[birdofthunder]

If you are hoping that the shooter(s) are a certain race or are already pushing some political agenda— shut the fuck up

[erinsbreakfast]

America has a fucking gun problem and anyone who says otherwise is a fucking moron

[super-affection]

when you finish watching a really sappy romantic thing

[super-affection]

i didn’t expect this to be this relatable, are you guys ok

[smiley-ba]

no…

[honeybambolina]

everyone needs to know this

[antifeminist-egalitarian-deacti]

I actually have a problem with this. 

Of course I agree that no person is obligated to have sex with their partner at any given moment, but sex is a part of romantic relationships, if you want to be in one, you’re gonna need to put out at some point. 

I don’t see a problem with women or men deciding to have sex when they don’t want to for the sake of their partner, either. Just because you don’t want sex, doesn’t mean you can’t or shouldn’t give consent to it. 

I don’t think this post is actually intended to explain consent. I think it’s essentially an expression of dominance. “Men’s sexual needs aren’t important in a relationship, and if you think they are, then you’re a rapist. Relationships should be orientated entirely around the needs of women, and men should be grateful just to be in women’s presence.” No, men’s needs are important, especially to men, and sex is important to both men and women. In fact, not getting the quantity or quality of sex that you need from a relationship can end that relationship.

No one needs an instruction manual on not raping somebody. The person who made this knows that.

[ima-fuckingt4ble]

This doesn’t mention gender at all though I think you’re reading a little too deep into this

Its true that basically no one needs a manual on not raping somebody, but the issue arises when there are people who think that the relationship IS the consent, therefore doesn’t believe they’re actually raping. Because a few decades ago you legally couldn’t rape your partner because the marriage was legally considered the consent, and some people acted on that.

[antifeminist-egalitarian-deacti]

It mentions gender implicitly by being feminist rhetoric and discussing consent. We both know about the feminist theory of rape culture, and which gender is the default rapist according to that theory. 

I don’t agree that ordinary people think a relationship is consent. I’ve never met anyone who thinks that way, nor have I ever seen a piece of methodologically sound research demonstrating that this mentality is common within any culture. At this point, I suspect that the idea is totally fabricated.

It’s also intellectually dishonest to say that marital rape was ever truly legal. Although, “it was believed that it was not legally possible for a husband to rape his wife, as the wife had given irrevocable consent to her husband as soon as they were married. […] It was also believed that although a husband may not be guilty of rape upon his wife, yet if he uses force or violence to exercise his right to intercourse, he may be guilty of assault or wounding. R v. MILLER (1954) 2 QB 282.” In effect, it has always been illegal for a husband to rape his wife, not the reverse though. 

[ima-fuckingt4ble]

I didn’t say ordinary people though did I?

You just fucking quoted me something that says IT IS NOT LEGALLY POSSIBLE FOR A HUSBAND TO RAPE HIS WIFE and tried to tell me that it actually means the opposite. You call me intellectually dishonest but did I fucking say that a man can just bash around his wife? No. I said RAPE. It was illegal to hurt her during the rape, the rape itself was not illegal. 

And I’m aware its not the reverse. Because in the UK men cannot be raped by women because they have no penis - male victims didn’t come into the equation. That’s why I was one of the people who campaigned to the government to have it changed. But that’s not the topic and you know it.

So are you a mong who can’t read or just a massive hypocrite?

[ima-fuckingt4ble]

Also, I just want to thank you for linking me to that case because fortunately, I have a university subscription and I can point out for everyone just exactly how you’re a cherry picking so and so.

Because the case analysis ends like this: “ Held, (1) the accused could not be guilty of the crime of rape; (2) the second count was a valid one and must be left to the jury for their decision; (3) if a person was caused hurt or injury resulting, not in any physical injury, but in an injury to her state of mind for the time being, that was within the definition of actual bodily harm.”

The rape was legal. The ABH was not. You get punished for the ABH resulting from the rape, not the rape itself. Try lying to someone who hasn’t studied criminal law next time.

It doesn’t take someone being a feminist or buying into feminist gender politics to be able to read a case properly. You alone making these misinformed posts is a PR nightmare for the MRM.

[antifeminist-egalitarian-deacti]

No, again, you’re the one who’s not paying proper attention to my arguments. What I’m saying, precisely, is that even though the law didn’t consider a husband forcing his wife to have sex “rape”, it was considered a crime, and the wife was protected from it. So even though the concepts of rape and consent were considered differently in the past, there still was never any scenario where the majority of ordinary people didn’t think sexually violent behaviour committed by men against women was possible within the context of a marriage or relationship.

I don’t see how you can have studied law if you don’t understand distinctions in meaning as simple and obvious as these. 

[natashitty]

i don’t see this as “feminist rhetoric“ honestly? this post wasn’t necessarily referencing rape or force, but the inherent idea that whenever sex is demanded by one partner, their agreement to be in a relationship has given the other one no reason to say no.

nobody is arguing that sex is a normal part of a relationship. why is this even an argument we’re having?

[lured-deactivated20170602]

wtf is wrong with white ppl

[strangeauthorarchive]

wait you have the edit and delete button in the screenshot which means….you made this post then screenshotted it and you didn’t even edited out those two features

[loftyskies-moved-deactivated201]

OHHSHGH MY GOD,

[coolslav]

THE RE A C H OP OHMY H

[gouachevalier]

[invenblocker]

No prisoners were taken.

[papayapom]

a Straight: hi

tumblr lgbt: STOP MURDERING US

[natashitty]

in relation to my last post about prepaying let me also say that if you start to pick a fight with somebody because they aren’t moving from the gas pump within literally 2 minutes, your impatient ass needs to calm the fuck down

do you know how many times i’ve had somebody pull up behind somebody and steal the pump in the time that the person who got there first was prepaying and ended up pumping on somebody else’s money? too many. wait your fucking turn, holy shit it’s not hard

i don’t see what’s so complicated about planning ahead of time and allowing yourself the time it takes to pull in, pay for your gas and pump it because it seems now everybody is always so fucking busy to get out and has to make a big fuss about being in a hurry or late or just too entitled to wait like everybody else

i’ve had people come in and complain because they’re parked behind somebody who isn’t at their car pumping yet and in reality the person has been standing in my 9 person line for the last few minutes trying to pay for their gas. calm the fuck down, not everybody wants to use their credit card. shut the fuck up and move along you entitled shit head.

[natashitty]

ok honestly??? i will never understand people who have such a hard time prepaying for their gas. apparently there are places that will let you pump before paying or will hold your credit card and open the pump but most gas stations aren’t like that when you use your card at the pump it presets an amount for you!!!! it does that because you’re not setting an amount yourself!!!! where i work it’s literally $151 dollars bc it’s a truck stop and people drop a lot of money on gas alone so sorry you got charged a large hold for only like $20 worth of gas, maybe prepay next time????

i always see people get huffy and say shit like “hmph well i don’t know how much it will take!” “i just wanna fill it!” “i can’t read my car’s mind!” and i just... sigh. are you that fucking retarded? i bought a new car barely a month ago and literally filled it twice. 2 times and i already have a pretty good guess on how much it’s gonna take. you’re telling me you’ve had this car for years and you just what, close your eyes and pay no attention to the things surrounding you such as how much you’re paying for the gas you pump whenever you fill your car? 

also no i will not hold your card for you and open the pump because not only is that against policy but it’s also the dumbest thing in the world. obviously there’s a reason it didn’t accept your card at the pump so what makes you think i wanna take your declined card and let you fill only to have it not work when you come in to pay? what if that card was stolen and i hold it for you not knowing that, you fill, you drive off and i now have somebody’s stolen card that is no longer activated while you got free gas. no thanks, fuck that.

pick a number, it’s not that fucking hard. all the time you spent moving to a different pump or driving to a different gas station all to avoid having to use your brain and pick a fucking amount, you could have been done and filled by now but you had to be a stubborn shit head. good god y’all piss me off

[juene-deactivated20170115]

‘bisexual/pansexual/asexual people are part of the lgbt community…

… but only if they’re dating someone of the same sex!’

[natashitty]

zoey looks so FUCKING BEAUTIFUL AND RASHA MY HEART

[natashitty]

fuckkkkk esme song. offense intended.

[natashitty]

tiny is a precious human and i love him dearly

[natashitty]

zoey and rasha are the absolute cutest and i'm so so so happy with zoey's progress bc i used to hate her

[natashitty]

listen, i’m all for body positivity and feeling comfortable in your own skin as well as i am against people bullying others for their body, small or large.

however, it’s moved past “let people who are bigger than a size 0 feel comfortable and happy” into “all skinny people are the devil and you could be as big as the person i just watched on my 600 pound life and still be healthy and beautiful.” it doesn’t work the same anymore.

this is coming from somebody who has lived a lot of my life being a larger woman. i’ve been bullied for my weight and called every name in the book. while i am absolutely against that and it still hurts and makes me mad, i also acknowledge that my eating habits aren’t the best. (and i know some people really are mostly healthy and can’t control some things i’m not denying that).

i see moderately overweight women working to better themselves by eating healthy and working out downright hated by people that are supposed to be supporting them. for some women, being healthy isn’t about their size. there are healthy, plus size women who are hated for being healthy and not fat enough. like wtf is this bullshit i thought body positivity was supposed to be about not bullying others for their size and also loving your body, which means treating it right and making yourself comfortable.

[gifsforeverytaste]

Love this moment

[jambociao]