Incipit Vita Nova

Pronounciation: [noh-vuh] Function: Noun Etymology: New Latin, Feminine of Latin novus new : a star that suddenly increases its light output tremendously and then fades away to its former obscurity.

[shadovvheart]

i will... draw for fun... the things that..... bring me joy ...

[moonstonecassie]

Since Netflix is removing She-Ra in January or something here’s a link to a Google drive with all five seasons <3

[liquidgoldgoblin]

Since it's less than two weeks before SPoP is removed from Netflix, I just wanted to reblog this again for visibility and to make sure more people can watch it.

[my-2nd-account]

[aidashakur]

[velvetvexations]

[cb-writes-stuff]

Your [tumblr] Wrapped

You made poasts. yuo freak

[ludmithjacques]

I love the use of the phrase 'some strange alchemy' as a descriptor for a process you don't understand.

'Through some strange alchemy(crochet) they turned a bundle of yarn into a stuffed giraffe'

'Through some strange alchemy(bad cooking) they turned a perfectly marinated steak into a charcoal briquet'

'Through some strange alchemy(good cooking) they turned a pile of slop into the fluffiest bread loaf I'd ever seen'

'Through some strange alchemy(bad reading comprehension) they took my polite statement and turned into a disgusting act against the poor'

and so on

[stitchposts]

[valdevia]

I was masking a house out of a photo for an edit and accidentally made an ontologically evil image

[spitelesss]

snatched

[valdevia]

whoops did it again

[svdcvnt]

Everything I’ve Ever Let Go Of Has Claw Marks On It

[gloriesunsung]

To save someone else going through eleventy billion reverse image searches - the sculptor is David Altmejd.

Thought 2, 2019

[onthefloorinthedirtwiththefilth]

Live by the sword laugh by the sword love by the sword

[vexheart]

[ymutate]

Untitled, 'Not defined by what I lack (2023), one of the surreal images from the inner world of Russian painter, performance artist, and photographer, Ellen Sheidlin (née Elena Viktorovna Lyalina in 1994)

[spaceboytoy]

Hello bisexual community

[spaceboytoy]

Begin killing

[tartrazeen]

[aq2003]

every day british actors wake up and think to themselves fuckkkkk i HAVE to help the incredibly bigoted woman make more money so she can funnel it into killing trans people i have to do it bro if i don't do it i will die

[beaniebaneenie]

In case y'all needed proof that continuing to engage with HP and fucking over trans folks is in fact a CHOICE, Daniel Radcliffe has refused to even have a cameo, despite being repeatedly asked.

For those that don't speak British, this is about as close as he can get to officially, publicly saying, "for FUCK'S sake, get that thing away from me and stop associating me with it, I do not want my name attached to that bigotry."

Daniel consistently redirects the topic away from Jo and toward the Trevor Project, an organization he has been heavily involved with for almost 20 years. He puts his money where his mouth is and uses his platform and his reach to amplify queer voices and queer struggles. He explicitly supports trans people, and is choosing to walk away from a very large and very easy paycheck, because he values trans lives over anything he could get from HP.

Emma and Rupert also won't go near this reboot. Jo has stated the reason she's doing it is BECAUSE the three of them refuse to support her vile hatred.

Every actor who puts their name on this, on any level, deserves to own the choice they're making with their whole chest. If they decide the paycheck is worth being ten toes down on transphobia? They're adults. They chose. And they deserve to be treated accordingly. Actions speak louder than words.

And if you give it a moment of attention or a single penny, you deserve to face the consequences of that choice too.

[ngoziu]

lmao jk rowling feeling bitter about emma, rupert and daniel is so "narcissistic parent realizes children aren't trophy" coded. and it's personal for *her* not for them, most likely? The three actors probably, simply, don't want to associate with a bigoted TERF. For her, it's a personal rejection and it further fuels her smarmy transphobe crusade. do not get me started on how this woman's misogyny and transphobia are masking a constellation of self-hatred and insecurities.

[etteraths]

Awake - Derek Pope

[bravehyde]

You need to move off of Google Docs!

I know some people have seen the news recently and may be doubtful of it. To the uninformed, Google Docs has started using AI to find "inappropriate" and "problematic" content, scraping your documents and deleting it. I know some people are unsure if this is real or think this is not going to affect them.

I regret to inform you that this is real.

As I was on a call with some writers and we were moving our documents as a precautionary measure, one person discovered entire pages missing that they did not delete themselves. This is happening to us, it's not a hoax or a rumor, it's happening right now. You need to move everything if you want to preserve it.

If you're a writer with writer mutuals, please reblog this so they know. I rarely write on Google Docs anymore, but I started my fanfics on there, and I would be devastated if I lost works more than ten years old because people decided marketing appeal is more important than creative freedom.

EDIT READ THIS: https://www.tumblr.com/bravehyde/790422701153157120/hi-can-we-have-any-sort-of-source-about-the

Post by @bravehyde · 1 image

💬 0  🔁 0  ❤️ 0 · What Happens When a Romance Writer Gets Locked Out of Google Docs · hi !! can we have any sort of source about the google d

[gamerphobe]

hey. this is not happening.

this excerpt is from the single article op uses as a source - a story about k. renee, an "open door" romance writer who had her documents restricted. "open door romance" refers to books where sex and intimate scenes take place on screen and in explicit detail; k. renee writes full on erotica. her works were restricted, with a warning message, not deleted out of no where. it is from over a year ago (may 2024, the incident took place in march 2024). the sentence is in front of you - adult content wasnt why the doc was restricted. google docs cannot and is not randomly deleting peoples works for having sex in it. and the article most certainly does not say that google is "using ai to find inappropriate content". the article mentions ai once, to say that k. renee had ai functions turned off and did not think that was the problem.

there is not a single other credible article about this happening to people and people in the notes havent given much testimony either. i, personally, have dozens of explicit works in my folders that ive shared with people and they havent been touched at all.

op has claimed they are looking for sources, but has also admitted they dont have them. like, guys. seriously. lets think rationally for a moment. do you think if google was mass deleting peoples works it would be this hard to find news stories about it? there are millions of erotica writers who use gdocs. its not just small fanfic writers, its published authors with companies and lawyers behind them. if google was deleting works abruptly there would be outrage. not to mention the amount of trouble they would get in with academics and scientists who use their platform - can you imagine years of someones research being completely deleted without any sort of warning by an incorrect ai flag? people would sue them. there would not be one tumblr post.

i dont know what happened to op's friend who was missing pages, and you absolutely should back up your docs / transition them to another server anyway. but this is, like, textbook fearmongering. there is absolutely no reason to believe this is happening, let alone anywhere near the scale op's dramatizing will have you believe.

[csevet]

you say to me here is a woman. she's insane and irreparably broken and probably a danger to herself and others. and i say yay yippee woohoo! and things of this nature

[zegalba]

details by Roberto Ferri