) not only decide to throw their lot with him but convince themselves that this is the way to create a brighter, shinier, kinder world for everyone. If only some women (and little girls) would stop making so much of a fuss about keeping their paints, their castles, and indeed anything of their own.

– Victoria Smith (2025) (Un)kind: How 'Be Kind' Entrenches Sexism, pp. 181-2

[volach-deactivated20230326]

Sex buyers kys

[pineappledaffodil]

When you make sex a service, you make it subject to the same capitalistic entitlement that people (read: rich men) feel for all goods and services.

[tigressliz]

‘It’s all consensual and empowering!’

If you can’t say no. If you can’t stop at any time, if your body is no longer yours for a set amount of time. It cannot be consensual. This isn’t sex this is rape.

That woman got sued for not letting a man rape her. For daring to say no. For stopping sex when she didn’t want it anymore.

Is this waht woman empowerment looks like?

[radfem-book-club]

“Making women seem anti-sex and joyless if we want the right to be sexual without being humiliated or hurt, and making men seem wimpy and undersexed if they prefer cooperation to domination, is clearly the tactic of choice for isolating anybody who tries to separate sexuality from violence and domination — which is a challenge to male dominance at its heart.”

— Gloria Steinem, Preface of “Outrageous Acts and Everday Rebellions” (2nd ed., 1995)

[johnturturro]

just another day stanning libraries

[kkoffin]

yall replaced all “lesbian” “gay” and “bisexual” with “queer” and all gnc with “trans”. yall fucking did it wrong.

they practically doing lgb✂️t themselves except they cut the lgb out instead of the t. replaced it with “queer” and then invited “spicy straights” to the party. then we’re the fucking hate group for trying to recreate our own spaces and services from scratch again

[stingycat]

That's why I've always hated the word queer. Not just that it blurs the line, it's a slur. A slur that dismissed anyone that wasn't heterosexual. So why would I reclaim a slur that doesn't respect my specific sexual orientation?

It was so obvious that weirdo straight people took advantage of this. High school, I had to ask a girl you like girls but I can tell she was avoiding it. She screamed strictly-dickey, but because she was spunky she must be queer. Ugh 😫

[amilta]

But sure “not all men”

[kittyit]

scanned from AMAZON EXPEDITION: a lesbian feminist anthology, 1973

[radfemart]

[1-800-horrorfilms]

i think "it takes a village" shouldn't be just "to raise a child". we should understand it takes a village to do literally everything we do. all day every day. without our communities we would not have drinking water or electricity or clean streets or food or shelter or anything. we cannot do any thing alone. we just can't. and with that comes the fact that you are not alone. you already have a community, seek to be an active part of it, you will feel better. reach out and thank them, they're happy to have you too. i promise. it takes a village to live.

[nansheonearth]

[boyfriend-beater]

the way people act like sexually disturbed people should be protected minorities is actually insane. no, someone calling your cake fart fetish nasty isn’t oppression. no, someone criticizing the fact that you get off to beating your girlfriend also isn’t oppression. stop letting everyone know you’re a pornsick gooner who can’t get it up unless your partner pretends to be a child/animal/etc and they will stop making fun of you. shrimple shrimple lol

[tributary]

you know, i think that if you travel internationally and visit a brothel that is later raided on suspicion of sex trafficking, that should be the end of your career