Untitled

[nefertitiqueendom]

virginity is good , western women !

One of the things that western women dislike is the idea of virginity because it is associated with conservative ideals . And I agree with them . I think the concept of virginity as conservatives determined it is nothing but a female sexual objectification to prepare her for private prostitution ( traditional marriage ).

However the contradiction arises when the same women sheer concepts such as " sexual revolution " which gave women a tough time with public prostitution ( yes women in every sexual setup are prostituted to men as passive objects to be acted abon with negotiated " consent " and humiliation sexual rituals, where's the liberation or freedom in that ? ).

Chosen separatism ( actual virginity which has nothing to do with the concept of virginity that conservatives uphold ), is the actual freedom from male sexuality and from objectification and it is a freedom from the thirst trap that nature sets up for women.

When women are forever virgin, they are free from the humiliation of sexuality and aren't compensating their boundaries or " consent ", they don't have to obey their sex drive which makes them stronger and having more self respect. And to be honest with you. I am a hetero women, I have high libido, but men ( straight men especially ) were capable of decreasing my sex drive to the degree, I don't get attracted to men easily nowadays.

Our bodies and hormones are dumb sometimes but it gets smart when we give them the right information and when we stop photoshopping reality. That's why I go insane when I see straight women are still attracted to straight men. Especially when they dropped the mask and showed women their ugly nature. That thing should be more than enough to turn off the female sex drive. I say with a confident tone as a woman with decent libido, there's nothing that moves me sexual towards straight men unless my fantasy to r*pe them and giving them harsh time. And even the latter is decreasing over time and I feel more neutral and sex-less motivated about their existence.

I am virgin and chosen separatist and my sex drive is regulating itself in my favour. Don't let anyone fool you by saying it is your destination to be attracted to men forever.

[meowykar]

Why did you become blackpilled about feminism?

Several reasons:

-feminists have boyfriends/husbands or are promicious

-they believe there are good men

-they get angry when you bring up separatism ("heterophobia!", "I can't change my sexuality!", "I don't want to be lonely!")

-they will hypocritically say that no matter how a woman looks like she's still a woman, while gossipping and hating on gnc women behind their backs

-they will always see women as victims no matter what

-they never allow any talk about the misogyny of women and brush it off as "internalized misogyny" even though it plays a big role in our society and has mental health effects on other women and especially girls, not to mention women helping pedophiles, rapists and serial killers to get victims

-their insistense that every perverted, degenerate woman and women who post porn of themselves are in reality men or women who are exploited by men because they always see women as victims

-they live in an echo chamber were they repeat their dogmas and that's it, no critical thinking allowed

-trying to hold women accountable is always shut down with "don't victim blame!"

-feminism is nothing but a coping strategy about female biology and their desire to fuck men

-feminists make it very clear that they're desperate and can't live without a man and will find every reason to not have to accept that men will never change

-which means that feminism will never liberate girls and women

-their insistence of matriarchy over separatism because it's very obvious that they can't live without getting fucked by men

-and so many more reasons that I have probably forgotten

When I discovered radical feminism like 10 years ago at first I thought it's cool to see women being angry at this misogynistic society that we live in and I agreed with a lot of things regarding misogyny, pedophilia, porn etc., but I could never consider myself a feminist, because I was already pissed at them because of the aforementioned reasons. I already had blackpilled thoughts when I was a teenager and questioned a lot of things when I was a child, so when I discovered radical feminism, I always felt like I could never speak my mind and had to censor myself or I would get hated by them. I saw that happening to other women, who spoke about how it's female biology that's part of the problem and that men won't change. Eventually I got sick of feminism because it leads to nothing and some time later I discovered even more like-minded women who believed that biology is at fault etc. and I was so happy to have found them and to know that I was not alone. I was never that active in any "blackpill feminism" community though and mostly lurked until now.

[nefertitiqueendom]

what made me peaked is feminists defending gender non conformity but only dating conformist males .

[reversebreakdown]

Five essential female blackpill books:

Loving to Survive: Sexual Terror, Men's Violence, and Women's Lives by Dee L.R. Graham, Edna I. Rawlings, Roberta K. Rigsby (Must read! To give you the gist: “There is nothing like femininity to dignify one’s indignity as one’s identity.” You won't find a better book to thoroughly explore the female 'Cockholm Syndrome'.)

The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Future by Cynthia Eller

The Inevitability of Patriarchy: Why the Biological Difference Between Men and Women Always Produces Male Domination by Steven Goldberg

Brain Sex: The Real Difference Between Men and Women by Anne Moir, David Jessel

The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise by Dorothy Dinnerstein, Adrienne Harris

Thanks anon!

[meowykar]

Thanks. These will go straight to my reading list.

[entropymisanthropy]

Reproduction is disgusting across the board. For humans its particularly awful but there are animals that have it even worse than us, somehow. Some animals suicide to bring offspring into existence. Humans definitely have one of the worst reproductive conditions in mammals. Life is so creepy and horrifying. What are we even doing here. Why does life have to exist at all. I hate it!

[meowykar]

Do you feel like you're running out of distractions?

Depends on what you mean by distractions. I'm thinking of entertainment media. In that case: Yes, sometimes.

A lot of media is trash. Its funny how people call AI created content "slop", when human created content is mostly slop.

The majority of media is shallow and generic and exists to cater to tired working people to have something to do after work or unintelligent people.

I feel like my life is pointless. I'm a bit nihilistic and due to all of my health problems, life is tiresome and exhausting. I use entertainment media to distract myself from that and the realization how doomed humanity is (capitalism, environment, feminism etc.).

But it's getting more difficult, because I also realized how pointless entertainment media is. Let's be honest, it's a waste of time! A lot of it is generic and stupid. And no, it's not modern entertainment media, as some nostalgic people might say. It has always been like this. A lot of classics are trash! But nowadays there exist so much media compared to back then, that it might seem that way. But when I think about a lot of mangas, books, anime, shows, movies etc. that I have consumed when I was younger, I couldn't really tell you any good ones.

Which doesn't mean that good ones don't exist. I started reading the manga "Atelier of Witch Hat" and I'm loving it. Same with the video game "Clair Obscur: Expedition 33". The worldbuilding, the character and world designs and the dialogue are great! But they also make me realize how much trash there's out here.

I sometimes also consume "slop" when I need a palate cleanser or something quick and relaxing. So I like reading thrillers. A lot of them are mediocre or bad, but they're fun enough I guess. I also listen to music, go to the cinema, museums or art exhibitions.

Still I have become disillusioned with the world we live in and wonder what's the point of it all?

Since a few years now I wanted to try drawing and writing again and I wonder if that might help to distract me better. That's probably would I should do instead of wasting my time consuming mediocre entertainment media. I rarely watch youtube or any streaming services now, so I have more time for other things.

Creating is probably better than consuming.

I don't know if that's what you meant, anon, but I hope I answered your question.

By the way sometimes I wonder what our world would look like without entertainment media. It's crazy how it's such a big "need" for people. People will pirate something because they can't live without it or go buy a vpn to watch a show that's not from their country or complain online about how expensive games, books and streaming services are getting and complain about rich people (the same they're giving their money when consuming/buying media).

How would our world look like without entertainment/distraction? Would people become depressed and suicidal? Would something change in our society? I've been pondering about this for a while, how crazy it is that people are so dependend and desperate for entertainment and distraction.

[meowykar]

"Hunter-Gatherer societies were egalitarian!"

I don't give a fuck.

Did the males become pregnant? Did the women penetrate the males when having sex? Did the women have more physical power? Were women never raped?

No?

Feminists will never see the problem with sex and reproduction and that's why feminism will never liberate women. They're too busy coping about being fucked.

Also feminists why can't you just go live in some hippie/eco commune and shut up?

[svintsovoe]

it is very bizarre that people seem to ignore the simple truth that men at large do not think that pedophilia and rape are morally reprehensible acts or deserve special attention. those are crimes typically committed against women and girls. with rape, men think that women exist to be penetrated. being penetrated is being defiled, being defiled is being violated, and as women are penetrated during consensual sex too, to them the rape of women is just not a big deal, because it's basically the same; females exist for that purpose, so what are they being so dramatic about?

with pedophilia, while not all men are pedophiles, a lot of them are; it is very normal, especially when the child is not pre-pubescent. they would certainly not be happy to let pedophiles prey upon their daughters - because they know what pedophiles think and want, because they all have male solidarity, but otherwise they don't care. it doesn't make a difference to them if their fellow men are into children or bondage, it's the same thing to them, and they will turn a blind eye. this is why pedo celebrities suffer no consequences over being outed, their audiences don't care.

not all men are rapists and not all of them are pedophiles, but it's not due to morality, it's more up to circumstances and preferences. the most they can muster is disgust with those who rape little boys, but it's because they hate homosexuality and can sympathize with the boys as they imagine themselves in their place; but even in those cases, most men will let it slide. publicly they act outraged about rape and pedophilia because not doing so is a social faux pas, but privately they don't see them as serious issues. regardless of culture, language or ethnicity. this is very obvious and common sense to me, but it doesn't seem to be the case for everyone.

[radioactivewisdomreactivated]

Heterosexual society is hellbent on destroying itself through the meaningless accumulation of billions of bodies because reproduction is a consumptive act in itself, heralded as the purpose of existence, and thus replicated all throughout civilization. The nuclear family is the first corporation, and the breeders desire for endless propagation manifests on all levels. As above, so below. Human life is created on a hedonistic conveyor belt, no different than one that pushes out Pepsi products. Quality versus quantity is the ultimate assessment one must make in order to evolve past rudimentary survival. Males and their devotees have made their choice incredibly clear already, scaling their low quality primitive sex obsessed existence to industrialized heights. Accusing anyone who wants to rise above the exploitation of both bodies and landmass, of being "antihuman." Meanwhile, mans desire to dominate all that surrounds him, begets destruction, misinterpreted as "legacy." Depleting and devouring. He wants to see a permanent physical change in all that he comes into contact with, whether a womb or the world itself, he must force his way into every corner of existence. A selfish desire to see oneself replicated, and to alter or annihilate all that doesn't mirror humanity's flawed reflection, is reason for our opportunistic reality.

[zyei]

i just don't see a way to move forward as a society now that rampant individualism and extremist libertarianism has infiltrated basically every corner of our lives. i saw a comment section about the r. vs brown case of 1993 (a uk case limiting a person's ability to consent to bodily harm that was presented after police found extensive footage of men burning, whipping, and genitally torturing each other "consensually") where defending a person's right to be burned, whipped, or genitally tortured was the predominant opinion. "consent" to even the most heinous acts has superseded any appeals to morality that people who don't want to live in a society where people are burning, whipping, or genitally torturing each other, including for their sexual pleasure, could muster. people with even an iota of respect for themselves and others are viewed as the "quaint" or "puritanical" or "naive" (or any number of equally condescending adjectives) ones, instead of people who want to torture each other being viewed as the psychopaths that others should rightly be wary of.

one comment in particular bothered me saying that since "nothing is a net good in society" we should let people do anything they want to themselves and others that have "consented" (or that we view as being incapable of consent, ie children, animals, and the environment). what a sad opinion to hold. i can think of plenty of things that are a net good for society: literacy, access to food, shelter, medical care, nature, and public gathering areas. yet building a society that ensures these things for their citizens is impossible because they diminish the "rights" of individuals to pursuing not only their own self destruction, but the destruction of those around them and the environment.

we can't tell people not to torture each other because it's their "right" to orgasm to torturing and being tortured. we can't tell people not to educationally neglect their children and teach them pseudoscience because it's their "right" to raise their children in line with their own backwards views. we can't tell people not to torture and slaughter animals because it's their "right" to have a $2.00 mcdonalds burger. we can't tell people not to cut off healthy body parts electively because it's their "right" to try to force themselves into misogynistic gender roles. we can't tell people not to drive gas guzzling trucks because it's their "right" to drive a 5 ton behemoth to and from soccer practice, nonrenewable resources be damned. we can't tell people not to hand off their children to be raised by the dopamine-receptor-frying social media algorithm because it's their "right" to have "relaxation time" by turning their children into manageable braindead consumers. we can't tell people their unfettered consumerism is enslaving them and that cheap sweatshop trinkets are not going to fill the void in their souls because it's their "right" to buybuybuybuybuy. on and on it goes and if you have a problem with it it's because you're the problem.

any opposition to the society these sociopaths have built and are building is futile because they're the majority. most people truly want to do as they please, so they will defend their right for themselves and others to do so til the last breath in their husk of a body. any suggestion that we should utilize our immense collective resources otherwise is seen as an attack on their very way of being, and their way of being is inextricable from their selves.

[meowykar]

Humanity is doomed and fundamentally flawed. Humans are greedy and selfish. There is nothing we can do against it. I have no hope for humanity and our self destructive ways.

I agree with your tag "we deseeve everything that's happening to us". It's our own doing after all.

[pisceanpharies]

My List of Posts on Sexuality, Relationships vs. Celibacy, & Natalism vs. Anti-natalism

(Note: I wrote these posts. Posts and reposts of other peoples related content are in my tags - celibacy, anti natalism, and anti-sexualism. Off-Tumblr links are at the bottom of this post.)

Ask Answered: "Healthy Blackpilled Separatism"

I Comment on Christian Mythology Verses, post 1 and post 2

Can you make the sex math math? They can’t.

Ask Answered: Healing Sexuality into Anti-sexuality is a Process

Ask Answered: Different Connotations of & Miscommunications About Celibacy - "Boring", Alone vs. Lonely

Reasons For Why Romance Doesn’t Work

Long Term Relationships & if I Think Men are Evil

The Joys of Celibacy (poem)

Both Exoteric & Esoteric Truth of Collective Chaotic Reality Creation

Forms of materialistic self-obsession are destroying the world, and sex is the root cause.

Porn Dehumanizes People & Destroys The Spirit, Other Animals Deserve the Planet

If Lesbians & Febfems Procreated and My Related Response to an Anon

A Bit of Tumblr Celibacy "Community" Drama From 2025

Time, Self-Reflection, Women & Men, Freedom: Why Labels Don't Work For Me

Both Men and Women are "Subtly" Pedophilic Trash

A few memes.

Why I'm Against Intercourse

The Desperation of Natalists

~~~

Off-Tumblr Recommended Resources

The Anti-Eroticist

The NEW Antisexual Stronghold

r/antisex

r/antinatalism2 (against arguments about veganism)

Trust Your Perceptions' essay, Semen: Men’s Chemical War Against Women

Stop Non-Consensual Intimate Image Abuse and Take it Down

Audio archives of removed content by separatist women Black Obsidian and Sekhmet She-Owl

*

Books, non-fiction

Sex is not compulsory: Giving up Sex For Better Health and Greater Happiness, by Liz Hodgkinson, 1986

Women, Passion & Celibacy by Sally Cline, 1994

Adam's Curse: A Future Without Men, by Bryan Sykes

Mother Ann Lee: Morning Star of the Shakers, by Nardi Reeder (biography of Shaker founder Ann Lee)

Sexology of the Bible: The Fall and Redemption of Man; a Matter of Sex, by Sidney Calhoun Tapp, 1870

Books, fiction (women-centric, and each with little to no romance)

Mystery novels involving the celibate, historical God-is-both-male-and-female, religious group the Shakers - Sister Rose Callahan Series

Middle-grade / All-ages, surprisingly complex and well written fantasy series - Faerie Tales from the White Forest by Danika Dinsmore

When Women Were Dragons, by Kelly Barnhill and Women are a Dangerous Magic, by Elora Nicole Ramirez

The Longest Night, by Lauren Carter

The Palace of Illusions, by Rowenna Miller

Atlas of Unknowable Things, by McCormick Templeman

The Obsidian Sisterhood (a trilogy about a martial artist ex-nun fighting supernatural forces to save her mostly female friends)

[false-therapist]

Humans are disgusting creatures, there is no such thing as a “good person” as it’s rooted in our nature to be violent and ruthless, some way or another

[unrepressed-purity]

When are we allowed to say that sex education, therapy, feminist consciousness raising, has failed to reduce sexual abuse?

The language around sexual abuse has changed a lot in my life time, and yet I am still surrounded by traumatized women. I see women a decade plus younger than me telling very similar stories of harrassment and abuse that my aunties would tell me when I was a child. Why is that?

How many different kinds of rape are men going to invent? (Date rape, marital rape, child rape, coercive rape, rape by deception, maintenance sex, sex work etc..) How many slogans and acronyms about consent are women going to invent? (No-means-no, consent-is-sexy, my-body-my-choice, FRIES, CRISP)

For how long are women going watch men create new psychological jargon and refurbish ancient religious dogma to pathologize women for saying no? For how long are women going to sit and watch men use every new advancement in technology to find new ways to prey and abuse women?

How many generations of women are going to ritualistically trauma bond with each other about being sexual abused? Exactly how many Epsteins and Giseles must exist before we're allowed to question the inherent goodness/neutrality of human sexuality?

When will it be socially acceptable to question the utility and morality of human sexuality regardless of it's alleged normalcy and naturalness? Never?

[hibou088]

It's crazy how offended straight women get when we point this out

There has been a drama on twitter recently, about how sex is inherently degrading for women (especially), since we always use words like fucked, cracked, ruined, railed ect.. And how the person getting fucked is always the one with less power then the one doing the fucking, people got so mad and claimed that its just a puritan take, and that's not how real life sex works, the partner ''doesnt'' see them as inferior, but if you think about it, the person getting fucked will always be inferior you can't just cope your way out of it by saying they're actually the ones in control, they aren't, it's all about power, someone HAS to be the weak one, and the other HAS to dominate and ruin the submissive one. So many delusional women continue to disagree with objective truth. A dad is proud of his son who FUCKED many girls, but he wouldn't be proud of his daughter who GOT FUCKED by many boys. it's just different and they know it deep down but no one dares to say it out loud, sex is degrading especially for the ''weak submissive" side. If women accepted reality, they would realize that the attention and kindness they receive from heterosexual men has nothing to do with their personality and humanity, and everything to do with the sexual benefits men receive from their acceptance of beauty standards and subjugation.

[unrepressed-purity]

Sexuals are incredibly stubborn. If not even the threat of literal cancer, HIV, various infections, unwanted pregnancy, and rape cannot discourage women from having sex, what can?

Women who can easily decide to risk death in exchange for something as cheap and shallow as male attention, never had any self esteem or inner sense of dignity to begin with.

I suspect that all women who love romanticizing sex are full of crap. They all know that sex is a traumatizing humiliation ritual but they're too rightfully embarrassed to defend their masochism publicly. They're just pretending they want men to respect them in the bedroom; a woman who truly desired respect wouldn't want a lustful man anywhere in her presence.

[unrepressed-purity]

If men aren't unevolved animals why aren't they EVER holding themselves accountable for their collective abuse of children? Why do they need a multi-generational international feminist re-education campaign in order to "stop"? Meanwhile, they NEVER have any problems collaborating and organizing to profit off of the abuse of children.

Women are not without fault, but we do police each other, especially when it comes to our treatment of children. Women love shaming and micro-policing female caretakers. Female outrage is the ONLY reason it's not socially acceptable to overtly abuse children publicly.

While males have their "bro-code" and are ALWAYS conveniently "unaware" of the child predators in their social circles.

If men aren't unevolved animals, why do we even need an age of consent?

Why do men need the threat of life in jail, the death penalty, and an eternity in hell to de-incentivize them from sexually abusing vulnerable children? And even with all these negative consequences it's not enough to stop them! They just start importing children from another country to abuse.

Why do they need they need sex education in order not to sexually abuse their siblings and classmates out of ignorance? And even with the sex education they don't stop abusing their peers they just become more saavy on how to conceal it?

"We must hold men accountable!"

Maybe women struggle to hold men accountable, because men: cannot be held accountable. Idk, Maybe the simplest more obvious answers are correct??

Why should we tie ourselves into knots to see male "humanity"? It's not like men even appreciate it. Call a man a savage beast and watch him take it as a compliment. Call a man a human capable of empathy and kindness and watch him try not to gag.

[radfemme-rage]

[nefertitiqueendom]

I think this is what they literally mean 😂

[pisceanpharies]

[death-begotten]

Maybe my most deranged post yet. Grab the popcorn.

I'm going fucking insane.

Why prolong the end of the world?

No, seriously, can someone tell me what is the point of all this?

People cry about the declining insect populations and how sad it is that they don't hear thousands of flies exploding to death against their car windshields anymore.

Why do they cry? What is so sad about extinction?

Is extinction sad for the animals? Certainly not. I doubt bug angels are weeping in bug purgatory that they never got to be splattered.

Did you know spiders inject their prey with enzymes that break down the tissues and then slurp up the dissolved innards? Do you have any idea how much it sucks to be a bug? To be digested alive? Have you ever even given it a thought?

Do bugs suffer? Of course they do. The very notion that they have no subjective experience of pain, because they have different brain structures from us, is suspect because - as stated by Asher A. Soryl, Andrew J. Moore, Philip J. Seddon & Mike R. King - accepting that sentience is an evolved trait resulting from the same selective pressures that drive the evolution of other trait within an organism, it is not clear that multiple configurations of neurons could not perform the same functions in relation to mental states in other animals. Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) state: The assumption that small brains are unlikely to support cognition or sentience likewise persists, despite growing evidence that arthropods have converged on cognitive functions comparable to those found in vertebrates. Exclusion of invertebrates with central nervous systems from bioethics and science policy is not justified by the current state of the evidence. Moral consistency dictates that the same standards of evidence and risk management that justify policy protections for vertebrates also support extending moral consideration to certain invertebrates. Invertebrate brains comprise upwards of 99% of the brains that exist on Earth. Cognitive theorists have begun to appreciate the intellectual rewards of studying invertebrate cognition and sentience. It is time that ethicists and policy makers do the same. According to Asher Soryl - Ph.D candidate researching the proposed discipline Welfare Biology at the University of Otago Bioethics Centre - even if we assume that there is only a 0.01 likelihood that terrestrial arthropods have a mental welfare, and if they do, that their moral standing is only 0.01 compared to the full moral standing of a regular mammal or bird the case for considering terrestrial arthropods is upwards of ten thousand times more than the case for considering mammals and birds. Snoozing on the pressing questions regarding their welfare is a recipe for moral catastrophe.

And it's not just bugs; It's the rodents and the fowl and the fish and the amphibians and the reptiles. The overwhelming majority of the animals of the overwhelming majority of species appear to have significant suffering but little (or no) happiness in their lives. They live painful lives and die painful deaths. Atlantic cod can lay from a few thousand to several million eggs. It entails that each time these animals reproduce, 6337.7529 years consisting of nothing but suffering is experienced. If this continues over an average human lifespan, the number of years of pure suffering generated would be 380,265.174. All this for a very specific species in a very specific area. And the rest of animal kind ain't much better. All animals reproduce in excess of the carrying capacity of their environments. Even the 'luckiest one', let's say, a wildebeest - who wasn't spawn camped by a cackle of hyenas while still inside the amniotic sac - doesn't have much to celebrate. Did you know predators often start to eat their prey from genital and anal regions? Like yea he got eaten alive balls first (maybe don't click this one), but at least he got to like. eat grass. yippee.

It's a fucking Ragnarök out there.

Life is mostly dying. Torturous dying. Why should such lives be lived? They should not. If a human baby would know such a short and painful life, we would abort the thing before they draw their first breath. Flush the slink down the toilet and say "it is only merciful". I'm telling you all, the whole animal kingdom is deserving of mercy. Why should anyone be condemned to live a life of absurd torment? Because it's the life they are expected to have? But what justification is there in thinking, that the life a creature is expected to have is therefore good by default? Could it not be, that a creature kind has been cursed with life that is wholly wretched? Nature is nothing but a mechanism that pushes genes into the future; there is no reason to believe that the lives a blind and mindless mechanism produces are automatically worth living.

People claim that reducing wild animal suffering is not possible, but plausible estimate is that the average person on Earth prevents ~1.4 * 10^7 insect-years by their environmental impact each year. So we already have. By accident.

Is nature good? If a system isn't good for those who live within it, then who is it good for? Who are you fighting for?

Yes no shit we need nature to maintain mankind. But doesn't it seem absurd to anyone, that quintillion sentient creatures should live in perpetual cloning-shredding-machine, for the sake of these ridiculous apes, who good portion of the time, use those natural resources only to spread further misery amongst themselves? There are approximately 1.4 billion insects for every person on Earth. And the average human lumbering about isn't even all that happy. I wake up 6:30 and prepare myself for servitude for our bourgeois overlords. I take a shower and wash away the sweat and bacterial gunk culminated all over my decaying body, thinking thoughts that lead to nowhere. And when I brush my teeth in front of the bathroom mirror and see pair of dead eyes staring, how could I seriously think that my vapid existence is worth all the torture it takes to maintain it? How could anyone? I already talked about how life itself is the Omelas, except way worse; billions of children tortured to death in filth and in darkness for every fuckass Bob.

Is anyone else disturbed by this? No? Just me? Ok.

What is the solution? IS there a solution?

Tumblrinas out here hallucinating the revolution is happening soon - that people will overthrow capitalism and establish some solarpunk hippie commune where people live "in harmony with nature" aww! Reblogging some shit like "maybe a system where for some thrive, many have to suffer is a bad system". What do you girlies think nature IS? Mother nature is a cruel bitch that feeds itself by cannibalizing its weakest babies. I can't stand this pseudo-spiritual hippie wankerism. If even the best world people can come up with (already propaganda by the Big Cheery) only benefits 0.0000001% of it's inhabitants, then a better world is not possible.

Quality of the experiences of sentient creatures is the only coherent reason to care about life, Earth or anything at all. "Nature lovers" say they care about earthlings. If you really cared about earthlings, you'd nuke the world and then nuke it some more.