In light of my answer to the ask about the âantiâ label being misapplied yesterday, I want to bring this back to illustrate a different but related point.
as fandom has (1) gone increasingly mainstream/diluted into mainstream spaces and (2) increasingly conflated shipping & activism*, the old ruling principle of âlive and let liveâ that transformative fandom once operated under has fallen increasingly to the wayside.
(*conflating shipping & activism is a subtype of conflating fiction and reality/âfiction affects realityâ.)
âship and let shipâ (SALS) and âyour kink is not my kink (and thatâs okay)â (YKINMKATO, âkinktomatoâ) are not âI endorse everything under the sun both irl and in fictionâ: they are guidelines to respecting other fans that have different values, coping mechanisms, feelings, worldviews, traumas, life experiences, identities, orientations, fantasies, etc, and acknowledging that this makes it impossible to judge their life choices.
this widespread cohesive attitude is what really made transformative fandom a radically unusual space in the 2000â˛s: not the existence of kinky shit by and for non-straightcismale audiences, but the lack of judgement of things that we knew we could not judge. and this had its own problems and blind spots (racism being (a hUGE) one of them) - it was far from perfect - but it was comparatively friendly when we consider current fandom environs.
these respect guidelines are not widely known/followed anymore due to a variety of circumstances. one of them is that itâs very common for the average, uncritical stance towards âweirdâ things to be âthatâs gross and I wish it didnât existâ/âI donât think it should existâ.Â
for example, that (in)famous gifset of Josh Keaton saying âfirst of all, learn the definition of pedophiliaâ? what was not giffed was what he followed it up with [paraphrased]: âthereâs people who ship shiro and keith as student/teacher and stuff and thatâs not okay. thatâs gross.â (this is why I donât find his apology when he bowed out of public shipping wank to be a change in his position on shipping.) even while JKeat did not approve the âantiâ definition of pedophilia, he also did not approve of kinky shipping from the start.Â
I believe this to be the average non-fandom-memberâs feelings on all fictional content (though in the main, only authoritarian groups try to police the existence of fictional content they find objectionable).
dilution of fandom into mainstream spaces & increased ease of access to transformative fandom means that many people have joined fandom without becoming acquainted with SALS or YKINMKATO as rules for respectful interaction. Instead they carry this casual âship/create whatever you want - except the gross shitâ attitude with them into fandom. and if they donât quickly figure out how to curate their fandom experience, viral sharing social media will bring the casual newcomer a host of âgross shitâ they donât want to see.
If such a person is inclined to be an authoritarian - that is, to demand that everyone live by their definition of whatâs gross and what isnât - they will probably become an enthusiastic militant anti-shipper, policing âbad shipsâ with vigor. If not, their fandom etiquette âalignmentâ is much more uncertain.
between this average âall kinks but my kinks are weirdâ feeling & the successful pushback against SALS/YKINMKATO by militant fandom antis: people who believe that fictional ships/fanworks should be morally pure/good/healthy and insult, denigrate, or discourage ships/fans of ships they see as âbadâ donât always identify themselves as âantisâ, âanti-[ship]â, or âanti-pedophilia/incest/abuseâ.
in fact, itâs become increasingly common for people who believe this to NOT identify as âantisâ because the âantiâ label is associated with harassment and abuse*.
at this strange, sort of postmodern transformative fandom juncture (Oct 2018), the labels people use to identify their opinion on fandom etiquette mean less and less. Weâre all so polarized that if a person wishes to throw their weight around with a small army of followers, harassing and dogpiling on people they disagree with, they could do it in the name of nearly anything and find some success.
the âanti-pedophilia/incest/abuseâ community remains the most popular place from which cyberbullies take positions of power and direct intrafandom attacks ⌠but it is not the only place that harbors cyberbullies, and it never was the only place harboring cyberbullies.
abusers are abusers are abusers, and again: they will use anything - shipping, anti-shipping, or anything else - to abuse people.Â
and: the more polarized fandom is, the easier it is for serial abusers and predators to find a place where if they say the right things, they can do whatever they want and get away with it.
 (*even the most virulent fandom policers often do not perceive their own intimidation tactics as abusive. they may see their actions as justified because theyâve deemed their target(s) as acceptable targets/subhuman, or they may justify them as a necessary evil for the good of all. alternatively, they may simply be so un-self-aware that they literally donât know theyâre harassing people.)