What Queen Larra Rogare/ Targaryen would have worn, Alfazairy
Jules of Nature

tannertan36
d e v o n
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Discoholic 🪩

PR's Tumblrdome
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
sheepfilms
Fai_Ryy
wallacepolsom

⁂
Game of Thrones Daily
almost home
untitled
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

blake kathryn
Stranger Things
Mike Driver
noise dept.
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Russia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
@nerosneckbeard
What Queen Larra Rogare/ Targaryen would have worn, Alfazairy
why are ethicists kinkshaming me
the bible said adam and eve not florence and the machine
ASOIAF META SERIES: PART 4
HOUSE STARK META POST
PART 1 // PART 2 // PART 3
HOUSE STARK
The Stark Myths Project
Bran Stark and Bran the Builder
Arya as a Pack Leader
Bran Stark: Wed to Winterfell, Wolf, and Weirwood
Sansa as a Narrative Mirror
Bran and his Destiny
An Analysis of Winterfell: As Camelot, Avalon, and Sacred Tree
A Time for Beasts: Bran, Arya, and the Long Night
The Stark in Winterfell: Bran Stark and the Fisher King
Sansa and the Royces
Bran and the Caves of Gendel and Gorne
The Relationship Between:
Arya and Bran: 1 | 2
Sansa and Bran
Catelyn and Arya
Ned and Arya: 1 | 2
Arya and Robb
Jon and Sansa: 1 | 2
Arya and Sansa
On the Starks and Skinchanging: 1 | 2
The Abilities of Bran and Arya 1 | 2
House Stark Family Tree Analysis
Starks, Vengeance, and Needle
A Pack of Wolves: Analysing the Stark Family Tree
On the True Characteristics of House Stark
The Stark Line Acts as a Sort of Fisher King
Wolf at the Door: A Character Analysis of Rickard Stark
Actually Starks are Hard to Kill
In Search of Homes, Jon and Arya
Arya and Sansa: The Foil Situation
The Stark Sisters and Mirroring Game Players
The Connection Between the Stark Sisters Journeys and their Wolves
Arya and Sansa and Ned’s Execution Scene
Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Eddard & Sansa Stark
Character Analysis: Brynden Tully - The Blackfish
All the Times Jon and Arya think of One Another
Parallels Between Ned and Bran
Arya and Bran Stark: The Bond Between a Stark and their Wolf
The Parallel Journeys of Bran and Arya
Parallels between Jon joining the Night’s Watch and Arya joining the Faceless Men
Arya won’t be Jon’s Nissa Nissa
Why Ned and Cat were Doomed to Die from the Start
Black and White in Jon and Arya’s Storylines
The Stark Kids and the Crypts at Winterfell
The Line of Succession as dictated by Robb’s Will
The Grand Northern Conspiracy
Why People Believe Brandon Stark and Ashara Dayne had a Relationship
Ned and Catelyn’s Deaths Parallels
The Stark Family Tree: Speculation about Serena and Sansa Stark
Bran’s Visions: The Woman who Emerged from the Dark Pool
House Stark Traits
The Pact of Ice and Fire
The Gorgons of Winterfell
The Last ~130 years of Stark Lords Explained
What’s in the Crypts of Winterfell
Jon and Bran’s future, and who sent the Direwolves
The Seven Aspects of the Starks
The Pool in Front of Winterfell’s Heart Tree
Deconstructing the Deconstruction: The True Scope of Northern Honor and Culture
Keep reading
Stories for all
A school librarian introduces me before I give an assembly. “Girls, you’re in for a real treat. You will love Shannon Hale’s books. Boys, I expect you to behave anyway.”
I’m being interviewed for a newspaper article/blog post/pod cast, etc. They ask, “I’m sure you’ve heard about the crisis in boys’ reading. Boys just aren’t reading as much as girls are. So why don’t you write books for boys?”
Or, “Why do you write strong female characters?” (and never asked “Why do you write strong male characters?”)
At book signings, a mother or grandmother says, “I would buy your books for my kids but I only have boys.”
Or, “My son reads your books too—and he actually likes them!”
Or, a dad says, “No, James, let’s get something else for you. Those are girl books.”
A book festival committee member tells me, “I pitched your name for the keynote but the rest of the committee said ‘what about the boys?’ so we chose a male author instead.”
A mom has me sign some of my books for each of her daughters. Her 10-year-old son lurks in the back. She has extra books that are unsigned so I ask the boy, “Would you like me to sign one to you?” The mom says, “Yeah, Isaac, do you want her to put your name in a girl book?” and the sisters all giggle. Unsurprisingly, Isaac says no.
These sorts of scenarios haven’t happened just once. They have been my norm for the past twelve years. I’ve heard these and many more like them countless times in every state I’ve visited.
In our culture, there are widespread assumptions:
1. Boys aren’t going to like a book that stars a girl. (And so definitely won’t like a book that stars a girl + is written by a woman + is about a PRINCESS, the most girlie of girls).
2. Men’s stories are universal; women’s stories are only for girls.
But the truth is that none of that is truth. In my position, not only have I witnessed hundreds examples of adults teaching boys to be ashamed of and avoid girls’ stories, I’ve also witnessed that boys can and do love stories about girls just as much as about boys, if we let them. For example, I’ve heard this same thing over and over again from teachers who taught Princess Academy: “When I told the class we were going to read PRINCESS ACADEMY the girls went ‘Yay!’ and the boys went 'Boo!’ But after we’d read it the boys liked it as much or even more than the girls.”
Most four-year-old boys will read THE PRINCESS IN BLACK without a worry in the world. Most fourth grade boys won’t touch PRINCESS ACADEMY—at least if others are watching. There are exceptions, of course. I’ve noticed that boys who are homeschooled are generally immune. My public-school-attending 11-year-old son’s favorite author is Lisa McMann. He’s currently enjoying Kekla Magoon’s female-led SHADOWS OF SHERWOOD as much as he enjoyed the last book he read: Louis Sachar’s boy-heavy HOLES. But generally in the early elementary years, boys learn to be ashamed to show interest in anything to do with girls. We’ve made them ashamed.
I want to be clear; if there’s a boy who only ever wants to read about other boys, I think that’s fine. But I’ve learned that most kids are less interested in the gender of the main character and more interested in the kind of book—action, humor, fantasy, mystery, etc. In adults’ well-meant and honest desire to help boys find books they’ll love, we often only offer them books about boys. We don’t give them a chance.
Whenever I speak up about this, I am accused of trolling for boy readers when they aren’t my “due.” So let me also be clear: I have a wonderful career. I have amazing readers. I am speaking up not because I’m disgruntled or demand that more boys read my books but because my particular career has put me in a position to observe the gender bias that so many of us have inherited from the previous generations and often unknowingly lug around. I’ve been witnessing and cataloging widespread gender bias and sexism for over a decade. How could I face my kids if I didn’t speak up?
And here’s what I’ve witnessed: “great books for boys” lists, books chosen for read alouds, and assigned reading in high schools and colleges, etc. are overwhelmingly about boys and written by men. Peers (and often adults) mock and shame boys who do read books about girls. Even informed adults tend to qualify recommendations that boys hear very clearly. “Even though this stars a girl, boys will like it too!”
This leads to generations of boys denied the opportunity of learning a profound empathy for girls that can come from reading novels. Leads to a culture where boys feel perfectly fine mocking and booing things many girls like and adults don’t even correct them because “boys will be boys.” Leads to boys and girls believing “girlie” is the gravest insult, that girls are less significant, not worth your time. Leads to girls believing they must work/learn/live “like a man” in order to be successful. Leads to boys growing into men who believe women are there to support their story, expect them to satisfy men’s desires and have none of their own.
The more I talk about this topic, the more I’m amazed at how many people haven’t really thought about it or considered the widespread effect gendered reading causes. I was overwhelmed by the response to a blog post I wrote earlier this year. To carry on this conversation, I’m working with Bloomsbury Children’s Books to create #StoriesForAll. Each day this week we’ll feature new essays on this topic from authors, parents, teachers, librarians, booksellers, and readers. On twitter, instagram, and tumblr, join us with the #StoriesForAll hashtag to share experiences, photos, book recommendations. Discuss: How deep is the assumption that there are boy books and girl books? Does it matter? What have you witnessed with regards to gendered reading? What damage does gendered reading cause to both girls and boys? What can each of us do to undo the damage and start making a change?
I yearn for that change. For our girls and for our boys.
——————
Shannon Hale is the New York Times bestselling author of over 20 books, including the Ever After High trilogy and the Newbery Honor winner Princess Academy. She co-wrote The Princess in Black series and Rapunzel’s Revenge with her husband, author Dean Hale. They have four children.
An algorithm can predict human behavior better than humans - Quartz
It’s fairly common for machines to analyze data, but humans are typically required to choose which data points are relevant for analysis. In three competitions with human teams, a machine made more accurate predictions than 615 of 906 human teams. And while humans worked on their predictive algorithms for months, the machine took two to 12 hours to produce each of its competition entries. For example, when one competition asked teams to predict whether a student would drop out during the next ten days, based on student interactions with resources on an online course, there were many possible factors to consider. Teams might have looked at how late students turned in their problem sets, or whether they spent any time looking at lecture notes. But instead, MIT News reports, the two most important indicators turned out to be how far ahead of a deadline the student began working on their problem set, and how much time the student spent on the course website. These statistics weren’t directly collected by MIT’s online learning platform, but they could be inferred from data available.
Race for the Iron Throne Kickstarter Update
So we’re 9 days into the Race for the Iron Throne Kickstarter, and the response has been quite encouraging: so far we’ve managed to raise $4,735 or…
tl;dr?
Jizo statues, symbolizing passage of death to life, showed a sign of change in the Japanese approach to afterlife compared to traditional Buddhist approaches: from a religion about control to a religion about compassion.
In response to the assholerly of aristocracy practices, the newer sects of Buddhism in Japan had the idea that EVERYONE. YES, EVERYONE, WAS ALLOWED TO BECOME ENLIGHTENED. Thus Japanese Buddhism becomes a religion about COMPASSION alongside discipline rather than FEAR and discipline!
Note that this is why BYAKUREN, who was around after the new sects of Buddhism, has compassion for Youkai! MIKO, who existed before these new sects, sees Buddhism as a tool of the aristocracy and a device of fear… because that’s how it used to be used!
This is also why EIKI, a Japanese Jizo god, is actually more compassionate and lenient than most other enmas! Due to her prior life and existence as someone whose goal is to SAVE EVERYONE FROM HELL.
that moment when you realize that alayne coming from “gulltown” continues with the bird imagery in sansa’s arc.
from here:
The moniker “seagull” is ubiquitous. There are actually several different kinds of gulls, but most of us clump them under the name “seagull”. In truth, it’s a poor name, because seagull’s aren’t found exclusively by the sea. They are often found inland, and can thrive in both fresh and salt water areas. This is a good start to symbolic meaning of seagulls. It speaks about opportunity, resources and adaptability. Seagulls go where they can find the best food. They are notorious for scavenging landfills, picking over refuse in parking lots, and other garbage sites. In a symbolic sense, the seagull reminds us to move where the best resources might be. Many of us deny ourselves opportunities because we feel safe in our comfort zone. Not so for the opportunistic seagull. These birds may be a sign to fly out of our realm of comfort, maybe take a risk, and do so with the goal of finding better conditions for our well-being.
Their tendency to pick over wastelands of trash left behind by humans is also symbolic, in my mind. It speaks to me of recycling. The seagull is the ultimate scavenger. When seagulls show up on my scene, it makes me mindful of making the most out of what I have. I’m reminded of the value of resources, and not to be wasteful. Seagulls also inspire me to re-purpose stuff. I love thrift stores, yard sales and such. I rarely see a reason to buy new things. Rather, I prefer to make new uses for old things. This is a great aspect of symbolic meaning of seagulls.
Symbolic Meanings For Seagulls
Freedom
Adaptation
Communication
Opportunistic
Resourcefulness
The word “gull” is derived from “gullible”. It’s named thusly, presumably because the seagull will swallow anything it can cram down its gullet. Symbolically, this begs the question: “Do we swallow everything we hear or see?” In essence, this aspect of seagull symbolism encourages using our wits to determine the truth. This seagull behavior reminds us to discern, rather than blindly follow without further investigation.
Seagulls are quite chatty. They have no problems squawking and letting their voices be heard. As far as the symbolic meaning of seagulls goes, this is a pretty big sign. Seagulls might be a reminder to find our voices, and be fearless about speaking our minds.
Many cultures associate the seagull with freedom. The book by Richard Bach called “Jonathan Livingston Seagull” is a modern cultural legend that reinforces that essence of freedom the seagull is known for. The story is about a seagull who is disenchanted with the common way of seagull-life. He strives to break from the shackles of convention. He pushes himself to fly ever higher, and perform more elaborate flight maneuvers in an effort to be free from the mundane. When seagulls soar into our consciousness, it might be a sign to break out of the same, boring routing. It might be time to fly high, show the world our potential, and dare to be free from what the world expects us to be.
You've probably answered this before but what would Robert have done if the whole Lannister/Incest/Heirs thing had been reveal while he was alive? Would he have them all killed? That seems unlikely unless it was in blind rage, to go against Tywin and his power would be a mighty thing. There would have to be big punishments though.
No, he would have absolutely had them all killed. It’s a deep threat to the political order. In a world where bloodlines mean everything, where allegations of illegitimacy gave birth to a civil war that nearly ripped Westeros in half, Cersei and Jaime’s incest run deeply counter to the established political system. It’s an attempted silent coup, one that seeks to topple House Baratheon for House Lannister.
On the personal note, doing this is a deep offense to Robert’s pride and masculinity, and it’s a violation of Jaime’s Kingsguard oaths as well as greater religious prohibitions on incest, and Jaime and Cersei do not have the Targaryen bloodline nor a convenient dragon to act as their shield.
House Baratheon has a lot of strength going for it. Assuming Jon Arryn is still alive, Robert can call on the Stormlands, the Vale, and the North, and the Riverlands through the shared Tully marriages with Jon and Eddard. The Reach would be happy to supplant the Lannisters as a house on the in, and Dorne might relish the chance to avenge Elia with royal sanction (even if Doran is cautious enough to stay out of the war and bide his strength until it comes time for his plans, you can believe Oberyn is going to show up, and bring a retinue of young, hot-headed Dornishmen eager to brawl). Balon would probably relish the chance to sack Lannisport, especially if he can use it as ‘proof of loyalty’ to get Theon returned to him. There’s a reason Littlefinger is undermining the royal coalition and why Varys is thankful for the death of Jon Arryn, a four-region coalition is too powerful to attack head on, even with Dornish support and ‘friends in the Reach.’
Tywin doesn’t have many family connections outside the Westerlands. He has House Frey, who almost certainly isn’t going to go to war on Tywin’s behalf if he’s so outnumbered. That secret can’t come out because the Lannisters are completely doomed. That’s why Martin can’t have Eddard or Jon Arryn make a public declaration, and why he has to come from Stannis well after Robb is declared King of the North and Renly makes his claim. It prevents that coalition from solidifying around a single claimant and making the Lannisters a dead family walking.
Thanks for the question, Anon.
SomethingLikeALawyer, Hand of the King
#im gonna miss this dork so much
In Defense Of Ned Stark
I have seen alot of critiques and down right hateful essays and comments recently about Ned. That he sexually abused Sansa (?), killed Lady out of loyalty to Robert, neglected Arya, can not be seen as someone who actually tried to make the kingdom better. Got a problem with a non stark character and mention Ned? No, you’ve automatically lost your argument because how dare you mention the individual who should only ever be remembered for the mistakes he made, not that he managed to inspire a whole kingdom, actually earned the respect he got. Honestly, usually I would reply to the meta, but there are so many, it’s just best if I do one, single meta that clears up my thoughts, and others- on Ned, who to be honest, is someone who I look up to and consider one of the best POV characters.
Keep reading
tbh i feel like you didn’t even read a lot of the metas you’re trying to critique….. especially the one that i think you’re talking about when you mention sansa’s abuse? it literally never implied that ned sexually abused her, it stated that in the author’s belief, sansa’s upbringing set her up for a lifetime of abusive relationships with men, and ned was definitely not the only culprit addressed since catelyn and mordane were explicitly called out as being harmful influences
& i havent seen a single ned criticism post acting like he’s the villain in the story or that he should “only ever be remembered for the mistakes he made” like…. you can critique a character or specifically critique fandom’s interpretation of him and not hate them?? being tired of saint ned and addressing the shitty things he did or the shitty things that his choices led to is not the same thing as hating him at all
As I said before in an earlier post, Ned can be a loving father AND a neglectful parent. GRRM does not tend to write one dimensional characters.
If anything I think it’s an absolutely fascinating perspective: the sexual grooming of all highborn women in Westeros. I mean, it’s quite obvious that Martin intimately explores the toxic effect the Westerosi patriarchy has on his characters as a major theme in his books, and understanding how good people feed into this system is downright chilling.
Holy fuck look at this man child lmfao
Context: this is the guy who became CEO of a pharmaceutical company and promptly raised the price of a life saving AIDS medication from $13.50 to $750 per pill.
He’s basically been a huge piece of shit in the face of justified public backlash over this (basically playing the “lol I’m rich I don’t care about your criticisms” card). Even Donald Trump has panned this guy. He eventually promised to lower the price (he didn’t say how much), but this hasn’t happened yet.
Recently, he donated $2,700 to the Bernie Sanders campaign in order to buy a meeting with him (some sort of play for power). Sanders and his campaign manager were aware of the situation with this dude and “refused” to take his money. But instead of just giving it back, they donated it to an HIV clinic as an extra slap to the face.
Shkreli has been trying to play it off (also saying Sanders should have given it back instead of donating it), but judging by this latest tweet I just got in my email, he’s starting to crack :y
Sources: http://www.advocate.com/politics/2015/10/16/bernie-sanders-gives-martin-shkrelis-donation-hiv-clinic
https://mobile.twitter.com/MartinShkreli/status/655863780912574464
He then posted a picture of “his fracture” on twitter from punching a wall. Then someone did a reverse image search of it and found that he couldn’t even punch the wall or fracture himself, he decided to lie about it and just get the X-Ray photo from the internet.
It’s. Precious.
How do you personally pronounce 'Brienne'? I've always done it Bree-enn, as opposed to Roy Dotrice and Bry-een
I was Unsullied for 2 seasons, so the show colored how I pronounce a lot of names (so bree-enn). I definitely don’t go with Dotrice’s pronunciation (and actually cringe at that one in particular). He says “Jaime” a bit weirdly too on occasion. Like sometimes one syllable. Also remember when Dany became a chain-smoker in ADWD?
It’s cute because my one friend only listened to the audiobooks, and he thought the name was spelled “Braiene” (he also thought Missandei was “Mersandi”).
But that being said, I’m a terrible resource for pronunciation. I was one of those people who totally Viktor Krum’d my way through Hermione’s name until those movies came out. 100% auditory. It still blows my mind that Ynys Yronwood is pronounced “Inis Ironwood.”
why do girls go to the bathroom together
to keep out the creepers trying to sneak a peak into the girl bathroom while your peeing
to have a feeling of security
to have a place to talk where the boys can’t hear
to have someone to help with either your hair, outfit or makeup
to gossip in safety
to cry in safety
to talk about the hottie in your algebra class
to get away from the forever judging society filled with antifeminists for a few moments
to tell each other you look like sluts and need to tone down the cat eye and pull up your shirt without the chance of other people hearing
to tell a secret
possibly because you both have to go to the bathroom
Also to rap battle
To sacrifice the males
To have lesbian sex
Because Hermione got attacked by a troll, Ginny became possessed by Voldemort, and Katie Bell was hexed when they went to the bathroom by themselves
I’m not gonna be fake and pretend like I’m this super brave powerful feminist who can confront men in public, truthfully, I get quite scared when I get unwanted attention from men lol. It’s sad but I do, at the end of the day… men scare me a little bit and I just never know how they’re going to react to anything I do or say. It could be really dangerous for me. That’s why I just prefer to ignore them. If you’re brave enough to confront strange men irl then more power to you, but please stop acting like women are weak or weird for simply preferring to just quietly get away from them
sometimes Cracked is so weirdly on point
It took me a second to get it because at first glance I thought Mywifejen was one of those Welsh names
The Glorification of White Crime
Take a facet of crime, and then look at television shows/movies that feature those criminals as protagonists.
White mobs.
White pirates.
White serial killers.
White political corruption
White drug dealers
I mostly want to talk about this as a TV phenomenon, but pick a crime, any crime, and Western media has probably made a movie/TV series/play/etc. with a white person that romanticizes the criminal activity. No matter what, a white person can do whatever terrible crimes and still have a TV/movie fanbase that loves them.
When you see black or brown people committing crimes on screen, you are to see them thugs and criminal masterminds and people to be beat down.
When you see white people committing crimes on screen, you see a three-dimensional portrait of why someone might commit that crime, how criminals are people too, and how you should even love them for the crimes that they commit because they’re just providing for their families or they’ve wronged or they’re just people and not perfect. This is particularly a luxury given to white male characters, since there few white female criminals as protagonists.
If and of the above shows were about black or brown folks, there would be a backlash of (white) people claiming that TV and movies are romanticizing criminals and are treating them too much like heroes and that it will affect viewers and encourage violence and “thuggish” behavior. And yet fictional white criminals get to have a deep fanbase who loves these white criminals, receive accolades and awards, get called amazing television that portray the complexities of human nature. Viewers of these characters see past the atrocious crimes and into their humanity, a luxury that white characters always have while characters of color rarely do. The closest that mainstream TV has come to showing black criminals as main characters is probably The Wire, and even then, the criminals share equal screen time and equal status as main characters as the police trying to stop them.
The idea that crime can be so heavily romanticized and glorified to such a degree is undoubtedly a privilege given to white characters. The next time you hear someone talk about Dexter Morgan or Walter White in a positive way, it may be an opportunity to rethink how white people can always able to be seen as people no matter what they do, while everyone else can be boiled down to nothing but a criminal.