The Batfamily
One Nice Bug Per Day
RMH
The Bright Sessions
Color Me Curious
The Bowery Presents
tumblr dot com
Mike Driver
noise dept.
official daine visual archive
Sade Olutola
Doug Jones
No title available
occasionally subtle

if i look back, i am lost
h
NASA

Product Placement
The Stonewall Inn
𓃗
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

seen from Netherlands
seen from Brazil
seen from France
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Singapore

seen from Peru
@nuances-et-insolence
The Batfamily
WHAT THE FUCK
Bruce Wayne: I’m not a criminal like you Black Mask:
Water, Earth, Fire, Air.
I like when fic length/book length/movie length is its own punchline
characters: Ah, I'm so glad that's all over now :). But luckily that's done and dealt with and we can all resume our normal lives now :)
fic length: Chapter 9 out of 48
Odysseus: Thank you for the concern, but brother, I can assure you Our journey is almost done.
Song 11 of 40
Happy Birthday Sasuke!
This place is not a place of honor… no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here… nothing valued is here. What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us. This message is a warning about danger. The danger is in a particular location… it increases towards a center… the center of danger is here… of a particular size and shape, and below us. The danger is still present, in your time, as it was in ours. The danger is to the body, and it can kill. The form of the danger is an emanation of energy. The danger is unleashed only if you substantially disturb this place physically. This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.
An example of long-time nuclear waste warning messages
"It's good to have you back." "It's good to be back." Had the absolute pleasure of drawing this Sheith postcard for @avidbeader mailing gift project, celebrating 10 years of Sheith ❤️🖤
The way that most of Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes stories’ most horrible villains are rich dudes that are abusive to women, in a time such as the 1880’s, compels me.
There’s a whole subset of Sherlock Holmes stories that could be labeled Asshole Guys Try to Control Women’s Money.
Yup, there’s a huge number of times where Sherlock Holmes is the ONLY person to take a young woman’s complaint or worry seriously and finds out someone is up to some serious evil. Holmes also shows a lot of compassion and empathy with the victims over and over again. (This is why I find “Secretly a woman” or “Trans” Holmes headcanons much more convincing than “sociopath” Holmes.)
I am never going to shut up about how much I specifically love The Adventure of The Copper Beeches because it is literally Sherlock Holmes listening to a young lady he does not know except as a potential client, agreeing with her that a potential job she has interviewed for that she thinks is SUPER SKETCHY is, indeed, sketchy as fuck and when she says she’s probably gonna take the job anyways because the money is good and she needs it going “OKAY I GUESS but for the love of god please write to us so we know you’re okay we will literally drop everything and jump on a train if you want us to”.
The job turns out to indeed be sketchy as fuck, she writes to them, Holmes and Watson drop everything and jump on a train when she asks them to. I read this story for the first time when I was twelve and it made a HUGE impression.
This is also the basis for a lot of speculation about Holmes’ family life. The idea that he has been a victim of abuse, or his mother was abused (or even murdered by his father.) There’s definitely SOMETHING that makes him very aware of how dangerous isolated families can be, and the dark things that can happen behind closed doors. Plus, of course, the motivation to devote himself to stopping crime. And yes, so much of it is of the personal type.
dude see this is one aspect of the original books i NEVER understand why modern remakes (cough cough) don’t go all in on. Like, in the 21th c we HAVE all the dumb forensic shit that made Victorian Holmes stand out, but we STILL DON’T HAVE uh….you know, compassion for women and minorities, or the willingness to believe them, adequate community support for domestic violence or hate crimes, etc. etc. which you’d think is exactly where a renegade consulting detective would come in handy. A good modern day Sherlock Holmes remake, instead of trying to convince us that Holmes is some super genius for being better than fingerprint analysis or whatever, could have him just be…a good person who helps out people the police can’t and won’t help. There you go. That’s how to write a relevant modern Holmes.
One thing that annoys me is how much the BBC version of Sherlock (and the fandom around it) focus on police cases or cold cases. In the stories, Holmes’ bread and butter cases had fuck-all to do with the police and in a few stories, he actively works around/against them, or outright lies to them. Of the many, many things I wish that show had done differently, this is one is particularly obnoxious since it’s such a gimme.
There were very few actual murder cases in the Canon, and Holmes handled them either one of two ways:
Option one: The murder victim was innocent while the killer was an abusive bastard, see Speckled Band. Conclusion, arrest and have the killer charged (Or in the case of Speckled Band, indirectly murder him yourself then shrug and go home)
Option two: The victim was murdered to protect someone that the victim was abusing, or for vengeance, see Boscombe Valley, Devil’s Foot, Abbey Grange. Conclusion, Oops, I don’t know who the killer is, I am suddenly incompetent, oh look a pheasant.
#my favorite murder in holmes canon#is when they straight up witness a lady murder her blackmailer#do nothing except destroy his other blackmail material#and then straight up lie to lestrade about it#sherlock holmes#more of this in modern adaptations pls (via @cactusspatz )
Let’s not forget the time Holmes helps a young woman who’s being catfished by her own stepfather to steal her inheritance, and when the villain sneers that the law can’t touch him, Holmes grabs a horsewhip out of sheerest chivalry.
So, the most canon-accurate iteration of Sherlock Holmes in the last few decades is actually Benoit Blanc….
I think it’s also important to note, and complicates our ideas about what the highly patriarchal/misogynistic society of 19th century England looked like, that these stories SOLD
they were POPULAR
the Victorians LIKED reading about women who won out over shitty men in their lives, even when that plotline reaffirmed a woman’s power and agency or put an active sexist in his place (ie Irene Adler besting Holmes)
which is fascinating in light of. you know. [gestures broadly at all of Victorian gender dynamics, laws, etc.]
did up a doodle suggestion for NMJ on patreon~
(he decided to drag the other two for a training session as well haha...)
Say all you want but Arthur’s ass was infact NOT listening to whatever Merlin is saying in this scene. He is hungry and it’s not for food.
Bradley James what WERE you thinking in all those scenes where you’re looking at Colin’s Merlin’s neck or lips or whatever the hell is going on here?
Why I Stopped Watching "House of the Dragon"
First of all: this is not about the actors.
The cast is incredibly talented, and they deserve love, respect, and appreciation for the work they put into these characters. My issue is not with the performances. My issue is with the writing, the adaptation choices, and the direction the show has taken.
As someone who has read "Fire & Blood" and is Team Green, I stopped watching because the show no longer feels like an adaptation of the Dance of the Dragons. It feels like a version of the story that constantly softens Team Black, weakens Team Green, and strips away the complexity that made the original conflict interesting.
And let me tell you, I am Team Green, but I loved the way Rhaenyra was written and how she didn't need to be soft and a "strong female character" to have supporters and to play the game. So this really is not about teams, but about how the characters and the story were written in the show.
In the book, neither side is good. That is the point. The Dance is not a story about saints and villains. It is a tragedy about ambition, inheritance, pride, violence, family, and political failure. Everyone is compromised. Everyone is hypocritical. Everyone loses. But the show keeps pushing the audience toward one side.
Rhaenyra, especially, is framed far too often as a hesitant, noble, passive, almost saintly figure who simply wants peace and justice. But book Rhaenyra is not that. She is proud, ambitious, entitled, politically reckless, capable of cruelty, and deeply hypocritical. That is what makes her interesting.
Rhaenyra does not want a new world. She wants Rhaenyra to be queen.
She lives in a patriarchal society, yet makes no meaningful effort to improve the condition of women generally. She has three sons widely believed to be bastards, yet does nothing to improve the status of bastards as a class. She does not challenge the system for everyone. She expects exceptions for herself and her children while leaving the same oppressive structures intact for everyone else. And that matters politically. In Westeros, succession is everything. Putting disputed heirs in line for the Iron Throne and Driftmark is not a minor scandal; it is a recipe for future rebellion. It gives rival branches of the family and ambitious lords grounds to challenge the succession. It also creates a dangerous precedent in a society built around legitimacy, inheritance, and bloodlines.
And yet the show surrounds Rhaenyra with prophecy, white stag symbolism, and “chosen one” imagery that never existed in the book. The prophecy was not part of the Dance. The white stag did not choose her. The universe was not endorsing her. "Fire & Blood" is far more cynical and far more interesting than that.
Another thing is that the show also keeps taking strengths from Team Green and either removing them or giving emotional weight to Team Black instead.
Book Alicent is not a helpless victim drifting through events. She is politically savvy, intelligent, ambitious, strategic, and deeply involved in the Green cause. She knows how to play the game. She rules effectively alongside the Green Council while Viserys declines and while Rhaenyra is away on Dragonstone.
The show, however, strips her of agency again and again. Her choices are softened, excused, or blamed on misunderstandings. The deathbed “Aegon” confusion was never in the book, and it weakens her political motivation. In "Fire & Blood", the Greens crown Aegon because they believe he has the stronger claim, because they have prepared for it, and because Alicent is protecting her children. It is deliberate. Even Aegon only accepts the crown to protect his siblings.
Even worse, the show makes Alicent look like she does not love her sons. That is one of the most unforgivable changes to me. Book Alicent’s defining motivation is her children. She fights for them. She defends them and their rights as children of the king. She is not perfect, but she is a mother whose political world is built around their safety and their claim.
Turning her into someone who betrays her sons for the sake of reconciliation with Rhaenyra is not tragic to me. It is character assassination.
And how they keep punishing Alicent by taking her agency and with assault situations - the whole feet thing with Larys, her marriage, Aemond kissing her - it only makes it clear to me that it was never about feminism for the show runners, but about Rhaenyra being the "strong female character" that will destroy the "evil side".
Helaena is another example. In the book, Helaena is Team Green. She is queen, Aegon is her husband, and they have children together. Their marriage may not be romantic in the modern sense, but it is not nothing. Aegon is said to share her bed until the death of their son. She is beloved by the smallfolk. She is a dragonrider bonded to Dreamfyre, one of the most important dragons alive.
The show reduces her almost entirely to prophecy and fragility. Her relationship with Dreamfyre is barely explored. Her role as queen is diminished. Her bond with her family is weakened. Her strength is removed.
Aegon II also suffers from this treatment. In the book, he is deeply flawed, but he is not an idiot. He is not meant to be a cartoon villain. He has one of the most extraordinary dragon bonds in the entire Dance with Sunfyre, the most beautiful dragon in the world. So why does the show make him seem incompetent even in basic Targaryen identity? Why is Sunfyre visually diminished, being rarely shown?
Daeron is another issue. In the book, Daeron is one of the Greens’ best assets: courteous, capable, brave, beloved, and an effective military presence. He was effectively the greatest threat to Rhaenyra, militarily speaking. He was fostered in Oldtown, which is normal in Westeros. That does not mean Alicent did not raise him or that he is only good because he was away from her. The show’s handling of him has been strange, delayed, and dismissive. He was in Oldtown for a few years only, not his whole life.
The Greens in the book are also much more united and politically competent. They are loyal to each other. They are strategic. They understand governance. In the show, they are constantly turned against each other, made weaker, more fractured, more foolish, and more cruel. Aemond turns against Aegon and bruns him. Aegon and Helaena barely look at each other. And Aemond is cruel towards Helaena. It never happened in the book.
Meanwhile, Team Black gets softened.
Daemon is one of the clearest examples. In the book, Daemon is dangerous, violent, predatory, and morally horrifying. He is not a romantic ideal. He is not simply a devoted husband who loves Rhaenyra. The show repeatedly leans into his charisma and his romantic appeal while transferring or emphasizing many of his worst traits elsewhere, especially onto Aegon. Daemon groomed his niece. He killed his first wife in the show. He is involved in horrific violence. Yet the fandom often treats him as “morally grey” while Aegon is treated as uniquely monstrous.
Then there is Nettles.
Removing Nettles is one of the worst adaptation choices. She is one of the most unique characters in the Dance. She is lowborn. She is not another polished Targaryen princess. She challenges ideas about blood purity and dragonriding. She is also the only confirmed Black character in the original Dance narrative, and her relationship with Daemon is one of the most ambiguous and interesting parts of his story.
Erasing her and handing parts of her role to Rhaena changes the story completely. It removes a lowborn outsider and replaces her with another Targaryen noble. It also removes one of the few characters who truly disrupts the aristocratic world of the Dance. It also makes Rhaenyra look like a saint, instead of the racist she truly was in the book.
And yes, the show’s racial choices frustrate me too. Making the Velaryons Black could have been interesting if the writing had meaningfully explored it. But instead, they erased Nettles, the one character whose presence actually challenged the Targaryen worldview from outside noble bloodlines. Criston Cole being a brown man could also have been interesting if the show developed him with care. Instead, he is often reduced to sexual scandal, humiliation, and villain framing.
Rhaenys also infuriates me. The show gives her speeches about Alicent serving men, as though Rhaenys herself spent her life fighting patriarchy. But what did she actually do? She toiled for Corlys’ ambitions. She allowed her very young daughter to be offered as a bride to Viserys. She accepted Lucerys as heir to Driftmark despite knowing the obvious questions around his parentage, instead of fighting for Baela and Rhaena. She later accepts political marriages between her granddaughters and Rhaenyra’s sons instead of truly advocating for them. So what was that speech supposed to be?
Again, this is the problem. The show gives certain characters modern-sounding lines about power, gender, and freedom, but their actions do not match.
And Maelor. The erasure of Maelor is something I cannot get over. That is not a small change. It affects Blood and Cheese, Helaena, Aegon, Alicent, and the entire emotional structure of the Green tragedy. Even George R. R. Martin publicly criticized the removal of Maelor and warned about the butterfly effect of simplifying the story.
At some point, it stops feeling like adaptation and starts feeling like distortion. That is why I stopped watching.
Not because I think Team Green are saints. They are not. Otto is manipulative. Aegon is deeply flawed. Aemond is dangerous. Criston is bitter and violent. Alicent is ambitious. I know exactly what side I support, and I do not need to pretend they are morally pure.
But that is precisely the difference. Many Team Green fans can admit our side is full of terrible people. What becomes exhausting is watching Team Black characters get romanticized, softened, excused, or turned into symbols of righteousness while the Greens are stripped of their intelligence, loyalty, complexity, and love for each other.
The Dance is supposed to be a tragedy where everyone is flawed. It is not supposed to be “Rhaenyra the chosen queen of feminism versus the evil misogynistic Greens.” Book Rhaenyra is not a saint. Book Alicent is not a helpless victim. Book Helaena is not just a fragile dreamer. Book Aegon is not an imbecile. Book Daemon is not husband goals. Book Nettles matters. Book Daeron matters. Maelor matters. The Green family matters.
Now, I repeat - The actors deserve every bit of praise. They are doing their jobs beautifully, even if the script is deeply flawed.
But the writing has lost me. This is not the Dance I wanted to watch.
There are a lot more stuff that I could point out and criticise, but theses are the ones on top of my head. In the end, I wanted to watch Fire & Blood. Instead, I got someone's fanfiction loosely inspired by it.
But hey, at least we got the whole prophecy thing linking to Jone Snow, right?
Anyway, if any Team Black stans want to yell at me, I'll be over here rereading "Fire & Blood", where nobody is the chosen one, everyone is awful, and somehow that's exactly what makes the story so brilliant.
Sometimes I get stuck thinking about the horror of being Gwen in the late seasons. She's the queen of Camelot, but she's utterly alone.
Her first love was enchanted by her, but he was so damn noble that he could never be a partner to her. He sacrificed his own happiness when he decided to leave Camelot, but never considered that he was sacrificing her happiness too. Maybe it was the right thing to do, but it still left her alone. And she tried to respect it and to keep the boundaries he established, but she still knew that he loved her and she accidentally used that love and that nobility to send him to his death. She didn't know if she loved him anymore, but she still knew she was responsible for a good man gone too soon.
Her brother always ran away; he didn't even return when their father died. And then she reached out anyways and saved him and he finally came home to stay, but she was banished by her fiance and Elyan didn't so much as speak up in her defense. Suddenly he didn't want to be a wanderer anymore. He settled down, but it was never for her—he loved Arthur and being a knight more than he loved his sister. After she came back he might have regretted his lack of action, because suddenly he dropped everything to rescue her from the dark tower. But what's the use in an epic quest if he still takes her husband's side when they argue? Where's the pleasure in knowing he loved her if it only got him killed?
Her husband was distant from the start. She watched him grow from a bratty teenager to a noble king, and she was wrapped up in the grandeur of their secret romance, but once they shared that crown it became clear that he would never truly open up to her. Whenever things got serious, Arthur hid from his wife and instead turned to his servant for emotional support. His servant who was supposed to be Gwen's best friend, and yet who always seemed to know Arthur's side of the story. She knew he could never let down his guard enough to be fully honest with her, to be truly vulnerable, or even to share a bedroom. And yet she was still drawn to him, just like everyone else, which was why she was stuck in a castle where not a single person would ever put her first.
Her best friend faded away as the years wore on. His liveliness melted into something steady and grim, as he was crushed under the weight of something she could never understand. She wanted to reach out and to support him, but the longer he stayed in Camelot the more clear it was that Merlin couldn't really see anyone other than Arthur. It wasn't fair—she befriended Merlin first. She was kind to him when he was alone, and they used to stand by the edges of feasts and giggle together about the silly nobles. Arthur was awful, and yet Merlin was still more of a friend to him than he ever was to Gwen. How could she blame him, when she loved Arthur too?
The other friend—the companion she'd grown alongside, the lady she'd served with loyalty and care—she was gone where Gwen could never follow. She had seen the visions tearing Morgana apart and felt her slipping away into the tides of bitterness and anger at the injustices that surrounded them. Gwen had been the only person to stand by Morgana's side, but she wasn't enough to protect her from the world. She felt the creeping dread as she realized that Morgana was willing to do things even fouler than Uther. But when Morgana finally declared herself Queen of Camelot, it was Gwen who betrayed her. She orchestrated her closest companion's downfall, and maybe Gwen still loved her but love wasn't enough when she could see the harm Morgana was doing to their people. Morgana hated Gwen more than anyone after that, and Gwen tried to hate her in turn. Still, when they were reunited in the tower, Morgana was more attentive to her pain than anyone had been in years. Afterwards, Merlin and Arthur told her that she'd been nothing more than a puppet, and that Morgana would surely have killed her after she arranged her husband's death. Still, she remembered those moments of tenderness as Morgana shared the truth of her suffering. She remembered the anger she'd felt upon hearing how Morgana had been left alone in the dark for years, because she knew what that was like.
And then it was over. They were all dead. She went from a castle full of people—brother, husband, friend—who should have loved her but didn't, to a castle empty of any kindness at all. She had lost everything, and there was no one to support her when she faltered. Merlin was still out there, but he could never leave the shore of Avalon. Gwen's husband was dead, and she couldn't turn to her best friend for comfort because he was the one being torn apart by grief. She had to be strong, like she'd always been. She set her feelings aside, and wore the crown with dignity and grace. She was the Queen after all, and Camelot needed her.
The hunting Merthur has become my obsession in recent days
This art should be taken with the composition "White Feather Hawk Tail Deer Hunter" by Lana Del Rey
@merthurmicrofic prompt for the week is "bruise" so voila - have some healer Merlin tending to Arthur's bruises/wounds. (A redraw of a 2016 piece) ☕Support me on Ko-Fi!
happy pride month!🏳️🌈